Quality of Workout
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Quality of Workout
Hi, I'm new to this board and bike on my own about 15 miles (lots of hills) most days. My ride is much shorter than many others but it takes about 1.15 hours to complete and is strenuous to me. I'm 57 but used to run long distances and I'm in excellent shape. Recently I did some longer biking along route 101 in CA, and it was not very difficult. I'm wondering of the longer distance riders are taking easier courses. I don't see how most people could handle 50 to 150 miles of the stuff I ride every day.
Also any views on the best type of bike for this type riding. I use an older hybrid (Kono) which I really like and service regularly but considering an upgrade.
Also any views on the best type of bike for this type riding. I use an older hybrid (Kono) which I really like and service regularly but considering an upgrade.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,653
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Liked 3,680 Times
in
2,381 Posts
welcome. if you like your bike, what would you consider an upgrade? for me, longer road riding calls for a drop bar road bike
#3
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 41,028
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Liked 3,015 Times
in
1,710 Posts
You'll be surprised to find how spending time in the saddle can increase your endurance. I know that sounds like stating the obvious but generally, you can do on a weekend the number of miles you do across the week. So if you ride 15 miles a day Monday through Friday, you should be able to ride 50 to 75 miles on Saturday or Sunday. Once you do that, increase your weekday mileage a bit, and you can increase your weekend mileage.
There is a section of bike forums for long distance riding. Some people ride 200 to 600 km in a single weekend, some even more. Those courses are not flat.
There is a section of bike forums for long distance riding. Some people ride 200 to 600 km in a single weekend, some even more. Those courses are not flat.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#4
Senior Member
Each ride, and rider is different.
Most of my longer day rides are relatively flat, but that still doesn't equate riding 15 miles to riding 150 miles. You may get some hills, but the rides are still, at least different. And, it takes a lot of general endurance to do a 150-PLUS mile ride.
Also, what you consider hilly may be killers for some riders, and pretty routine riding for other riders.
I've done a few semi-organized half century rides, and they certainly are not flat. The organized century rides I've done also seem to find good sized hills to go over. Yes, a fair amount of flat riding, but perhaps 15 miles of hill climbing (not counting descents).
Most of my longer day rides are relatively flat, but that still doesn't equate riding 15 miles to riding 150 miles. You may get some hills, but the rides are still, at least different. And, it takes a lot of general endurance to do a 150-PLUS mile ride.
Also, what you consider hilly may be killers for some riders, and pretty routine riding for other riders.
I've done a few semi-organized half century rides, and they certainly are not flat. The organized century rides I've done also seem to find good sized hills to go over. Yes, a fair amount of flat riding, but perhaps 15 miles of hill climbing (not counting descents).
#5
Non omnino gravis
Intensity and ascent are not strictly related. My rides with what I consider to be "climbing numbers," that is, +60ft/mi ascent, routinely have lower kJ/mi numbers than flatter rides or rides on undulating terrain.
63.1 miles with 3,800ft of vertical, 36.5kj/mi (17.3mph)
35.4 miles with 770ft of vertical, 35.4kj/mi (20.8mph)
43.6 miles with 1,184ft of vertical, 39.1kj/mi (18.9mph)
Going solo +22mph on flat land is as hare as tackling +6% grades, if not harder. Because there's no downhill on the other side.
63.1 miles with 3,800ft of vertical, 36.5kj/mi (17.3mph)
35.4 miles with 770ft of vertical, 35.4kj/mi (20.8mph)
43.6 miles with 1,184ft of vertical, 39.1kj/mi (18.9mph)
Going solo +22mph on flat land is as hare as tackling +6% grades, if not harder. Because there's no downhill on the other side.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 702
Bikes: 2015 CAAD 10; 2016 Felt Z85
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Personally, I just find it hard to be on a bike for more than about 50 miles. As much as I like cycling, there is a tipping point where I just don't want to sit on a bike anymore.
It's not so much that I'm just physically spent...I just feel too uncomfortable to care anymore.
To me it's a hobby and a way to keep in shape, and to also socialize with other cyclists. But it comes to a point where "doing something else" overrides my desire to sit on the saddle any longer.
But that's me.
It's not so much that I'm just physically spent...I just feel too uncomfortable to care anymore.
To me it's a hobby and a way to keep in shape, and to also socialize with other cyclists. But it comes to a point where "doing something else" overrides my desire to sit on the saddle any longer.
But that's me.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 2,673
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Liked 139 Times
in
90 Posts
Hi, I'm new to this board and bike on my own about 15 miles (lots of hills) most days. My ride is much shorter than many others but it takes about 1.15 hours to complete and is strenuous to me. I'm 57 but used to run long distances and I'm in excellent shape. Recently I did some longer biking along route 101 in CA, and it was not very difficult. I'm wondering of the longer distance riders are taking easier courses. I don't see how most people could handle 50 to 150 miles of the stuff I ride every day.
Also any views on the best type of bike for this type riding. I use an older hybrid (Kono) which I really like and service regularly but considering an upgrade.
Also any views on the best type of bike for this type riding. I use an older hybrid (Kono) which I really like and service regularly but considering an upgrade.
If you are riding mostly road, and are trying to get better, consider a drop bar road bike. Then you'll get the sickness we all get...upgrade fever!
#9
Senior Member
You can look for routes on sites like RideWithGPS and see the length of rides people do, along with how many feet of climbing there are - a good indicator of how hard or easy a ride is but not the only indicator, since doing a flat 100 mile ride under 6 hours is a good workout, too...
I'm 61 and regularly do 60 - 85 mile rides and an occasional 100 miler. If you were to lengthen your typical rides from 15 miles to 25-30 miles, then you would only need to do three of them, with rest stops in between, and you are doing big mileage.
I used a hybrid bike for many years, did upgrade to a road bike with drop bars and a lighter frame/better wheels - the difference is definitely noticeable from either a fatigue/mile or overall mph at equal fitness view.
I'm 61 and regularly do 60 - 85 mile rides and an occasional 100 miler. If you were to lengthen your typical rides from 15 miles to 25-30 miles, then you would only need to do three of them, with rest stops in between, and you are doing big mileage.
I used a hybrid bike for many years, did upgrade to a road bike with drop bars and a lighter frame/better wheels - the difference is definitely noticeable from either a fatigue/mile or overall mph at equal fitness view.
#10
Senior Member
As a fellow runner, though my distances are getting shorter, there is definitely a difference between cycling fitness and running fitness. BTW - I am 52, so not the youngest of this group. Keep pedaling, just like running you are building strength and endurance, just using muscles differently than running. If you want speed, I would recommend finding a road bike. The old ones still work great and there are some great bikes on Craigslist if you are patient, or if you buy new get at least Tiagra level groupset.
#11
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,910
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Liked 1,746 Times
in
864 Posts
Personally, I just find it hard to be on a bike for more than about 50 miles. As much as I like cycling, there is a tipping point where I just don't want to sit on a bike anymore.
It's not so much that I'm just physically spent...I just feel too uncomfortable to care anymore.
To me it's a hobby and a way to keep in shape, and to also socialize with other cyclists. But it comes to a point where "doing something else" overrides my desire to sit on the saddle any longer.
But that's me.
It's not so much that I'm just physically spent...I just feel too uncomfortable to care anymore.
To me it's a hobby and a way to keep in shape, and to also socialize with other cyclists. But it comes to a point where "doing something else" overrides my desire to sit on the saddle any longer.
But that's me.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,653
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Liked 3,680 Times
in
2,381 Posts
did 48 Tuesday, that took all day, especially with a little sight seeing mixed in
did just under 18 last night & that was a nice cpl of hrs
used to do a regular 30 mile loop & that was good for a solid cpl hrs out of the house
funny last night I felt like I was ready to crush it, but was quickly reminded about all the regular strong riders there are out there. all of which, completely smoked me. not rudely at all, just a solid reminder what a true athlete looks like
did just under 18 last night & that was a nice cpl of hrs
used to do a regular 30 mile loop & that was good for a solid cpl hrs out of the house
funny last night I felt like I was ready to crush it, but was quickly reminded about all the regular strong riders there are out there. all of which, completely smoked me. not rudely at all, just a solid reminder what a true athlete looks like
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 702
Bikes: 2015 CAAD 10; 2016 Felt Z85
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Join Strava, and like me, you'll constantly be amazed at the fitness level of A LOT of people. I'll come back from a 60+ miler with 5,000' of climbing, thinking "I done good", but upload to Strava, and cower in shame at the random people on my FlyBy's that are doing 80+ miles with 8,000' or more of climbing. Usually I'll see at least one 100+ mile rider. And a lot of these are hard efforts, not some soft pedal easy effort. Being in excellent shape doesn't mean you're in excellent cycling shape, or have the same kind of ability as others. I know this first hand!
If you are riding mostly road, and are trying to get better, consider a drop bar road bike. Then you'll get the sickness we all get...upgrade fever!
If you are riding mostly road, and are trying to get better, consider a drop bar road bike. Then you'll get the sickness we all get...upgrade fever!
There is a hill near where I live that I saw a guy climbing up - this was about 2 years ago. I was so impressed and wondered how ANYBODY could climb that hill. Today it's just a blip on the road for me.
I happened to run into Bobby Lea (our US Olympic cycling competitor) at a local bike shop. I told him how I marveled at how he could win a 30 mile training race on Thursday, and then hit the velodrome and win races on Friday night. I said that I didn't know how he did it.
His reply to me was, "Yeah, I don't know how I did it, either".
It all comes down to how much you want to train and work to improve, really.
#14
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I've now gotten to the point where I do at least one century per weekend, and have averaged 200 + miles for each of the last 3 weekends. I recently rode 168 miles in one day, and I have decided that's max for me because the thought of one more hour on top of that ride was not a happy prospect. The point is, though, that I got to the ability to do this by setting arbitrary goals for myself and not by comparing myself to other riders. I'm 57 years old--if I went on Strava and compared my times and elevations etc. to other riders, I'm sure I could find ones that would make me feel like my performance is inadequate. But I have to remember, if someone had told me 2 years ago I'd be riding these distances, I'd have thought they were nuts.
No one can tell you what is good for you--15 miles on a hilly, windy road is good if you're enjoying it and it makes you feel good. If you think you'll feel better doing another 5 miles, do it! If not, don't.
BTW, with the length of my rides, if I didn't vary them enough so that the longer ones didn't involve some exploring and/or a good meal, I'd go nuts out of boredom.
As to bikes--with distance, it isn't just how fast you can go. I had a '90s hybrid I could ride pretty fast, but after one of my arms swelled up from bad positioning combined with repetitive bumps after a 153 mile ride, I decided I needed either to ride less or get a better bike. I went with the FX 3 which is a fast, comfy flat bar. The day after I rode the 168 miles on it, I rode another 50 and felt fine. One thing I've learned the hard way is the value of proper fit of a bike grows exponentially with distance. Don't go too big or too small. I also think you can't buy a distance bike sight unseen and expect good results. You really need to try it out to see if the geometry lets you get into positions you can tolerate for hours.
No one can tell you what is good for you--15 miles on a hilly, windy road is good if you're enjoying it and it makes you feel good. If you think you'll feel better doing another 5 miles, do it! If not, don't.
BTW, with the length of my rides, if I didn't vary them enough so that the longer ones didn't involve some exploring and/or a good meal, I'd go nuts out of boredom.
As to bikes--with distance, it isn't just how fast you can go. I had a '90s hybrid I could ride pretty fast, but after one of my arms swelled up from bad positioning combined with repetitive bumps after a 153 mile ride, I decided I needed either to ride less or get a better bike. I went with the FX 3 which is a fast, comfy flat bar. The day after I rode the 168 miles on it, I rode another 50 and felt fine. One thing I've learned the hard way is the value of proper fit of a bike grows exponentially with distance. Don't go too big or too small. I also think you can't buy a distance bike sight unseen and expect good results. You really need to try it out to see if the geometry lets you get into positions you can tolerate for hours.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Intensity and ascent are not strictly related. My rides with what I consider to be "climbing numbers," that is, +60ft/mi ascent, routinely have lower kJ/mi numbers than flatter rides or rides on undulating terrain.
63.1 miles with 3,800ft of vertical, 36.5kj/mi (17.3mph)
35.4 miles with 770ft of vertical, 35.4kj/mi (20.8mph)
43.6 miles with 1,184ft of vertical, 39.1kj/mi (18.9mph)
Going solo +22mph on flat land is as hare as tackling +6% grades, if not harder. Because there's no downhill on the other side.
63.1 miles with 3,800ft of vertical, 36.5kj/mi (17.3mph)
35.4 miles with 770ft of vertical, 35.4kj/mi (20.8mph)
43.6 miles with 1,184ft of vertical, 39.1kj/mi (18.9mph)
Going solo +22mph on flat land is as hare as tackling +6% grades, if not harder. Because there's no downhill on the other side.
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Personally, I just find it hard to be on a bike for more than about 50 miles. As much as I like cycling, there is a tipping point where I just don't want to sit on a bike anymore.
It's not so much that I'm just physically spent...I just feel too uncomfortable to care anymore.
To me it's a hobby and a way to keep in shape, and to also socialize with other cyclists. But it comes to a point where "doing something else" overrides my desire to sit on the saddle any longer.
But that's me.
It's not so much that I'm just physically spent...I just feel too uncomfortable to care anymore.
To me it's a hobby and a way to keep in shape, and to also socialize with other cyclists. But it comes to a point where "doing something else" overrides my desire to sit on the saddle any longer.
But that's me.
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've now gotten to the point where I do at least one century per weekend, and have averaged 200 + miles for each of the last 3 weekends. I recently rode 168 miles in one day, and I have decided that's max for me because the thought of one more hour on top of that ride was not a happy prospect. The point is, though, that I got to the ability to do this by setting arbitrary goals for myself and not by comparing myself to other riders. I'm 57 years old--if I went on Strava and compared my times and elevations etc. to other riders, I'm sure I could find ones that would make me feel like my performance is inadequate. But I have to remember, if someone had told me 2 years ago I'd be riding these distances, I'd have thought they were nuts.
No one can tell you what is good for you--15 miles on a hilly, windy road is good if you're enjoying it and it makes you feel good. If you think you'll feel better doing another 5 miles, do it! If not, don't.
BTW, with the length of my rides, if I didn't vary them enough so that the longer ones didn't involve some exploring and/or a good meal, I'd go nuts out of boredom.
As to bikes--with distance, it isn't just how fast you can go. I had a '90s hybrid I could ride pretty fast, but after one of my arms swelled up from bad positioning combined with repetitive bumps after a 153 mile ride, I decided I needed either to ride less or get a better bike. I went with the FX 3 which is a fast, comfy flat bar. The day after I rode the 168 miles on it, I rode another 50 and felt fine. One thing I've learned the hard way is the value of proper fit of a bike grows exponentially with distance. Don't go too big or too small. I also think you can't buy a distance bike sight unseen and expect good results. You really need to try it out to see if the geometry lets you get into positions you can tolerate for hours.
No one can tell you what is good for you--15 miles on a hilly, windy road is good if you're enjoying it and it makes you feel good. If you think you'll feel better doing another 5 miles, do it! If not, don't.
BTW, with the length of my rides, if I didn't vary them enough so that the longer ones didn't involve some exploring and/or a good meal, I'd go nuts out of boredom.
As to bikes--with distance, it isn't just how fast you can go. I had a '90s hybrid I could ride pretty fast, but after one of my arms swelled up from bad positioning combined with repetitive bumps after a 153 mile ride, I decided I needed either to ride less or get a better bike. I went with the FX 3 which is a fast, comfy flat bar. The day after I rode the 168 miles on it, I rode another 50 and felt fine. One thing I've learned the hard way is the value of proper fit of a bike grows exponentially with distance. Don't go too big or too small. I also think you can't buy a distance bike sight unseen and expect good results. You really need to try it out to see if the geometry lets you get into positions you can tolerate for hours.
#19
☢
Personally, I just find it hard to be on a bike for more than about 50 miles. As much as I like cycling, there is a tipping point where I just don't want to sit on a bike anymore.
It's not so much that I'm just physically spent...I just feel too uncomfortable to care anymore.
To me it's a hobby and a way to keep in shape, and to also socialize with other cyclists. But it comes to a point where "doing something else" overrides my desire to sit on the saddle any longer.
But that's me.
It's not so much that I'm just physically spent...I just feel too uncomfortable to care anymore.
To me it's a hobby and a way to keep in shape, and to also socialize with other cyclists. But it comes to a point where "doing something else" overrides my desire to sit on the saddle any longer.
But that's me.
If centuries and all day marathons in the saddles are your goal and what you enjoy doing then by all means do so. But that's not to say that's the goal of every cyclist, nor is it necessary to get in shape. After all, a sprinter is not a marathon runner but doesn't mean they both can't be the best at what they do.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As a fellow runner, though my distances are getting shorter, there is definitely a difference between cycling fitness and running fitness. BTW - I am 52, so not the youngest of this group. Keep pedaling, just like running you are building strength and endurance, just using muscles differently than running. If you want speed, I would recommend finding a road bike. The old ones still work great and there are some great bikes on Craigslist if you are patient, or if you buy new get at least Tiagra level groupset.
#21
Non omnino gravis
Well, I'm as addicted to numbers as I am to riding the bike, so along with the GPS computer is a crank-based power meter, heart rate monitor, and wheel speed sensor. I don't know why I need to know all of these things, but I do. I pore over them. I spend long periods of time trying make sense out of things like this:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,653
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Liked 3,680 Times
in
2,381 Posts
#23
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,147
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,404 Times
in
3,729 Posts
Thanks, I don't want the speed as much as I want the workout. I always wonder if the people who buy extremely expensively equipment are undermining themselves by making it as easy as possible. Going forward, I planning to run less and bike more to reduce the friction on my joints.
#24
☢
No benefits come entirely without some cost. In this case, it would be restricted view and increased neck and back strain.
Not necessarily. But you could add lower center-of-gravity for sure.
All the things that are beneficial when racing because it give us something to measure and compare. The effects of the energy expenditure on the body, however, are indistinguishable -- either way.
lighter bike
All the things that are beneficial when racing because it give us something to measure and compare. The effects of the energy expenditure on the body, however, are indistinguishable -- either way.
#25
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,147
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,404 Times
in
3,729 Posts
All the things that are beneficial when racing because it give us something to measure and compare. The effects of the energy expenditure on the body, however, are indistinguishable -- either way.