Colnago C50 vs. Cadex ALR-1
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Colnago C50 vs. Cadex ALR-1
This question has been on my mind for a long time.
Ever since my friend bought his Colnago C50 ( C-fibre frame, 11-speed e-shifting, carbon wheels, Campagnolo Super-Record, etc. ), he has been giving me maniacal accounts of how much faster this bike is than his previous alum. frame Fondcriest 9-speed of about 3 decades earlier vintage.
But he is also not known for his rationality or his ability to compare things in a fair ( scientific ) manner.
I went for a hard 50 km road ride with him the other day and he left me eating his dust. I was on a bike akin to his old Fondcriest in technology ( Cadex ALR-1 ).
I just can't see that more modern wheel bearings, bottom brackets, etc. can make that much difference.
I am of course aware of factors like differences in rider fitness but I am not asking about those.
Are these newer bikes significantly faster than the older ones ?
Ever since my friend bought his Colnago C50 ( C-fibre frame, 11-speed e-shifting, carbon wheels, Campagnolo Super-Record, etc. ), he has been giving me maniacal accounts of how much faster this bike is than his previous alum. frame Fondcriest 9-speed of about 3 decades earlier vintage.
But he is also not known for his rationality or his ability to compare things in a fair ( scientific ) manner.
I went for a hard 50 km road ride with him the other day and he left me eating his dust. I was on a bike akin to his old Fondcriest in technology ( Cadex ALR-1 ).
I just can't see that more modern wheel bearings, bottom brackets, etc. can make that much difference.
I am of course aware of factors like differences in rider fitness but I am not asking about those.
Are these newer bikes significantly faster than the older ones ?
#2
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,360
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Liked 8,542 Times
in
4,037 Posts
Significantly? No. A little bit? Probably. There are lots of variables involved. In the case of your experience, my bet would be that your friend is simply a stronger rider, and would likely be faster even if you switched bikes. Nothing matters more than the motor.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#3
LR÷P=HR
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,246
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 & 2019 Cervelo R3’s & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Liked 1,257 Times
in
724 Posts
What color is the Colnago ?
__________________
Don’t “quote” me on that. 8-)
You’re welcome, don’t “mention” it. 8-)
Don’t “quote” me on that. 8-)
You’re welcome, don’t “mention” it. 8-)
Likes For Barry2:
#5
Senior Member
This question has been on my mind for a long time.
Ever since my friend bought his Colnago C50 ( C-fibre frame, 11-speed e-shifting, carbon wheels, Campagnolo Super-Record, etc. ), he has been giving me maniacal accounts of how much faster this bike is than his previous alum. frame Fondcriest 9-speed of about 3 decades earlier vintage.
But he is also not known for his rationality or his ability to compare things in a fair ( scientific ) manner.
I went for a hard 50 km road ride with him the other day and he left me eating his dust. I was on a bike akin to his old Fondcriest in technology ( Cadex ALR-1 ).
I just can't see that more modern wheel bearings, bottom brackets, etc. can make that much difference.
I am of course aware of factors like differences in rider fitness but I am not asking about those.
Are these newer bikes significantly faster than the older ones ?
Ever since my friend bought his Colnago C50 ( C-fibre frame, 11-speed e-shifting, carbon wheels, Campagnolo Super-Record, etc. ), he has been giving me maniacal accounts of how much faster this bike is than his previous alum. frame Fondcriest 9-speed of about 3 decades earlier vintage.
But he is also not known for his rationality or his ability to compare things in a fair ( scientific ) manner.
I went for a hard 50 km road ride with him the other day and he left me eating his dust. I was on a bike akin to his old Fondcriest in technology ( Cadex ALR-1 ).
I just can't see that more modern wheel bearings, bottom brackets, etc. can make that much difference.
I am of course aware of factors like differences in rider fitness but I am not asking about those.
Are these newer bikes significantly faster than the older ones ?