Polarized VS Non-polarized
#26
well hello there
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,435
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Liked 343 Times
in
211 Posts
I've never had any problems using polarized. But I'm always buying upper end, uber expensive, polarized shades, if that makes a difference.
__________________
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
#27
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,700 Times
in
1,167 Posts
The issue with polarized lenses is that while they reduce the glare from a horizontal reflective surface (e.g., water and road), they also attenuate the glare from an object in one's peripheral vision, which your peripheral vision would otherwise perceive as a glint at the corner of your eye. Plus the issue with screen glare filter layer mentioned by others above..
#28
dot dash
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,569
Bikes: Shmikes
Liked 6,168 Times
in
3,320 Posts
Likes For MoAlpha:
#29
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Right now, I have some non-polarized sport glasses that I've had for at least 10 years. I'm sure I paid less that $20 for them and I've been pretty happy with them, but over the years, they've developed some minor scratches which I find distracting. If I remembered where I got them, and if they were available, I would buy another.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,036
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
Tifosi do have some reasonably priced wraparounds, but starting at about the $50 mark. I have a pair of photochromatic Tifosi's that cost me $70ish at REI a few years back.
#31
dot dash
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,569
Bikes: Shmikes
Liked 6,168 Times
in
3,320 Posts
I wear prescription glasses all day, but use Tifosis with near-vision inserts on the bike. They're completely comfortable, the optical quality is as good as polycarbonate can provide, and, best of all, the lenses can be replaced for 20 bucks plus tax and shipping.
#32
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I find the flat front to be just as good at deflecting bugs, and they fog up less when climbing due to better airflow over the lenses. YMMV.
Tifosi do have some reasonably priced wraparounds, but starting at about the $50 mark. I have a pair of photochromatic Tifosi's that cost me $70ish at REI a few years back.
Tifosi do have some reasonably priced wraparounds, but starting at about the $50 mark. I have a pair of photochromatic Tifosi's that cost me $70ish at REI a few years back.
Likes For fujidon:
#33
Junior Member
I really like my polarized sunglasses, I find them very comforting. They're prescription to boot so I can't speak to the mfg'r. One thing they help with is foggy and overcast days and seem to make distant objects more defined and bike riders seem to stick out better for judging distance when I'm driving. LCD screens emit polarized light; so that's the reason many devices show up as blank when wearing them. Try flipping the device if it can rotate the display output. My android fortunately does not blank on the vertical, but I can turn it 90* horizontal and it will.
#34
Senior Member
I mostly use the same shades on and off the bike.
Here in Seattle, it rains. It can take a while to fully dry, there can be wet spots on the pavement. A rumble strip is the land of ten thousand lakes.
The sunglasses I like are darker at the bottom, and polarized, which both help with this.
Here in Seattle, it rains. It can take a while to fully dry, there can be wet spots on the pavement. A rumble strip is the land of ten thousand lakes.
The sunglasses I like are darker at the bottom, and polarized, which both help with this.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,771
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Liked 1,846 Times
in
1,183 Posts
I to feel better using non-polarized sun glasses. My cataracts are not bad enough for correction yet but using non-polarized glasses with a green tint helps. I have an old pair or aviator clip-on's that were commonly used on UH1's. The green tint is effective in that it adds contrast and as humans we see more shades of green than any other color...
Maybe not needed for those suicidal cyclists flipping off of mountains cause they are not Human...
Maybe not needed for those suicidal cyclists flipping off of mountains cause they are not Human...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
Last edited by zandoval; 10-15-21 at 05:52 PM.
#36
Senior Member
I wear polarized when road biking to cut down on glare from car windows, body paneling, and even the road itself.
When mountain biking, glare is not a problem, so I save a few bucks and use non-polarized and with less tint, since I'm often riding in darker areas
When mountain biking, glare is not a problem, so I save a few bucks and use non-polarized and with less tint, since I'm often riding in darker areas
#37
Newbie
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My experience has been that non-polarized sunglasses work better on the bike. It seems that polarized sunglasses can sometime hide road hazards especially when sunlight is filtering through the trees.. Now that I'm looking for new cycling glasses, I find that everyone wants to sell polarized glasses. Am I missing something? Do others have different experiences?
#38
Just marketing?
What’s just marketing to you is essential to me.
I’m very sensitive to light, so I walk, drive, and ride with prescription polarized sunglasses.
Enough said.
I’m very sensitive to light, so I walk, drive, and ride with prescription polarized sunglasses.
Enough said.
Likes For robertAltman:
#39
Senior Member
Polarized glasses were created for a variety reasons. Your niche use case is one of them. Riding a bicycle under normal conditions is not one of them.
#40
Newbie
My experience has been towards problems with scratches on the lenses. It seems to matter how careful I am, after a season or two the lenses get scratched and bug me enough that I want to replace them. So I've gone to some rather inexpensive safety glasses. I've tried the polarized and non-polarized types and like them - haven't had any issues with viewing phone or computer screens. So I'm saving my Maui Jim's for walking. :-)
#41
padawan
My experience has been that non-polarized sunglasses work better on the bike. It seems that polarized sunglasses can sometime hide road hazards especially when sunlight is filtering through the trees.. Now that I'm looking for new cycling glasses, I find that everyone wants to sell polarized glasses. Am I missing something? Do others have different experiences?
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,992
Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70
Liked 513 Times
in
306 Posts
Pretty sure my Oakley Prizm lenses are not polarized. For a while I was riding with polarized lenses but at the right angle I had a hard time reading my bike computer. Nothing serious and I only had it happen maybe once or twice a season. And never in a dangerous situation. Definitely something to keep in mind though when looking for new sunnies.
#43
Senior Member
I love my polarized phototec Tifosi sunglasses. With my contact lenses in my eyes are very sensitive to the light and the polarized sunglasses means I can actually see. Really cuts down on glare. The major negative is they have a narrow range of photosensitivity so even though they can adjust to how much light there is the range isn't very large. It's something like 11-25% light allowed in. I have a non-polarized pair and it lets in 11-90%. I'd still wear the polarized in most riding conditions, though.
#44
I buy safety glasses with good wrap around and a good fit with my nose. That keeps dirt from hitting my cheek bones and ending up in my eyes. The safety glasses have been a good fit overall, and ones like the DeWalt ones for tradespeople sell for less than $15. I have clear ones and tinted ones and yellow pairs depending upon the conditions. All are bi-focal readers which I need to read the bike computer display.
Plastic lenses are easily scratched and even the special coatings sold by opticians do not really help.Glass lenses make for a heavier pair and not good for use when I am active as with bicycling and these can break and the idea of glass going into my eyes from eyeglasses is not appealing.
Polarized eyeglasses are great out on the water but then the actual polarization or filtration is strongest when the rays of the light are at a 90 degree angle and the filtration falls off rapidly at the sides. For driving I have found polarized sunglasses to be relatively worthless and of no help when their is glare from a car window or chrome bumper in front of me. My polarized sunglasses are the most expensive ones I own but they are the ones I would never use when driving or riding a bike.
And a polarizing coating does not block UVA or UVB which is what damages ones eyes and leads to cataracts.
Plastic lenses are easily scratched and even the special coatings sold by opticians do not really help.Glass lenses make for a heavier pair and not good for use when I am active as with bicycling and these can break and the idea of glass going into my eyes from eyeglasses is not appealing.
Polarized eyeglasses are great out on the water but then the actual polarization or filtration is strongest when the rays of the light are at a 90 degree angle and the filtration falls off rapidly at the sides. For driving I have found polarized sunglasses to be relatively worthless and of no help when their is glare from a car window or chrome bumper in front of me. My polarized sunglasses are the most expensive ones I own but they are the ones I would never use when driving or riding a bike.
And a polarizing coating does not block UVA or UVB which is what damages ones eyes and leads to cataracts.
#45
Senior Member
- Smoke: A classic gray tint. This also has a polarized option. Polarized can be beneficial if your activity has you near water, snow, or sand. Light transmission: 47.7-15.2%, polarized: 32.1-11.9%
- Light Night: This tint will provide the best range for low light conditions. Light transmission: 75.9-27.7%
- Brown: A contrast-enhancing tint. This too, comes in a polarized version. Light transmission: 75.9-27.7%, polarized: 28.7-9.4%
- High Speed Red: It’s all in the name–this is the top performer, made for the fastest athletes! Light transmission: 35.3-13.5%
Likes For guachi:
#46
Senior Member
For driving I have found polarized sunglasses to be relatively worthless and of no help when their is glare from a car window or chrome bumper in front of me. My polarized sunglasses are the most expensive ones I own but they are the ones I would never use when driving or riding a bike.
When out running, I find it much easier to see the driver of stopped cars at driveways / entrances waiting to pull out onto the road. Particularly when I'm approaching from their right - I can see if they've looked in my direction or are looking left at traffic and more likely not to look to the right before moving.
Cycling, I'm indifferent at this point. My polarized sunglasses don't impact using my electronics but I also wouldn't necessarily go out of my way to choose polarized. I'd say folks should see for themselves.
fujidon FWIW, I've owned Tifosi sunglasses for several years at this point and they've held up very well. They have many options - both polarized and unpolarized, as well as options for reader insets. Many bicycling shops around here tend to carry the brand, or you can do Amazon or you can go directly to tifosioptics.com
I mostly wear Tifosi either
#47
cycles per second
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930
Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110
Liked 72 Times
in
49 Posts
I love my polarized phototec Tifosi sunglasses. With my contact lenses in my eyes are very sensitive to the light and the polarized sunglasses means I can actually see. Really cuts down on glare. The major negative is they have a narrow range of photosensitivity so even though they can adjust to how much light there is the range isn't very large. It's something like 11-25% light allowed in. I have a non-polarized pair and it lets in 11-90%. I'd still wear the polarized in most riding conditions, though.
Likes For Gonzo Bob:
#48
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for the Tifosi recommendation. I ordered the non-polarized with the AC (all condition) lens. It's exactly what I was looking for and I'm very happy with them.
In fact, I like them so much, I ordered another pair with the smoke lens for sunny days... BUT, these glasses create an odd distortion when looking anywhere but dead center. The AC lens don't have this issue at all. I'm going to return them. Amazon makes it easy.
If I got a "lemon", I'd consider ordering again. Anyone have similar or opposite experience?
In fact, I like them so much, I ordered another pair with the smoke lens for sunny days... BUT, these glasses create an odd distortion when looking anywhere but dead center. The AC lens don't have this issue at all. I'm going to return them. Amazon makes it easy.
If I got a "lemon", I'd consider ordering again. Anyone have similar or opposite experience?
Likes For fujidon:
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Treasure Coast, FL
Posts: 1,014
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Supersix EVO 3, 2015 Trek 520, 2017 Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, 2022 Moots Vamoots Disc RSL
Liked 276 Times
in
147 Posts
I'm in SE Florida where the sun can get brutal in the summer. So I start many Summer Saturday rides in the dark so I'm back inside by 11:00 AM. I've tried both non-polarized and polarized, and I prefer the polarized lenses. I also wear prescription polarized and have recently purchased transition- polarized lenses, since I start many rides in the dark. I like this combination the most. The transition-polarized won't dull the sun as much as just polarized lenses when it is super bright outside, but I find it quite adequate. I use a Garmin bike computer and have no problem seeing it when I'm on the bike. If I have a problem seeing the computer when I'm off the bike, I can take a step or two to get closer and see it. I also have not noticed any difference in seeing hazards between the non-polarized and polarized lenses. Maybe there is, but I have not noticed it.
#50
For bicycling I rely on "safety glasses" that block 100% of the UVA and UVB rays.Both ultraviolet-A (UV-A) and UV-B induce cataract formation and are not necessary for sight. Ultraviolet radiation is also a risk factor for damage to the retinas of children. The removal of these wavelengths from ocular exposure will greatly reduce the risk of early cataract and retinal damage.
Even the slightly more expensive reader type which I need to read the bike computer display cost me less than $20 per pair. These cost less than $10 and are available in different colors. I like gray in bright sunlight and the yellow on overcast days.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...?ie=UTF8&psc=1
When I have looked for polarized sunglasses it was often not stated whether they blocked 100% of the UVA and UVB rays so I doubt that they did filter these damaging rays.
Even the slightly more expensive reader type which I need to read the bike computer display cost me less than $20 per pair. These cost less than $10 and are available in different colors. I like gray in bright sunlight and the yellow on overcast days.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...?ie=UTF8&psc=1
When I have looked for polarized sunglasses it was often not stated whether they blocked 100% of the UVA and UVB rays so I doubt that they did filter these damaging rays.