What do endurance bikes accomplish for you?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: NorCal
Posts: 816
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur 4 TR, Canyon Endurace cf sl, Canyon Ultimate cf slx, Canyon Strive enduro, Canyon Grizl sl8
Liked 1,555 Times
in
572 Posts
I do have one "endurance" bike, my '20 Canyon Endurace CF SL. I really like this bike, as the geometry is on the "racier" end of the endurance bike spectrum, while still having generous tire clearance. The local roads get beat up in the winter, so I really like the ability to run 30mm tires to smooth things out.
My other road bike is a Canyon Ultimate CF SLX, it's my weight-weenie rim brake bike. Although it is a "race" bike, the geometry on the Ultimate isn't that far off from the Endurace. I can easily switch between both bikes with no issues. I'm running a slammed stem on the Endurace and a single 10mm spacer on the Ultimate. I'm comfortable with a fairly tight hip angle/flat back, so an endurance bike may not seem like the best choice...but I also have long femurs compared to the rest of my body, so I end up in an aggressive position, even on a frame with lots of stack(or that's how I interpret it.)
My other road bike is a Canyon Ultimate CF SLX, it's my weight-weenie rim brake bike. Although it is a "race" bike, the geometry on the Ultimate isn't that far off from the Endurace. I can easily switch between both bikes with no issues. I'm running a slammed stem on the Endurace and a single 10mm spacer on the Ultimate. I'm comfortable with a fairly tight hip angle/flat back, so an endurance bike may not seem like the best choice...but I also have long femurs compared to the rest of my body, so I end up in an aggressive position, even on a frame with lots of stack(or that's how I interpret it.)
#52
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,038
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,065 Times
in
4,472 Posts
I disagree, and so does Tom Kellogg:
https://www.spectrum-cycles.com/geometry.php
I also prefer neutral trail, but if I was grinding away at 15 miles an hour for 200 miles, I would certainly consider a bike that wants to ride straight at those speeds - low trail.
https://www.spectrum-cycles.com/geometry.php
I also prefer neutral trail, but if I was grinding away at 15 miles an hour for 200 miles, I would certainly consider a bike that wants to ride straight at those speeds - low trail.
A higher trail bike tends to want to stay straight at higher speed. More steering input(effort) is needed to turn. At lower speeds, steering is more wandering due to increased wheel flop.
Gravel bikes tend to have higher trail than paved road bikes and the idea is that the higher trail helps to keep the bike steering straight on uneven and rough surface. Less twitchy.
A lower trail bike tends to feel twitchier, compared to a high trail bike. Less effort is required to turn.
Bikes that are described as cornering on rails would be lower trail than bikes that are described as stable and willing to roll straight over anything.
56mm of trail an be neutral, thars totally fine. A ton of race bikes(not endurance) are higher trail than that. Just keep that reality in mind when you argue 56mm is neutral.
BMC Timemachine- 64mm trail
BMC Teammachine- 64mm trail
Cannondale SuperSix EVO- 58mm trail
Pinarello Dogma F- 66mm trail
Cervelo r5- 57.3 mm trail
Colnago v4rs- 59mm trail
Giant Propel Advanced- 59.2mm trail
These are just some of the race bikes on the world tour.
If you are going to claim these are high trail just because they are above the number you and Kellogg prefer as being neutral, there is no reason to even continue the discussion.
It isn't simply 'anything over 56mm trail is high'. There clearly is a range before something is high trail or low trail.
Last edited by mstateglfr; 12-17-23 at 10:22 PM.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#53
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,699 Times
in
1,166 Posts
The fore-aft adjustability of the saddle rail clamp makes it look very fragile, and you have confirmed my concern. If the frame takes a regular round seat post I would have bought this bike, because Bianchi celeste.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#54
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,353
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,203 Times
in
6,777 Posts
#55
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,950
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Liked 6,608 Times
in
3,342 Posts
My Cannondale Synapse also has a hidden seat post clamp with a retaining bolt that is in front of the seat post, but I don't have an issue with the wedge. My issue was having a small enough torque wrench which could access that bolt, until I found the Topeak Nano Torq Bar.
The fore-aft adjustability of the saddle rail clamp makes it look very fragile, and you have confirmed my concern. If the frame takes a regular round seat post I would have bought this bike, because Bianchi celeste.
The fore-aft adjustability of the saddle rail clamp makes it look very fragile, and you have confirmed my concern. If the frame takes a regular round seat post I would have bought this bike, because Bianchi celeste.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#56
I dont get this thread. Endurance road bikes are mildly tweaked race bikes to make them more comfortable for long distance riding where ultimate uncompromising performance is not strictly required. In my mid 50s I appreciate slightly wider tyres and a slightly more relaxed fit for century riding.
Whats not to like? Should we all have to make do with dedicated race bikes with a pile of stem spacers, short stems and potentially limited tyre clearance just to massage our egos? I do know guys who refuse to ride an endurance bike because it makes them feel less pro.
Whats not to like? Should we all have to make do with dedicated race bikes with a pile of stem spacers, short stems and potentially limited tyre clearance just to massage our egos? I do know guys who refuse to ride an endurance bike because it makes them feel less pro.
Likes For PeteHski:
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,868
Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8
Liked 2,068 Times
in
906 Posts
i am an old fat drunk and my 2024 goal is to do a 100 mile ride in 5 hours...I have a Canyon endurace cf8 disc size small as I am short and fat. I have no idea what it's geometry is. I did put a 100mm stem on it as it came with a 90mm and it felt kind of short. I actually think I could use a 110mm stem. I wonder if it is the right bike? I have put over 3000 miles on it since the end of july even tho I had to take most of sept off due to not being patient and waiting for a new seat.
#59
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,038
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,065 Times
in
4,472 Posts
Seriously Kontact- what is your actual point in starting the thread? You ask people if endurance bikes accomplish something for owners of the bikes, and then you proceed to argue a bunch and post some comments that are either wrong or not phrased in a way that makes them clear and correct.
Anyways, since I posted the trail figure for a Cervelo R5 due to that being a bike I happened to see a UCI World Team uses for regular stage races(so its a race bike?) I figured I would go back and read all the rambling thru the thread about an R5. I looked up the geometry of an R5 from years ago and yeah that looks like a pretty cool bike to ride for roads, at least for how I ride and what I would want. I would not call the geometry overly aggressive, but I also wouldnt call the geometry 'endurance'. While I wouldnt toss it in the endurance category, it isnt exactly far off.
Funny enough, comparing it to Cervelo's current endurance bike, its pretty similar. For a 2012/16 Cervelo R5 in 61 and a 2023 Cervelo Caledonia in 61...
- Stack is the same.
- Reach is the same.
- Head angle is more relaxed and fork rake is higher on the Caledonia, but those two measurements result in the same trail number of 57(using 28mm tire).
- Chainstay is 10mm longer on the Caledonia...and thats a 415mm chainstay, so hardly long.
- BB drop is 3.5mm more on the Caledonia.
Compared to an R5- same stack, same reach, same trail, and a chainstay that is only 415mmm- thats what Cervelo calls their Endurance bike. I mean, and R5 from a decade ago isnt an endurance bike, but based on the numbers above, its not not an endurance bike!
Basically the only downside is an R5 from the mid-teens before the slight frame change was that clearance maxed out at a 25mm tire. That isnt even something thats disc specific, it was just how they designed the frames at the time. It could have easily been designed to handle a 28(and that did fit in the late teens).
As already mentioned by me and others- an endurance bike is not some 'marketing fear' created by bike companies. It is simply a bike that has slightly different geometry from the race bike in that brand's lineup. It is just 1 more option for someone to consider as it provides a slightly different fit and/or slightly different feeling ride.
Options are good- consumers should like options. This isnt a nefarious plan by bike companies- thats a goofy viewpoint.
This is all just bike companies recognizing that they can get a bigger piece of the pie if they offer a couple models of road bikes that have slightly different geometries since that will increase the number of people that fit their road bikes.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#60
Component build spec also tends to be tailored more toward endurance. Its a little more than just frame geometry. Bars, seatpost, wheels, tyres and gear ratios are all tweaked on my Canyon compared to the equivalent race bike. It all adds up.
Likes For PeteHski:
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,898
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Liked 2,710 Times
in
1,459 Posts
i am an old fat drunk and my 2024 goal is to do a 100 mile ride in 5 hours...I have a Canyon endurace cf8 disc size small as I am short and fat. I have no idea what it's geometry is. I did put a 100mm stem on it as it came with a 90mm and it felt kind of short. I actually think I could use a 110mm stem. I wonder if it is the right bike? I have put over 3000 miles on it since the end of july even tho I had to take most of sept off due to not being patient and waiting for a new seat.
I will provide my address so this bike can be shipped to me (this old fat drunk)
seriously - that’s a great bike and should serve you well - 20 mile rides to 100 mile rides
for long road rides consider tires with low rolling resistance
what’s up with the seat ? taking off time due to a seat ? just get a seat and get going ! lol
btw - if you ride small sizes (as I do) - many if not most times the frame geometry will include a generous amount of trail (can often be higher number than the same frame in larger sizes) … this is a big plus for me
Last edited by t2p; 12-18-23 at 09:28 AM.
#62
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,353
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,203 Times
in
6,777 Posts
I genuinely love this back and forth. It is entertaining while getting right to the takeaway of this thread, at least the takeaway that anyone without skin in the game would have. That takeaway is- wow this is all just a big word salad without any actual substance or point.
Seriously Kontact- what is your actual point in starting the thread? You ask people if endurance bikes accomplish something for owners of the bikes, and then you proceed to argue a bunch and post some comments that are either wrong or not phrased in a way that makes them clear and correct.
Anyways, since I posted the trail figure for a Cervelo R5 due to that being a bike I happened to see a UCI World Team uses for regular stage races(so its a race bike?) I figured I would go back and read all the rambling thru the thread about an R5. I looked up the geometry of an R5 from years ago and yeah that looks like a pretty cool bike to ride for roads, at least for how I ride and what I would want. I would not call the geometry overly aggressive, but I also wouldnt call the geometry 'endurance'. While I wouldnt toss it in the endurance category, it isnt exactly far off.
Funny enough, comparing it to Cervelo's current endurance bike, its pretty similar. For a 2012/16 Cervelo R5 in 61 and a 2023 Cervelo Caledonia in 61...
- Stack is the same.
- Reach is the same.
- Head angle is more relaxed and fork rake is higher on the Caledonia, but those two measurements result in the same trail number of 57(using 28mm tire).
- Chainstay is 10mm longer on the Caledonia...and thats a 415mm chainstay, so hardly long.
- BB drop is 3.5mm more on the Caledonia.
Compared to an R5- same stack, same reach, same trail, and a chainstay that is only 415mmm- thats what Cervelo calls their Endurance bike. I mean, and R5 from a decade ago isnt an endurance bike, but based on the numbers above, its not not an endurance bike!
Basically the only downside is an R5 from the mid-teens before the slight frame change was that clearance maxed out at a 25mm tire. That isnt even something thats disc specific, it was just how they designed the frames at the time. It could have easily been designed to handle a 28(and that did fit in the late teens).
As already mentioned by me and others- an endurance bike is not some 'marketing fear' created by bike companies. It is simply a bike that has slightly different geometry from the race bike in that brand's lineup. It is just 1 more option for someone to consider as it provides a slightly different fit and/or slightly different feeling ride.
Options are good- consumers should like options. This isnt a nefarious plan by bike companies- thats a goofy viewpoint.
This is all just bike companies recognizing that they can get a bigger piece of the pie if they offer a couple models of road bikes that have slightly different geometries since that will increase the number of people that fit their road bikes.
Seriously Kontact- what is your actual point in starting the thread? You ask people if endurance bikes accomplish something for owners of the bikes, and then you proceed to argue a bunch and post some comments that are either wrong or not phrased in a way that makes them clear and correct.
Anyways, since I posted the trail figure for a Cervelo R5 due to that being a bike I happened to see a UCI World Team uses for regular stage races(so its a race bike?) I figured I would go back and read all the rambling thru the thread about an R5. I looked up the geometry of an R5 from years ago and yeah that looks like a pretty cool bike to ride for roads, at least for how I ride and what I would want. I would not call the geometry overly aggressive, but I also wouldnt call the geometry 'endurance'. While I wouldnt toss it in the endurance category, it isnt exactly far off.
Funny enough, comparing it to Cervelo's current endurance bike, its pretty similar. For a 2012/16 Cervelo R5 in 61 and a 2023 Cervelo Caledonia in 61...
- Stack is the same.
- Reach is the same.
- Head angle is more relaxed and fork rake is higher on the Caledonia, but those two measurements result in the same trail number of 57(using 28mm tire).
- Chainstay is 10mm longer on the Caledonia...and thats a 415mm chainstay, so hardly long.
- BB drop is 3.5mm more on the Caledonia.
Compared to an R5- same stack, same reach, same trail, and a chainstay that is only 415mmm- thats what Cervelo calls their Endurance bike. I mean, and R5 from a decade ago isnt an endurance bike, but based on the numbers above, its not not an endurance bike!
Basically the only downside is an R5 from the mid-teens before the slight frame change was that clearance maxed out at a 25mm tire. That isnt even something thats disc specific, it was just how they designed the frames at the time. It could have easily been designed to handle a 28(and that did fit in the late teens).
As already mentioned by me and others- an endurance bike is not some 'marketing fear' created by bike companies. It is simply a bike that has slightly different geometry from the race bike in that brand's lineup. It is just 1 more option for someone to consider as it provides a slightly different fit and/or slightly different feeling ride.
Options are good- consumers should like options. This isnt a nefarious plan by bike companies- thats a goofy viewpoint.
This is all just bike companies recognizing that they can get a bigger piece of the pie if they offer a couple models of road bikes that have slightly different geometries since that will increase the number of people that fit their road bikes.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,868
Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8
Liked 2,068 Times
in
906 Posts
absolutely not a good bike for you - Canyon bikes - especially Endurace - are not designed for old fat drunks
I will provide my address so this bike can be shipped to me (this old fat drunk)
seriously - thats a great bike and should serve you well - 20 mile rides to 100 mile rides
for long road rides consider tires with low rolling resistance
whats up with the seat ? taking off time due to a seat ? just get a seat and get going ! lol
btw - if you ride small sizes (as I do) - many if not most times the frame geometry will include a generous amount of trail (can often be higher number than the same frame in larger sizes) this is a big plus for me
I will provide my address so this bike can be shipped to me (this old fat drunk)
seriously - thats a great bike and should serve you well - 20 mile rides to 100 mile rides
for long road rides consider tires with low rolling resistance
whats up with the seat ? taking off time due to a seat ? just get a seat and get going ! lol
btw - if you ride small sizes (as I do) - many if not most times the frame geometry will include a generous amount of trail (can often be higher number than the same frame in larger sizes) this is a big plus for me
Likes For jadmt:
#64
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,353
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,203 Times
in
6,777 Posts
it came with a torture device and I could not wait to go for a ride before my replacement came. I am used to C17's and had ordered one but it was delayed. the seat it came with gave me a saddle sore that was epic and put me off the bike for 20+ days. I did an 80 mile ride on this saddle and regretted it. this is the saddle it came with....
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,898
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Liked 2,710 Times
in
1,459 Posts
it came with a torture device and I could not wait to go for a ride before my replacement came. I am used to C17's and had ordered one but it was delayed. the seat it came with gave me a saddle sore that was epic and put me off the bike for 20+ days. I did an 80 mile ride on this saddle and regretted it. this is the saddle it came with....
#67
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,353
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,203 Times
in
6,777 Posts
Yep. It cut into the backs of my thighs while making the plumbing numb. Exactly what you DON'T want in a saddle. But I'm sure there are people it works well for.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,898
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Liked 2,710 Times
in
1,459 Posts
years (actually) decades ago … early 90’s .. saw a Flite saddle and had to have one
initially they were a challenge to find … pre-internet days … distributors did not have them … but found a black Flite for MTB and white Flite for road bike … later found a gray Flite (rare - still on one of my old road bikes)
won a small bet when a couple guys in the group said I could not do a century on a Flite … never had an issue
initially they were a challenge to find … pre-internet days … distributors did not have them … but found a black Flite for MTB and white Flite for road bike … later found a gray Flite (rare - still on one of my old road bikes)
won a small bet when a couple guys in the group said I could not do a century on a Flite … never had an issue
#69
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,353
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,203 Times
in
6,777 Posts
years (actually) decades ago
early 90s .. saw a Flite saddle and had to have one
initially they were a challenge to find pre-internet days distributors did not have them but found a black Flite for MTB and white Flite for road bike later found a gray Flite (rare - still on one of my old road bikes)
won a small bet when a couple guys in the group said I could not do a century on a Flite never had an issue
initially they were a challenge to find pre-internet days distributors did not have them but found a black Flite for MTB and white Flite for road bike later found a gray Flite (rare - still on one of my old road bikes)
won a small bet when a couple guys in the group said I could not do a century on a Flite never had an issue
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#70
Senior Member
Compared to the usual "debate" threads about chain lube, discs vs rim, counter steering, etc, this one doesn't seem to be getting a lot of traction. Not necessarily a bad thing.
#71
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,353
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,203 Times
in
6,777 Posts
Since the point - assuming there is one - is entirely semantic, maybe it doesn't go to the very core of people's identities, the way chain lube or brake type does.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#72
Junior Member
I don’t get this thread. Endurance road bikes are mildly tweaked race bikes to make them more comfortable for long distance riding where ultimate uncompromising performance is not strictly required. In my mid 50s I appreciate slightly wider tyres and a slightly more relaxed fit for century riding.
What’s not to like? Should we all have to make do with dedicated race bikes with a pile of stem spacers, short stems and potentially limited tyre clearance just to massage our egos? I do know guys who refuse to ride an “endurance” bike because it makes them feel less “pro”.
What’s not to like? Should we all have to make do with dedicated race bikes with a pile of stem spacers, short stems and potentially limited tyre clearance just to massage our egos? I do know guys who refuse to ride an “endurance” bike because it makes them feel less “pro”.
The UCI definitely owns much of the blame due to the mandate that all bikes on the world tour be made available for sale to the public. That essentially means that race bikes are designed for hyper-flexi, hyper-fit professional cyclists, and then marketed to the general public as the absolute pinnacle of modern day cycling excellence (which they are). But when you look at the pool of potential buyers - those with enough disposable income to afford a bicycle that costs 5-figures - many are not hyper-flexi, hyper-fit, or in their 20s. Therein lies the rub.
The bicycle industry has to figure out how to deliver "pro" and "comfortable" to the people who are actually buying the bikes.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,868
Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8
Liked 2,068 Times
in
906 Posts
years (actually) decades ago
early 90s .. saw a Flite saddle and had to have one
initially they were a challenge to find pre-internet days distributors did not have them but found a black Flite for MTB and white Flite for road bike later found a gray Flite (rare - still on one of my old road bikes)
won a small bet when a couple guys in the group said I could not do a century on a Flite never had an issue
initially they were a challenge to find pre-internet days distributors did not have them but found a black Flite for MTB and white Flite for road bike later found a gray Flite (rare - still on one of my old road bikes)
won a small bet when a couple guys in the group said I could not do a century on a Flite never had an issue
Likes For jadmt:
#74
I totally agree with your comments, but it's that last statement in bold that seems to mess everything up. Ego and self-image more often than not tend to dictate too many buying decisions. However, the ego-driven consumer is only partly to blame.
The UCI definitely owns much of the blame due to the mandate that all bikes on the world tour be made available for sale to the public. That essentially means that race bikes are designed for hyper-flexi, hyper-fit professional cyclists, and then marketed to the general public as the absolute pinnacle of modern day cycling excellence (which they are). But when you look at the pool of potential buyers - those with enough disposable income to afford a bicycle that costs 5-figures - many are not hyper-flexi, hyper-fit, or in their 20s. Therein lies the rub.
The bicycle industry has to figure out how to deliver "pro" and "comfortable" to the people who are actually buying the bikes.
The UCI definitely owns much of the blame due to the mandate that all bikes on the world tour be made available for sale to the public. That essentially means that race bikes are designed for hyper-flexi, hyper-fit professional cyclists, and then marketed to the general public as the absolute pinnacle of modern day cycling excellence (which they are). But when you look at the pool of potential buyers - those with enough disposable income to afford a bicycle that costs 5-figures - many are not hyper-flexi, hyper-fit, or in their 20s. Therein lies the rub.
The bicycle industry has to figure out how to deliver "pro" and "comfortable" to the people who are actually buying the bikes.
"If we were being honest with ourselves, the Defy is the kind of bike that most of us probably should be riding". This was a tongue-in-cheek reference to MAMILs often choosing to ride full blown race bikes.
Personally, I don't really care how they market "endurance" bikes. For me they are pretty good at doing what it says on the tin. A race bike would work for me too, but in slightly less comfort over a long haul ride on mixed roads.
I doubt that the manufacturers care either as long as those well-heeled MAMILs buy either a "race" or "endurance" bike. Some might even buy both!
Likes For PeteHski:
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,726
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Liked 437 Times
in
263 Posts
There's a reason Baskin Robbins makes 31 flavors.
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton