Optimal tubeless 28mm tire pressure?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times
in
249 Posts
Try reducing pressure 5 psi at a time til it gets too soft, then come back up to find your optimum level. Trial and error is your friend!
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Likes For bbbean:
#27
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,636
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4735 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
FWIW, I believe that that at least for the Silca calculator, the returned values are based on a lot of actual 'real world' testing. Sure, every possible iteration of weight, road surface, tire width, etc wasn't tested, so likely a good chunk of values interpolated. But, to imply that all of it is just theoretical guessing is a bit extreme IMO.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,434
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,007 Posts
I just set mine to the recommended pressure and ride. If the ride feels too harsh I drop the pressure 5 psi on the next ride. Likewise if I think they are squirming about too much I increase by 5 psi next ride. I only make changes of 5 psi at a time and I don’t mess around attempting to fine tune them by 1 or 2 psi. I’m not that sensitive.
Likes For PeteHski:
#30
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,636
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4735 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Silca's priority is speed. For a given power output, surface, rider and tire, the ideal tire pressure is theoretically the one that moves the rider fastest for a given power output. Or at least, that's what I believe their goal is.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Ah, ok, thanks. I didn't realize optimal meant fastest specifically. Vs most comfortable, least likely to pinch, or whatever balance of qualities any particular rider is looking for. Hence my confusion. 🙂
#33
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,636
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4735 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
EDIT: I should also point out that Silca has the caveat that whatever pressure they recommend is not likely to break your setup (ie. flat or break your rim). Finishing the ride is one of their givens.
Last edited by Sy Reene; 07-27-21 at 05:19 PM.
#34
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,636
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4735 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
#35
I like bike
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Merry Land USA
Posts: 662
Bikes: Roubaix Comp 2020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
191 Posts
I just set mine to the recommended pressure and ride. If the ride feels too harsh I drop the pressure 5 psi on the next ride. Likewise if I think they are squirming about too much I increase by 5 psi next ride. I only make changes of 5 psi at a time and I don’t mess around attempting to fine tune them by 1 or 2 psi. I’m not that sensitive.
I currently am putting 10psi between front and back (70 vs 60psi for me on 30mm tires, 175lbs bike+rider), even with this I have more tire drop in the back. I don't understand why the recommendations (e.g. from the SRAM calculator) are for less difference but there is probably something I don't know.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,434
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,007 Posts
I do the same thing more or less.. "inflate to just below harshness". It might not be perfect but it is relatively simple and repeatable.
I currently am putting 10psi between front and back (70 vs 60psi for me on 30mm tires, 175lbs bike+rider), even with this I have more tire drop in the back. I don't understand why the recommendations (e.g. from the SRAM calculator) are for less difference but there is probably something I don't know.
I currently am putting 10psi between front and back (70 vs 60psi for me on 30mm tires, 175lbs bike+rider), even with this I have more tire drop in the back. I don't understand why the recommendations (e.g. from the SRAM calculator) are for less difference but there is probably something I don't know.
I just put my own stats into the Sram and Silca calculators and they recommend 67/71 & 69/71 respectively. I'm actually currently running 70/74 based on my specific tyre manufacturer's guide (Pirelli in this case). Note that Pirelli suggest reducing the front pressure by 5 psi for more comfort.
Last edited by PeteHski; 07-27-21 at 06:30 PM.
#37
I like bike
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Merry Land USA
Posts: 662
Bikes: Roubaix Comp 2020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
191 Posts
My impression is that for optimal speed and comfort you want the same % drop in the tires, the old "15% drop" standard. But if your weight is really 40% front 60% back it really should be 10psi or more pressure difference for this optimal point.
There is another calculator at PSI Calculator which applies this 15% rule and it shows a 17psi front-back difference for me. Since I'm not sure how accurate that calculator is I also "faked" the SRAM calculator into making a 60-40 weight difference by putting in 20% less and then 20% more for my weight respectively, and averaging the font-back results in each case. I got 57 front 67 rear using that, a 10psi difference. So, the SRAM calculator seems to be applying something like a 55%/45% weighting difference to front and back. My best guess as to their logic is for climbing the weight can be more like 50-50 (?) and they are averaging things out. Or maybe there is something else going on.
PS the calculator at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...LTY/edit#gid=0 might make this more clear, you enter weight per tire here, so start by halving the weight of you-plus-bike. If I put in 80% on front and 120% on back (a 40-60 split) I get 45psi front - 70psi back.
There is another calculator at PSI Calculator which applies this 15% rule and it shows a 17psi front-back difference for me. Since I'm not sure how accurate that calculator is I also "faked" the SRAM calculator into making a 60-40 weight difference by putting in 20% less and then 20% more for my weight respectively, and averaging the font-back results in each case. I got 57 front 67 rear using that, a 10psi difference. So, the SRAM calculator seems to be applying something like a 55%/45% weighting difference to front and back. My best guess as to their logic is for climbing the weight can be more like 50-50 (?) and they are averaging things out. Or maybe there is something else going on.
PS the calculator at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...LTY/edit#gid=0 might make this more clear, you enter weight per tire here, so start by halving the weight of you-plus-bike. If I put in 80% on front and 120% on back (a 40-60 split) I get 45psi front - 70psi back.
Last edited by scottfsmith; 07-28-21 at 08:58 AM.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,434
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,007 Posts
My impression is that for optimal speed and comfort you want the same % drop in the tires, the old "15% drop" standard. But if your weight is really 40% front 60% back it really should be 10psi or more pressure difference for this optimal point.
There is another calculator at PSI Calculator which applies this 15% rule and it shows a 17psi front-back difference for me. Since I'm not sure how accurate that calculator is I also "faked" the SRAM calculator into making a 60-40 weight difference by putting in 20% less and then 20% more for my weight respectively, and averaging the font-back results in each case. I got 57 front 67 rear using that, a 10psi difference. So, the SRAM calculator seems to be applying something like a 55%/45% weighting difference to front and back. My best guess as to their logic is for climbing the weight can be more like 50-50 (?) and they are averaging things out. Or maybe there is something else going on.
There is another calculator at PSI Calculator which applies this 15% rule and it shows a 17psi front-back difference for me. Since I'm not sure how accurate that calculator is I also "faked" the SRAM calculator into making a 60-40 weight difference by putting in 20% less and then 20% more for my weight respectively, and averaging the font-back results in each case. I got 57 front 67 rear using that, a 10psi difference. So, the SRAM calculator seems to be applying something like a 55%/45% weighting difference to front and back. My best guess as to their logic is for climbing the weight can be more like 50-50 (?) and they are averaging things out. Or maybe there is something else going on.
Likes For PeteHski:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
I have found that 70 psi on the front is a good compromise for me on 30 mm tyres. I've certainly tested them at 65 psi and didn't like the feeling. It might also be a factor that my rims are relatively narrow (17 mm internal). On wider rims I can imagine running with lower front pressure without the sidewalls feeling too soft.
Likes For WhyFi:
#40
I like bike
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Merry Land USA
Posts: 662
Bikes: Roubaix Comp 2020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times
in
191 Posts
Thanks, this is starting to make some sense now. My regular rims are 21mm ID and I don't recall feeling any squirming at 60psi in front. I could probably go even a bit lower, I might try out 55psi in front given these 15% drop numbers.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,434
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,007 Posts
Yep, some of the calculators factor in the internal rim width. Going from 17 to 21 mm rims on the sram calculator drops the pressures by about 5 psi. It applies that to both front and rear tyres, but it's the front I notice squirming too much at lower pressures.
#42
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,636
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4735 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
The only problem with those calculators (eg. the Zipp one), is they have to use some predetermined guess as to what your actual tire width (and therefore volume) will be after inflation. I think we all mostly know that brand vs brand or model vs model, the nominal size labelled tires (eg. 25mm) are often different sizes once inflated even on the same rim (GP4000 vs GP5000 is good example).
#43
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
After reading this I now know why I find pumping my track tubulars up to 120+ to be so satisfying.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Yup. On my old Assaults (17mm int width), I didn't like going below ~70psi on 28mm/~65psi on 30mm tires. With 28s on the Zipps (23mm int width), I've never had that uneasy squirm in the corners, and that's even when letting the tires run down in to the low 50s (I assume; I inflate to ~60psi and will sometimes often go close to a week without topping them off again).
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#46
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,988
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
Unless my gauges are wrong, I ride 125 psi rear and 100 psi front on the MUP here. I don't get my bones shaken. However lately I've been on the roads which have a few segments of rougher road. So I've dropped the pressure in the rear to 110 psi. 25mm GP5000's, tubed version.
I'm both faster and less tired at those pressures than when I've tried 90 psi. But your roads aren't my roads. So I'm not going to say what you should run. But if you just let a calculator tell you what to put in them, you are doing yourself a disservice, IMO.
I'm both faster and less tired at those pressures than when I've tried 90 psi. But your roads aren't my roads. So I'm not going to say what you should run. But if you just let a calculator tell you what to put in them, you are doing yourself a disservice, IMO.
Likes For Iride01:
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#48
Senior Member
#49
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,636
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4735 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
True that, and probably why I'd prefer the Silca calculator, though worth nothing that Zipp (and Silca doesn't) presumably might be building in safety (e.g. ETRTO) refinements or otherwise, since its calculator also asks for rim profile info (hookless TL, hooked TL, tubed, tubular). I Haven't seen yet a calculator that's got every variable. We need Silca and Zipp to have a baby.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,434
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4409 Post(s)
Liked 4,861 Times
in
3,007 Posts
True that, and probably why I'd prefer the Silca calculator, though worth nothing that Zipp (and Silca doesn't) presumably might be building in safety (e.g. ETRTO) refinements or otherwise, since its calculator also asks for rim profile info (hookless TL, hooked TL, tubed, tubular). I Haven't seen yet a calculator that's got every variable. We need Silca and Zipp to have a baby.
I don't fuss over a couple of psi here or there. I don't find it that sensitive.
The only big variation I see between the various calculators are those that recommend significantly lower front pressure based on the 15% drop rule e.g. I've got one that recommends 52/79 with a 60% rear weight distribution.