Found a reference for Tange and Ishawata tubing
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Found a reference for Tange and Ishawata tubing
If you haven't already seen this (below), it is a good explanation of the various Japanese-manufactured tubes used on some 70's - 80's vintage bikes - on the Retrogrouch website. The posting and some of the comments are helpful. It helped me better understand the quality of some bikes/frames that I see on Craigslist.
Retrogrouch makes the case that some of the Tange and Ishawata tubes are of a comparable quality to the better Columbus and Reynolds offerings - and this means that some vintage bikes are under-appreciated for the quality of their frames thereby relected in asking prices. ....may be some bargains out there...
The Retrogrouch: Classic Tubes: Tange and Ishiwata
Retrogrouch makes the case that some of the Tange and Ishawata tubes are of a comparable quality to the better Columbus and Reynolds offerings - and this means that some vintage bikes are under-appreciated for the quality of their frames thereby relected in asking prices. ....may be some bargains out there...
The Retrogrouch: Classic Tubes: Tange and Ishiwata
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
...just noticed I spelled it wrong - should be 'Ishiwata', not 'Ishawata'..
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
If you haven't already seen this (below), it is a good explanation of the various Japanese-manufactured tubes used on some 70's - 80's vintage bikes - on the Retrogrouch website. The posting and some of the comments are helpful. It helped me better understand the quality of some bikes/frames that I see on Craigslist.
Retrogrouch makes the case that some of the Tange and Ishawata tubes are of a comparable quality to the better Columbus and Reynolds offerings - and this means that some vintage bikes are under-appreciated for the quality of their frames thereby relected in asking prices. ....may be some bargains out there...
The Retrogrouch: Classic Tubes: Tange and Ishiwata
Retrogrouch makes the case that some of the Tange and Ishawata tubes are of a comparable quality to the better Columbus and Reynolds offerings - and this means that some vintage bikes are under-appreciated for the quality of their frames thereby relected in asking prices. ....may be some bargains out there...
The Retrogrouch: Classic Tubes: Tange and Ishiwata
Perhaps it should go without saying, but tubing quality is only the starting point of frame quality. The end point has much more to do with things other than tubing.
#5
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,408
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 222 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1558 Post(s)
Liked 2,037 Times
in
991 Posts
^^^ Agreed. Two '80s steeds of mine are both Tange Prestige: A hand-built (small local shop) Davidson Impulse and a (presumably hand-built in Japan at Panasonic) 1987 Schwinn Prologue. Top quality stuff. Both are very good bikes, but only one encourages me to ride longer, charge up hills, or push harder to accelerate, while feeling as fairly close in liveliness to my '16 Trek Emonda ALR. [answer: it's the Schwinn!]
#6
small ring
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,031
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 440 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times
in
375 Posts
__________________
59 Allegro Special -- 72 Bob Jackson -- 74 Motobecane Grand Jubile -- 74 Sekine SHS 271 -- 80 Nishiki International
85 Shogun 800 -- 86 Tommasini Super Prestige -- 92 Specialized Rockhopper -- 17 Colnago Arabesque
59 Allegro Special -- 72 Bob Jackson -- 74 Motobecane Grand Jubile -- 74 Sekine SHS 271 -- 80 Nishiki International
85 Shogun 800 -- 86 Tommasini Super Prestige -- 92 Specialized Rockhopper -- 17 Colnago Arabesque
Last edited by droppedandlost; 04-13-18 at 06:19 PM. Reason: not sure why the link looks like that....
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee-Chicago (Last stop on the North Shore Metra Line)
Posts: 372
Bikes: 1975 Fuji 'The Finest', 1975 Fuji Super Road Racer S10-S,1980 SR 10-Speed, 1980 Fuji Newest, 1984 Araya 14-Speed, 1985 Bridgestone 500, 1986 Fuji 'Sekkei Series', 1995 Gary Fisher Kaitai MTB
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
8 Posts
Great reference page. I went to their main index page and it's loaded with lots of information. Use a browser that translated from Japanese characters to english is most helpful to me. If you can read Japanese you have it made.
Thanks for the link
#8
Senior Member
google translate main poage excellent information
https://translate.google.com/transla...t/&prev=search
https://translate.google.com/transla...t/&prev=search
__________________
riding
riding
#9
Senior Member
I have Tange #1 and #2 bikes. Both are nice. I read somewhere that the weight limit for the #1 tube set was 165 lbs. I rode that bike regularly for over 30 years, sometimes weighing up to 210 lbs.
#10
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,035
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1038 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times
in
657 Posts
Tubing Weight Limits
A well constructed frame can handle much heavier riders than the published weight limits.
For example, during the 80's and 90's several well known Northern California frame builders used uber high strength Excel tubing with main tube wall thicknesses as thin as 0.3mm and 0.5mm. I've seen some of those frames as large as 62cm and never heard of any problems with them.
They also used Super Vitus 980 and Tange Prestige primarily because those tubes sets were less expensive than Reynolds or Columbus.
4130 Chrome Molybdenum alloy steel has been the world standard for structural applications since the 1930's. Tange, Ishiwata and Columbus used 4130 alloy steel for their top quality tubes until the early 80's when higher alloy steels became available.
All 3 brands published slightly different chemistry and strength specs as if the steel that they used was something special...It wasn't! Those specs are all with the the tolerance limits for 4130 steel.
NOTE! Tange changed the "published" wall thickness specs for butted #1 and #2 main tubes several times.
In the last iteration:
#1 Top Tube 0.8mm x 0.5mm x 0.8mm, Seat Tube 0.8mm x 0.5mm, Down Tube 0.9mm x 0.6mm x 0.9mm
#2 Top Tube 0.9mm x 0.6mm x 0.9mm, Seat Tube 0.9mm x 0.6mm, Down Tube 0.9mm x 0.6mm x 0.9mm
Those were the only differences between Tange #1 and #2.
Columbus SL and Super Vitus 971 had the same 0.9mm x 0.6mm main tube wall thicknesses as Tange #2. The rest of the tubes in those sets were about the same too.
Reynolds 531 was produced with butted main tube wall thicknesses ranging from 0.5mm x 0.3mm up to 1.2mm x 0.9mm. The lightest for was for specialty time trial and track bikes, the heaviest for tandems.
The most commonly used Reynolds 531 tubing for production frames from the late 60's through the early 80's was called the Sprint tube set. The main tubes were 1.0mm thick in the butted sections and 0.7mm in the rest of the tube.
That was the same wall thickness as Columbus SP tubing which was also used on many production frames during those years. So, the urban fantasies about Reynolds vs. Columbus and which was lighter were just that.
By the late 70's Columbus SL tubing became more popular but SP was still used for larger frames.
In the UK a lot of builders used a lighter gage of Reynolds 531 with the main tube wall thicknesses the same as Tange #1. In the late 80's this became known as Reynolds 531 Competition tubing.
Reynolds 531, Super Vitus 971/980 and the 4310 tubing from Tange, Ishiwata and Columbus all had pretty much the same physical properties and strengths.
Differences in performance between frames made from those tubes sets was due to geometry, wall thickness and construction methods.
The introduction of higher strength alloys for bicycle tubing in the 1980's allowed for thinner wall thickness tubes resulting in lighter frames.
verktyg
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 04-14-18 at 07:27 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 608 Times
in
405 Posts
It would also be nice to learn the types of Lugs these two companies produced
(if any). or whether the Lugs were outsourced by the end builder.
I am rather new to Japanese Frames and am interested in learning.
(if any). or whether the Lugs were outsourced by the end builder.
I am rather new to Japanese Frames and am interested in learning.
#12
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee-Chicago (Last stop on the North Shore Metra Line)
Posts: 372
Bikes: 1975 Fuji 'The Finest', 1975 Fuji Super Road Racer S10-S,1980 SR 10-Speed, 1980 Fuji Newest, 1984 Araya 14-Speed, 1985 Bridgestone 500, 1986 Fuji 'Sekkei Series', 1995 Gary Fisher Kaitai MTB
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
8 Posts
I enjoyed reading your assessment of the variations on the different tubings. I am very interested in the different seat tube dimensions that the Tange tubing had over time, i.e. the Tange 1 being 0.8mm x 0.5mm, while all the tables I've seen, including the one you provided, had the seat tubes as 0.9mm x 0.6mm for Tange 1, 2 and 3. The tables that I've seen only had the dimensions variations on the top and down tubes, being thinner as the tubing number went down. However, to go along with your review I indeed have noticed that on manufactured bikes they often didn't follow the table dimensions, especially for the seat tube, based on the labeled (via decal) and advertised 'set' used. For example, I recently acquired an old 1984 SR Maxima (SR bikes out of California with frames made in Japan). It was sold and labeled as using TANGE 2, which per the tables would have that 0.9mm x 0.6mm seat tube and thus a 26.6mm seat post would be expected. However, the advertised bike indicates a 26.8mm seat post and the frame I have verifies that. In the same SR catalog they had a model called the Pro Am which also states uses the TANGE 2 tubing, yet it has a seat post dimension given as 27.0mm (True the catalog could be wrong as I don't have a real Pro Am to verify that size). So using the normal means of determining seat post sizes I'd expect the tube thicknesses to be 0.8mm for the SR Maxima and 0.7mm for the SR Pro Am. BTW, the frames for both SR bikes were made by Araya! Did manufactures often bore out seat tubes as standard practice or use tubes from another set, yet fail to indicate so?
It appears that the tubing labels on various bikes must be taken with some dimensional flexibility. BTW, on some of the later Araya bike catalogs from the late 80's they would advertise mixtures of TANGE 1 and TANGE 2 being used on one bike, or at least that how interpreted them as they are written in Japanese which I can't read.
Just wondering if others have encountered this same flexibility of tube dimensions on bikes labeled for a specific tubing type? You would think that it would have been a marketing plus to tell your buyers that in some places thinner, thus lighter, tubing was used.
It appears that the tubing labels on various bikes must be taken with some dimensional flexibility. BTW, on some of the later Araya bike catalogs from the late 80's they would advertise mixtures of TANGE 1 and TANGE 2 being used on one bike, or at least that how interpreted them as they are written in Japanese which I can't read.
Just wondering if others have encountered this same flexibility of tube dimensions on bikes labeled for a specific tubing type? You would think that it would have been a marketing plus to tell your buyers that in some places thinner, thus lighter, tubing was used.
#13
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,844
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3617 Post(s)
Liked 3,454 Times
in
1,960 Posts
Tange made investment cast lugs and fork crowns (we used some of these on the mid-80s high-end steel frames), as well as stamped lugs. We used the short-point Champion stamped lugs on the first "170" model frames.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 656 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,048 Times
in
1,883 Posts
Only when Tange introduced Prestige did they succumb to the weight weenie demands for single butted seat tubes, offering builders a choice of seat tubes. Even the 1980s, the Tange 900 and Inifinity tubesets would employ the standard 0.9/0.6/0.9mm seat tube, though in a seamed version.
During manufacturer, it is fairly common to experience distortion of the seat tubes. This can cause manufacturers to use smaller posts. Some manufacturers routinely ream/hone to correct this and in some cases will go one size larger, to ensure the tube is round. It's also easy to become too aggressive with this operation. Consequently, it is fairly common to see posts that vary +/- 0.2mm from the nominal size.
There are also cases where manufacturers will request a custom tube. Centurion did this with the Turbo and Ironman models. Despite the Tange #1 decal, the tubesets are a custom blend and typically are fitted with 27.0-27.2mm posts.
The bottom line is that it fairly common to see posts that +/- 0.2mm from nominal, after allowing for clearance.
Last edited by T-Mar; 04-14-18 at 10:33 AM.
#15
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,408
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 222 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1558 Post(s)
Liked 2,037 Times
in
991 Posts
Wow. Such fantastic information here! Thank you! Looks like my Prestige frames are properly slender, but that's I think part of what makes them so nice.
#16
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee-Chicago (Last stop on the North Shore Metra Line)
Posts: 372
Bikes: 1975 Fuji 'The Finest', 1975 Fuji Super Road Racer S10-S,1980 SR 10-Speed, 1980 Fuji Newest, 1984 Araya 14-Speed, 1985 Bridgestone 500, 1986 Fuji 'Sekkei Series', 1995 Gary Fisher Kaitai MTB
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
8 Posts
During manufacturer, it is fairly common to experience distortion of the seat tubes. This can cause manufacturers to use smaller posts. Some manufacturers routinely ream/hone to correct this and in some cases will go one size larger, to ensure the tube is round. It's also easy to become too aggressive with this operation. Consequently, it is fairly common to see posts that vary +/- 0.2mm from the nominal size.
There are also cases where manufacturers will request a custom tube. Centurion did this with the Turbo and Ironman models. Despite the Tange #1 decal, the tubesets are a custom blend and typically are fitted with 27.0-27.2mm posts.
The bottom line is that it fairly common to see posts that +/- 0.2mm from nominal, after allowing for clearance.
#17
Senior Member
I recently picked up a 1984 Schwinn Peloton. Specs show 26.6 seat post, but it came with a 27.0. It is Columbus tubing as opposed to Tange or Ishiwata. The 26.6 is too small and the seat post does not look like it has been altered. How does someone like Schwinn keep it all straight if the seat posts varied for a given model?
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 656 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,048 Times
in
1,883 Posts
I hear what your saying TMar. What was confusing to me was those SR frames (Araya) that both are advertised as using TANGE #2 which should have been 26.6 posts, and even considering that my SR Maxima went to 26.8mm which falls into your +/- 0.2mm, that advertised Pro AM was actually + 0.4mm using the 27mm post. I'm just more of the belief that they, Araya in this case, didn't hold to a true TANGE #2 tubeset on these bikes. Or at the very least Araya was doing some serious reaming (almost making double butted into a triple butted seat tube (0.9 X 0.6 X 0.7).
Some of the Centurion catalogs show the same thing. In 1984 catalogue, the Turbo (Tange #1) is spec'd with a 27.2mm post while the Comp TA (Tange #2) is spec'd with a 27.0mm post. Later catalogues show both #1 and #2 frames with 27.0mm posts. Clearly all are larger than you would typically expect. Obviously, there was some form of customization taking place.
#19
Senior Member
Great info. Another example of what a useful brain trust the forum is. Its possible I missed something, but I didnt notice Ishiwata 024 on the lists so far. Any info on that set?
#20
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee-Chicago (Last stop on the North Shore Metra Line)
Posts: 372
Bikes: 1975 Fuji 'The Finest', 1975 Fuji Super Road Racer S10-S,1980 SR 10-Speed, 1980 Fuji Newest, 1984 Araya 14-Speed, 1985 Bridgestone 500, 1986 Fuji 'Sekkei Series', 1995 Gary Fisher Kaitai MTB
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
8 Posts
Well, it could be a custom blend. One possibility would be Tange #2 with a #4, single butted seat tube. Even though the #4 seat tube is 0.1mm thicker in the non-butted section, the fact that it is a single butted tube results in it weighing ~10g less than the double butted #2 seat tube. Theoretically, the single butted tube should also be slightly less expensive, though at least some of that would have been offset by having to stock two post sizes. Still, this utilizes a combination of stock tubes, so is easy and cheap to accomplish, while providing a very small but definable difference to a stock #2 frame. .
Some of the Centurion catalogs show the same thing. In 1984 catalogue, the Turbo (Tange #1) is spec'd with a 27.2mm post while the Comp TA (Tange #2) is spec'd with a 27.0mm post. Later catalogues show both #1 and #2 frames with 27.0mm posts. Clearly all are larger than you would typically expect. Obviously, there was some form of customization taking place.
Some of the Centurion catalogs show the same thing. In 1984 catalogue, the Turbo (Tange #1) is spec'd with a 27.2mm post while the Comp TA (Tange #2) is spec'd with a 27.0mm post. Later catalogues show both #1 and #2 frames with 27.0mm posts. Clearly all are larger than you would typically expect. Obviously, there was some form of customization taking place.
I'm completing the restoration of that frame, newly powder coated, today. I will do a write-up for the forum in
short order, once the weather around here warms up enough for some nice outdoor pictures
Thanks again, as always, T-Mar for your valuable insights.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Also, Kaisei tubing is basically exactly the same as Ishiwata. They even use the same names for the different series.
#22
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,408
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 222 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1558 Post(s)
Liked 2,037 Times
in
991 Posts
I recently picked up a 1984 Schwinn Peloton. Specs show 26.6 seat post, but it came with a 27.0. It is Columbus tubing as opposed to Tange or Ishiwata. The 26.6 is too small and the seat post does not look like it has been altered. How does someone like Schwinn keep it all straight if the seat posts varied for a given model?
Regardless, you have a seat post that works, which is important, because Pelotons are pretty freaking sweet bikes.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 608 Times
in
405 Posts
Ishiwata made some bulge-formed and investment cast fork crowns, but I'm not aware of any Ishiwata lugs. At Trek, we used Nikko lugs on the early frames.
Tange made investment cast lugs and fork crowns (we used some of these on the mid-80s high-end steel frames), as well as stamped lugs. We used the short-point Champion stamped lugs on the first "170" model frames.
Tange made investment cast lugs and fork crowns (we used some of these on the mid-80s high-end steel frames), as well as stamped lugs. We used the short-point Champion stamped lugs on the first "170" model frames.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 656 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,048 Times
in
1,883 Posts
The charts that I've seen for "E" series tubesets indicate quad butting and that includes the later Kaisei versions.