Late 80s vs 70s Road Bike ride feel
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Bikes: 2015 Felt Z75 Disc, 2008 Fuji Cross Comp, 2010 Trek Navigator 1.0, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1974 Schwinn Le Tour, 1981 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Surly Cross Check, 2021 Giant Talon 2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
60 Posts
Late 80s vs 70s Road Bike ride feel
I've ridden some 70s road bikes with the wider 27" tires and find them to be really smooth riding. I'm thinking about getting a late 80s steel Trek road bike and am curious how the ride feel is with the skinnier 700 tires? Are they a harsher ride feel?
__________________
check out the Frugal Average Bicyclist
Frugal Average Bicyclist – The goal here is to help you keep cycling on a budget.
check out the Frugal Average Bicyclist
Frugal Average Bicyclist – The goal here is to help you keep cycling on a budget.
#2
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,945
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3817 Post(s)
Liked 5,840 Times
in
2,952 Posts
A wider tire can usually be ridden with less pressure. All other things being equal it will ride more smoothly than a narrower tire. Bet you know that already. 27" or 700c wouldn't matter. In reality, there are so many variables that it's impossible to make a generalized judgement, 70's vs 80's bikes. Bet you know that as well....
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,563
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 1,359 Times
in
503 Posts
Now I'm confused. My 80s road bike has really wide 700C tires (which are widely available) and my 80s touring bike has narrower 27" tires (because they don't make anything wider than about 32 mm) and because the larger wheel diameter and therefore reduced frame clearances restricts you to narrower tires. I think that you have things backwards. That said, in the late 80s to 2000s there was a silly trend to build frames with really tight clearances so that you were restricted to very narrow tires (e.g. <25 mm) based on the incorrect assumption that thinner = lower rolling resistance. The solution...don't get a frame with tight clearances because skinny tires generally = higher rolling resistance, higher fatigue and discomfort, and poorer grip in turns.
Also note that there's more than tire width that goes into road feel. Frame geometry and material has a lot to do with it.
Also note that there's more than tire width that goes into road feel. Frame geometry and material has a lot to do with it.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Bikes: 2015 Felt Z75 Disc, 2008 Fuji Cross Comp, 2010 Trek Navigator 1.0, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1974 Schwinn Le Tour, 1981 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Surly Cross Check, 2021 Giant Talon 2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
60 Posts
Now I'm confused. My 80s road bike has really wide 700C tires (which are widely available) and my 80s touring bike has narrower 27" tires (because they don't make anything wider than about 32 mm) and because the larger wheel diameter and therefore reduced frame clearances restricts you to narrower tires. I think that you have things backwards. That said, in the late 80s to 2000s there was a silly trend to build frames with really tight clearances so that you were restricted to very narrow tires (e.g. <25 mm) based on the incorrect assumption that thinner = lower rolling resistance. The solution...don't get a frame with tight clearances because skinny tires generally = higher rolling resistance, higher fatigue and discomfort, and poorer grip in turns.
Also note that there's more than tire width that goes into road feel. Frame geometry and material has a lot to do with it.
Also note that there's more than tire width that goes into road feel. Frame geometry and material has a lot to do with it.
__________________
check out the Frugal Average Bicyclist
Frugal Average Bicyclist – The goal here is to help you keep cycling on a budget.
check out the Frugal Average Bicyclist
Frugal Average Bicyclist – The goal here is to help you keep cycling on a budget.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,563
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 1,359 Times
in
503 Posts
It is true that there was a trend to tighter clearances later on for racing bikes (I'm thinking this really started in the 90s, not the 80s), but actually many late 80s touring and sport touring bikes had pretty wide clearances and could generally take wider tires compared to what was available in the 70s. Like I said, this has nothing to do with 700C vs 27", especially today when wide 27" tires don't exist whereas wide 700C tires are easy to get.
#6
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,709
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3954 Post(s)
Liked 6,642 Times
in
3,287 Posts
They can to some folks, especially large folks. Required pressure is a direct function of total weight.
23mm tires can feel "harsh" to me, especially in a smaller frame that's very lightweight in the rear triangle. In a dedicated road bike, 28's feel sluggish. 25's are just right.
I also like dark red wine, pumpkin scented candles, and Bob Dylan's gospel albums.
23mm tires can feel "harsh" to me, especially in a smaller frame that's very lightweight in the rear triangle. In a dedicated road bike, 28's feel sluggish. 25's are just right.
I also like dark red wine, pumpkin scented candles, and Bob Dylan's gospel albums.
Likes For SurferRosa:
#7
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,225
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 897 Post(s)
Liked 950 Times
in
553 Posts
80s race bikes got much more tight and aggressive, but they also got more accessible, as bigger manufacturers offered bikes that incorporated the designs that were formerly the realm of more specialist builders.
Enthusiast riders who had been pedaling Raleigh Grand Sports and Miyata 712s “moved up” to Ironman Centurions and Criterium Cannondales that were available at their local bike shops.
As 70s Boom Bike riders moved up to nicer bikes, they also moved to more “racy” ones.
#8
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,225
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 897 Post(s)
Liked 950 Times
in
553 Posts
A more expensive tire may provide higher performance, at the sake of durability, or like the Gatorskins, high durability and good performance, but at the expense of comfort.
I acquired a set of S-Works Turbo 320tpi cotton racing clinchers in 26mm that I fitted to my Cannondale Criterium. Those tires absolutely transformed the riding character of that bike, compared to the 23mm 60 tpi Kendas it originally came with. Transitions and pavement changes that previously made the bike nervous and jittery are now effortlessly fast and smooth.
The left turn onto my street has a distinct transition, so all of my bikes go across it, like my “control @ bump. The Turbos are definitely smoother than the 32mm Paselas and 28mm Ultra Sports on the other road bikes, and up there with the 2.0s on the “urban MTB” for ride compliance.
Of course those tires are about 4x more expensive, and I wonder about tread life expectancy, but they are so, so satisfying to ride.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,548
Bikes: One of everything and three of everything French
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 470 Post(s)
Liked 351 Times
in
225 Posts
There is no formula for smoothness. One of my smoothest riders is a late 80s SLX race bike with 23mm tires. I dont know why- maybe it's magic. Good luck!
__________________
I.C.
I.C.
Likes For Insidious C.:
#10
Junior Member
I haven't ridden a 70's bike really, but I can say I got used to 23's and 25's at 100-110psi over 2 or 3 weeks. I treat it like a different "experience" and enjoy the positives and negatives. Would I do a tour on bad pavement over a long period of time? probably not, but it sure is fun on normal road rides and with some adaptation over time it's fine. Of course as said above tire suppleness can vary. I tend to use cheaper low TPI tires but it doesn't bother me much unless I don't standup for big impacts or I try and ride fast over bad roads. Also..... thee are 80's touring treks with decent tire clearance, so the specific model and intentions of the bike do matter.
Likes For thinktubes:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,531
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1846 Post(s)
Liked 3,491 Times
in
1,618 Posts
There was definitely a trend towards tighter clearances in the 80's, partly due to fashion and partly due to some desire for increased stiffness that would result from shorter stays and fork blades. Not sure that it really did this, but what do I know....
I've got a 1987 Hetchins that must have been near the peak for tight clearances. The brakes are the short reach Campy Record model, and the frame was designed to have the brake pads at the top of the slots. I can barely fit a 25mm Continental in there (this was prior to ETRTO sizing, so maybe you could get a current 28mm in there).
For contrast, this is my '74 Raleigh International with Weinmann 610 brakes. Lots of room for a larger tire there! I think the tire shown was a 23mm. The limiting factor for the bike is the space between the chain stays, though. I think a 32mm will fit fine, but I'm not sure how much larger could fit.
The Hetchins is built with what appears to be lighter tubing, and I do think the ride is nicer for my relatively light weight.
Steve in Peoria
I've got a 1987 Hetchins that must have been near the peak for tight clearances. The brakes are the short reach Campy Record model, and the frame was designed to have the brake pads at the top of the slots. I can barely fit a 25mm Continental in there (this was prior to ETRTO sizing, so maybe you could get a current 28mm in there).
For contrast, this is my '74 Raleigh International with Weinmann 610 brakes. Lots of room for a larger tire there! I think the tire shown was a 23mm. The limiting factor for the bike is the space between the chain stays, though. I think a 32mm will fit fine, but I'm not sure how much larger could fit.
The Hetchins is built with what appears to be lighter tubing, and I do think the ride is nicer for my relatively light weight.
Steve in Peoria
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 6,045
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3663 Post(s)
Liked 3,100 Times
in
1,868 Posts
My 1989 Cinelli can probably take wider tires than the 23 mm I currently use (I think it's rated for 25 max), but I would never do that, because I'm not looking for a "smoother" ride. Late 80s bikes were probably driven a bit by the American "crit" mentality, so may have steeper angles and quicker steering than a 1970s model. Why don't you just get one and see for yourself?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,392
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1168 Post(s)
Liked 1,847 Times
in
1,004 Posts
Late 80’s, that may feel twitchy after riding a 70’s. Depends on the specific bike geometry. Late 80’s had a lot 74', mid 70’s had 72' and more offset to the fork.
Likes For Mr. 66:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: California's capital
Posts: 525
Bikes: Litespeed Firenze, Spot Acme, Specialzed S Works Pro Race, Davidson Stiletto, Colnago Superissimo
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked 327 Times
in
191 Posts
The question has me pondering when, if ever, did 27" rims become available with hook bead configuration? My sole 27" bike did not allow me to pump the tires particularly hard. When I overpumped (or left the bike in a hot trunk) they would blow out {BANG!}. All my 700C clincher rims have been hook-bead style and back when 20 and 23mm tires comprised most of those available, the ride was noticeably harsher, with more precise steering and less rolling resistance the rewards. 25s and 28s now are a lot more comfy and as long as the '80s bike has clearance, it should be tunable to your preference.
ETA restoring my '83 Colnago I had the OG tubular rims swapped out for vintageish Velo Orange clinchers, and the 25mm tires fit with plenty of room to spare--frame and brakes. The ride is lovely.
ETA restoring my '83 Colnago I had the OG tubular rims swapped out for vintageish Velo Orange clinchers, and the 25mm tires fit with plenty of room to spare--frame and brakes. The ride is lovely.
Last edited by Rick_D; 05-17-24 at 12:34 PM.
#16
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,986
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1519 Post(s)
Liked 1,142 Times
in
667 Posts
This is a bit of a subjective assessment. I (briefly) had two Trek road bikes from the 1980s. Neither of them rode the way I was used to (teenager of the 70s), and I passed them both on. Some of it may have been the tires, but to me, they both felt a bit "dead". I think they were constructed to be a bit less horizontally compliant than I liked. I have no idea how prevalent this was, but it was enough so that I believed that I noticed it.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,531
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1846 Post(s)
Liked 3,491 Times
in
1,618 Posts
Of course, this was also around the time that 90 psi clinchers in the 27 x 1 1/8" became available (replacing the 70 psi 27 x 1 1/4"). These were all(?) steel bead tires. IIRC, there was little chance of blowing a 70 psi tire off a hookless rim.
Steve in Peoria
(those 90 psi 1 1/8" tires were fairly nice, and it's surprising that we are finally finding our way back to them)
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Bikes: 2015 Felt Z75 Disc, 2008 Fuji Cross Comp, 2010 Trek Navigator 1.0, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1974 Schwinn Le Tour, 1981 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Surly Cross Check, 2021 Giant Talon 2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
60 Posts
I haven't ridden a 70's bike really, but I can say I got used to 23's and 25's at 100-110psi over 2 or 3 weeks. I treat it like a different "experience" and enjoy the positives and negatives. Would I do a tour on bad pavement over a long period of time? probably not, but it sure is fun on normal road rides and with some adaptation over time it's fine. Of course as said above tire suppleness can vary. I tend to use cheaper low TPI tires but it doesn't bother me much unless I don't standup for big impacts or I try and ride fast over bad roads. Also..... thee are 80's touring treks with decent tire clearance, so the specific model and intentions of the bike do matter.
__________________
check out the Frugal Average Bicyclist
Frugal Average Bicyclist – The goal here is to help you keep cycling on a budget.
check out the Frugal Average Bicyclist
Frugal Average Bicyclist – The goal here is to help you keep cycling on a budget.