Need super stable road bike
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Need super stable road bike
I'm 56 and ride a Specialized Roubaix. I've been cycling since 1979 but have always been weak on handling--very nervous rider, can't stand pack riding or having a lot of people around me. I used to compete, actually did 40K in under 57 minutes, about 60 races in my lifetime, maybe more, but the older I get, the more nervous I get. The only time in my life I could ride no-handed was with my 40 pound rusted Schwinn.
I get nervous on downhills and crosswinds and sometimes have to sing to calm my nerves, although I do about 3000 miles a year.
So I'm thinking about replacing my Roubaix with something like a Trek Checkpoint or some road bike style that is super stable. The trail on my Roubaix is 59mm and I think the Checkpoint may be 72mm. When I look for bicycles for nervous riders I come up with fat tires, upright handlebars but I just want a super stretched bicycle that is light and fast enough to be competitive in hillclimbs.
I noticed a marked loss of confidence in 2000 when I traded my 53cm Klein Quantum for a Trek 5200. I don't know if there's a point where I can get my confidence back or if 72mm of trail will be noticeably more stable than 59mm.
I would also like a long wheelbase. My first good bicycle was a Klein Performance with a 41.1inch wheelbase and I had plenty of room to carry a full size frame pump.
If I can't find a bicycle that will be noticeably more stable, there's no point in spending the money because my current bicycle is fine. I almost ordered a Checkpoint two weeks ago but the backup is almost a year.
I get nervous on downhills and crosswinds and sometimes have to sing to calm my nerves, although I do about 3000 miles a year.
So I'm thinking about replacing my Roubaix with something like a Trek Checkpoint or some road bike style that is super stable. The trail on my Roubaix is 59mm and I think the Checkpoint may be 72mm. When I look for bicycles for nervous riders I come up with fat tires, upright handlebars but I just want a super stretched bicycle that is light and fast enough to be competitive in hillclimbs.
I noticed a marked loss of confidence in 2000 when I traded my 53cm Klein Quantum for a Trek 5200. I don't know if there's a point where I can get my confidence back or if 72mm of trail will be noticeably more stable than 59mm.
I would also like a long wheelbase. My first good bicycle was a Klein Performance with a 41.1inch wheelbase and I had plenty of room to carry a full size frame pump.
If I can't find a bicycle that will be noticeably more stable, there's no point in spending the money because my current bicycle is fine. I almost ordered a Checkpoint two weeks ago but the backup is almost a year.
#2
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,896
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,575 Times
in
1,090 Posts
I think you are on the right track by looking at a gravel bike like the Checkpoint. Have you looked at other gravel bikes? How about a longer stem?
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I looked at the Giant Revolt but it doesn't have the suspension like the Checkpoint. It does have an even longer trail, up to 84mm.
Honestly, I don't think anything will really fix the problem. But putting a longer stem on my old bike helped and when I bought this Roubaix second hand in 2013, I put the same stem on it. They normally have a shorter stem. I've never had a new bicycle and I thought if I was going to do it and get the disc brakes (although I heard they are more sensitive in cross winds) and the fancy e-shifting, I might as well try to get a super stable frame. The kind of racing I do doesn't need nimble handling--I was only good at time trials and hill climbs so although I need a fast bike, I don't need a quick bike. Right now I use it mostly for cross-training for my running, but I like to race Pikes Peak or Mt. Washington or Mt. Evans, and I'd love to give Haleakala a shot.
I picked the Checkpoint because the suspension on the Treks was rated as good or better than the Roubaix suspension, and since the new Roubaix has gone with more aggressive geometry, I probably should go for the Trek. I think a heavier bike would help, but then I'd suffer on the climbs. I have lighter wheels I use for climbing. I think improving my ability to train without nerves would more than make up for any extra weight.
Honestly, I don't think anything will really fix the problem. But putting a longer stem on my old bike helped and when I bought this Roubaix second hand in 2013, I put the same stem on it. They normally have a shorter stem. I've never had a new bicycle and I thought if I was going to do it and get the disc brakes (although I heard they are more sensitive in cross winds) and the fancy e-shifting, I might as well try to get a super stable frame. The kind of racing I do doesn't need nimble handling--I was only good at time trials and hill climbs so although I need a fast bike, I don't need a quick bike. Right now I use it mostly for cross-training for my running, but I like to race Pikes Peak or Mt. Washington or Mt. Evans, and I'd love to give Haleakala a shot.
I picked the Checkpoint because the suspension on the Treks was rated as good or better than the Roubaix suspension, and since the new Roubaix has gone with more aggressive geometry, I probably should go for the Trek. I think a heavier bike would help, but then I'd suffer on the climbs. I have lighter wheels I use for climbing. I think improving my ability to train without nerves would more than make up for any extra weight.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Rather than the Checkpoint, why not the Domane? It'll have the front IsoSpeed in addition to the rear IsoSpeed and I would think that the other the Checkpoint additions (larger tire clearance, additional mounting points for touring, etc) would actually be welcome omissions, in your case.
I found my old Domane to be super stable, I could ride no-hands on it for days, and it was very sure-footed over rough/bumpy surfaces, which was particularly noticeable when cornering. I actually moved away from my Domane because I wanted something a little more snappy in the handling department, though I briefly considered keeping it around for long, solo rides.
I found my old Domane to be super stable, I could ride no-hands on it for days, and it was very sure-footed over rough/bumpy surfaces, which was particularly noticeable when cornering. I actually moved away from my Domane because I wanted something a little more snappy in the handling department, though I briefly considered keeping it around for long, solo rides.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
I'm 56 and ride a Specialized Roubaix. I've been cycling since 1979 but have always been weak on handling--very nervous rider, can't stand pack riding or having a lot of people around me. I used to compete, actually did 40K in under 57 minutes, about 60 races in my lifetime, maybe more, but the older I get, the more nervous I get. The only time in my life I could ride no-handed was with my 40 pound rusted Schwinn.
I get nervous on downhills and crosswinds and sometimes have to sing to calm my nerves, although I do about 3000 miles a year.
So I'm thinking about replacing my Roubaix with something like a Trek Checkpoint or some road bike style that is super stable. The trail on my Roubaix is 59mm and I think the Checkpoint may be 72mm. When I look for bicycles for nervous riders I come up with fat tires, upright handlebars but I just want a super stretched bicycle that is light and fast enough to be competitive in hillclimbs.
I noticed a marked loss of confidence in 2000 when I traded my 53cm Klein Quantum for a Trek 5200. I don't know if there's a point where I can get my confidence back or if 72mm of trail will be noticeably more stable than 59mm.
I would also like a long wheelbase. My first good bicycle was a Klein Performance with a 41.1inch wheelbase and I had plenty of room to carry a full size frame pump.
If I can't find a bicycle that will be noticeably more stable, there's no point in spending the money because my current bicycle is fine. I almost ordered a Checkpoint two weeks ago but the backup is almost a year.
I get nervous on downhills and crosswinds and sometimes have to sing to calm my nerves, although I do about 3000 miles a year.
So I'm thinking about replacing my Roubaix with something like a Trek Checkpoint or some road bike style that is super stable. The trail on my Roubaix is 59mm and I think the Checkpoint may be 72mm. When I look for bicycles for nervous riders I come up with fat tires, upright handlebars but I just want a super stretched bicycle that is light and fast enough to be competitive in hillclimbs.
I noticed a marked loss of confidence in 2000 when I traded my 53cm Klein Quantum for a Trek 5200. I don't know if there's a point where I can get my confidence back or if 72mm of trail will be noticeably more stable than 59mm.
I would also like a long wheelbase. My first good bicycle was a Klein Performance with a 41.1inch wheelbase and I had plenty of room to carry a full size frame pump.
If I can't find a bicycle that will be noticeably more stable, there's no point in spending the money because my current bicycle is fine. I almost ordered a Checkpoint two weeks ago but the backup is almost a year.
#6
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,404
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,013 Times
in
3,448 Posts
Since you mention you ride in groups too, then I'd be on the opposite side of very stable.
I'd want something that is responsive and let me quickly dodge any hazards that those in front of me failed to point out or for times wheels are about to touch. And that is going to be a sporty handling bike which some refer to as twitchy.
If you truly are only going to be a solo rider, then stable is okay. But the last bike I had that I'd call really very stable was from 1991. And the most stable bike a 46 pound Schwinn Varsity from 1979.
How 'bout a recumbent trike?
I'd want something that is responsive and let me quickly dodge any hazards that those in front of me failed to point out or for times wheels are about to touch. And that is going to be a sporty handling bike which some refer to as twitchy.
If you truly are only going to be a solo rider, then stable is okay. But the last bike I had that I'd call really very stable was from 1991. And the most stable bike a 46 pound Schwinn Varsity from 1979.
How 'bout a recumbent trike?
Last edited by Iride01; 05-18-22 at 01:20 PM.
#7
Senior Member
It sounds like you're really looking for "a bike that won't fall over" - and such a bike doesn't exist. Outside of bikes so poorly designed or set up that they're impossible to keep upright, all bikes exists within a spectrum of somewhat more or less stable than others - but it really comes down to the rider to keep it upright - even the twitchiest bike is rideable, and even the stablest bike is crashable. Yes, you can make life easier for yourself with a nice stable machine with a long wheelbase, a slightly more upright position etc, without sacrificing weight and performance (eg gravel or endurance geometry), but you really have to figure out how to get out of your own head - that's where the problem is, and no bike is going to solve it.
#9
My Giant Defy is about as stable as reasonably fast road bikes go. Long wheelbase and fairly slack steering. It's rock solid on fast descents.
#10
Full Member
Buy something old for $40.
Likes For Random11:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,079
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,206 Times
in
1,251 Posts
@OP, I'd be looking for longer wheel base bikes, they will handle slower, feel less twitchey. Gravel bikes can be that, you can always get a 2nd wheel set with skinny, 32mm tires. Gravel bikes tend to weigh more though. My aluminum Topstone is 22 lbs vs. my carbon road bike at 17.
Last edited by Steve B.; 05-18-22 at 07:43 PM.
#13
Senior Member
This is weird advice but whenever I test ride a new bike I try standing up while taking my hands off the handlebars. It takes a while to learn, but once you can its really easy to tell when there is some stability issue with the bike. Normally indicates something wasn't installed perfectly or has since come out of adjustment, but some bikes are just more stable than others. A stable bike will mostly correct itself even in gusts of wind, while some bikes will buck like a bronco. A shop owner taught me this
#14
Senior Member
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: 757
Posts: 11,357
Bikes: Madone, Emonda, 5500, Ritchey Breakaway
Liked 5,306 Times
in
2,267 Posts
My vote.
Trek Domane
Ritchey Outback or Road logic
Trek Domane
Ritchey Outback or Road logic
Likes For bampilot06:
#16
This is weird advice but whenever I test ride a new bike I try standing up while taking my hands off the handlebars. It takes a while to learn, but once you can its really easy to tell when there is some stability issue with the bike. Normally indicates something wasn't installed perfectly or has since come out of adjustment, but some bikes are just more stable than others. A stable bike will mostly correct itself even in gusts of wind, while some bikes will buck like a bronco. A shop owner taught me this
#17
Senior Member
I ride a 2018 Domane SL 5 and have nothing but good things to say about it. With 32mm tires it can take some gravel and bad roads. That said, I just bought a 2022 Chedkpoint SL5, not because of any problem with the Domane but because I'm 74 and wanted a new bike to add to the stable. Either way you'll love either of the two. I would think that the Checkpoint would offer more stability. You have to look around the country to find a shop that has either bike in stock. The Trek site will help you do this. I visited my son in Houston two weeks ago and both bikes were available. I live in Montana and neither are available here with the exception of the Checkpoint AL. I'm sure that there are other endurance and gravel bike options available from other companies.
#18
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,637
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Liked 2,003 Times
in
1,423 Posts
Huh. My 5200 is the bike I'd vote as "mostly likely to continue going where I point it." Very smooth and comfortable on crowded rides. Stable, no wobble ever, up to 60 mph. I'd say something's wrong with yours. Headset? Replace with Chris King. If it has the original 1-bolt stem, they were recalled. Replace with a threadless adapter and a forged stem. Or I wonder, is it the bike?
I remember thinking when I first had mine, "No wonder Lance won his first TdF on this frame. It's so effortless to handle."
I remember thinking when I first had mine, "No wonder Lance won his first TdF on this frame. It's so effortless to handle."
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#19
Zen Master
Huh. My 5200 is the bike I'd vote as "mostly likely to continue going where I point it." Very smooth and comfortable on crowded rides. Stable, no wobble ever, up to 60 mph. I'd say something's wrong with yours. Headset? Replace with Chris King. If it has the original 1-bolt stem, they were recalled. Replace with a threadless adapter and a forged stem. Or I wonder, is it the bike?
I remember thinking when I first had mine, "No wonder Lance won his first TdF on this frame. It's so effortless to handle."
I remember thinking when I first had mine, "No wonder Lance won his first TdF on this frame. It's so effortless to handle."
__________________
Ron - Tucson, AZ
Ron - Tucson, AZ
#20
Senior Member
The obvious answer is to go test ride one, if you can find one in stock.
#21
Senior Member
FWIW - the trail measurement on the Domane is only longer than the Roubaix in certain sizes:
52cm frame: Domane=59mm and Roubaix=59mm.
54cm frame: Domane=59mm and Roubaix=61mm.
56cm frame: Domane=61mm and Roubaix=55mm.
I realize there's more to a bike's overall handling than this one measurement, but the OP specifically noted increased trail as something they were looking for.
52cm frame: Domane=59mm and Roubaix=59mm.
54cm frame: Domane=59mm and Roubaix=61mm.
56cm frame: Domane=61mm and Roubaix=55mm.
I realize there's more to a bike's overall handling than this one measurement, but the OP specifically noted increased trail as something they were looking for.
#22
Senior Member
Surly Disc Trucker.
Heavy, long, and more stable than an aircraft carrier.
Can ride it for a week no-handed.
26 lbs of real sweet steel.
Heavy, long, and more stable than an aircraft carrier.
Can ride it for a week no-handed.
26 lbs of real sweet steel.
#24
Senior Member
That’s not why I referenced it though. I referenced it because the OP equated it to handling/stability. Either way the OP is pretty much looking for a unicorn as he also wants something light and fast(but not quick)for hill climbs?
Please try to keep up though
Last edited by downhillmaster; 05-20-22 at 05:27 AM.
#25
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,299
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Liked 9,202 Times
in
4,262 Posts
Likes For datlas: