⛍ Dooring
#51
Senior Member
What possible hazard could there be from "following cars" when located in the middle of the car lane? Is that something that only can occur after a dooring?
Isn't the middle of the car lane being touted on this list and elsewhere by a certain breed of enthusiasts as allegedly the safest place to be and always a preferable alternative to riding in a door zone?
Isn't the middle of the car lane being touted on this list and elsewhere by a certain breed of enthusiasts as allegedly the safest place to be and always a preferable alternative to riding in a door zone?
Of course you always have to ride according to conditions and nothing is absolute. But in general, the lane is a safer place to ride than the door zone. Do you really believe otherwise?
#52
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,118
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,649 Times
in
1,110 Posts
Do you really "take the lane" and sit still when stuck in stalled rush hour traffic no matter how long it takes to inch forward rather than carefully filter forward to the right even if it is a door zone?
Do you really take the lane for any significant distance rather than an available door zone when all the traffic in every parallel lane is traveling at least 35+MPH in dense formations ? Do feel safer that way?
#53
#54
Senior Member
In my small city on the side of town where I commute, I'm fortunate not to have to deal with that. But in any case that's a question of what is most expedient. I've certainly done that in other places at other points in my life. That I might well well filter forward in the door zone under some conditions doesn't mean that's the safest thing to do. I would never suggest I always take the safest option in any facet of life. That would be an untenably restrictive regimen.
#55
Senior Member
What possible hazard could there be from "following cars" when located in the middle of the car lane? Is that something that only can occur after a dooring?
Isn't the middle of the car lane being touted on this list and elsewhere by a certain breed of enthusiasts as allegedly the safest place to be and always a preferable alternative to riding in a door zone?
Isn't the middle of the car lane being touted on this list and elsewhere by a certain breed of enthusiasts as allegedly the safest place to be and always a preferable alternative to riding in a door zone?
#57
Senior Member
#58
Senior Member
You might consider that if you are doored, you WILL be tossed into the middle of the car lane. Not maybe. I was both times, Every dooring I have ever seen likewise. I often ride further into the street with cars close behind just for that reason. ANd yes, doorings are rarely fatal. But the strike from the following car could well be.
Ben
Ben
What possible hazard could there be from "following cars" when located in the middle of the car lane?Is that something that only can occur after a dooring?
Isn't the middle of the car lane being touted on this list and elsewhere by a certain breed of enthusiasts as allegedly the safest place to be and always a preferable alternative to riding in a door zone?
Isn't the middle of the car lane being touted on this list and elsewhere by a certain breed of enthusiasts as allegedly the safest place to be and always a preferable alternative to riding in a door zone?
If you're thrown in the middle of a car lane because you got doored, like at 3m40s, could very well be fatal.
Noting a Kavanaugh-like “answer.” The question was if you are in the middle of the lane what could go wrong?
-mr. bill
-mr. bill
PS. I know who Kavanaugh is but what is a "Kavanaugh-like" answer?
#59
Senior Member
I think the feature that sets American road culture apart from every other First World traffic environment is its variability. The result of American's doing everything their own way results in the absolutely piss-poor metrics we have for overall cyclist safety. When it comes to urban congestion, large cities in The Netherlands are much more like NYC than like Sioux City, IA. But Dutch drivers are FAR more uniform in their response to the sight of a cyclist nearby than in the U.S. If five drivers pull away from you as they pass, but the sixth does not, and you are clipped by the ultra-wide wing mirror he added to admire the deluxe 5th Wheel being pulled behind the F350 ... ... game over. As I understand it, the onus of dooring prevention is on the person exiting the vehicle. As cyclists we tend to think only about ourselves. In reality a person who exits a vehicle without checking properly to make sure it is safe could be hit and killed by a CAR.
How many fatal or even near fatal doorings occur in a year? Not enough to have a thread about. Seriously. I've been alongside or near a car and heard the 'click' of the door latch and even seen the door pop open a few inches. Except for the one time the door literally exploded open in my face because it had been kicked open, most doors open relatively slowly. You have scant seconds to react and even if there is a crash it is rarely fatal. The "door zone" is just so much hyperbole and hysterical overreaction. Why it matters. Because "door zone" avoiders encroach on the traffic lane and this has more lasting impact on their survival metrics than the "door zone" does. The lowest urban speed limit I know of is 20mph and this is not sustainable by the average cyclist for more than a brief sprint. Get out in the real world and you see cyclists in the door zone. In A&S and the Commuting Forum you see the outspoken "door zone" avoiders who never get around to saying exactly where they ride instead but vehemently state how assiduously they avoid the deadly "door zone" I call BS. I think the reality is much more nuanced.
How many fatal or even near fatal doorings occur in a year? Not enough to have a thread about. Seriously. I've been alongside or near a car and heard the 'click' of the door latch and even seen the door pop open a few inches. Except for the one time the door literally exploded open in my face because it had been kicked open, most doors open relatively slowly. You have scant seconds to react and even if there is a crash it is rarely fatal. The "door zone" is just so much hyperbole and hysterical overreaction. Why it matters. Because "door zone" avoiders encroach on the traffic lane and this has more lasting impact on their survival metrics than the "door zone" does. The lowest urban speed limit I know of is 20mph and this is not sustainable by the average cyclist for more than a brief sprint. Get out in the real world and you see cyclists in the door zone. In A&S and the Commuting Forum you see the outspoken "door zone" avoiders who never get around to saying exactly where they ride instead but vehemently state how assiduously they avoid the deadly "door zone" I call BS. I think the reality is much more nuanced.
#60
Senior Member
#62
Cycleway town
Never, ever ride in a door zone.
I have seen a clip of a cyclist who was cycling along merrily, and was dead just two seconds later. Two!
He was passing a parked car, as a truck was passing him. The car door swung open straight into him, and pushed him in front of the truck's rear wheels.
Happy to dead in two seconds.
Always take a lane past a parked vehicle, if you absolutely have to use the road.
I have seen a clip of a cyclist who was cycling along merrily, and was dead just two seconds later. Two!
He was passing a parked car, as a truck was passing him. The car door swung open straight into him, and pushed him in front of the truck's rear wheels.
Happy to dead in two seconds.
Always take a lane past a parked vehicle, if you absolutely have to use the road.
#63
Senior Member
Never, ever ride in a door zone.
I have seen a clip of a cyclist who was cycling along merrily, and was dead just two seconds later. Two!
He was passing a parked car, as a truck was passing him. The car door swung open straight into him, and pushed him in front of the truck's rear wheels.
Happy to dead in two seconds.
Always take a lane past a parked vehicle, if you absolutely have to use the road.
I have seen a clip of a cyclist who was cycling along merrily, and was dead just two seconds later. Two!
He was passing a parked car, as a truck was passing him. The car door swung open straight into him, and pushed him in front of the truck's rear wheels.
Happy to dead in two seconds.
Always take a lane past a parked vehicle, if you absolutely have to use the road.
#64
Life Feeds On Life
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 2,151
Bikes: Too many Motobecanes
Liked 4,776 Times
in
3,192 Posts
The rider kind of asked for it and he received it I ride bikes obviously but I don’t expect special treatment just common courtesy thats all.
#65
Cycleway town
I don't know. Parked vehicles usually line up. Taking the lane past 'a parked vehicle' is not realistic. So our happy cyclist would have had that truck on his six at 20mph (32kph) for at least a city block. If it's all the same to you I'll ride in the safe (to me) pocket between the line of parked cars and the line of motor traffic next to it. Your alarmism doesn't impress me. I've been doing it my way safely for way too many decades to be convinced otherwise.
#66
The Dutch reach is a decent solution, but teaching it isn't everything. Ultimately, we would depend on people voluntarily following this method, and we all know how stupid humans can be. A low-tech way to mistake proof this is to design doors such that two latches must be pulled to open them. To open the front driver or passenger door the occupant would have to hold open a latch on the car's B-pillar and then open the door latch with the other arm. This would force them to twist their body whether they want to or not. The rear doors would be opened by first holding open a latch on the C-pillar followed by the door latch, and it would double as a secondary childproofing measure.
#67
Senior Member
Parked vehicles usually line up. Taking the lane past 'a parked vehicle' is not realistic. So our happy cyclist would have had that truck on his six at 20mph (32kph) for at least a city block. If it's all the same to you I'll ride in the safe (to me) pocket between the line of parked cars and the line of motor traffic next to it.
#68
Senior Member
It would. However, it is amazing the number of drivers that didn't get the memo, and if one of the mouth breathers behind me is doing stupid things to try and get around me on a sharrow I will usually make it easy for them and move over right.
#69
Senior Member
The Dutch reach is a decent solution, but teaching it isn't everything. Ultimately, we would depend on people voluntarily following this method, and we all know how stupid humans can be. A low-tech way to mistake proof this is to design doors such that two latches must be pulled to open them. To open the front driver or passenger door the occupant would have to hold open a latch on the car's B-pillar and then open the door latch with the other arm. This would force them to twist their body whether they want to or not. The rear doors would be opened by first holding open a latch on the C-pillar followed by the door latch, and it would double as a secondary childproofing measure.
#70
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,910
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Liked 1,746 Times
in
864 Posts
In another thread on filtering to the front, I said that one of the reasons I wouldn't filter is the possibility of getting doored. One poster suggested I was overstating the danger. IIRC he gloated over never having seen a door opened curbside in all his many miles and years of riding.
#71
Back in post #30 claims were made about the relative braking ability of cars versus bicycles. I checked my usual reference for such things, Bicycling Science by David Gordon Wilson. DGW is an extraordinary cyclist and emeritus professor of engineering, MIT and others. The text of the first edition is available online for free. Please refer to Chapter 8, 'Braking'. Stopping distance for a bicycle at normal speeds is excellent. Bikes do belong on public roads. Bicycles are competent to operate on public roads. If you erroneously believe your bike is some kind of second or third class road user maybe just stay off the road. And don't tell me how to ride.
#72
Senior Member
Back in post #30 claims were made about the relative braking ability of cars versus bicycles. I checked my usual reference for such things, Bicycling Science by David Gordon Wilson. DGW is an extraordinary cyclist and emeritus professor of engineering, MIT and others. The text of the first edition is available online for free. Please refer to Chapter 8, 'Braking'. Stopping distance for a bicycle at normal speeds is excellent. Bikes do belong on public roads. Bicycles are competent to operate on public roads. If you erroneously believe your bike is some kind of second or third class road user maybe just stay off the road. And don't tell me how to ride.
Last edited by Leisesturm; 11-01-18 at 04:42 PM.
#73
I cite the pre-eminent reference work in the field and it is just not good enough for this forum. Because red herrings and non sequiturs. All your questions are readily answered online for free. If you want the newest edition you can pay MIT Press. Bicycling Science is about bicycles, it is not about exemplars or racing or the spandex set.
If you think or suggest that bicycles are inherently unsafe, do not stop well, you could reasonably anticipate some pushback. And if you just take it as an article of faith that bicycles have excessively long stopping distances or need perfect operators to get good performance you should be behind the wheel of a car.
If you think or suggest that bicycles are inherently unsafe, do not stop well, you could reasonably anticipate some pushback. And if you just take it as an article of faith that bicycles have excessively long stopping distances or need perfect operators to get good performance you should be behind the wheel of a car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skankingbiker
Advocacy & Safety
55
02-05-17 10:21 PM
1nterceptor
Advocacy & Safety
87
03-17-13 02:15 AM
dgrenthum
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
10
03-20-11 07:13 AM