Tires that have a solid foam core
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 3,048
Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5
Liked 774 Times
in
560 Posts
heavy as a mack truck... ride like a brick... and impossible to dismount when the usually lousy rubber wears out... highly recommended by any shop that has them in stock... and on sale, too!
#3
Mechanic/Tourist
+1 There is no advantage that does not come with a disadvantage.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
I rode a set recently from Nexo. They didn't absorb shock as well as an air-filled tire, but they would work for an application where low-maintenance and no-failure were important. Think rental bikes for tourists who just want to pedal around and explore a city. I've seen them on bike-share bikes too, most recently in Seattle.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,195
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Liked 4,000 Times
in
2,379 Posts
I sure hope the traction, comfort and shock damping are better then the other non air filled tires of the last 45 years. Traction because this will save your skin, especially in wet conditions. Comfort as I'm no child on a trike. Shock damping because I like my tension spoked wheels remaining tensioned, not loosening up as I've seen firsthand. Andy.
#6
Senior Member
#7
Senior Member
I rode solid tires from greentyre for probably thousands of miles.
Pretty much only thought about them while crossing lane markers at a shallow angle, on cobbles or when dropping off a curb.
For good roads, regardless of weather, I rode them just like any other tire.
If they damaged the rims, or detensioned the spokes they certainly weren't in a hurry about it.
Mounting them was difficult, until I figured out the trick.
Getting them off was no big deal.
Pretty much only thought about them while crossing lane markers at a shallow angle, on cobbles or when dropping off a curb.
For good roads, regardless of weather, I rode them just like any other tire.
If they damaged the rims, or detensioned the spokes they certainly weren't in a hurry about it.
Mounting them was difficult, until I figured out the trick.
Getting them off was no big deal.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 379
Bikes: SR, Bianchi, Raleigh, Bertin, Kona, Schwinn, Eisentraut, Zunow, Columbine, Naked, Nishiki, Phillips, Specialized, Giant
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I sure hope the traction, comfort and shock damping are better then the other non air filled tires of the last 45 years. Traction because this will save your skin, especially in wet conditions. Comfort as I'm no child on a trike. Shock damping because I like my tension spoked wheels remaining tensioned, not loosening up as I've seen firsthand. Andy.
#10
I rode a set recently from Nexo. They didn't absorb shock as well as an air-filled tire, but they would work for an application where low-maintenance and no-failure were important. Think rental bikes for tourists who just want to pedal around and explore a city. I've seen them on bike-share bikes too, most recently in Seattle.
#12
The main reason I am checking into foam tires is that I ride all winter long. Sometimes the temperature is around 10 degrees F. I have never changed a flat at that temp and would not want to.
Mike A.
Mike A.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 10,056
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Liked 3,054 Times
in
1,646 Posts
Another way to look at this: If there were any even sorta of good foam,solid etc tires people would be using them in droves, the would be standard equipment on bikes, etc.
They aren't which shows that the market and users have voted: these thing are just not good.
future may change
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,998
Bikes: old ones
Liked 10,449 Times
in
7,248 Posts
.
...there are some new wheel designs that might make a solid tyre more practical for use, but the few I've experienced have been (as stated above) heavy on the rim, difficult to mount/dismount, and generally not much fun to ride on.
...there are some new wheel designs that might make a solid tyre more practical for use, but the few I've experienced have been (as stated above) heavy on the rim, difficult to mount/dismount, and generally not much fun to ride on.
#15
Senior Member
The most aggressively flat resistant solution would be a tubeless tire that is puncture resistant. The Schwalbe Marathon Supreme comes to mind.
Last edited by cpach; 12-09-17 at 12:16 AM.
#16
You can get normal tyres that are virtually bomb proof and Im betting even the most rigid pneumatic tyre is still better riding, has lower rolling resistance, lower weight, easier to mount ect. Only thing is to refill the air once in a while. That is no big deal at all with a decent floor pump. That said a "solid" tyre is somewhat interesting in certain applications like very infrequent use.
#17
Senior Member
It worked OK, but would have worked better if I’d gotten the psi equivalent right. The websites don’t mention how much they firm up below freezing.
I might not pick them for full-attack cornering, but for the overwhelming mileage of My commuting they did just fine.
What happens though is that the tire gets harder, it deforms less. So apart from feeling like you’re riding on a rim wrapped with a fan belt, you lose a bit of traction similar to when riding an overinflated MTB.
One of the tires I used had a continuos center ridge. That was noticeably bad for winter riding. But once I notched it, the tire worked OK.
#18
Senior Member
Big thing for me is dexterity.
I’ve got Raynauld’s, and lose dexterity FAST around or below freezing.
Replacing a tire will invariably get My hands injured - if I manage at all.
But rode rougher.
#19
Senior Member
You can get normal tyres that are virtually bomb proof and Im betting even the most rigid pneumatic tyre is still better riding, has lower rolling resistance, lower weight, easier to mount ect. Only thing is to refill the air once in a while. That is no big deal at all with a decent floor pump. That said a "solid" tyre is somewhat interesting in certain applications like very infrequent use.
Lower rolling resistance - depends on which PSI equivalent and which flat protection you’re comparing.
The outcome isn’t a given.
My current schwalbes roll heavier than My greentyres did.
Lower weight is also a so-so thing.
For wide tires, sure.
For typical road tire widths, the tire is a bit heavier, but the bicycle weight doesn’t change much as you can leave the flat-fixing stuff at home.
#20
I have a hard time believing a sold tyre would have less rolling resistance than a properly inflated pneumatic tyre, even if said tyre had proper puncture protection.That said, Im not aware of any actual data, except some rudimentary tests performed on solid wheel chair tyres, that seem to support solid tyres have more rolling resistance. Of course even pneumatic tyres that seem similar, have widely different rolling resistance, but compared to the better choices, I would want to see the data before believing a solid tyre is as good.
#21
The comments are really good. I ride for cardio vascular reasons. I just want a good work out without flatting. I ride for about an hour on a rail trail with very small stones.
Mike Adams
Mike Adams
#22
Senior Member
I have a hard time believing a sold tyre would have less rolling resistance than a properly inflated pneumatic tyre, even if said tyre had proper puncture protection.That said, Im not aware of any actual data, except some rudimentary tests performed on solid wheel chair tyres, that seem to support solid tyres have more rolling resistance. Of course even pneumatic tyres that seem similar, have widely different rolling resistance, but compared to the better choices, I would want to see the data before believing a solid tyre is as good.
Summer tires, Conti Sport contact, my commute is an average 65-68 minutes.
On my 80- 90 psi simulate solid tires, it was a 75 minute average on clear roads.
On My puncture protected Schwalbe Marathon winters I’m consistently above 80 minutes.
On Suomityres w240, and SMW w/o puncture protection, I’d manage a 75 minute average on clear roads.
I can well imagine that using solids, or inserts mimicking typical MTB pressures would be quite punishing.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
Your use case makes sense to me. I guess it would be an expensive experiment to try a set of those Tannus tires, but it sure would be an interesting one.
#24
Again, it’s about the specifics of the comparison.
Summer tires, Conti Sport contact, my commute is an average 65-68 minutes.
On my 80- 90 psi simulate solid tires, it was a 75 minute average on clear roads.
On My puncture protected Schwalbe Marathon winters I’m consistently above 80 minutes.
On Suomityres w240, and SMW w/o puncture protection, I’d manage a 75 minute average on clear roads.
I can well imagine that using solids, or inserts mimicking typical MTB pressures would be quite punishing.
Summer tires, Conti Sport contact, my commute is an average 65-68 minutes.
On my 80- 90 psi simulate solid tires, it was a 75 minute average on clear roads.
On My puncture protected Schwalbe Marathon winters I’m consistently above 80 minutes.
On Suomityres w240, and SMW w/o puncture protection, I’d manage a 75 minute average on clear roads.
I can well imagine that using solids, or inserts mimicking typical MTB pressures would be quite punishing.
#25
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I replaced my Marathon Plus 1.75 (70psi) with Tannus Shield 1.5 (rated 80psi) on an ICE Adventure FS, hoping to squeeze a bit more speed. Didn't notice a big diff. Now running Tannus MiniVelo 1.25 rated 90psi; seems a bit faster on pavement, but I really need wider tires for softer gravel trails. Difference between 90 vs 32 temp appears negligible. With 3 wheels I don't care about traction.
Installation of the Shield required a dealer to use a commercial install tool, due to 19-21mm tire barely fitting into a 19mm rim. The MiniVelo was fairly easy to do myself with 17-20mm tires. Cutting off an old Tannus with garden shears takes 5 minutes.
Speed and rolling resistance is so subjective without controlled tests. This is the best test I've seen, after hours of Googling, showing little difference between Tannus and pneumatic: see Youtube, "Tannus 700x23c Solid Road Tyre vs Pneumatic - Downhill test". I'll run the Tannus through the winter and may then try a 100psi wider Marathon, with a controlled comparison.
Installation of the Shield required a dealer to use a commercial install tool, due to 19-21mm tire barely fitting into a 19mm rim. The MiniVelo was fairly easy to do myself with 17-20mm tires. Cutting off an old Tannus with garden shears takes 5 minutes.
Speed and rolling resistance is so subjective without controlled tests. This is the best test I've seen, after hours of Googling, showing little difference between Tannus and pneumatic: see Youtube, "Tannus 700x23c Solid Road Tyre vs Pneumatic - Downhill test". I'll run the Tannus through the winter and may then try a 100psi wider Marathon, with a controlled comparison.