One V brake arm sticks out too far
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
One V brake arm sticks out too far
"Why" you were probably not wondering "is peter swapping on and testing every set of 20inch wheels he has? Instead of cleaning up the garage like he promised"
I swapped from short arm Tektro Mini-V calipers on my Bike Friday (because the attachment thingee was just touching the rear tire) for regular length V calipers.
but on the new calipers I noticed how close to the LH crankarm the LH caliper was sitting , when installed and adjusted tightly. the crank arm barely clears it. while one the RH side there is plenty of clearance, about 25mm.
Why?
I checked the hardware for extra spacers but they were the same on both sides.
moving the spring pin to a different hole has no effect.
Finally, I measured how centered the wheel was. and .... Yes, from the outside of the seatstay to the top edge of the brake track was about 5 or more mm greater on the RH side than the Left.
and the wheels are well seated in the dropouts. Now.
which made me wonder if that wheel (#1) was not "dished" correctly.
Maybe.
so I pulled two other 406 rears and tired them.
one measured about centered. a difference of just 1mm
but another was equally off. 39mm on one side 44mm on the other side.
so what now?
pop the wheels into a truing stand and test them there?
is there any other reason the V-brake calipers could be so off?
I swapped from short arm Tektro Mini-V calipers on my Bike Friday (because the attachment thingee was just touching the rear tire) for regular length V calipers.
but on the new calipers I noticed how close to the LH crankarm the LH caliper was sitting , when installed and adjusted tightly. the crank arm barely clears it. while one the RH side there is plenty of clearance, about 25mm.
Why?
I checked the hardware for extra spacers but they were the same on both sides.
moving the spring pin to a different hole has no effect.
Finally, I measured how centered the wheel was. and .... Yes, from the outside of the seatstay to the top edge of the brake track was about 5 or more mm greater on the RH side than the Left.
and the wheels are well seated in the dropouts. Now.
which made me wonder if that wheel (#1) was not "dished" correctly.
Maybe.
so I pulled two other 406 rears and tired them.
one measured about centered. a difference of just 1mm
but another was equally off. 39mm on one side 44mm on the other side.
so what now?
pop the wheels into a truing stand and test them there?
is there any other reason the V-brake calipers could be so off?
#2
I don't know.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 2,219
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night, '89 Marinoni
Liked 1,041 Times
in
532 Posts
I find it difficult to get the v-brake arms symmetrical. I always have one at a different angle than the other. You've adjusted the small screw on the right arm to try to pull the left arm in?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,344
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Liked 4,188 Times
in
2,471 Posts
If the wheel sits centered in the frame and if the brake bosses are located in the same places of either side the brake pads generally are in the same spot in the arm's slots. The photo doesn't show this as the left pad is high up it its slot and the right pad far down. This miss matching pad position can be an indication of a wheel that is not centered, for whatever reason. It is hard to see well enough with these photos to confirm this. And our ability to best understand these positional relationships is less.
I would go back to a base line of what you can confirm. Is the axle bent? Is the rim centered/dished WRT the axle lock nut edges? Does the wheel seat fully in the dropouts? Once the wheel is confirmed to be "right" only then would I begin to explore the frame aspects.
I suspect there's an issue with the wheel and/or how it fits in the frame.
BTW the very first aspect I looked for is the pad mounting spacers/orbital adjusting washers were of the same thickness on each side of the bike. They are. Andy
I would go back to a base line of what you can confirm. Is the axle bent? Is the rim centered/dished WRT the axle lock nut edges? Does the wheel seat fully in the dropouts? Once the wheel is confirmed to be "right" only then would I begin to explore the frame aspects.
I suspect there's an issue with the wheel and/or how it fits in the frame.
BTW the very first aspect I looked for is the pad mounting spacers/orbital adjusting washers were of the same thickness on each side of the bike. They are. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#4
A thing to check is the distance between the posts that the brakes mount unto. Shimano MTB V-brakes are usually speced to use an 80mm spacing standard. Narrower spacing would require that the rims braking surface is also narrow. Matching narrow post spacing with wide rims would cause the brake arms to be splayed out too much (even with all the brake pad mounting spacers 'outside'.
Also the design of the early V-brake with the 'parallel push' system moves the pads further inwards from the arm, which makes narrow post spacing even more problematic. The BR-M739, which appears to be what you have, needs to be splayed outward more than usual than other models.
So, it seems that the frame may not have been designed to work with MTB V-brakes (long arm) and the rim width combo you're trying. The M739 makes it worst.
Also the design of the early V-brake with the 'parallel push' system moves the pads further inwards from the arm, which makes narrow post spacing even more problematic. The BR-M739, which appears to be what you have, needs to be splayed outward more than usual than other models.
So, it seems that the frame may not have been designed to work with MTB V-brakes (long arm) and the rim width combo you're trying. The M739 makes it worst.
Likes For KCT1986:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Update.
so to recap.
the brake pads are equidistant from the rims so it is not a question of spring tension.
which pointed me to my wheel not being centered. maybe due to the dishing being off.
and measuring from a point on the seat stay to a point on the rim, Left and Right, gave me different readings. about 5mm off.
but a 2nd wheel gave the same result - LH V brake caliper arm being way to close to the crank arm (and visibly being too far Left)
Could I really have two off-dish rear 20" wheels?
So I put both these wheels in a freshly calibrated truing stand AND checked them with a dish-checking tool . and they are both perfectly symmetrical. apparently correctly dished.
so what does that leave me?
the frame is not straight?
I did put the rear derailleur into the spokes on this bike once and bent the derailleur hanger (but only it seemed VERY slightly as everything still functioned afterwards, it wasn't like I ripped the hanger off the frame or trashed the wheel)
I am baffled (and reading up on how to check frame straightness)
so to recap.
the brake pads are equidistant from the rims so it is not a question of spring tension.
which pointed me to my wheel not being centered. maybe due to the dishing being off.
and measuring from a point on the seat stay to a point on the rim, Left and Right, gave me different readings. about 5mm off.
but a 2nd wheel gave the same result - LH V brake caliper arm being way to close to the crank arm (and visibly being too far Left)
Could I really have two off-dish rear 20" wheels?
So I put both these wheels in a freshly calibrated truing stand AND checked them with a dish-checking tool . and they are both perfectly symmetrical. apparently correctly dished.
so what does that leave me?
the frame is not straight?
I did put the rear derailleur into the spokes on this bike once and bent the derailleur hanger (but only it seemed VERY slightly as everything still functioned afterwards, it wasn't like I ripped the hanger off the frame or trashed the wheel)
I am baffled (and reading up on how to check frame straightness)
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
but the brake pads are correctly gapped Left and Right and the arms spring back equally.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
at that point I had been uninstalling and reinstalling the caliper arms a few times and because the fit is very tight I had to remove and reinstall the pads a few times.
I might not have had them aligned correctly when I took that photo.
I'll check that "height in slots" tomorrow.
#8
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,324
Bikes: Bike Friday All-Packa & Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte, Ozark Trail G.1 Explorer
Liked 1,621 Times
in
733 Posts
This was my Pocket Crusoe after mounting new brake pads.
And this is after someone here advised me to re-arrange the brake pad spacers to create a bigger gap. Note that the pulley is not technically required (I converted the bike to flat bars) but helps create a tighter pull vs. a traditional noodle.
__________________
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
JohnMFlores.com | YouTube: JohnMFlores
Insta: JohnMichaelFlores | TikTok: @johnnymotoflores
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
JohnMFlores.com | YouTube: JohnMFlores
Insta: JohnMichaelFlores | TikTok: @johnnymotoflores
#9
I don't see how you can tell anything about the wheel or the brakes with the pads so wonky. Raise and straighten the right pad.
Likes For Kontact:
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The left pad is at the top of the adjustment slot and 90 degrees to the arm. The right pad is much lower, but angled up at least 30 degrees above perpendicular.
I don't see how you can tell anything about the wheel or the brakes with the pads so wonky. Raise and straighten the right pad.
I don't see how you can tell anything about the wheel or the brakes with the pads so wonky. Raise and straighten the right pad.
BUT you are right. looking at things again just now, with the pads correctly installed and positioned on the brake tracks one pad (LH) is at the top of the slot while the other (RH) is much lower down.
I confirmed that the axles are firmly seated in the dropouts Left and Right
Last night I checked the two sets of wheels I tried and they seemed both dished correctly
Now I am completely confused.
could the dropouts be at different heights? so the wheel, when installed would be akimbo/off center?
RH pad correctly positioned on the brake track
but RH pad is low in the slot.
RH axle fully seated.
LH pad correctly positioned on the brake track
LH pad positioned HIGH in the slot
LH axle fully seated
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,176
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Liked 801 Times
in
591 Posts
Your pictures confirm that the left side brake pad is slid all the way up to the top of its adjustment slot and the right side brake pad is slid all the way down to the bottom of its adjustment slot. Aligning the brake pads the same way in each arm should help the situation with one arm splayed more than the other (or at least rule pad adjustment out as a possibility).
As to why the arms are so splayed out in general, I think the XT arms (with the parallel push design) probably contribute to that, as the parallelogram action is just physically larger and moves the pad further from the arm, even in the at-rest position. They're also designed to clear larger MTB tires, so their design is such that they curve outward by intention. It looks also like your pads may be pretty bulky, with the replaceable rubber insert design. You can find low profile threaded brake pads (such as these Thinline pads from Kool Stop).
Using thin pads combined with a brake arm with a relatively svelte profile (such as this M530 from Tektro, just as an example) should improve your crank clearance.
As to why the arms are so splayed out in general, I think the XT arms (with the parallel push design) probably contribute to that, as the parallelogram action is just physically larger and moves the pad further from the arm, even in the at-rest position. They're also designed to clear larger MTB tires, so their design is such that they curve outward by intention. It looks also like your pads may be pretty bulky, with the replaceable rubber insert design. You can find low profile threaded brake pads (such as these Thinline pads from Kool Stop).
Using thin pads combined with a brake arm with a relatively svelte profile (such as this M530 from Tektro, just as an example) should improve your crank clearance.
Likes For hokiefyd:
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Your pictures confirm that the left side brake pad is slid all the way up to the top of its adjustment slot and the right side brake pad is slid all the way down to the bottom of its adjustment slot. Aligning the brake pads the same way in each arm should help the situation with one arm splayed more than the other (or at least rule pad adjustment out as a possibility).
#13
The question is whether you want to ride the bike or diagnose the wheel problem. Did you try putting the wheel in backwards to see if it offers the same way?
#14
Senior Member
Does the OP have any new pads they can try?
Old pads can have been installed wrong and wear down lopsided, skewed.
They can't really be re-seated unless you shave them down back to parallel, which is what I do often to dumpster finds. I do get bulk jobber pads for about $1 each, but I still reuse whenever I can get away with it.
Old pads can have been installed wrong and wear down lopsided, skewed.
They can't really be re-seated unless you shave them down back to parallel, which is what I do often to dumpster finds. I do get bulk jobber pads for about $1 each, but I still reuse whenever I can get away with it.
#15
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,927
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Liked 1,346 Times
in
716 Posts
Your pictures confirm that the left side brake pad is slid all the way up to the top of its adjustment slot and the right side brake pad is slid all the way down to the bottom of its adjustment slot. Aligning the brake pads the same way in each arm should help the situation with one arm splayed more than the other (or at least rule pad adjustment out as a possibility)..
Not to mention the possilbe pedal / brake interference. As I think of it perhaps one post is bent ?
/marpk
#16
I looked at the pics and I see several things but this is the big problem. Either the brake posts are assymetric (unlikely) or you have something else set up wrong on the brakes. I disagree with your contention that "if the pads are equidistant then spring tension should be the same". Disagree.
Not to mention the possilbe pedal / brake interference. As I think of it perhaps one post is bent ?
/marpk
Not to mention the possilbe pedal / brake interference. As I think of it perhaps one post is bent ?
/marpk
#17
Francophile
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,573
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Liked 678 Times
in
331 Posts
Yes, it seems to me that the first thing to check is the wheel dish. If the wheel is correctly dished, then check the alignment of the rear triangle of the frame. If the frame and wheel are straight, then and only then start fixing the brake alignment.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
#18
Senior Member
Were there always V-brakes there?
I've only seen U-brakes with road pads by the chainstays.
Otherwise V-brake arms are just too dangerous, not just for barely clearing the crank, but for cyclists' foot.
I've only seen U-brakes with road pads by the chainstays.
Otherwise V-brake arms are just too dangerous, not just for barely clearing the crank, but for cyclists' foot.
Likes For soyabean:
#19
Likes For Kontact:
#21
"Why" you were probably not wondering "is peter swapping on and testing every set of 20inch wheels he has? Instead of cleaning up the garage like he promised"
I swapped from short arm Tektro Mini-V calipers on my Bike Friday (because the attachment thingee was just touching the rear tire) for regular length V calipers.
but on the new calipers I noticed how close to the LH crankarm the LH caliper was sitting , when installed and adjusted tightly. the crank arm barely clears it. while one the RH side there is plenty of clearance, about 25mm.
I swapped from short arm Tektro Mini-V calipers on my Bike Friday (because the attachment thingee was just touching the rear tire) for regular length V calipers.
but on the new calipers I noticed how close to the LH crankarm the LH caliper was sitting , when installed and adjusted tightly. the crank arm barely clears it. while one the RH side there is plenty of clearance, about 25mm.
Likes For grumpus:
#22
Take a wheel, check that the axle is not bent, the bearings are properly adjusted and the rim is true. Fit it to the frame and measure the distance from each chainstay to the rim (this will probably be easier without a tyre fitted). Now remove the wheel and fit it backwards, measure again. What are the measurements?
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
but I am heading off on a Two week excursion in about a week and so I would like to try to resolve wheel and brakes before I leave.
what do you mean by "bring the angle down"?
#24
Senior Member
In addition to the pads moving up and down in the arm, they can be angled up or down, using the convex/concave washers. This is generally done to match the angle of the rim relative to the brake arm, so the pad engages the rim evenly.
#25