Rudelli head, tapered rollers, vs Campagnolo Victory
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Rudelli head, tapered rollers, vs Campagnolo Victory
(Rudelli Headset, 1")
Completely different approaches and materials, what do you think is the best one for a road bicycle?
#2
Sometimes, it pays to go with the simpler component, as it will more likely be more reliable.
the Rudelli looks cool, but it seems to be "over-engineered", compared to the Victory headset.
Being such, the Rudelli might be harder to service and maintain, in the long run......
the Rudelli looks cool, but it seems to be "over-engineered", compared to the Victory headset.
Being such, the Rudelli might be harder to service and maintain, in the long run......
__________________
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
Likes For Chombi1:
#3
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 25,052
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Liked 3,684 Times
in
2,080 Posts
Tapered roller bearings combine high load-handling with low friction, but are pretty fussy about alignment. Cylindrical roller bearing like used in the Stronglight A9 and Tange RollerDrive have similar load handling to tapered rollers, but slightly higher friction because of sliding contact along the roller. This makes them less costly than tapered rollers and the floating races on the Stronglight and Tange units make them more tolerant of misalignment than tapered rollers. Since a headset is not in constant rotation like a hub or bottom bracket, the slight friction isn't a functional issue. The Campagnolo Victory is essentially a Campagnolo Gran Sport headset with slightly different cosmetics. The races are parabolic ground to allow minor misalignment, and use standard balls. While not as durable in principle as a roller bearing headset, it is entirely acceptable durability in use and lower friction than either roller bearing design.
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I can buy a brand new (NOS) Rudelli for 50 euro, while a Campy Victory (NOS) is about 130 euro, and very difficult to find.
I'm carefully considering the purchase, but I also wanted to understand on a principle level what was better.
Thanks guys!
I'm carefully considering the purchase, but I also wanted to understand on a principle level what was better.
Thanks guys!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,960
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Liked 681 Times
in
520 Posts
Tapered roller bearings combine high load-handling with low friction, but are pretty fussy about alignment. Cylindrical roller bearing like used in the Stronglight A9 and Tange RollerDrive have similar load handling to tapered rollers, but slightly higher friction because of sliding contact along the roller. This makes them less costly than tapered rollers and the floating races on the Stronglight and Tange units make them more tolerant of misalignment than tapered rollers. Since a headset is not in constant rotation like a hub or bottom bracket, the slight friction isn't a functional issue. The Campagnolo Victory is essentially a Campagnolo Gran Sport headset with slightly different cosmetics. The races are parabolic ground to allow minor misalignment, and use standard balls. While not as durable in principle as a roller bearing headset, it is entirely acceptable durability in use and lower friction than either roller bearing design.
does it make a difference? Not sure but I think the Stronglight setup should be cheaper to manufacture. If accurately made, Id think the Rudelli would be slightly smoother.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,960
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Liked 681 Times
in
520 Posts
where can I get that deal? I thought they would be a lot higher!
#7
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 25,052
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Liked 3,684 Times
in
2,080 Posts
Yes, that's why I referred to the Stronglight and Tange rollers as "cylindrical rollers."
It makes a small difference. The difference in track radius from the inner end of a cylindrical roller to the outer end of a cylindrical roller means that some parts of the roller will be in sliding contact with the race instead of rolling contact. A tapered roller addresses this by having a different radius on the roller ends, smaller at the inner end and larger at the outer end, so the entire length of the roller is in rolling contact with the race, resulting in lower friction in the bearing. But as I noted in my previous comment, it's not a meaningful difference for a headset, since a headset is not in constant rotation, like a hub or bottom bracket bearing would be.
Yes, as I pointed out earlier, cylindrical rollers are less costly to implement and more forgiving of minor misalignment than tapered rollers.
does it make a difference?
Not sure but I think the Stronglight setup should be cheaper to manufacture. If accurately made, I’d think the Rudelli would be slightly smoother.
Last edited by JohnDThompson; 04-25-24 at 05:23 PM.
#8
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,797
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaņa pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Liked 829 Times
in
461 Posts
My experience with roller headsets is very limited, but the ones I've seen appeared to be more prone to "brinelling" than ball bearing headsets. Could it be?
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
which one? the Rudelli or the Victory?
edit:
link, typos
- Rudelli headset, from an Italian dude on eBay, who works as a professional photographer, but occasionally cleans out warehouses, and sometimes finds interesting things, in NOS/mint conditions.
- Victory headset, for the titanium bike I'm building, I got one from a craftsman who paints steel frames and builds handcrafted forks. He has a few things in stock, and if he is int the right moon - it can help if you also commission him a NivaCrom steel fork - he'll give you great prices for the rest too. He said that 120 euro NOS with its original box was a really good price, and that he couldn't do better. True, because on eBay I have seen prices above 200 euros
- Atena 1" headeset, NOS, English threaded, paid 80 euro
- Mirage 1997 1" headset, NOS, English threaded, paid 40 euro
edit:
link, typos
Last edited by DiTBho; 04-26-24 at 05:17 AM.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#12
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,927
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Liked 1,346 Times
in
716 Posts
that's a real neat part, I especially like the colleted upper nut that compresses as you tighten it.
that said, I would not install that on a bike I was going to ride. No spare parts available and more complicated than it needs to be.
I have had VERY good luck with the Stronglight A9 roller headsets, 1000s of trouble free miles. On several bikes I just use the lower portion, leaving the upper cup Campagnolo parts in place
ALSO - the comment about alignment of the headtube faces - the Stronglight A9 and I beleive this Rudelli unit, have conical "slip plates" that make them more tolerant of minor mis-alignment. The Galli headset with it's true tapered roller bearings required very accurate headtube facing. This unit should not require any special treatment in that regard.
/markp
/markp
that said, I would not install that on a bike I was going to ride. No spare parts available and more complicated than it needs to be.
I have had VERY good luck with the Stronglight A9 roller headsets, 1000s of trouble free miles. On several bikes I just use the lower portion, leaving the upper cup Campagnolo parts in place
ALSO - the comment about alignment of the headtube faces - the Stronglight A9 and I beleive this Rudelli unit, have conical "slip plates" that make them more tolerant of minor mis-alignment. The Galli headset with it's true tapered roller bearings required very accurate headtube facing. This unit should not require any special treatment in that regard.
/markp
/markp
Last edited by mpetry912; 04-26-24 at 01:27 PM.
#13
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 25,052
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Liked 3,684 Times
in
2,080 Posts
#14
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 25,052
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Liked 3,684 Times
in
2,080 Posts
https://www.somafabshop.com/shop/297...gory=979#attr=
The Galli headset with it's true tapered roller bearings required very accurate headtube facing.
Only the early Galli headsets used tapered roller bearings; later ones were rebranded Stronglight A9s, probably because of the alignment fussiness of the tapered roller version.
Last edited by JohnDThompson; 04-26-24 at 05:03 PM.
#15
I'd always choose the Stronglight A9 headset over any headset. They are smooth and lasts forever with minimum adjustments.
they are also quite simple and the needle bearings are still available oit there if you ever need them. Same goes gor the top and bottom steel races Just keep them lubricated and they can last the life of the bike. The oldest one I have is the original one on my 1984 Peugeot PSV. It is still going strong to this day.
they are also quite simple and the needle bearings are still available oit there if you ever need them. Same goes gor the top and bottom steel races Just keep them lubricated and they can last the life of the bike. The oldest one I have is the original one on my 1984 Peugeot PSV. It is still going strong to this day.
Last edited by Chombi1; 04-27-24 at 02:15 AM.