Speeding ticket while 'just riding along'
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Speeding ticket while 'just riding along'
I can neither confirm, nor deny such alleged activities happened in reality... just asking for a friend: what is the best way to challenge a speeding ticket issued to a cyclist? Let's say a ticket was issued and indicated that the offense was captured with radar. There are two primary problems that I can see:
* po po was not stationary (approaching, then circled back and caught up to alleged rider) and radar tickets can only be issued from stationary vehicle (as far as I am aware); and
* radar is known to be wildly inaccurate when used on cyclists.
So, am I correct in suggesting that "if" a person were to be issued a speeding ticket while on a bicycle that the legal challenge is reasonable given the two points above?
This is a pretend scenario and was just in a dream, but I appreciate any views, advice, wisdom from experience.
Cheers
* po po was not stationary (approaching, then circled back and caught up to alleged rider) and radar tickets can only be issued from stationary vehicle (as far as I am aware); and
* radar is known to be wildly inaccurate when used on cyclists.
So, am I correct in suggesting that "if" a person were to be issued a speeding ticket while on a bicycle that the legal challenge is reasonable given the two points above?
This is a pretend scenario and was just in a dream, but I appreciate any views, advice, wisdom from experience.
Cheers
Likes For probe1957:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Liked 702 Times
in
418 Posts
Your first assumption is false. Radar/lidar has been capable of compensating for being in a moving vehicle for over a decade (more like 2 decades now). For you leadfoots out there, there are a lot of cruisers and even motorcycle with both front and rear facing radar now.
Depending on the technology, it may or may not be very accurate pinging a bicycle.
Usually if it's a speeding ticket, your best defense is that cycles aren't >required< to have a speedometer, so there's no legally obligated reason for you to know how fast you were going, regardless of whether you actually have a cycling computer or not.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV.
Depending on the technology, it may or may not be very accurate pinging a bicycle.
Usually if it's a speeding ticket, your best defense is that cycles aren't >required< to have a speedometer, so there's no legally obligated reason for you to know how fast you were going, regardless of whether you actually have a cycling computer or not.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV.
Likes For Notso_fastLane:
#6
Senior Member
I never show a reading when I pass the radar trailers the sheriff put on the side of the road to show your speed. If you go to court the police might not appear to testify.
#7
Newbie
Thread Starter
Your first assumption is false. Radar/lidar has been capable of compensating for being in a moving vehicle for over a decade (more like 2 decades now). For you leadfoots out there, there are a lot of cruisers and even motorcycle with both front and rear facing radar now.
Depending on the technology, it may or may not be very accurate pinging a bicycle.
Usually if it's a speeding ticket, your best defense is that cycles aren't >required< to have a speedometer, so there's no legally obligated reason for you to know how fast you were going, regardless of whether you actually have a cycling computer or not.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV.
Depending on the technology, it may or may not be very accurate pinging a bicycle.
Usually if it's a speeding ticket, your best defense is that cycles aren't >required< to have a speedometer, so there's no legally obligated reason for you to know how fast you were going, regardless of whether you actually have a cycling computer or not.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV.
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
Cheers
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
How fast was your "friend" riding? What was the speed limit there?
Really?
Really?
(You'd likely need to provide sort of reference for either of these before anybody would consider these claims as "proof" of anything.)
Really?
(You'd likely need to provide sort of reference for either of these before anybody would consider these claims as "proof" of anything.)
Last edited by njkayaker; 06-02-20 at 03:00 PM.
Likes For njkayaker:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
* You might be legally required to have a speedometer in a motor vehicle.
It's two separate offences.
#11
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,963
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Liked 890 Times
in
533 Posts
They pick me up every time. I take pleasure in attempting to see if I can get it to hit the speed limit. The radar reading shown is usually congruent with my cyclometer reading.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
I register with these routinely but there might be a minimum speed for it to show.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,863
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Liked 3,111 Times
in
1,418 Posts
I don’t suppose that you have a gps track for this ride. If so, and if it shows you going slower than the speed limit, you could go to court and enter it as conflicting evidence.
Likes For caloso:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
(Seems pretty certain "his friend" was speeding.)
Likes For njkayaker:
Likes For FiftySix:
#17
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,175
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,413 Times
in
3,736 Posts
The place to argue a ticket is in the court. Arguing with the cop is not the place to argue.
As @Notso_fastLane posted, radar has been compensating for the vehicle speed for a very long time. Much longer than two decades. Even in the 80's highway patrol here was using doppler technology with radar units that allowed them to figure out speed of the other vehicle no matter what direction it was going in relation to the vehicle it was in.
Don't make assumptions on how well radar works based on your interaction with a speed sign. Just like some sailboats are better than other speed boats they don't do much the same other than float.
Are speed limits only for motor vehicles? I don't know for certain, but it likely depends on the state you are in. I'd be proud to go in a pay a speeding ticket for cycling. Unless it was only a 20 mph zone. <grin>
Is radar wildly inaccurate on cyclist? That likely got passed around by those thinking that radar speed signs use the same radar the cops use. At any rate probably depends on the specific unit. Might be the only valid argument your friend could make to the Judge. Knowing what the model radar unit was used will at least let you go to the mfr's site and read some literature and see if there is any statement about such. However unless your state requires speed to be measured by a radar, that may not fly in court either.
As @Notso_fastLane posted, radar has been compensating for the vehicle speed for a very long time. Much longer than two decades. Even in the 80's highway patrol here was using doppler technology with radar units that allowed them to figure out speed of the other vehicle no matter what direction it was going in relation to the vehicle it was in.
Don't make assumptions on how well radar works based on your interaction with a speed sign. Just like some sailboats are better than other speed boats they don't do much the same other than float.
Are speed limits only for motor vehicles? I don't know for certain, but it likely depends on the state you are in. I'd be proud to go in a pay a speeding ticket for cycling. Unless it was only a 20 mph zone. <grin>
Is radar wildly inaccurate on cyclist? That likely got passed around by those thinking that radar speed signs use the same radar the cops use. At any rate probably depends on the specific unit. Might be the only valid argument your friend could make to the Judge. Knowing what the model radar unit was used will at least let you go to the mfr's site and read some literature and see if there is any statement about such. However unless your state requires speed to be measured by a radar, that may not fly in court either.
Last edited by Iride01; 06-02-20 at 03:52 PM.
#18
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,910
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Liked 1,746 Times
in
864 Posts
Are you kidding me? I am framing my first bicycle speeding ticket. If I don't have one by the time I am 70, I am going to make it a mission to get one. I hope I can get the cop to pose with me.
Likes For Paul Barnard:
Likes For Pratt:
#20
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 21,178
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy Viscount Aerospace Pro Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Liked 7,515 Times
in
4,199 Posts
Likes For cb400bill:
#21
Senior Member
Way too little info from the o.p. (deliberately?) for y'all's to be whipping yourselves into such a froth to compose cogent responses. Even urban speed limits are challenging to achieve for a cyclist on level ground. On downslopes it might be possible but for law enforcement to get interested the average cyclist has run out of nerve. There would have to be some clearly displayed recklessness accompanying the speed limit violation to result in a pull-over situation.
Likes For Leisesturm:
#22
Senior Member
Way too little info from the o.p. (deliberately?) for y'all's to be whipping yourselves into such a froth to compose cogent responses. Even urban speed limits are challenging to achieve for a cyclist on level ground. On downslopes it might be possible but for law enforcement to get interested the average cyclist has run out of nerve. There would have to be some clearly displayed recklessness accompanying the speed limit violation to result in a pull-over situation.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,735
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Liked 4,345 Times
in
1,527 Posts
Your first assumption is false. Radar/lidar has been capable of compensating for being in a moving vehicle for over a decade (more like 2 decades now). For you leadfoots out there, there are a lot of cruisers and even motorcycle with both front and rear facing radar now.
Depending on the technology, it may or may not be very accurate pinging a bicycle.
Usually if it's a speeding ticket, your best defense is that cycles aren't >required< to have a speedometer, so there's no legally obligated reason for you to know how fast you were going, regardless of whether you actually have a cycling computer or not.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV.
Depending on the technology, it may or may not be very accurate pinging a bicycle.
Usually if it's a speeding ticket, your best defense is that cycles aren't >required< to have a speedometer, so there's no legally obligated reason for you to know how fast you were going, regardless of whether you actually have a cycling computer or not.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV.
Likes For MattTheHat:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,576
Liked 1,498 Times
in
1,037 Posts
Way too little info from the o.p. (deliberately?) for y'all's to be whipping yourselves into such a froth to compose cogent responses. Even urban speed limits are challenging to achieve for a cyclist on level ground. On downslopes it might be possible but for law enforcement to get interested the average cyclist has run out of nerve. There would have to be some clearly displayed recklessness accompanying the speed limit violation to result in a pull-over situation.
It makes no sense criticize people for doing what you just did.
Yes, it's "deliberate". Obviously.
Last edited by njkayaker; 06-03-20 at 10:42 AM.
Likes For njkayaker:
Likes For motion sickness: