Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

How fast have you ridden?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

How fast have you ridden?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-23, 10:50 AM
  #51  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,428
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 345 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack Tone
62, indicated, on my mtn bike. Probably slower because of smaller street tires. 172 on my motorcycle.
Now that speed really would kill you if anything went wrong. Unless you had a track to slide along the perimeter of.
choddo is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 10:57 AM
  #52  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,428
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 345 Posts
Originally Posted by LarrySellerz
kind of? You can take all the precautions you want, wear a helmet, etc, and still have a decent chance at death when crashing above 50 mph.
Controlling the bike well and understanding what increases the risk, all of which comes with experience, is way more important than a helmet at those kinds of speeds. Arguably not wearing a helmet is possibly safer because it makes most people more cautious.
choddo is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 12:49 PM
  #53  
Dave Mayer
Senior Member
 
Dave Mayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,515
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1384 Post(s)
Liked 491 Times in 287 Posts
53 mph on a sustained 7% descent at 7,000 ft. Thinner air allows you to go faster. And we had a serious swirly tailwind. My buddy, who had/has a significant weight advantage passed me by at least 3 mph.

There were some white spots far in the distance on the side of the road, and before my brain could process what they were, I had passed the family of mountain goats licking road salt. In retrospect, if I had more time I should have been very worried, as my pal might have spooked them and driven them right in front of me. Not that I would have had the time or skills to dodge them.
Dave Mayer is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 01:08 PM
  #54  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,100

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4037 Post(s)
Liked 7,617 Times in 3,054 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
Arguably not wearing a helmet is possibly safer because it makes most people more cautious.
Bad logic.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 11-27-23, 01:14 PM
  #55  
john m flores 
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
 
john m flores's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 841

Bikes: Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 425 Post(s)
Liked 892 Times in 418 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
Controlling the bike well and understanding what increases the risk, all of which comes with experience, is way more important than a helmet at those kinds of speeds.
This is not an either/or. You can be good at controlling a bike and still have a deer jump out in front of you at 50mph. The helmet is there for the things you cannot control.

Originally Posted by choddo
Arguably not wearing a helmet is possibly safer because it makes most people more cautious.
I have a traffic engineer friend who has said something similar. But we're talking about speed in this thread.
john m flores is online now  
Likes For john m flores:
Old 11-27-23, 01:29 PM
  #56  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,428
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 345 Posts
Originally Posted by john m flores
This is not an either/or. You can be good at controlling a bike and still have a deer jump out in front of you at 50mph. The helmet is there for the things you cannot control.
The point was that Larry’s “safety is about things like helmets” is a very small part of the picture and arguably a misleading one. If someone only does 30 because they are more risk averse with no helmet a deer jumping out might be far less dangerous.

and having had a front wheel slide out at about that speed and my helmet hit the deck, I am not about to suggest anyone stops wearing one for safety improvement.

Last edited by choddo; 11-27-23 at 01:34 PM.
choddo is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 01:29 PM
  #57  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,428
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 345 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Bad logic.
OK

https:/amp.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/24/bike-helmet-appetite-danger
choddo is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 01:44 PM
  #58  
Rick_D
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: California's capital
Posts: 518

Bikes: Litespeed Firenze, Spot Acme, Specialzed S Works Pro Race, Davidson Stiletto, Colnago Superissimo

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked 324 Times in 189 Posts
Will never know because my wild-and-crazy days are in the rearview, but can attest to pacing highway traffic on a long downhill coming into Victoria, B.C., where the posted speed limit was 60 mph. Whee! Descending certain Sierra Nevada highways I've passed motorcycles, but no idea what that translates into speedwise.

Today's electronics would capture and document, but did not have them back when I did most of my advanced riding. Or helmets, but a different topic.
Rick_D is offline  
Likes For Rick_D:
Old 11-27-23, 02:01 PM
  #59  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,100

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4037 Post(s)
Liked 7,617 Times in 3,054 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
OK

https:/amp.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/24/bike-helmet-appetite-danger
For those that don't want to click on the link: A couple of psychologists had people inflate animated balloons on a computer screen -- some wearing helmets and some wearing hats -- and concluded that the ones wearings helmets were willing to take more risks. Seriously. Real science.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 11-27-23, 02:14 PM
  #60  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,140
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7143 Post(s)
Liked 11,335 Times in 4,841 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
OK

https:/amp.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/24/bike-helmet-appetite-danger
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
For those that don't want to click on the link: A couple of psychologists had people inflate animated balloons on a computer screen -- some wearing helmets and some wearing hats -- and concluded that the ones wearings helmets were willing to take more risks. Seriously. Real science.
Your tl;dr only made me want to click on the link. Wowza. The article refers to the study as "extraordinary." Since it's the Guardian, I'm hoping that was an example of British sarcasm. If I were teaching research methods, I'd use that study as an example of poor research design.

The idea that safety equipment leads people to engage in riskier behavior is called risk compensation; this review of the literature (as of 2018) concludes that there is no such demonstrated effect for helmets and cyclists.
Koyote is offline  
Likes For Koyote:
Old 11-27-23, 02:19 PM
  #61  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,100

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4037 Post(s)
Liked 7,617 Times in 3,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
Your tl;dr only made me want to click on the link. Wowza. The article refers to the study as "extraordinary." Since it's the Guardian, I'm hoping that was an example of British sarcasm. If I were teaching research methods, I'd use that study as an example of poor research design.

The idea that safety equipment leads people to engage in riskier behavior is called risk compensation; this review of the literature (as of 2018) concludes that there is no such demonstrated effect for helmets and cyclists.
And, for people that don't want to click on that link:

Conclusions

Supporters of risk compensation argue against bicycle helmet wearing as they hypothesise the protective benefit is offset by risky behaviour. This systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature found little to no supportive evidence of the risk compensation hypothesis and bicycle helmet wearing. Although two out of the 23 studies were supportive of risk compensation, ten other studies found helmet wearing was associated with safer cycling behaviour.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 03:42 PM
  #62  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,428
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 345 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
For those that don't want to click on the link: A couple of psychologists had people inflate animated balloons on a computer screen -- some wearing helmets and some wearing hats -- and concluded that the ones wearings helmets were willing to take more risks. Seriously. Real science.
The interesting point was that it, in spite of having nothing to do with taking real risks, had an effect that replicated other studies demonstrating safety equipment like helmets worn in the type of activity they would normally be used also showed results of increased appetite for risk.

But I’m sure you have citations of real psychology studies showing that this is flawed logic.
choddo is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 03:44 PM
  #63  
choddo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,428
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 345 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
Your tl;dr only made me want to click on the link. Wowza. The article refers to the study as "extraordinary." Since it's the Guardian, I'm hoping that was an example of British sarcasm. If I were teaching research methods, I'd use that study as an example of poor research design.

The idea that safety equipment leads people to engage in riskier behavior is called risk compensation; this review of the literature (as of 2018) concludes that there is no such demonstrated effect for helmets and cyclists.
Thanks for an actual link. I’ll read it in a bit.
choddo is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 03:52 PM
  #64  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,100

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4037 Post(s)
Liked 7,617 Times in 3,054 Posts
Originally Posted by choddo
The interesting point was that it, in spite of having nothing to do with taking real risks, had an effect that replicated other studies demonstrating safety equipment like helmets worn in the type of activity they would normally be used also showed results of increased appetite for risk.

But I’m sure you have citations of real psychology studies showing that this is flawed logic.
The link in post #60 is a good place to start. As quoted from that link, far more studies show the effect does not exist.
tomato coupe is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 07:57 PM
  #65  
One Wheel
Full Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 158 Post(s)
Liked 56 Times in 44 Posts
54.8 mph according to Strava, recorded on a Garmin 230 running watch. I'm at least 30 lbs lighter now, which has a significant negative impact on my max speed. I've gotten over 50 mph at least 2-3 times this summer and fall, most rides I'll go over 40. I think with the right hill and tailwind, and probably a more aerodynamic helmet, 60 mph is very doable.
One Wheel is online now  
Old 11-27-23, 08:55 PM
  #66  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,627
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2626 Post(s)
Liked 3,174 Times in 1,808 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
For those that don't want to click on the link: A couple of psychologists had people inflate animated balloons on a computer screen -- some wearing helmets and some wearing hats -- and concluded that the ones wearings helmets were willing to take more risks. Seriously. Real science.
But back in the real world, if riders without helmets are more cautious, it follows logically that the safest riders of all are helmetless brakeless fixie ninjas.
Trakhak is offline  
Old 11-27-23, 09:31 PM
  #67  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,100

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4037 Post(s)
Liked 7,617 Times in 3,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
But back in the real world, if riders without helmets are more cautious, it follows logically that the safest riders of all are helmetless brakeless fixie ninjas.
... that carry knives in their teeth.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 11-28-23, 05:07 AM
  #68  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,627
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2626 Post(s)
Liked 3,174 Times in 1,808 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
... that carry knives in their teeth.
More likely, throwing stars: i.e., sharpened jockey and pulley wheels from the derailleurs that they Drewed off.
Trakhak is offline  
Likes For Trakhak:
Old 11-28-23, 07:03 AM
  #69  
eduskator
Senior Member
 
eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,161

Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 448 Posts
56mph (90kph) once and I'd never do it again. I went downhill a 20-25% gradient hill, freshly paved road, no cars.
eduskator is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 09:24 AM
  #70  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,248

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 561 Times in 448 Posts
Originally Posted by eduskator
56mph (90kph) once and I'd never do it again. I went downhill a 20-25% gradient hill, freshly paved road, no cars.
It must have been short to only hit 56. I've never found any road nearly that steep.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 09:28 AM
  #71  
eduskator
Senior Member
 
eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,161

Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 448 Posts
Yes, short and dangerous. It's between 2 mountains. The acceleration was insane. A good rush of adrenaline.
eduskator is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 09:56 AM
  #72  
genejockey 
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,369

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10634 Post(s)
Liked 12,270 Times in 6,288 Posts
There are a couple short descents on my usual routes where I routinely push 40 mph - I am somewhat 'gravity enhanced' - but one day gravity and a tailwind got together to get me up to 45 on one of them. For folks who know San Mateo, it was on Alameda de las Pulgas by Aragon HS.

Then the city in its infinite wisdom reset the timing on the traffic light at the point of maximum velocity so that I can't depend on it being green when I get there, so I've had to moderate my enthusiasm there.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 09:57 AM
  #73  
StanSeven
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 2,219 Times in 1,491 Posts
Good thread going. But let’s stop with helmet discussions. Long term experience here with that subject shows threads quickly get off on a sensitive subject. Tharts why we have this dedicated thread on helmets. Helmet sticky
StanSeven is offline  
Likes For StanSeven:
Old 11-28-23, 10:26 AM
  #74  
aliasfox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 636

Bikes: Lynskey R270 Disc, Bianchi Vigorelli

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 300 Post(s)
Liked 158 Times in 133 Posts
Originally Posted by genejockey
There are a couple short descents on my usual routes where I routinely push 40 mph - I am somewhat 'gravity enhanced' - but one day gravity and a tailwind got together to get me up to 45 on one of them. For folks who know San Mateo, it was on Alameda de las Pulgas by Aragon HS.

Then the city in its infinite wisdom reset the timing on the traffic light at the point of maximum velocity so that I can't depend on it being green when I get there, so I've had to moderate my enthusiasm there.
That might be the hill I specifically tried to avoid yesterday. I instead routed myself around to Polehmas and Ralston to get onto Alameda de Puglas. Polehmas's climb isn't so bad, but I forgot how terrifying Ralston's descent is (I probably last did it four years ago on a trip, before moving out here). Feathering the brakes on slightly broken pavement with traffic coming up from behind... kept it under 40mph, though I think I would've been more comfortable closer to 35.

Big Basin going into Saratoga can be a blast though - freshly paved, and there's a fairly straight, -7% section for well over a mile...
aliasfox is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 10:48 AM
  #75  
Eric F 
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,236

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5105 Post(s)
Liked 8,416 Times in 3,974 Posts
60mph - sitting on my top tube, with every part of me tucked in as close as I could get it. This was on a long, wide-open, 4-lane road in Death Valley (Hwy 190, descending to Panamint Springs from Towne Pass), during a race where I was trying to catch the lead group who had dropped me on the climb. I caught them after the descent, only to be dropped again on the next climb. That was 20+ years ago. These days, I don't go over 40mph very often.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Eric F is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.