Why We Should STOP Our Obsession With Bike Weight
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,732
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4554 Post(s)
Liked 5,074 Times
in
3,129 Posts
I’m pretty sure e-bikes are not allowed in the timed Sportive events I enter. Anyway, the idea is to use only my own power. I’m certainly not against e-bikes, but they are totally irrelevant to this discussion.
#77
Full Member
Alee Denham's quantitative study of this topic is fascinating to me, and really relevant to the kind of riding I do. This hard data takes a lot of the "weight weenie" out of me. He does make the disclaimer that these studies are about touring, primarily, not racing (where a few seconds can matter a lot).
The part of the study that looks at rolling resistance and aero effects of panniers also surprised me. I had these factors switched with weight before I saw his investigation using a power meter and stopwatch.
The part of the study that looks at rolling resistance and aero effects of panniers also surprised me. I had these factors switched with weight before I saw his investigation using a power meter and stopwatch.
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,732
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4554 Post(s)
Liked 5,074 Times
in
3,129 Posts
You know they can just press a little button on their radio and be off and riding on an identical spare bike in a matter of seconds, right? Pro bike racing seems like one of the few situations where shaving grams at the expense of durability makes sense. They don't need bikes that survive crashing. They have a whole car full of spare bikes, parts and mechanics that follow them around.
As long as you don’t crash at 65 kph and have half a dozen other riders slam into your bike it should be durable enough. The only thing with carbon is that it isn’t very tolerant of being loaded in the wrong direction. So for example stamping on a thin carbon seatstay is likely to break it, while a steel one would probably be okay.
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,839
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 2,199 Times
in
1,337 Posts
I guess you missed the OP’s previous thread about his theory that the lower jockey wheel had worn and caused the chain to catch on the cage and destroy his Shimano derailleur.
He insisted it was due to Shimano’s flawed design. He was quite adamant; complete with sketches depicting the design flaw.
But it all worked out because the OP was able to replace it with a non-Shimano rear derailleur for $2.25.
John
He insisted it was due to Shimano’s flawed design. He was quite adamant; complete with sketches depicting the design flaw.
But it all worked out because the OP was able to replace it with a non-Shimano rear derailleur for $2.25.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 4,128
Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
70 Posts
I would agree with this if it wasn’t for the now pretty conservative UCI minimum weight. Without that restriction they would go a fair bit lighter. So now we have non-race bikes like the Aethos coming in well under the minimum race weight.
As long as you don’t crash at 65 kph and have half a dozen other riders slam into your bike it should be durable enough. The only thing with carbon is that it isn’t very tolerant of being loaded in the wrong direction. So for example stamping on a thin carbon seatstay is likely to break it, while a steel one would probably be okay.
As long as you don’t crash at 65 kph and have half a dozen other riders slam into your bike it should be durable enough. The only thing with carbon is that it isn’t very tolerant of being loaded in the wrong direction. So for example stamping on a thin carbon seatstay is likely to break it, while a steel one would probably be okay.
#81
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,670
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4763 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
1,011 Posts
#82
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,803
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4452 Post(s)
Liked 4,117 Times
in
2,749 Posts
I guess if that is what you want go for it.
In terms of e-bikes mine is probably 70lbs, whatever. It weighs what it weighs, two 625wh batteries, Rohloff E-14, front suspension, Bosch mid-drive...I am not trying to save on weight, reliability, durability and usability are most important. I want to be able to tour and get groceries and all that sort of stuff. Sure if I could get all of that down to 40lbs that would be great but that ain't happening in something reliable at least not for many years. Maybe in the future this will all get ultralight but batteries are unlikely to get much lighter and still have the same capacity and I don't want a less powerful motor or a less reliable 14 speed IGH with electronic shifting.
In terms of e-bikes mine is probably 70lbs, whatever. It weighs what it weighs, two 625wh batteries, Rohloff E-14, front suspension, Bosch mid-drive...I am not trying to save on weight, reliability, durability and usability are most important. I want to be able to tour and get groceries and all that sort of stuff. Sure if I could get all of that down to 40lbs that would be great but that ain't happening in something reliable at least not for many years. Maybe in the future this will all get ultralight but batteries are unlikely to get much lighter and still have the same capacity and I don't want a less powerful motor or a less reliable 14 speed IGH with electronic shifting.
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: northWET washington
Posts: 1,197
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 690 Times
in
396 Posts
I guess if that is what you want go for it.
In terms of e-bikes mine is probably 70lbs, whatever. It weighs what it weighs, two 625wh batteries, Rohloff E-14, front suspension, Bosch mid-drive...I am not trying to save on weight, reliability, durability and usability are most important. I want to be able to tour and get groceries and all that sort of stuff. Sure if I could get all of that down to 40lbs that would be great but that ain't happening in something reliable at least not for many years. Maybe in the future this will all get ultralight but batteries are unlikely to get much lighter and still have the same capacity and I don't want a less powerful motor or a less reliable 14 speed IGH with electronic shifting.
In terms of e-bikes mine is probably 70lbs, whatever. It weighs what it weighs, two 625wh batteries, Rohloff E-14, front suspension, Bosch mid-drive...I am not trying to save on weight, reliability, durability and usability are most important. I want to be able to tour and get groceries and all that sort of stuff. Sure if I could get all of that down to 40lbs that would be great but that ain't happening in something reliable at least not for many years. Maybe in the future this will all get ultralight but batteries are unlikely to get much lighter and still have the same capacity and I don't want a less powerful motor or a less reliable 14 speed IGH with electronic shifting.
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,732
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4554 Post(s)
Liked 5,074 Times
in
3,129 Posts
#85
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
806 Posts
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that the OP has never ridden a light bike. Light road bikes are fabulous. Light mountain bikes are even more fabulous.
I have bikes ranging from 17 lbs to 30+ lbs. Each is excellent at doing its particular job. Light bikes have a place in the lineup because they offer advantages that can be enjoyed even by ordinary athletes who are nevertheless experienced riders.
If you're a heavy rider with poor technique, then there's no need to obsess over any weight but your own. Figure that out and fix it. Then learn to ride "light", and then go out and try a lighter bike.
I have bikes ranging from 17 lbs to 30+ lbs. Each is excellent at doing its particular job. Light bikes have a place in the lineup because they offer advantages that can be enjoyed even by ordinary athletes who are nevertheless experienced riders.
If you're a heavy rider with poor technique, then there's no need to obsess over any weight but your own. Figure that out and fix it. Then learn to ride "light", and then go out and try a lighter bike.
#86
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Most cyclist are not too worried about weight. Bikes have gotten so light and fragile that the UCI has set a low limit.
I remember back in the 80s when the weight weenies were drilling out everything they could on a bike. The racer boyz learned that drilled out bikes never made it to the finish line with out failing.
I remember back in the 80s when the weight weenies were drilling out everything they could on a bike. The racer boyz learned that drilled out bikes never made it to the finish line with out failing.
Last edited by rydabent; 07-01-21 at 02:48 PM.
#87
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,238
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3539 Post(s)
Liked 3,695 Times
in
1,851 Posts
On the contrary, modern carbon parts and frames are often stronger and stiffer than the heavier stuff they replace.
The UCI weight limit of 6.9 kg was established in 2000 to prevent "stupid light" bikes and ensure that competitors raced on similar bikes.
Technology has improved greatly since 2000, and now a strong and sturdy bike can be built that's well below the UCI limit.
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,732
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4554 Post(s)
Liked 5,074 Times
in
3,129 Posts
I'm not seeing evidence that lightweight bikes are "fragile".
On the contrary, modern carbon parts and frames are often stronger and stiffer than the heavier stuff they replace.
The UCI weight limit of 6.9 kg was established in 2000 to prevent "stupid light" bikes and ensure that competitors raced on similar bikes.
Technology has improved greatly since 2000, and now a strong and sturdy bike can be built that's well below the UCI limit.
On the contrary, modern carbon parts and frames are often stronger and stiffer than the heavier stuff they replace.
The UCI weight limit of 6.9 kg was established in 2000 to prevent "stupid light" bikes and ensure that competitors raced on similar bikes.
Technology has improved greatly since 2000, and now a strong and sturdy bike can be built that's well below the UCI limit.
+1
The UCI minimum weight is now very conservative.
Likes For PeteHski:
#89
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,980
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,051 Times
in
670 Posts
Is there a price difference for fielding a significantly lighter bike or could all the teams equip riders with lighter bikes for similar cost?
What do the pro teams do to keep the weight up above the limit? Is their rider or team pressure asking for a lower limit or is it not really an issue?
Otto
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,051
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4008 Post(s)
Liked 7,504 Times
in
3,023 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,896
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,491 Times
in
874 Posts
I'm not seeing evidence that lightweight bikes are "fragile".
On the contrary, modern carbon parts and frames are often stronger and stiffer than the heavier stuff they replace.
The UCI weight limit of 6.9 kg was established in 2000 to prevent "stupid light" bikes and ensure that competitors raced on similar bikes.
Technology has improved greatly since 2000, and now a strong and sturdy bike can be built that's well below the UCI limit.
On the contrary, modern carbon parts and frames are often stronger and stiffer than the heavier stuff they replace.
The UCI weight limit of 6.9 kg was established in 2000 to prevent "stupid light" bikes and ensure that competitors raced on similar bikes.
Technology has improved greatly since 2000, and now a strong and sturdy bike can be built that's well below the UCI limit.
Carbon is really strong. Steven Kruijswijk was involved in a huge pileup crash on Saturday and his seat stay was sheered off. He got back on the bike and still raced it to the finish with just one stay:
Likes For msu2001la:
#93
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,896
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,491 Times
in
874 Posts
I know essentially nothing about bikes in this realm, so pardon the ignorance in my questions, but what is the current impact of the restriction?
Is there a price difference for fielding a significantly lighter bike or could all the teams equip riders with lighter bikes for similar cost?
What do the pro teams do to keep the weight up above the limit? Is their rider or team pressure asking for a lower limit or is it not really an issue?
Otto
Is there a price difference for fielding a significantly lighter bike or could all the teams equip riders with lighter bikes for similar cost?
What do the pro teams do to keep the weight up above the limit? Is their rider or team pressure asking for a lower limit or is it not really an issue?
Otto
Pro riders are generally weight weenies and want the lightest bikes possible. Most of them would prefer a 6kg bike with 800g of weight added over a bike that is 6.8kg out of the box, because that added weight can be lower down on the bike which helps make it feel lighter when they rock it back and forth on a climb. This is especially true with wheelsets where they all want the lightest sets possible because they spin up faster and generally make a bike feel faster. If you look at pro bikes in this year's Tour de France, there are a number of them running "non-sponsor correct" wheels with blacked out logos, which are likely lighter than whatever their official team sponsor can make.
Cost is somewhat irrelevant for top level pro teams. The bikes are all provided to them from manufacturers under sponsorship contracts, so it's not as if Jumbo Visma has to go buy a new batch of Cervelos every spring, and would complain if the cost went up. Manufacturers use pro racing to develop and test new products. The bikes are required to be commercially available, but there are many prototype products/components in use on the pro tour.
Here's an interesting article about non-sponsorship correct wheelsets currently in use at the Tour:
https://cyclingtips.com/2021/06/tour...-weve-spotted/
#94
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,192
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10537 Post(s)
Liked 12,114 Times
in
6,200 Posts
I'm not seeing evidence that lightweight bikes are "fragile".
On the contrary, modern carbon parts and frames are often stronger and stiffer than the heavier stuff they replace.
The UCI weight limit of 6.9 kg was established in 2000 to prevent "stupid light" bikes and ensure that competitors raced on similar bikes.
Technology has improved greatly since 2000, and now a strong and sturdy bike can be built that's well below the UCI limit.
On the contrary, modern carbon parts and frames are often stronger and stiffer than the heavier stuff they replace.
The UCI weight limit of 6.9 kg was established in 2000 to prevent "stupid light" bikes and ensure that competitors raced on similar bikes.
Technology has improved greatly since 2000, and now a strong and sturdy bike can be built that's well below the UCI limit.
Now, you have bikes like the Specialized Aethos that weighs 13 lbs but will carry a rider as heavy as 275 lbs, and won't crumble under them.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Indeed. I remember back in the 90s when the now-defunct 'Bicycle Guide' magazine put together a 16 lb bike, sparing no expense and paying attention only to the weight of components, and came up with a bike so noodly nobody over 150 lbs could reasonably ride it. It even had Modolo's plastic DT shifters that had a reputation for coming apart in the hand - a fact they even mentioned in the article!
Now, you have bikes like the Specialized Aethos that weighs 13 lbs but will carry a rider as heavy as 275 lbs, and won't crumble under them.
Now, you have bikes like the Specialized Aethos that weighs 13 lbs but will carry a rider as heavy as 275 lbs, and won't crumble under them.
#96
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,501
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18526 Post(s)
Liked 15,873 Times
in
7,452 Posts
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,524
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 3,089 Times
in
1,972 Posts
#98
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,192
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10537 Post(s)
Liked 12,114 Times
in
6,200 Posts
I wonder what the bike felt like to ride? I suspect a little 'springy'.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Likes For WhyFi: