Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Solo riding - does it build strength/speed?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Solo riding - does it build strength/speed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-18, 07:58 AM
  #76  
SeanBikes
Cyclist
 
SeanBikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 113

Bikes: 1987 Nishiki Altron 7000 (Road), 1983 Norco Monterey (Fixed-gear), 2005 Kona Blast (MTB), 2008 Lemond Poprad (CX)

Liked 18 Times in 11 Posts




SeanBikes is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 08:24 AM
  #77  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,535
Liked 461 Times in 272 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
No it does and strength can be measured but its difficult to measure because the muscles necessary to propel a bicycle are multi-variant and interactive. A strength test to propelling a bicycle the fastest can not be measure by a leg press or how many push ups or how much weight you can curl or bench press. It is overall body strength required to rotating the pedals on the bike. And yes, guys like you will equate Power purely to aerobic fitness and that would be wrong. It is the interaction of body strength and cardio capability that determines Power, not either or. That is why there is no substitute to the training on a bicycle to make a rider faster. No gym exercise can emulate this muscle stress. Your position on the subject in fact denies the very existence of the musculature of the human body...lol.
This is why we need precise, common definitions for our terms like strength, power, fatigue, etc.
asgelle is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 08:40 AM
  #78  
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
But they're not as significant as what actually strong people can do elsewhere.
Agreed. Strong is relative. You are strong compared to the average cyclist.

I'm nothing like Griepel, obviously. I've used an SRM, G3, P2max, and C1 powermeters, and have spent a considerable amount of time looking at that data. My peak power does not come anywhere near 100 rpm[/QUOTE]That's not what I said. What I meant was if you're capable of 1400+W for a reasonable amount of time (at least 5 Secs) you likely still have decent (1200?) power at 100rpm.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 08:45 AM
  #79  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
Agreed. Strong is relative. You are strong compared to the average cyclist.

That's not what I said. What I meant was if you're capable of 1400+W for a reasonable amount of time (at least 5 Secs) you likely still have decent (1200?) power at 100rpm.
Well, yeah. I'm a cat 1. That stands to reason I'm quite a bit faster than the average cyclist. But that "strength" isn't a whole lot of strength as the word is generally used by the current population. Not many people would look at me and say "that guy's strong". In fact, I imagine most would assert the opposite. And that can be taken even further when you're talking about people actually talented at riding bikes. They can look near anorexic in comparison and certainly aren't "strong". They just produce inordinate amounts of power for their weights for extended durations.

I'm not capable of 1400 watts for 5 seconds. I don't know why you're trying to stretch this out to meet some fairly arbitrary mark, or why you need to argue about my power data based off of you reading something completely unrelated about a world tour sprinter.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 08:52 AM
  #80  
downhillmaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,684
Liked 779 Times in 403 Posts
Originally Posted by NoWhammies
I've been reading a lot of posts lately about how riding with riders who are faster than you is a good way to build strength and speed. I don't disagree with this statement.

What I'm curious about, is it possible to build strength/speed doing solo rides? And can you build the strength/speed to the same extent one would by doing group rides with faster riders? Finally if so, how?

All of my riding this past summer was solo and I managed to increase my average speed from the start of the summer until the end. Mind you that could have been just my fitness going from crappy winter fitness to healthy summer fitness. And I feel I could definitely have increased my speed/strength more had I known how to train properly. Cheers.
Nope.
Numerous scientific studies have proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that riding solo at any speed, under any circumstances, does the exact opposite.
They even recommend driving to your group rides instead of pedaling there as even that small amount of solo riding will negate the rest of the group ride.
downhillmaster is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 08:59 AM
  #81  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
No. Power is the combination of body strength and aerobic capability. Yes, it could be argued that aerobic capability matters more. But strength matters and performing intervals on the bike like you did to gain sprinting speed increases your sprinting (no gym time) by increasing your body strength and aerobic capability.
Your inability to hold a fairly paltry wattage is not because you lack the body strength to do so and absolutely because you lack the aerobic capability to do so.

I can go out on a ride and hit 500 watts about a million times, but I can't hold 500 watts for more than 3 minutes at a time. And I can't hold 400 watts for more than 10 minutes. I have plenty of strength to hit those numbers, but I can't sustain those numbers. But I know/know of dudes 15-20 lbs lighter than me can hold those numbers, despite me being "stronger" than them in any other sense you'd like to define it.

So no, it's not even an argument. It's just the fact of the matter.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:16 AM
  #82  
Zaskar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 800
Liked 301 Times in 162 Posts
And to reiterate O.P.... Yes, you can get faster training solo. ;-)
Zaskar is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:20 AM
  #83  
colnago62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
Road sprinting and track sprinting are not the same thing. Cavendish and Viviani are sprinters on the road. On the track they are considered Enduros. An Elite track sprinter will produce in the range of 2,200 or more Watts. I was told Chris Hoy would hit 2,600 Watts. For track sprinting at an Elite level, you have to be massively strong. To compare track and road sprinting is apples and oranges.

Just to add some levity


colnago62 is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:40 AM
  #84  
Campag4life
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle

This is why we need precise, common definitions for our terms like strength, power, fatigue, etc.
It isn't complicated if you have a physics background. I gave the definition. You dismiss it because it doesn't fit your narrative that strength doesn't matter. It does.
In fact, I could easily tweak the algorithm of any power meter on a bike to provide real time pedal 'force' instead of wattage...a simple equation based upon cadence. Why could I do this? Because Power is a function of strength. Not solely strength, but part of the equation.

Power = Torque X RPM
Torque = F X D
Power = F X D X RPM

Power is a function of pedal force which is function of strength. A 12 y.o. girl even world class can not impart the pedal force of competitive track sprinter. The girl is weaker. The girl isn't as strong. Say it any way you like, physics don't lie. Strength matters when it comes to propelling a bike. Not overarching even. Contador may not be the strongest guy in a room of men. Yes, he has superior aerobic fitness. But he has very strong 'cycling specific' muscles. Even before cardio comes into play he can create more watts on the bike than just about any weight lifters in the gym 'his body weight'. He is stronger relative to the muscles used to propel a bicycle.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:45 AM
  #85  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,535
Liked 461 Times in 272 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
Power is a function of pedal force which is function of strength.
Submaximal force has nothing to do with strength.
asgelle is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:49 AM
  #86  
Campag4life
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
Your inability to hold a fairly paltry wattage is not because you lack the body strength to do so and absolutely because you lack the aerobic capability to do so.

I can go out on a ride and hit 500 watts about a million times, but I can't hold 500 watts for more than 3 minutes at a time. And I can't hold 400 watts for more than 10 minutes. I have plenty of strength to hit those numbers, but I can't sustain those numbers. But I know/know of dudes 15-20 lbs lighter than me can hold those numbers, despite me being "stronger" than them in any other sense you'd like to define it.

So no, it's not even an argument. It's just the fact of the matter.
lol...you and asguelle must be brothers. You create a narrative to conflate aerobic performance with strength.

Let's talk strength. Let's compare you to Marcel Kittel. Let's stand you up next to Marcel Kittel and have a group of one hundred cyclists pick who 'looks strongest'. I bet it will 100 to 0 in favor of Marcel. Kittel isn't just a little stronger than you, he is a lot stronger. Of course he has superior cardio as well but his strength makes him a lot stronger than you in any sprint. In fact, he could likely beat you on a mountain bike with platform pedals on any sprint he is that much 'stronger'.

Great denial tho...lol.

Campag4life is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:53 AM
  #87  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,535
Liked 461 Times in 272 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
Because Power is a function of strength. Not solely strength, but part of the equation.

Power = Torque X RPM
Torque = F X D
Power = F X D X RPM
Nowhere in your equations does strength appear. How then can power be a function of strength?
asgelle is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:54 AM
  #88  
memebag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,597

Bikes: 2017 Cannondale CAAD12 105, 2014 Giant Escape City

Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle

Submaximal force has nothing to do with strength.
Except in the English language, where strength is a quantity of force. That's why we named the nuclear forces "strong" and "weak".
memebag is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:55 AM
  #89  
Campag4life
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle

Submaximal force has nothing to do with strength.
either does myofascial release or price of tea in China. You must believe men can beat women on the bike because they have superior aerobic fitness...or in the pool.
And again, you would be wrong.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:55 AM
  #90  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,535
Liked 461 Times in 272 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
lol...you and asguelle must be brothers. You create a narrative to conflate aerobic performance with strength.
I think you’re confused. I’m saying aerobic performance is independent of strength.
asgelle is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:57 AM
  #91  
Campag4life
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle

Nowhere in your equations does strength appear. How then can power be a function of strength?
Force imparted equals strength.
Let me ask you again, do you believe pro cyclist men or woman are faster? Pick one and explain why the difference.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:57 AM
  #92  
NoWhammies
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
NoWhammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,992

Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70

Liked 512 Times in 306 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
As to the OP's original point, you can definitely get fast riding by yourself if you push hard enough.

Following a well thought out plan of structured intervals can actually make you faster than just doing all group rides. Using a power meter for feedback and motivation helps a lot in this regard.

Most group rides you can sit in the draft and not work at a level , or a duration you need to improve.

IMHO, the best program is a mixture of structured individual efforts, and a couple of group rides, or races each week.
I think this is what I need to focus on next summer. Get a good training plan and mix in some solo rides with some group rides. This summer I exclusively rode solo. Any improvements I made were based just on my ability to get out on the bike on a regular basis.

Next year though with the right plan and the use of powermeter I will hopefully notice even better gains.

Originally Posted by wphamilton
I don't think that track starts (or pure leg strength) are what OP is asking about though.
Originally Posted by redlude97
i thought we had already settled that the OP was mistaken to refer to gains on the bike as "strength" which is why I put it in quotes. At some point the discussion diverted to whether weightlifting was helpful for endurance athletes. The science says yes
My apologies for using the term 'strength' that seems to have started a good discussion on the thread. What I was trying to ask about is getting faster, for an extended period of time, on the bike. When talking with some friends I'll say "wow, he's strong on the bike" meaning he can ride a long distance at a fast speed/pace. So when I posted my question here, that's what I meant/was getting at. Cheers.
NoWhammies is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:57 AM
  #93  
canyoneagle
Senior Member
 
canyoneagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,599

Bikes: Vassago Moosknuckle Ti 29+ XTR, 90's Merckx Corsa-01 9sp Record, PROJECT: 1954 Frejus SuperCorsa

Liked 157 Times in 75 Posts
Wow, talk about minutia derailing the central question.........
The rabbithole side discussion is fascinating and engaging, but I think misses the point. Perhaps better served in the 33.

Anywhoo, I have found that my solo riding has always provided me with the most consistent gains in cycling capacity, but specific group situations have contributed to stepping up my solo riding.

Specifically, interval training 1-2 days per week. In my team's case the interval was 15 minutes on (75-90% max HR), 4 minutes off x 4. This was a long time ago (late 90's) when heart rate training was the thing (before power meters), but same idea. This combined with consistent solo riding contributed in a significant increase in my solo average speed on my typical 25-40 mile rides (from 19-20 mph to 22-23 mph). I was in my 30's at the time.
I also found that there was (is) a beneficial balance to strike between the data and your own personal situation. Some days you'll feel better than others, and I feel it is important to listen to that, and to "be OK" with an easy spin day with no STRAVA achievements. Easier said than done, of course

Other group rides or "race pace" team outings (or races) have helped with group-specific skills and testing of individual progress with others in a competitive setting.

I'm in the same boat at the moment, after having a 5 year hiatus from cycling. Gettin' back on the saddle.
Get out and ride -
canyoneagle is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:58 AM
  #94  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,535
Liked 461 Times in 272 Posts
Originally Posted by memebag
Except in the English language, where strength is a quantity of force.
Unbelievable.
asgelle is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 09:59 AM
  #95  
Campag4life
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle

I think you’re confused. I’m saying aerobic performance is independent of strength.
No you have dominion on the confused front. A start. Yes, aerobic performance 'can be decoupled' from strength. But is it completely?
Does a heart have a muscle? What happens when a heart muscle weakens? What happens to aerobic performance with a weak heart muscle?
You know, muscles are strong or weak or in between. Can a stronger heart muscle pump more blood with the same heart stroke volume?
Campag4life is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 10:00 AM
  #96  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,535
Liked 461 Times in 272 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
Let me ask you again, do you believe pro cyclist men or woman are faster? Pick one and explain why the difference.
Over what distance? Think carefully before answering.
asgelle is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 10:04 AM
  #97  
Campag4life
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by asgelle

Over what distance? Think carefully before answering.
Fastest pro sprinters, man versus woman? Which is 'stronger'. Heck let's take that to the track and on foot. 100 meter dash. Man versus Woman. Do their bodies look different? Which has greater muscle mass? Muscles don't matter? Can't make this up.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 10:06 AM
  #98  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,535
Liked 461 Times in 272 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
Fastest pro sprinters, man versus woman? Which is 'stronger'. Heck let's take that to the track and on foot. 100 meter dash. Man versus Woman. Do their bodies look different? Which has greater muscle mass? Muscle don't matter? Can't make this up.
Can you read the sub-forum title?
asgelle is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 10:06 AM
  #99  
rubiksoval
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
It isn't complicated if you have a physics background. I gave the definition. You dismiss it because it doesn't fit your narrative that strength doesn't matter. It does.
In fact, I could easily tweak the algorithm of any power meter on a bike to provide real time pedal 'force' instead of wattage...a simple equation based upon cadence. Why could I do this? Because Power is a function of strength. Not solely strength, but part of the equation.

Power = Torque X RPM
Torque = F X D
Power = F X D X RPM

Power is a function of pedal force which is function of strength. A 12 y.o. girl even world class can not impart the pedal force of competitive track sprinter. The girl is weaker. The girl isn't as strong. Say it any way you like, physics don't lie. Strength matters when it comes to propelling a bike. Not overarching even. Contador may not be the strongest guy in a room of men. Yes, he has superior aerobic fitness. But he has very strong 'cycling specific' muscles. Even before cardio comes into play he can create more watts on the bike than just about any weight lifters in the gym 'his body weight'. He is stronger relative to the muscles used to propel a bicycle.
Look at what you're resorting to to try to make your argument. You go from the extreme of world class track sprinters to a 12 year old girl. It's comical!

How many watts do you think Contador can put out? Seriously. How many do you think he can put out, and how many do you think your typical gym rat can put out after he's had a few attempts at clipping in and learning how to sprint?

Is this you just making up random stuff again?

I mean, I know you have a penchant for absurd assertions (pacelines without computers springs to mind), but now you really seem to be reaching.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 09-14-18, 10:11 AM
  #100  
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
Well, yeah. I'm a cat 1. That stands to reason I'm quite a bit faster than the average cyclist. But that "strength" isn't a whole lot of strength as the word is generally used by the current population. Not many people would look at me and say "that guy's strong". In fact, I imagine most would assert the opposite. And that can be taken even further when you're talking about people actually talented at riding bikes. They can look near anorexic in comparison and certainly aren't "strong". They just produce inordinate amounts of power for their weights for extended durations.

I'm not capable of 1400 watts for 5 seconds. I don't know why you're trying to stretch this out to meet some fairly arbitrary mark, or why you need to argue about my power data based off of you reading something completely unrelated about a world tour sprinter.
When I saw 1400+W I thought of a sprinter (which I know you've said you are not). Sprinters are generally strong. Now that I look at my own CP curve I see a peak of 1200W and 1090 for 5S and my peaks didn't occur at 120rpm. I'm a long way from 'strong'. Apologies for derailing this thread.
gregf83 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.