TLR (using tubes) vs Clincher?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Alamitos, Calif.
Posts: 2,523
Bikes: Canyon Endurace
Liked 975 Times
in
566 Posts
TLR (using tubes) vs Clincher?
While deciding on my next set of tires I've noticed that the selection of TLR tires far exceeds what I'm seeing available in clinchers. That's not to say I can't find the clinchers I like, but again, the availability and selection of TLR tires is huge.
I understand that a TLR setup without tubes will most likely decrease my rolling resistance and increase the ride comfort while assisting by reducing downtime due to flats, but how much am I actually hobbling myself by running those TLRs with a tube? I'm a devote clincher user and would rather stay away from a tubeless setup.
I understand that a TLR setup without tubes will most likely decrease my rolling resistance and increase the ride comfort while assisting by reducing downtime due to flats, but how much am I actually hobbling myself by running those TLRs with a tube? I'm a devote clincher user and would rather stay away from a tubeless setup.
#2
Not actually Tmonk
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 15,092
Bikes: road, track, mtb
Liked 3,911 Times
in
2,040 Posts
I use some Aeolus Pro TLR 3's on my daily driver TCR with tubes (TPU). It works just fine.
__________________
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
Likes For TMonk:
#3
Not actually Tmonk
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 15,092
Bikes: road, track, mtb
Liked 3,911 Times
in
2,040 Posts
Just checked your location. In coastal Orange County CA, things like goatheads and broken glass would be minimized compared to more rural areas. Tubeless would be a solution looking for a problem for you (as it is for me, on road at least).
__________________
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
Likes For TMonk:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 7,226
Bikes: Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Liked 2,061 Times
in
1,168 Posts
I have some Pirelli P Zero Race TLR's that I run with TPU's and it works fine and I do not see any difference in my avg speed or power.
Likes For jaxgtr:
#5
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,855
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Liked 1,613 Times
in
1,061 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 7,226
Bikes: Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Liked 2,061 Times
in
1,168 Posts
I have been running them tubeless for a while and I wanted to try the TPU's, but did not want to buy the tubed versions for the experiment. So the last time I had to add sealant, I just cleaned them up, popped in the TPU and off I went. Knock on wood, no flats yet and it has been somewhere close to 800 miles give or take a few.
#7
Senior Member
TLR ready tires with tubes are a hassle. They're harder to deal with when fixing a flat. I prefer a clincher with a good balance of puncture/rolling resistance and TPU tubes.Tubeless road tires are still susceptible to sidewall cuts and flats. I've seen many stranded tubeless cyclists forced to call a ride share or taxi.
My recipe is running clinchers + TPU tubes on taped up TLR carbon wheels. I carry several spare TPU tubes and use a portable e-pump for the smoothest and fastest way to fix a flat. I also make sure I adhere to proper PSI based on my ride conditions & weight. I used 25c clinchers, but run them around 80psi on rough roads.
Though for my gravel bike, I'm 100% tubeless and even like hookless! Though I only run that setup at 40psi or less!
My recipe is running clinchers + TPU tubes on taped up TLR carbon wheels. I carry several spare TPU tubes and use a portable e-pump for the smoothest and fastest way to fix a flat. I also make sure I adhere to proper PSI based on my ride conditions & weight. I used 25c clinchers, but run them around 80psi on rough roads.
Though for my gravel bike, I'm 100% tubeless and even like hookless! Though I only run that setup at 40psi or less!
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Alamitos, Calif.
Posts: 2,523
Bikes: Canyon Endurace
Liked 975 Times
in
566 Posts
I agree. I had a heck of a time getting it to mount correctly. I thought it was just because of inexperience or just being out on the road with little patience. I tried to get them mounted correctly a couple of times when I got home and finally gave up.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,221
Bikes: Columbine, Paramount Track Bike, Colnago Super, Santana Tandems (1995 & 2007), Gary Fisher Piranha, Trek Wahoo, Bianchi Track Bike, a couple of Honda mountain bikes
Liked 440 Times
in
271 Posts
I’m still on the fence about tubeless. How low of a tire pressure would one be able to run on a 700c x 32 tire?
__________________
Cheers, Mike
-Stupid hurts....ride safe
Cheers, Mike
-Stupid hurts....ride safe
#10
Senior Member
I would go tubeless on a 32c tire. There's enough tire volume making them easier to work with. I would say 60psi or less depending on your weight and road conditions.
Likes For jonathanf2:
#11
Senior Member
Basically it boils down to when I need new tires, what is available and at a good price.
I agree. I had a heck of a time getting it to mount correctly. I thought it was just because of inexperience or just being out on the road with little patience. I tried to get them mounted correctly a couple of times when I got home and finally gave up.
I agree. I had a heck of a time getting it to mount correctly. I thought it was just because of inexperience or just being out on the road with little patience. I tried to get them mounted correctly a couple of times when I got home and finally gave up.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 7,226
Bikes: Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Liked 2,061 Times
in
1,168 Posts
In the past few months I helped two cyclists on the road fix their flat tires. Both were running TLR tires with butyl tubes. Drives me nuts that many bike shops let cyclists ride with this combination without giving them options. For new or mechanically challenged riders, it's a major PITA to fix a flat. Either give them clinchers or set them up full tubeless.
I like tubeless, but I am leaning to going back to tubes on my road bikes and have no problems running then with my current tires while they still have life left in them as I know I can easily change a tube on the side of the road. When they are due for replacement, I could go back to a tubed version for some of the weight savings.
Likes For jaxgtr:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,336
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,415 Times
in
1,363 Posts
I run tubeless (I assume that's "TLR", never heard of that). on my new Emonda. Has Bontrager rims that are 27.5 mm wide exterior, I run Conti GP5000 S TR 28mm tires that end up as 30mm. I run 70/80 psi. I weigh 225. It's a very comfortable ride.
#14
Full Member
Confusing question by the OP. For example, Continental Grand Prix 5000 tubeless tires are heavier and more expensive than the tubed tire version. I’ve debated tubeless vs tubed (my carbon rims are ‘tubeless ready’) and based on my riding style and conditions, I’ve opted for the tubed variety….using lightweight TPU tubes. No regrets.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,336
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,415 Times
in
1,363 Posts
Confusing question by the OP. For example, Continental Grand Prix 5000 tubeless tires are heavier and more expensive than the tubed tire version. I’ve debated tubeless vs tubed (my carbon rims are ‘tubeless ready’) and based on my riding style and conditions, I’ve opted for the tubed variety….using lightweight TPU tubes. No regrets.
#16
Full Member
250g/220g tubeless/tubed manufacturer specs
255g/221g tubeless/tubed measured weight
Last edited by Biker Pete; 05-26-24 at 05:42 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,336
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,415 Times
in
1,363 Posts
Thats what BTD shows as well for the 25’s. The 28’s are the same weight. Kind of a moot point. 30 grams is an ounce,
#18
Full Member
tubeless/tubed 280g/250g manufacturer specs
tubeless/tubed 265g/235g measured weight
I use 28mm tubed and their measured weights jive with my results.
Yeah it’s not a lot of weight but the tubeless in this brand/model do appear to be heavier. And the times I’ve looked the tubeless are more expensive.
So for me, these factors, in addition to my riding style and conditions and other factors I won’t go into, swayed me to the tubed version. Using the tubeless version with tubes, which is what the OP is wondering about, makes even less sense to me. But I acknowledge that people have different opinions, perspectives, and needs.
Last edited by Biker Pete; 05-26-24 at 05:42 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,336
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,415 Times
in
1,363 Posts
And for the 28s
tubeless/tubed 280g/250g manufacturer specs
tubeless/tubed 265g/235g measured weight
I use 28mm tubed and their measured weights jive with my results.
Yeah it’s not a lot of weight but the tubeless in this brand/model do appear to be heavier. And the times I’ve looked the tubeless are more expensive.
So for me, these factors, in addition to my riding style and conditions and other factors I won’t go into, swayed me to the tubed version. Using the tubeless version with tubes, which is what the OP is wondering about, makes even less sense to me. But I acknowledge that people have different opinions, perspectives, and needs.
tubeless/tubed 280g/250g manufacturer specs
tubeless/tubed 265g/235g measured weight
I use 28mm tubed and their measured weights jive with my results.
Yeah it’s not a lot of weight but the tubeless in this brand/model do appear to be heavier. And the times I’ve looked the tubeless are more expensive.
So for me, these factors, in addition to my riding style and conditions and other factors I won’t go into, swayed me to the tubed version. Using the tubeless version with tubes, which is what the OP is wondering about, makes even less sense to me. But I acknowledge that people have different opinions, perspectives, and needs.
Likes For Steve B.:
#20
Full Member
I had the typical “go tubeless” dilemma. The bike came with some low end Bontrager tubed tires in 25. I knew the rim could go tubeless and I wanted to replace with 5000’s. I also knew what a PITA it can be (as noted in this thread) changing a flat with tubes in the field with a tubeless rim. Thus opted to pay some more for the 5000 in tubeless, went up a size as well and ran as tubeless. As it developed, Trek did not install tubeless TLR tape as per spec., so after a frustrating time trying to air up, o had my LBS do it. I gamble that the sealant will handle typical punctures and I won’t need to install a tube on the side of a highway. I carry a tube anyway, plus CO2, a pump and tire levers. I do have the benefit of a comfortable ride at reduced psi, so there’s that. And 5000’s are a nice riding tire.
#21
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,144
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,702 Times
in
1,169 Posts
This may be a stupid reason, but I plan to setup my new road bike tubeless because the wheels are deeper, and I do not want to want to use valve extensions.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 7,226
Bikes: Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Liked 2,061 Times
in
1,168 Posts
That is actually not a stupid reason, I hate valve extensions.
#23
Senior Member
#24
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,144
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,702 Times
in
1,169 Posts
#25
Senior Member
While deciding on my next set of tires I've noticed that the selection of TLR tires far exceeds what I'm seeing available in clinchers. That's not to say I can't find the clinchers I like, but again, the availability and selection of TLR tires is huge.
I understand that a TLR setup without tubes will most likely decrease my rolling resistance and increase the ride comfort while assisting by reducing downtime due to flats, but how much am I actually hobbling myself by running those TLRs with a tube? I'm a devote clincher user and would rather stay away from a tubeless setup.
I understand that a TLR setup without tubes will most likely decrease my rolling resistance and increase the ride comfort while assisting by reducing downtime due to flats, but how much am I actually hobbling myself by running those TLRs with a tube? I'm a devote clincher user and would rather stay away from a tubeless setup.