Beginner bike, which is best?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Beginner bike, which is best?
Greetings
I have been looking at road bikes for 3 years now and have decided to throw myself in the deep end. Which of these two bikes are better assuming that they are exactly the same price. Will a cheaper bike do? I have been cycling about 50km om my normal bike in all kinds of weather and expect to do the same on a road bike, hopefully more.
I cannot link a url so the bikes are
1. Liv avail advanced 2 (2019)
2. Rose pro SL disc lady (it has a red frame and a white seat and Shimano 105 gears)
Thanking you in advance
I have been looking at road bikes for 3 years now and have decided to throw myself in the deep end. Which of these two bikes are better assuming that they are exactly the same price. Will a cheaper bike do? I have been cycling about 50km om my normal bike in all kinds of weather and expect to do the same on a road bike, hopefully more.
I cannot link a url so the bikes are
1. Liv avail advanced 2 (2019)
2. Rose pro SL disc lady (it has a red frame and a white seat and Shimano 105 gears)
Thanking you in advance
#2
Globo Gym lifetime member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 5,204
Bikes: Fast ones
Liked 614 Times
in
306 Posts
The Liv would have better after-purchase support if you ever needed it. From the little blurb I read about the Rose, they tend to ride a bit more harshly than other bikes.
Giant (Liv) makes fantastic bikes, and you'd be hard pressed to find a better value.
Giant (Liv) makes fantastic bikes, and you'd be hard pressed to find a better value.
__________________
Likes For Cypress:
#3
Both are fine bikes, but both only come in t-shirt sizes that may or may not fit you. The mens version of the rose bike come i all sizes with much less increment. Im sure Giant (Liv) has better selection too.
Im sure you could get away with a much less expensive bike. I do :-)
Im sure you could get away with a much less expensive bike. I do :-)
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,728
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,710 Times
in
1,954 Posts
#5
You still need to refine your preferences. In my opinion, don't go cheap based on "beginner" argument. If you do, then, 1-2 years later, you might need to spend again on a new and more expensive bike.
Go direct to carbon fiber and Ultegra (or sram Force) level. You can discount disk brakes if you need: rim brakes are cheaper and still work ok at that level, just a little more difficult on long descents, but still very manageable (professionals used them tens of years, so, for amateurs is piece of cake).
You can set your budget and search for the above level.
I don't advise on a specific brand, but just in case that Rose would better fit the bill, you can try them, I ride one of their carbon model and they have reasonable service.
Go direct to carbon fiber and Ultegra (or sram Force) level. You can discount disk brakes if you need: rim brakes are cheaper and still work ok at that level, just a little more difficult on long descents, but still very manageable (professionals used them tens of years, so, for amateurs is piece of cake).
You can set your budget and search for the above level.
I don't advise on a specific brand, but just in case that Rose would better fit the bill, you can try them, I ride one of their carbon model and they have reasonable service.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You still need to refine your preferences. In my opinion, don't go cheap based on "beginner" argument. If you do, then, 1-2 years later, you might need to spend again on a new and more expensive bike.
Go direct to carbon fiber and Ultegra (or sram Force) level. You can discount disk brakes if you need: rim brakes are cheaper and still work ok at that level, just a little more difficult on long descents, but still very manageable (professionals used them tens of years, so, for amateurs is piece of cake).
You can set your budget and search for the above level.
I don't advise on a specific brand, but just in case that Rose would better fit the bill, you can try them, I ride one of their carbon model and they have reasonable service.
Go direct to carbon fiber and Ultegra (or sram Force) level. You can discount disk brakes if you need: rim brakes are cheaper and still work ok at that level, just a little more difficult on long descents, but still very manageable (professionals used them tens of years, so, for amateurs is piece of cake).
You can set your budget and search for the above level.
I don't advise on a specific brand, but just in case that Rose would better fit the bill, you can try them, I ride one of their carbon model and they have reasonable service.
If they are not noticably safer then I maybe I should stick to rim brakes.
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Both are fine bikes, but both only come in t-shirt sizes that may or may not fit you. The mens version of the rose bike come i all sizes with much less increment. Im sure Giant (Liv) has better selection too.
Im sure you could get away with a much less expensive bike. I do :-)
Im sure you could get away with a much less expensive bike. I do :-)
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you so much this is exactly the kind of advice I was looking for. I like the Liv more than I can try it, I cant try the Rose bike.
#9
You should be looking for a bike that fits You and is suited for whatever riding you are going to do. Imo, it really doesnt much if its alloy or carbon, or if it has Tiagra components or Ultegra. Sure Ultegra Is nice, but lesser components work perfectly fine and all of them require some regular maintenance to keep working well. I think its wise to choose hydro discs tho, and that is not widely available in cheaper models. Note that many have the idea that carbon is always lighter. Its not. It can be. Check to make sure if its important to you.
Imo, If you want a compliant riding bike, get one that fits 28 mm or wider tyres and back off on the tyre pressure. No need to spend a lot on a compliant frame to compensate for rock hard tyres.
Imo, If you want a compliant riding bike, get one that fits 28 mm or wider tyres and back off on the tyre pressure. No need to spend a lot on a compliant frame to compensate for rock hard tyres.
Likes For Racing Dan:
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You should be looking for a bike that fits You and is suited for whatever riding you are going to do. Imo, it really doesnt much if its alloy or carbon, or if it has Tiagra components or Ultegra. Sure Ultegra Is nice, but lesser components work perfectly fine and all of them require some regular maintenance to keep working well. I think its wise to choose hydro discs tho, and that is not widely available in cheaper models. Note that many have the idea that carbon is always lighter. Its not. It can be. Check to make sure if its important to you.
Imo, If you want a compliant riding bike, get one that fits 28 mm or wider tyres and back off on the tyre pressure. No need to spend a lot on a compliant frame to compensate for rock hard tyres.
Imo, If you want a compliant riding bike, get one that fits 28 mm or wider tyres and back off on the tyre pressure. No need to spend a lot on a compliant frame to compensate for rock hard tyres.
#12
Thank you for your advice! I have had a few near on accidents at high speeds on my City/hybrid bike with rim brakes in bad weather. I thought that disc breaks were better in wet weather? If that is the case then I would rather pay a little bit more and have a lesser chance of getting in an accident. I also think that professionals know what they are doing more than me
If they are not noticably safer then I maybe I should stick to rim brakes.
If they are not noticably safer then I maybe I should stick to rim brakes.
And one more thing about rim brakes: quality is very important. At Ultegra or Sram Force level (maybe even one level below - 105 or Rival), they are good quality. But I also rode a bike with lower brand (B'Twin) rim brakes and the difference was really big: way too long breaking distance and too high force needed to apply to the lever. That bike was, in fact, for my home trainer.
#13
Technically correct, apart from some 1 kg weight difference. There is no issue if you ride an 1 kg heavier alloy bike with probably 0.2 km/h lower speed on climbs, versus a carbon fiber bike.
But for many riders, the bike they ride on the road is also a little bit of nice toy. If you also have that "nice toy" feeling, then it might be better to pay now a little bit more on carbon fiber, to avoid later regrets. If not, then, indeed, alloy it's ok, because the difference in riding is so small that it's unlikely that somebody can feel it.
But for many riders, the bike they ride on the road is also a little bit of nice toy. If you also have that "nice toy" feeling, then it might be better to pay now a little bit more on carbon fiber, to avoid later regrets. If not, then, indeed, alloy it's ok, because the difference in riding is so small that it's unlikely that somebody can feel it.
#14
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,464
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Liked 2,116 Times
in
1,379 Posts
I think those are both great.
I'm sold on hydraulic disc brakes.
Someone who does 50km rides doesn't need to think of herself as a newbie.
I'm sold on hydraulic disc brakes.
Someone who does 50km rides doesn't need to think of herself as a newbie.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#15
Senior Member
Any bike with geometry you are looking for that fits you well (!!) and has current 105 and disc brakes will be awesome for you. Just be sure it fits.
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The snazzy Giant bike got sold so I found this instead
Liv avail SL 1 disc 2020 (still no url)
I think it is a nice alternative, and cheaper too. How is this in comparison?
Liv avail SL 1 disc 2020 (still no url)
I think it is a nice alternative, and cheaper too. How is this in comparison?
Last edited by Grandthings; 03-29-20 at 02:48 AM.
Likes For guadzilla:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,728
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,710 Times
in
1,954 Posts
https://www.liv-cycling.com/int/avail-sl-1-disc-2020
Looks excellent. As [MENTION=153612]guadzilla[/MENTION] notes, Giants usually offer excellent value, and this model comes with as much as anyone really should ever need (and yes, that is an opinion.)
Thios compares with the Contend men’s model, which I researched quite a bit before buying a different Al-frame, CF-fork disc endurance-frame bike. It was a lcose choice, because the Giant is a great bike.
105 (and this is the latest, 8000 series) has 99 percent of the performance of the more expensive Ultegra group, and is truly a joy to ride. The gear range will take you from 33 mph on the flats to up a ridiculously steep hill, the brakes will stop you immediately with little pressure.
The bike lacks nothing.
IMO.
Looks excellent. As [MENTION=153612]guadzilla[/MENTION] notes, Giants usually offer excellent value, and this model comes with as much as anyone really should ever need (and yes, that is an opinion.)
Thios compares with the Contend men’s model, which I researched quite a bit before buying a different Al-frame, CF-fork disc endurance-frame bike. It was a lcose choice, because the Giant is a great bike.
105 (and this is the latest, 8000 series) has 99 percent of the performance of the more expensive Ultegra group, and is truly a joy to ride. The gear range will take you from 33 mph on the flats to up a ridiculously steep hill, the brakes will stop you immediately with little pressure.
The bike lacks nothing.
IMO.
#20
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,464
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Liked 2,116 Times
in
1,379 Posts
#21
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Southern California
Posts: 161
Bikes: 70's frame, newer parts
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times
in
29 Posts
f you are already rinding 50 km as your normal ride then you really can make use of a mid-range carbon/105 bike. But you likely don't need a women's specific bike. Seat ad handlebars that fit you is important but can be put on any bike.
I agree about rim brakes, my normal ride goes down a 1,000 foot hill and rim brakes work. But I'm a bit of a chicken and watch my downhill speed so I'm not trying to modulate speeds of 40 MPH down to 30 MPH for a corner. If I were riding at those speeds (and anyone can on a long downhill) I'd go disk.
#22
Senior Member
Depends on the particular era and where the iterations are on their cycle. And it hasn't even always been one-way: the 1987 iteration of 105 had some tech that wouldn't be seen on the higher-level groups for another year, notably the SLR braking system.
#23
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Southern California
Posts: 161
Bikes: 70's frame, newer parts
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times
in
29 Posts
Yes, you are correct on both counts. But I was directing the comment to a person who is buying a new bike today. Today the top three teirs are functionally the same as long as you are not planning on electronic shifting.
It would be fun to take bets on what is the next new feature and which groupset it will be introduced into. My bet: A power/cadence sensor that is built into the crank. I doubt they three lins will remain the same forever. But now they almost are.