Bicycle harrassment ordinance passes unanimously
#1
it's easy if you let it.
Thread Starter
Bicycle harrassment ordinance passes unanimously
https://www.columbiamissourian.com/stories/2009/06/16/b/
Interesting?
Note the power of showing up:
Some details...
Hopefully more communities start taking back their streets from four-wheeled terrorists!
Incidentally, the fun part, as is often the case, in reading articles like these is the comment section, teething with raging drivers demanding the oft-executed right to execute cyclists.
Interesting?
COLUMBIA — A bicyclist harassment ordinance passed unanimously at the City Council meeting Monday after nearly an hour and a half of discussion.
The ordinance makes harassment of bicyclists — including throwing objects, verbal assault and other offenses — a misdemeanor offense punishable by a $1,000 fine or one year of jail time, the council said.
The ordinance makes harassment of bicyclists — including throwing objects, verbal assault and other offenses — a misdemeanor offense punishable by a $1,000 fine or one year of jail time, the council said.
Many in the bicycling community showed up to voice their feelings about the ordinance. Twenty individuals, some with children in tow, lined up to wait for their turn at the microphone. All 20 supported the ordinance.
Residents cited a number of reasons for their support and shared horror stories from bike riding. The tales ranged from waking up face down in ditches to having ashtrays dumped on their heads. The consensus among supporters was that the ordinance would help protect them on the streets.
“Unfortunately, there are people in our community who believe that roads are for automobiles and bicyclists who dare ride on the road should be honked at, yelled at or even have something thrown at them,” PedNet Education Coordinator Robert Johnson said.
Residents cited a number of reasons for their support and shared horror stories from bike riding. The tales ranged from waking up face down in ditches to having ashtrays dumped on their heads. The consensus among supporters was that the ordinance would help protect them on the streets.
“Unfortunately, there are people in our community who believe that roads are for automobiles and bicyclists who dare ride on the road should be honked at, yelled at or even have something thrown at them,” PedNet Education Coordinator Robert Johnson said.
The ordinance, which is modeled after similar ordinances in South Carolina and Colorado, makes it a misdemeanor to do the following: throw an object at or in the direction of a cyclist, threatening a cyclist to frighten or disturb the cyclist, sounding a horn with the intention to frighten or disturb a cyclist, knowingly placing a cyclist in the path of physical injury, or knowingly engaging in conduct that creates a risk of death or serious physical injury for a cyclist.
Incidentally, the fun part, as is often the case, in reading articles like these is the comment section, teething with raging drivers demanding the oft-executed right to execute cyclists.
#2
it's easy if you let it.
Thread Starter
I should also add that the legislation is scheduled for amendment in July; the goal is to add protection for pedestrians and joggers, which is great. They're as vulnerable to vehicles as we are, and bike-friendly and ped-friendly cities go hand-in-hand.
#4
Senior Member
Fantastic until you realize it's about as enforceable as the 3 foot law. Unless a cop actually sees it happen (in which case regardless of the presence of this particular law he'd be able to cite them for something), nothing will happen. The city threw a bone to the cyclists who as usual get all excited about nothing.
#5
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,026
Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is just another silly and unnecessary law, and a waste of time and effort. All it will accomplish is to make politicians feel good.
Most of the things cited are already illegal- they are simply not being enforced. Throwing objects at cyclists is an offense of assault and littering. (A littering charge could be a larger fine, no doubt!) We need the police and DA to pursue offending behavior. That is where pressure should be applied. More useless, redundant laws are not going to accomplish anything of substance for cyclists.
Most of the things cited are already illegal- they are simply not being enforced. Throwing objects at cyclists is an offense of assault and littering. (A littering charge could be a larger fine, no doubt!) We need the police and DA to pursue offending behavior. That is where pressure should be applied. More useless, redundant laws are not going to accomplish anything of substance for cyclists.
#6
Senior Member
I thought it didn't make sense either since harrassment is already illegal, but after reading the rest it looks like they have increased the charge "Before the ordinance passed, the only charge for a cyclist to file against a motorist exhibiting these behaviors was third-degree assault." So while it was illegal before it just didn't hve much of a punishment.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
People can talk about how additional laws are not necessary all they want. In the real, not theoretical, world, laws like this cause prosecutors to take the actions prohibited by the law more seriously. When prosecutors take the law more seriously, so do police.
It is a good first step.
It is a good first step.
#11
Pedal pusher...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,766
Bikes: I've got a bunch...
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
People can talk about how additional laws are not necessary all they want. In the real, not theoretical, world, laws like this cause prosecutors to take the actions prohibited by the law more seriously. When prosecutors take the law more seriously, so do police.
It is a good first step.
It is a good first step.
My thought, also.
__________________
May you live long, live strong, and live happy!
May you live long, live strong, and live happy!
#12
Can't ride enough!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 1,235
Bikes: IFab Crown Jewel, Giant Defy, Hardtail MTB, Fuji finest, Bianchi FG conversion
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is just another silly and unnecessary law, and a waste of time and effort. All it will accomplish is to make politicians feel good.
Most of the things cited are already illegal- they are simply not being enforced. Throwing objects at cyclists is an offense of assault and littering. (A littering charge could be a larger fine, no doubt!) We need the police and DA to pursue offending behavior. That is where pressure should be applied. More useless, redundant laws are not going to accomplish anything of substance for cyclists.
Most of the things cited are already illegal- they are simply not being enforced. Throwing objects at cyclists is an offense of assault and littering. (A littering charge could be a larger fine, no doubt!) We need the police and DA to pursue offending behavior. That is where pressure should be applied. More useless, redundant laws are not going to accomplish anything of substance for cyclists.
We have a winner! This thread is now closed.
#13
I hate to B-I-T-C-H (really, I can't write that...?) when something seemingly productive has been done, but, I think, this really does just "seem" productive. This ordinance will punish people for throwing objects at bicyclists? Wasn't throwing things at others illegal, already ("assault")? Even if there was no $1,000 fine deterrent previously in place, people will have to know about it for it to be consequential, and I wonder if news of this legislation will spread to ears beyond those in this forum. Those signs that tell people assaulting a bus-driver is a felony punishable by up to seven years (?) in prison work (if they do) because they're placed right by the driver you might be thinking of knocking over. Maybe bikers need to wear posters emphasizing why, now, more than ever, they shouldn't be harassed...
#14
Faster than yesterday
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
it's a good sign for general respect for cyclists. good luck enforcing it, though.
I'm of the opinion that we're way too soft on crime not involving death and drugs in this country. Why shouldn't people who use their cars as weapons or accessories in crimes lose their licenses? Why shouldn't repeat offenders lose the right to drive for a very extended period of time? Like, forever? How many times can you forgive someone for being scum?
Fines are a slap on the wrist, as the long-term repercussions of losing $1000 are non-existent.
I'm of the opinion that we're way too soft on crime not involving death and drugs in this country. Why shouldn't people who use their cars as weapons or accessories in crimes lose their licenses? Why shouldn't repeat offenders lose the right to drive for a very extended period of time? Like, forever? How many times can you forgive someone for being scum?
Fines are a slap on the wrist, as the long-term repercussions of losing $1000 are non-existent.
Last edited by tadawdy; 06-18-09 at 09:08 PM.
#15
I somewhat disagree, but, then, I also somewhat agree. Our culture isn't very strict when it comes to many sorts of crimes (of course, certain jurisdictions may be), and is insanely aggressive against some very silly things (such as drugs — you might disagree).
#16
Feel-good wankery which results mostly self-congrulatory behavior on the part of activits and legislators while a handful of the literate reflexive contrarians get their hackles raised and spew accusations of nanny statery or dirty hippie favoritism.
I'd much rather see laws of comparatively unilateral benefit enforced before legislators put on the tunics and play Moore's Utopia. That speed limit dealy they had in the olden days, for instance...
I'd much rather see laws of comparatively unilateral benefit enforced before legislators put on the tunics and play Moore's Utopia. That speed limit dealy they had in the olden days, for instance...
#17
People can talk about how additional laws are not necessary all they want. In the real, not theoretical, world, laws like this cause prosecutors to take the actions prohibited by the law more seriously. When prosecutors take the law more seriously, so do police.
It is a good first step.
It is a good first step.
#18
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,910
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Liked 1,746 Times
in
864 Posts
While I agree that aggressive enforcement of existing laws would be useful, I think this law will go a long way toward raising awareness. The more people who are aware of bicyclists rights under the law, the better off we all are.
#19
Senior Member
Wow.. Columbia a big, bicycle town.?>.. Maybe a university town.. Exactly what America needs to enhance cycling.. Is this a first for all of the USA>?>
__________________
Pray for the Dead and Fight like Hell for the Living
^ Since January 1, 2012
Pray for the Dead and Fight like Hell for the Living
^ Since January 1, 2012
#20
Senior Member
This law doesn't give cyclists any special rights. Perhaps if more effort was put towards educating cyclists about their own rights, rather than fighting for unenforceable laws such as this one and three foot passing laws, we'd be getting somewhere.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,104
Bikes: Too many to count
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't think that this law would catch many people harassing cyclists, but I still think it is a good law. It's in the books now. And if it is a good law, then there is no need to take it out of the books.
#23
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,910
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Liked 1,746 Times
in
864 Posts
I understand that much better things can be done, but anything that gets the word out is a good thing. For bicyclists to be accepted as legitimate road users a profound cultural shift has to take place. Anything that contributes to that shift is good thing.
#24
Senior Member
In my opinion, laws like this make cyclists seem like some endangered species that needs special protection as compared to other road users. I mean, what about pedestrians, motorcyclists, farmers, street sweepers, mail carriers, etc.? All of those groups have something in common with cyclists yet you don't see the same types of fluff laws protecting them.
#25
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,029
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Definitely way over 99%. Several hundred drivers interact with me every day on my commute. It can be months between negative encounters.