Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Trek 5900 USPS - Factory vs Pro Frame Color?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Trek 5900 USPS - Factory vs Pro Frame Color?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-19, 03:01 PM
  #1  
rr99
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 75
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Trek 5900 USPS - Factory vs Pro Frame Color?




Hi Guys,

I have a major dilemma concerning the color of the Trek 5900 OCLV 110 USPS edition, ridden by LA on TdF 2000.

Back than, Trek used to produce exactly the same (factory) bikes for both pro and amateur riders. In other words, you can get to ride the same bike as pro riders. However, the color of the Trek 5900 varies a lot from bike to bike, and its slightly different from the one used by LA and the one that I found online.

As you can notice, the color of LA bike is extremely grey and it looks like its not the same as the one below which is for mass production. Am I crazy or these two bikes have different color?

Thank you!
rr99 is offline  
Old 05-27-19, 05:52 PM
  #2  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,733
Liked 16,179 Times in 7,598 Posts
Originally Posted by rr99
Am I crazy or these two bikes have different color?
Yes.
indyfabz is offline  
Likes For indyfabz:
Old 05-27-19, 09:14 PM
  #3  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Liked 2,807 Times in 1,803 Posts
May just be color correction problems. Web browsers vary in color management, so some colors can appear different between different browsers, computers or handheld devices, even between different viewers.

Open two or more browsers and compare the photos. Chrome, Firefox, whatever Windows calls its latest browser that nobody uses, Safari, etc., will all differ somewhat in color management. Ditto if the device isn't color managed, although it's generally best to use the default sRGB. Handheld devices vary all over the place in color rendering.

My early 1990s Trek 5900 is very definitely purple. Trek called it "Abyss". But in some photos it appears blue.

My smartphone JPEGs render the purpose reasonably accurately in most lighting. But my Nikon JPEGs and default raw files render it blue. I need to make color corrections in Lightroom to get the correct purple without shifting all other colors until they're inaccurate.

And when my Android phone and laptop shift to night mode, which cuts blue, color management goes to h311.

But this isn't really new. In ye olden dayes of film, many color negative and slide films had trouble accurately rendering blues, violets, purples, etc.

Below: Same bike, different days, different cameras, times of day, white balance, etc. Bottom photo is closest to the bike's true purple color.




Last edited by canklecat; 05-27-19 at 09:37 PM. Reason: add photos
canklecat is offline  
Old 06-15-24, 11:16 AM
  #4  
Mark Swofford
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trek 5900 team vs retail

Actually no. The lower OP photo appears to be similar to the team issue bicycle, lacking the number plate hangar on the top tube. The upper photo is similar to my 2000/2001 Trek 5900 with its Roval wheels and different stem, handlebar, tires, sear post etc. The frame color of both bikes is likely to be what mine has, which is a clear coat with sparse silver metal flakes and both bikes have really cheesy thick vinyl USPS Trek decals and Shimano on the right chain stay and Volkswagen on the left. Team issue bikes also have other cosmetic differences. The 5900 has OCLV 110 and are suppose to be climbing versions vs the 5500 with OCLV 120, or so I have read.
Mark Swofford is offline  
Old 06-16-24, 08:58 AM
  #5  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,413

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Liked 5,020 Times in 3,454 Posts
What's the major dilemma? You either like the bike you can obtain, or you don't. A bike that looks like a bike they rode in the pro grand tours still isn't a bike that was ridden in the pro grand tours. No matter how well everything matches.
Iride01 is offline  
Likes For Iride01:
Old 06-16-24, 04:45 PM
  #6  
shelbyfv
Expired Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 12,001
Liked 5,924 Times in 2,987 Posts
Seems as if every other rider had one of those BITD. Can't remember that last time I saw one on the road. Evocative of a time for sure.
shelbyfv is online now  
Old 06-16-24, 05:03 PM
  #7  
TiHabanero
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,516
Liked 1,394 Times in 733 Posts
Those models are proof that beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder!
TiHabanero is offline  
Likes For TiHabanero:
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tarsi
Classic & Vintage
1
10-06-17 04:45 PM
Klaista2k
Hybrid Bicycles
21
06-20-17 04:04 AM
sthslvrcnfsn
Classic & Vintage
17
07-03-16 10:15 AM
drasp
Classic & Vintage
15
03-02-16 12:56 AM
joaocampos
Touring
0
06-02-11 08:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.