Do you hate Walmart FIXIES? Kent Thruster
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you hate Walmart FIXIES? Kent Thruster
Hey bike friends! I just picked up a Kent Thruster on Craigslist for $60. It was brand new and set up well for what it is. I checked out the welds and the components. They seemed about average for the level of hate the bikes typically get.
Check out my initial YOUTUBE review of it below!
I'm going to be upgrading the bike and documenting the process. Just because I like going against the grain. It really doesn't seem all that bad, and in fact, it's fun to ride.
Upgrades:
-Bottom Bracket
-Threadless Adapter
-Better bars
-Saddle
Check out my initial YOUTUBE review of it below!
I'm going to be upgrading the bike and documenting the process. Just because I like going against the grain. It really doesn't seem all that bad, and in fact, it's fun to ride.
Upgrades:
-Bottom Bracket
-Threadless Adapter
-Better bars
-Saddle
#6
#8
52psi
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,019
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Liked 803 Times
in
392 Posts
Title is three words too long.
And who's Kent Thruster? Sounds like Max Power's second cousin.
And who's Kent Thruster? Sounds like Max Power's second cousin.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are too many good quotes here!
I'm glad you guys can make fun and not be too disrespectful.
I think they came up with that name using the pornstar name generator. Or something along those lines.
I'm glad you guys can make fun and not be too disrespectful.
I think they came up with that name using the pornstar name generator. Or something along those lines.
#11
I'm genuinely curious about the weight.
#13
Super-duper Genius
So, for some upgraded components, you've already spent roughly as much as the bike itself cost, no? The next logical upgrade would be a set of decent wheels, which will cost at least that much again = a total of $200 or so for everything. You're almost into the price territory of a reasonably good bike.
People cringe so much over those bikes because every part of them is the cheapest quality possible. It's true that they're (usually) at least ridable when new. The trouble is, they do not last long. And even in the best case, they don't give the performance, comfort, and reliability you can get for only a few hundred dollars more.
Numbers are a funny thing...
You might make the following argument:
Your bike only cost $60. If asked what they'd consider a reasonable, entry-level bike for someone on a tight budget, most guys here would probably recommend about a $400 model. "So I spent less than 1/6 that amount," you might say, "surely I got a bike that's at least 1/6 as good."
To that, I'd say:
You got a bike that's barely usable for any kind of serious riding. If you'd saved up a mere $300 more (one week's pay for someone at minimum wage, or maybe 15 hours' worth for a median income earner), you'd have something that will last ten times longer AND be more enjoyable from day one.
It comes down to value. Department store bikes are less expensive than "good" bikes--much less expensive, even. But value equals quality (or usefulness) per dollar spent. So if the Kent were $5 vs. $5000 for an entry-level, good quality bike, the value might be comparable. Even at a ratio of $20 to $2000, the value might be in the same ballpark. But at $60-ish vs. $400-ish, the good bike has tremendously more value.
People cringe so much over those bikes because every part of them is the cheapest quality possible. It's true that they're (usually) at least ridable when new. The trouble is, they do not last long. And even in the best case, they don't give the performance, comfort, and reliability you can get for only a few hundred dollars more.
Numbers are a funny thing...
You might make the following argument:
Your bike only cost $60. If asked what they'd consider a reasonable, entry-level bike for someone on a tight budget, most guys here would probably recommend about a $400 model. "So I spent less than 1/6 that amount," you might say, "surely I got a bike that's at least 1/6 as good."
To that, I'd say:
You got a bike that's barely usable for any kind of serious riding. If you'd saved up a mere $300 more (one week's pay for someone at minimum wage, or maybe 15 hours' worth for a median income earner), you'd have something that will last ten times longer AND be more enjoyable from day one.
It comes down to value. Department store bikes are less expensive than "good" bikes--much less expensive, even. But value equals quality (or usefulness) per dollar spent. So if the Kent were $5 vs. $5000 for an entry-level, good quality bike, the value might be comparable. Even at a ratio of $20 to $2000, the value might be in the same ballpark. But at $60-ish vs. $400-ish, the good bike has tremendously more value.
Last edited by Broctoon; 01-31-18 at 08:43 PM.
#14
Senior Member
value is relative. I see tons of people commuting on crappy bikes but they make it work for them. Could they get a quality ride with more durable and reliable parts for a few hundred bucks more? absolutely, but that's everyone's own choice to make. if you want to buy a cheap bike and ride it into the dirt, go for it. We all know the thruster is an abomination but some people seem to enjoy it so whatever.
but why bother upgrading parts? you'd be better off starting with a decent frame and so-so components then a throw away frame with upgraded components, the expression lipstick on a pig comes to mind.
but why bother upgrading parts? you'd be better off starting with a decent frame and so-so components then a throw away frame with upgraded components, the expression lipstick on a pig comes to mind.
#15
Fish Out of Water
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Milwaukee, U.S.A.
Posts: 44
Bikes: 1992 Cannondale 2.8, 1993 Trek 930, 2012 Trek Marlin, 2018 Raleigh Back Alley
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"Price is an absolute number. Value is what you get for the price." I'm in sales, and I remind my customers of this all the time.
#16
Bad example
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,303
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Liked 445 Times
in
209 Posts
I spend a lot of money and time fixing up old low end bikes. Part of the “value” to me is the fun I get from fixing up the bike, tinkering with things to get them to work well, and so on. Plus even cheap hi-ten steel frames can be pleasant to ride, at least when they have nice wheels.
Likes For Aubergine:
#17
Fish Out of Water
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Milwaukee, U.S.A.
Posts: 44
Bikes: 1992 Cannondale 2.8, 1993 Trek 930, 2012 Trek Marlin, 2018 Raleigh Back Alley
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I spend a lot of money and time fixing up old low end bikes. Part of the “value” to me is the fun I get from fixing up the bike, tinkering with things to get them to work well, and so on. Plus even cheap hi-ten steel frames can be pleasant to ride, at least when they have nice wheels.
Only the person spending the money can determine what the "value" is. What you see as a value, I may not. And there is nothing wrong with that. I'm new around here and I see a fair bit of critical comments when someone tries to do something "on the cheap". I'd rather see someone suggest alternate ideas for the same or similar cost versus saying "you should have bought this", even if "this" is at a significantly higher cost...
#18
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Liked 942 Times
in
504 Posts
Cool bike.
Near the beginning of the video you said you wouldn't upgrade the BB.
But then you did? What gives?
My concern is that now that you have changed out parts, your bike is no longer an "original" Kent Thruster, and has therefore lost much of its value.
Hopefully, you have retained the take off parts so you can return the bike to its original glory.
Near the beginning of the video you said you wouldn't upgrade the BB.
My concern is that now that you have changed out parts, your bike is no longer an "original" Kent Thruster, and has therefore lost much of its value.
Hopefully, you have retained the take off parts so you can return the bike to its original glory.
#19
Super-duper Genius
Nothing wrong with taking a decent inexpensive frame and building it up with mid-grade components. On the other hand, anything you spend putting nice stuff on a Walmart fixie is money wasted.
#21
#23
Junior Member
Knew a guy that bought Walmart bikes and justified it by saying that when something went wrong with it, it was usually cheaper to buy a new bike than get it fixed at the LBS.
#24
Then people can do dope review videos of my single-use bikes on YouTube instead of making stupid videos on how to rehab old bikes, how to find a bike coop near you or why to use your LBS.