Asymetric Columbus tubing ID help (not MS)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Asymetric Columbus tubing ID help (not MS)
Gentlemen,
I have this VanTuyl frame with asymetric columbus tubing and it1's not MS due to 27.2 seat post size... The frame is brazed except for the seat tube where is lugged. Except the head tube and seat tube no tube is round:
- top tube is kind of lemon shaped as in it is a flatened oval
- down tube is a like a reversed triangle facing towards the ground
- the chain stays are different from each other , the left one having a straight side facing inwards.
I took some pictures but it' s hard to fotograph. Hope someone could help me out. Thank you
I have this VanTuyl frame with asymetric columbus tubing and it1's not MS due to 27.2 seat post size... The frame is brazed except for the seat tube where is lugged. Except the head tube and seat tube no tube is round:
- top tube is kind of lemon shaped as in it is a flatened oval
- down tube is a like a reversed triangle facing towards the ground
- the chain stays are different from each other , the left one having a straight side facing inwards.
I took some pictures but it' s hard to fotograph. Hope someone could help me out. Thank you
Last edited by estebe; 03-22-23 at 09:59 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,795
Bikes: Numerous
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1679 Post(s)
Liked 3,151 Times
in
925 Posts
I had a Coppi frame once in Columbus Genius that had a rounded corner elongated triangular down tube. I'm pretty sure it was a 27.2 post.
__________________
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,795
Bikes: Numerous
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1679 Post(s)
Liked 3,151 Times
in
925 Posts
Yeah I didn’t think it was quite a match but food for thought. I think the tubing can be/ was formed into different shapes for different builders. My wife has a Tommasini Tecno in Genius with tubes shaped differently than this Coppi.
__________________
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Oh well, fork decals look like SL, right? Might be that frame is custom drawn SL as well...
It's kind of frustrating really because it fits the description of Columbus multi shape tubing almost perfectly with the exception of the seat tube, seat post diameter: (found on the web)
It's kind of frustrating really because it fits the description of Columbus multi shape tubing almost perfectly with the exception of the seat tube, seat post diameter: (found on the web)
Anyway, each of the MS tubes has a different shape. The non-drive side chain stay is triangular shaped and a larger flat-sided oval chainstay was used on the drive-side. The top tube is lemon shaped (not ovalized, it has distinct ridges down the sides of the tubes) with the long axis traversing the head tube. The down tube has tear drop shaped but designed to be mounted upside down (pointed edge facing the ground) relative to normal orientation of a tube this shaped. The seat tube is a long taper from 28.6mm at the BB shell to 26.4mm at the top tube end and designed to take a 25.4mm seat post.
Last edited by estebe; 04-26-19 at 03:49 PM.
#6
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,622
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 1,085 Times
in
805 Posts
Beside that one fork blade decal (and did you check the steerer base for rifling) what evidence that this is all Columbus tubing? If it's something "custom-blended" it could involve other brands as well as models of tubing, within one frame. OP says the seat tube (assuming that's the seat cluster?) is the only "lug" in a lugless frame...can we see a pic of it?
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Beside that one fork blade decal (and did you check the steerer base for rifling) what evidence that this is all Columbus tubing? If it's something "custom-blended" it could involve other brands as well as models of tubing, within one frame. OP says the seat tube (assuming that's the seat cluster?) is the only "lug" in a lugless frame...can we see a pic of it?
#8
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,622
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 1,085 Times
in
805 Posts
I did not know Dosenna also did repaints, but his shop sure was active with a LOT of very distinctive and fancy "factory paint jobs" BITD, if there's 'rifling' in the steerer's base (and it's the 6 low-profile spirals type and not something from Tange or Ishiwata) it means that steerer and presumedly the fork could be SL/SP or onward/upward, including SLX, TSX, etc. The spiraling IN the bases of the main tubes (look into the BB shell) would be SLX, etc., SL and SP will have none there.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I did not know Dosenna also did repaints, but his shop sure was active with a LOT of very distinctive and fancy "factory paint jobs" BITD, if there's 'rifling' in the steerer's base (and it's the 6 low-profile spirals type and not something from Tange or Ishiwata) it means that steerer and presumedly the fork could be SL/SP or onward/upward, including SLX, TSX, etc. The spiraling IN the bases of the main tubes (look into the BB shell) would be SLX, etc., SL and SP will have none there.
Last edited by estebe; 03-22-23 at 10:00 AM.
#10
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,622
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 1,085 Times
in
805 Posts
Hmm, interesting: the paint certainly looks like something Dosenno would do, and the stay cap is remeniscent of Colnago, but I wouldn't take any conclusions from that! Looks like it could be from late 80's so the right era for SLX, but also right for much other tubing too...I have no more theorizing to inflict on you!
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Just to bring this to the top of the list, what does the collective mind think, which is more realistic: custom drawn SL / SLX and that's it OR given that with the exeption of the seat tube fits the description of Multi shape perfectly it' rather a modified MS? Which sounds more reasonable?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 656 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,046 Times
in
1,882 Posts
It's really hard to get an appreciation for the tube shapes without seeing the frame in person. Columbus started offering optional tube sections in the mid-1990s. The dowtube sounds like it could be a Megatube option but installed upside down. There were obround chain stay options that would have provided a flat inside and outside surface. However, the really perplexing shape is the top tube. I can't recall seeing anything lemon shaped with a definite crease along the sides. To this end, I'm tempted to say it's a modified tubeset. Given the oversize tubes and lugless construction, I'd place the oversize versions of Thron and Brain at the top of my list and that's assuming it is Columbus to match the fork decal. I wouldn't rule out a modified Dedacciai or Oria tubeset, as both were popular during the apparent era.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Thank tou very much for answering, it' s kind of frustrating that such a distinctive set of tubes remains unidentified...one tube away from MS...
#16
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,622
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 1,085 Times
in
805 Posts
Just because it jogged a long-lost memory: I bought and built a frame for a friend way back 10 or 15 years ago that also had "shaped" tubes (but was none were grossly oversized) and tho it had no markings (but some strong similarities to the OP's frame) it was sold as a Diamant (maybe Belgian) and supposedly built of Mannesmann tubing. YMMV
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Just because it jogged a long-lost memory: I bought and built a frame for a friend way back 10 or 15 years ago that also had "shaped" tubes (but was none were grossly oversized) and tho it had no markings (but some strong similarities to the OP's frame) it was sold as a Diamant (maybe Belgian) and supposedly built of Mannesmann tubing. YMMV
Thank you for the info. O guesd when i'll come around to repainting it I'll just leave out the tubing d
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Just because it jogged a long-lost memory: I bought and built a frame for a friend way back 10 or 15 years ago that also had "shaped" tubes (but was none were grossly oversized) and tho it had no markings (but some strong similarities to the OP's frame) it was sold as a Diamant (maybe Belgian) and supposedly built of Mannesmann tubing. YMMV
Thank you for the info. O guesd when i'll come around to repainting it I'll just leave out the tubing decals... At leat i know that the fork is columbus (slx probably due to internal rifling)...
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2205 Post(s)
Liked 428 Times
in
340 Posts
Most likely MS with one tube substitution. The stock MS seat tube took an odd sized seat post (25.0?) so substituting a more normal tube makes perfect sense.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
To anyone finding this through google search and for further reference it seems that the tubing is Columbus AIR (non aero seat tube version) with SLX (factory) original forks. I long last managed to find an identical frame on the internets, so mystery solved. ..
Likes For estebe:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 656 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,046 Times
in
1,882 Posts
If it is Columbus Air, it has been further massaged. I don't recall Air having asymmetrical chain stays and it definitely didn't have creases in the top tube. As for SLX, there were no SLX fork blades. The only tubes unique to SLX were the down tube, seat tube and chain stays, which had helical ridges at the BB end. Everything else was from the SL set. That pictured fork decal is 1988+, at which time the blades included in a SLX set would have used a decal with a red border.
Likes For T-Mar: