Driver Hits a Group ride in Victoria BC
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Peg
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Driver Hits a Group ride in Victoria BC
I didn't see this posted yet.
https://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-col...-accident.html
RCMP are investigating a strange accident in Sidney in which a passing vehicle apparently crashed into a group of about 20 cyclists from a Victoria-area riding club.
The cyclists were biking along Lands End Road, north of Victoria, when the car attempted to go around them, but a second vehicle turned onto the same road, sideswiping the first one, said police in a statement released on Sunday morning.
Several of the cyclists sustained minor injuries and two were treated in hospital and later released.
Neither driver suffered any injuries, but substantial property damage occurred to both the vehicles and many of the bicycles.
RCMP were continuing their investigation into the collision, but pointed out that under the British Columbia Motor Vehicle Act, a cyclist must not ride abreast of another person operating a cycle on the roadway.
https://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-col...-accident.html
RCMP are investigating a strange accident in Sidney in which a passing vehicle apparently crashed into a group of about 20 cyclists from a Victoria-area riding club.
The cyclists were biking along Lands End Road, north of Victoria, when the car attempted to go around them, but a second vehicle turned onto the same road, sideswiping the first one, said police in a statement released on Sunday morning.
Several of the cyclists sustained minor injuries and two were treated in hospital and later released.
Neither driver suffered any injuries, but substantial property damage occurred to both the vehicles and many of the bicycles.
RCMP were continuing their investigation into the collision, but pointed out that under the British Columbia Motor Vehicle Act, a cyclist must not ride abreast of another person operating a cycle on the roadway.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 970
Bikes: Miyata 600, Marin Larkspur, Marin Muirwoods, GT tequesta, Fuji Ace
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Of course we had marshalls at many of the intersections, but reason suggests that bikes should be able to pass each other at the very least, and when there are significant numbers of bikes on the road (say 5-10/minute or so) it would cause everybody headaches if there was no side by side riding.
IMHO the issue here is someone was passing without have a clear line of sight on the opposite lane - a dangerous manouver indeed.
#3
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Yup yet again, along comes an impatient motorist...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 1,051
Bikes: Specialized Allez (2007)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To up is allowed in the UK, though many drivers are unaware of this and give us stick about it. But I feel it's much safer- the group becomes much shorter and the motorists behind are more easily aware that there are a lot of cyclists there, which they need to overtake as they would any other vehicle. In single file most will just push past, buzzing you if the opposite lane is in use. I'd rather have the angry arsehole honking at me and waiting his turn than the people buzzing me any day.
#6
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,029
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
How many cyclist were riding abreast is likely irrelevant if the lane was not wide enough for a motor vehicle to pass a single file line of cylists without going over the roadway centerline. Even if it was wide enough it is not what caused the accident.
In the US it is illegal to drive on the left side of the roadway (pass):
1. When approaching the crest of a grade or on a curve in the highway where the driver's view is obstructed within such distance as to create a hazard in the event another vehicle might approach from the opposite direction.
2. When approaching within one hundred feet of or traversing any intersection or railroad grade crossing or where appropriate signs or markings have been installed to define a no passing zone.
3. When the view is obstructed on approaching within one hundred feet of any bridge, viaduct or tunnel
In most cases intersection approaches are marked (with signs and/or centerline striping) as no passing zones.
The other cause is the 2nd driver who pulled into the roadway should not (by US law) enter the roadway if vehicles "are approaching so closely on the through highway as to constitute an immediate hazard"
Of course these are US laws, but very likely similar ones apply.
In the US it is illegal to drive on the left side of the roadway (pass):
1. When approaching the crest of a grade or on a curve in the highway where the driver's view is obstructed within such distance as to create a hazard in the event another vehicle might approach from the opposite direction.
2. When approaching within one hundred feet of or traversing any intersection or railroad grade crossing or where appropriate signs or markings have been installed to define a no passing zone.
3. When the view is obstructed on approaching within one hundred feet of any bridge, viaduct or tunnel
In most cases intersection approaches are marked (with signs and/or centerline striping) as no passing zones.
The other cause is the 2nd driver who pulled into the roadway should not (by US law) enter the roadway if vehicles "are approaching so closely on the through highway as to constitute an immediate hazard"
Of course these are US laws, but very likely similar ones apply.
#7
Senior Member
as for passing within 100 feet of an intersection - in dense urban areas, does that mean no passing at all?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,457
Liked 1,452 Times
in
1,009 Posts
I did the Ride to Conquer Cancer last year, where we had 3500 cyclists on a two day ride. In such circumstances, riding single file would mean that a car waiting at an intersection with a stop sign might have to let 7km of bicycles by before they could get onto the street.
It's not clear that the BC group ride was anything more than 20 people riding together.
"RCMP are investigating a strange accident in Sidney in which a passing vehicle apparently crashed into a group of about 20 cyclists from a Victoria-area riding club."
Passing isn't really "side by side" riding in the way the BC law intends since it's temporary and performed when it's appropriate/safe to pass. Keep in mind that the person passing (whether in a car or on a bicycle) has the largest responsibility with respect to safety. (Note that cars are not allowed to drive side-by-side but they are allowed to pass.)
Last edited by njkayaker; 03-10-09 at 05:43 PM.
#9
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,527
Liked 3,822 Times
in
2,604 Posts
there is a small problem with not letting a group of cyclists double up. Namely, it is a lot more difficult to pass a single line of 20 than a double line of 20. The motorist was probably catastrophizing and didn't want to be stuck behind the group forever.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 970
Bikes: Miyata 600, Marin Larkspur, Marin Muirwoods, GT tequesta, Fuji Ace
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Doubling up is a good idea in many cases.
Furthermore, I pass other cyclists (or get passed myself) regularly on my short (about 2 km) commute. Does that constitute 'doubling up'?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,457
Liked 1,452 Times
in
1,009 Posts
====================
Side-by-side (two abreast) riding is legal in WA and MA (at least). And in Vancouver.
https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/bike/laws.htm
https://www.massbike.org/bikebill/index.htm
https://www.cityofvancouver.us/bike.a...ID=23514#23559
Last edited by njkayaker; 03-11-09 at 11:12 AM.
#13
Senior Member
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,457
Liked 1,452 Times
in
1,009 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,457
Liked 1,452 Times
in
1,009 Posts
Let's just say that in my video, every single driver crossed over the double yellow while passing, and I consider that a good thing.
Last edited by njkayaker; 03-11-09 at 05:17 PM.
#17
Senior Member
At least in Ohio (where I live), a motorist can cross the double yellow when the following are true:
(1) The slower vehicle is proceeding at less than half the speed of the speed limit applicable to that location.
(2) The faster vehicle is capable of overtaking and passing the slower vehicle without exceeding the speed limit.
(3) There is sufficient clear sight distance to the left of the center or center line of the roadway to meet the overtaking and passing provisions of section 4511.29 of the Revised Code, considering the speed of the slower vehicle.
(2) The faster vehicle is capable of overtaking and passing the slower vehicle without exceeding the speed limit.
(3) There is sufficient clear sight distance to the left of the center or center line of the roadway to meet the overtaking and passing provisions of section 4511.29 of the Revised Code, considering the speed of the slower vehicle.
#18
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,600
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Liked 4,530 Times
in
2,140 Posts
I find it rather amusing that nobody has since realized that the result of the accident would have been the same regardless of whether the cyclists were riding two abreast or single file.
A few feet farther right on the part of the passing motorist would not have prevented the other vehicle from shoving said passing vehicle into the paceline. No difference.
-Kurt
A few feet farther right on the part of the passing motorist would not have prevented the other vehicle from shoving said passing vehicle into the paceline. No difference.
-Kurt
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles area (SoBay)
Posts: 280
Bikes: DiamondBack Edgewood// Raleigh M20
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The car was passing in an unsafe and probably illegal manner if he went over the line and didn't allow for traffic pulling onto the road.
Also, the car pulling out didn't look both ways before pulling out. He pulled out when someone was passing on the wrong side of the road.
The car or cars were at fault here, not the bikes.
dc
Also, the car pulling out didn't look both ways before pulling out. He pulled out when someone was passing on the wrong side of the road.
The car or cars were at fault here, not the bikes.
dc
#20
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
The car was passing in an unsafe and probably illegal manner if he went over the line and didn't allow for traffic pulling onto the road.
Also, the car pulling out didn't look both ways before pulling out. He pulled out when someone was passing on the wrong side of the road.
The car or cars were at fault here, not the bikes.
dc
Also, the car pulling out didn't look both ways before pulling out. He pulled out when someone was passing on the wrong side of the road.
The car or cars were at fault here, not the bikes.
dc
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,457
Liked 1,452 Times
in
1,009 Posts
The car was passing in an unsafe and probably illegal manner if he went over the line and didn't allow for traffic pulling onto the road.
Also, the car pulling out didn't look both ways before pulling out. He pulled out when someone was passing on the wrong side of the road.
The car or cars were at fault here, not the bikes.
dc
Also, the car pulling out didn't look both ways before pulling out. He pulled out when someone was passing on the wrong side of the road.
The car or cars were at fault here, not the bikes.
dc
That is (unless there were some visibility issues), the cyclists did not cause the accident (in my opinion).
Is there any support for this statement? The article/link doesn't support it. (It merely reiterates the law at the bottom.)
Last edited by njkayaker; 03-12-09 at 11:15 AM.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myrtle Beach SC, USA
Posts: 287
Bikes: Klein Quantum Pro w/ Ultegra
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Good or bad, it's an illegal thing. At least the cars crossing the line have the option of moving back into the lane if there is on coming traffic when passing a bicycle. I doublt that many cops would ticket a driver who crossed the line (a bit) when passing a bicyclist. Note that you can get a ticket for crossing the solid line even when you aren't passing anybody!
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,457
Liked 1,452 Times
in
1,009 Posts
You haven't established that it is legal in any state let alone "most" of them.
https://www.njtrafficlawcenter.com/imp_pass.htm
"Finally, a driver must not cross a “No Passing” solid line on the highway unless directed to do so by a traffic or police officer."
Heck, it isn't even legal in VA!
https://www.dmv.state.va.us/webdoc/ci...dm/vadm2-7.asp
=======
Note that it's quite possible that at least one state allows it. But, in terms of a general discussion of the law, if it's illegal in at least one state, it's safer to assume it's illegal in all states. That is, if something is legal in some places and illegal in others, it's better to error on the side of stuff being illegal in forum discussions whose participants are from all over!
People should keep in mind that there can be differences in the law in different locations and it's the responsibility of people to know the law in their particular location.
Last edited by njkayaker; 03-19-09 at 02:39 PM.
#24
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
If a motorist is trying to pass you in a solid double yellow area, they are in the WRONG.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,457
Liked 1,452 Times
in
1,009 Posts
There is no ambiguity in his statement. There is nothing that indicates that he's "thinking" of something else!
I don't think there is any state that treats dashed lines any different (ie, it isn't "most" states).
Last edited by njkayaker; 03-19-09 at 02:51 PM.