Front wheel vs rear - spoke count
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Front wheel vs rear - spoke count
Hi Guys,
I'm 75kgs, and live in India. Roads I ride on are largely good, but there are the occasional potholes, and a number of 'speed breakers', which I dont slow down much for. Even my carbon 56mm wheels have 24/24.
Just saw that all our wheels have 24/24. Just ordering a new LB carbon wheelset, and the default for the build I want is 20/24. Depth 46mm. I think with deeper rims, the stress on the spokes is less?
I get that the rear carries more of the weight, but doesn't the front take the majority of the assault when you hit a pot hole or the like?
What would you guys suggest?
I'm 75kgs, and live in India. Roads I ride on are largely good, but there are the occasional potholes, and a number of 'speed breakers', which I dont slow down much for. Even my carbon 56mm wheels have 24/24.
Just saw that all our wheels have 24/24. Just ordering a new LB carbon wheelset, and the default for the build I want is 20/24. Depth 46mm. I think with deeper rims, the stress on the spokes is less?
I get that the rear carries more of the weight, but doesn't the front take the majority of the assault when you hit a pot hole or the like?
What would you guys suggest?
#2
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,955
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3822 Post(s)
Liked 5,854 Times
in
2,960 Posts
Fewer spokes=less import duty
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
If the rear is carrying more weight, why would the front take more abuse?
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For deepakvrao:
#6
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,270
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 561 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22771 Post(s)
Liked 9,169 Times
in
4,253 Posts
Likes For datlas:
#7
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Then again, most of my wheels now are 18/24, and they’ve been fine.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2953 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I'm about the same weight and my Williams 58s are 20/24. Rock solid and true as the day I bought them.
#10
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,806 Times
in
1,802 Posts
My weight varies from 66-70 kg and last year I rode 16-spoke wheels all year on some pretty bad roads, no problem. Aluminum rims, not carbon fiber. It's a 10-15 year old set of Bontrager Race Lite Aero wheels that had a so-so reputation but I've had good luck with 'em. Just now needing to replace the rear bearings but the rims and spokes are fine. Haven't even needed to true them.
I was kinda surprised. I really thought wheels needed at least 32 spokes to hold up on our roads. But well designed and built wheels seem pretty tough.
I was kinda surprised. I really thought wheels needed at least 32 spokes to hold up on our roads. But well designed and built wheels seem pretty tough.
Likes For canklecat:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
One reason some ride higher spoke count wheels is if there is a spoke breakage during the ride, the wheel has less deflection. This seems more important for bicycle tourists and riders who get out into rural areas then the average cyclist.
Likes For colnago62:
#12
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
With no scientific evidence to back it up, I'd say the same. Even riding on 37s @ 50psi today, hitting a couple of road imperfections jarred the front wheel quite hard. Was worried I might have broken a spoke, actually (no damage, though).
Likes For guadzilla:
#13
Non omnino gravis
Likes For DrIsotope:
#14
Shop owner
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: suffolk
Posts: 6
Bikes: alot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Lower spoke count works on the front as there is less weight over the front wheel.
For disc brake same drilling front and rear is common because disc brske load the spokes more than rim bakes. Simple maths demonstrates this.
i bet someone now posts i don't think that true- they obviously don't get the physics of wheels.
For disc brake same drilling front and rear is common because disc brske load the spokes more than rim bakes. Simple maths demonstrates this.
i bet someone now posts i don't think that true- they obviously don't get the physics of wheels.
#15
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
Lower spoke count works on the front as there is less weight over the front wheel.
For disc brake same drilling front and rear is common because disc brske load the spokes more than rim bakes. Simple maths demonstrates this.
i bet someone now posts i don't think that true- they obviously don't get the physics of wheels.
For disc brake same drilling front and rear is common because disc brske load the spokes more than rim bakes. Simple maths demonstrates this.
i bet someone now posts i don't think that true- they obviously don't get the physics of wheels.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#19
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
But i could be wrong.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 182
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
10 Posts
I dont know the answer to that. If I had to guess, I would say no - seems to me that braking force is transferred more to the bike fork/stays (where the calipers are mounted) rather than to the spokes (I would expect that the hub body absorbs a lot of the braking stress, as far as the wheel is concerned) - whereas, with a rim brake, the increased friction force on the rim definitely puts more stress on the spokes.
But i could be wrong.
But i could be wrong.
This is old but still applicable.
Likes For November Dave:
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Good thought, but it's kind of opposite to that actually. Think of how your rear hub works when you're pedaling - it transfers "go" from the hub to the rim through the spokes. This is torque. When you stop a disc brake bike, it transfers "stop" from the hub to the rim through the spokes. Also torque. That's why you don't see all radial laced disc wheels, but it works just fine in rim brake front wheels - radial is terrible at transferring torque. In a front rim brake wheel, you don't transfer the "stop" from rim to hub, you just stop the rim and that's that.
This is old but still applicable.
This is old but still applicable.
Yup. Makes sense. Thanks. Nice read.
#22
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
Good thought, but it's kind of opposite to that actually. Think of how your rear hub works when you're pedaling - it transfers "go" from the hub to the rim through the spokes. This is torque. When you stop a disc brake bike, it transfers "stop" from the hub to the rim through the spokes. Also torque. That's why you don't see all radial laced disc wheels, but it works just fine in rim brake front wheels - radial is terrible at transferring torque. In a front rim brake wheel, you don't transfer the "stop" from rim to hub, you just stop the rim and that's that.
This is old but still applicable.
This is old but still applicable.
#23
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
Rim brakes exert radial forces, so add to normal riding load, and radial lacing works well. DBs are effectively hub brakes, so exert torsional forces, but the force is the same since the brakes need to scrub the same amount of energy in both cases. Although DBs can do it quicker, so can exert higher forces, and I suspect this is why a few spokes are added. From my sample of 3 front DB wheels, all three use 2-cross lacing, which makes intuitive sense.
__________________
"This 7:48 cycling session burned 5933 calories. Speed up recovery by replacing them with a healthy snack." - Whoop
"This 7:48 cycling session burned 5933 calories. Speed up recovery by replacing them with a healthy snack." - Whoop
#24
Banned
Not 'road' bikes .
Touring 1, 36_40. & I built my own, 40_48..
Brompton Mk2 20_28 My Bike Friday uses a 24 spoke rim , and a 36 hole hub .. build skips every 3rd hole in hub..
Touring 1, 36_40. & I built my own, 40_48..
Brompton Mk2 20_28 My Bike Friday uses a 24 spoke rim , and a 36 hole hub .. build skips every 3rd hole in hub..