Climbing -- Does Bike Weight Really Matter?
#26
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,510
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,059 Times
in
1,999 Posts
I climb Mt Hamilton Road twice a week, weather permitting. Speeds for the same segment are all over the place, even when I keep the power about the same. It's the wind.
#27
#28
I regret clicking on this thread...
Likes For Caliwild:
#29
Likes For Caliwild:
#30
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,759
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Liked 2,098 Times
in
1,485 Posts
Lower gearing allows for lower maximum crank torque and lower minimum speed (before falling over), and thus lower power. Lower gearing isn't so much to make you climb faster, it's to allow you to climb slower. Like PeteHski, I can climb steeper hills on my 12kg MTB than my 8kg road bike.
On my single, purchased at 55 with a 30 X 25 bottom gear, gradually acquired a 26 X 30 gear over the decades, which really starts to matter on rides of over say 50 miles, converting more oxygen into speed and less sugars. From 55 y.o. to 76 y.o. and making those gear changes on the same bike, my time on a 154 mile 9000' course only increased by about an hour. Low gears are more about being able to continue to make power over the long hours. This is sorta PeteHski's point too, less exhaustion over time.
I'm giving the newbie some old SPD double sided pedals and taking him shopping for MTB shoes. Ooooh, another victim for the Dark Side, just waiting to be harvested.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#31
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,387
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Liked 7,182 Times
in
3,714 Posts
Sorry for the disruption OP, please carry on.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
Likes For BillyD:
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,205
Bikes: Columbine, Paramount Track Bike, Colnago Super, Santana Tandems (1995 & 2007), Gary Fisher Piranha, Trek Wahoo, Bianchi Track Bike, a couple of Honda mountain bikes
Liked 432 Times
in
266 Posts
Sadly, age is more important than weight or gears......
__________________
Cheers, Mike
-Stupid hurts....ride safe
Cheers, Mike
-Stupid hurts....ride safe
#33
Full Member
yes. It matters less then your fitness, and I think matters as much as tire choice and drivetrain condition. If I had to classify on what is important for climbing it would be tier 2. Tier 1 would be body weight, fitness, and gearing. Tier 2 would be bike weight, tire type+inflation level, total bike condition, and brake rub/frame rub when standing.
#34
OM boy
true, but 'age' can have a pleasant side... you worry just a little less about 'time' and 'see' the climb more completely, everything that you're passing through...
... knowing that things are going way better than they might... and maybe even better than expected...
looking forward to hitting some hills this am
Time on the bike, is aging suspended
Ride On
Yuri
... knowing that things are going way better than they might... and maybe even better than expected...
looking forward to hitting some hills this am
Time on the bike, is aging suspended
Ride On
Yuri
Likes For cyclezen:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 1,206
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Liked 1,125 Times
in
559 Posts
At my weight of 180# and climbing power of 225w - an 8% 20 mile climb on a 22# bike(water bottles, bike bag) = 195 min.
Take 4#s off the bike, which = a whole bunch of money, I would save under three min.
Something I would never notice at all.
Take 4#s off the bike, which = a whole bunch of money, I would save under three min.
Something I would never notice at all.
#36
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,950
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Liked 6,608 Times
in
3,342 Posts
And even a slight headwind or tailwind can have a much bigger effect than a reduction in weight (or an increase in power).
I climb Mt Hamilton Road twice a week, weather permitting. Speeds for the same segment are all over the place, even when I keep the power about the same. It's the wind.
I climb Mt Hamilton Road twice a week, weather permitting. Speeds for the same segment are all over the place, even when I keep the power about the same. It's the wind.
No data to support my claim other than the sprinters in the major tours always trying to beat the cut-off on the major climbs; but personal body weight probably plays more of a factor in climbing speed than the bike. Watts/Kg
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#37
This is certainly true because variation in rider weight is far greater than variation in bike weight. Those pro tour bikes are all well within 1 kg, while the rider weights might vary by 20 Kg from lightest to heaviest.
#38
Senior Member
The climbing challenge at the end is the truth. It shows it better than any explainations.
#39
The climbing challenge at the end is the truth. It shows it better than any explainations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCLvqN9kwuo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCLvqN9kwuo
#40
Senior Member
https://www.omnicalculator.com/sports/cycling-wattage
The calculator above can compare changes in weight and wind conditions. I did a comparison with 10 pounds of extra weight for an ebike and it only takes 15-20 watts more to go up a 13% climb. Wind is big factor. I've ridden a 12 mile climb up to 2 mph faster with a tail wind and hardly noticed the help going up. If the weather ever gets better, I'll be experimenting with customized power curves to provide minimal assistance, only on the steepest climbs. A Fazua Ride60 can provide ridiculous amounts of power, but it can also be programmed for much lower amounts.
The calculator above can compare changes in weight and wind conditions. I did a comparison with 10 pounds of extra weight for an ebike and it only takes 15-20 watts more to go up a 13% climb. Wind is big factor. I've ridden a 12 mile climb up to 2 mph faster with a tail wind and hardly noticed the help going up. If the weather ever gets better, I'll be experimenting with customized power curves to provide minimal assistance, only on the steepest climbs. A Fazua Ride60 can provide ridiculous amounts of power, but it can also be programmed for much lower amounts.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,201
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Liked 601 Times
in
453 Posts
It's subjective. It depends on your definition of ''really''. For a world elite athlete climber that wants to shave 1 second off a 5km climb, yes. For us mere mortals who spend money on bikes we don't really need, no.
#42
The effect of the weight on your climbing time is entirely objective. The importance of that time difference is the only subjective part.
Likes For PeteHski:
#43
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,510
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,059 Times
in
1,999 Posts
If I can do a long climb at the same pace but with 10 fewer watts, that will make a huge difference in my fatigue. Even a 5 watts difference is noticeable.
Rough Rule of Thumb: When climbing at a spirited but not outrageous 1000 meters/hr, every kilogram requires about 3 watts. Add a kg, you have to put out another 3 watts. Dump a kg, reduce effort by 3 watts.
Last edited by terrymorse; 05-06-24 at 04:59 PM.
Likes For terrymorse:
#44
Perceptual Dullard
Damon Rinard, my friend now at Cannondale (but ex-Cervelo, ex-Trek, ex-Kestrel, and ex-rec.bicycles.tech) sometimes says we got it wrong when we started obsessing about how much *faster* a change makes us. He says it often makes sense for us to think in terms of how much *easier* a change makes it for us. There isn't much difference in speed between riding at 250 watts vs. 240 watts but if your threshold is 245 watts there's a big difference to you in which is easier.
#45
When climbing, I think less about time savings and more about power savings.
If I can do a long climb at the same pace but with 10 fewer watts, that will make a huge difference in my fatigue. Even a 5 watts difference is noticeable.
Rough url of thumb: When climbing at a spirited but not outrageous 1000 meters/hr, every kilogram requires about 3 watts. Add a kg, you have to put out another 3 watts. Dump a kg, reduce effort by 3 watts.
If I can do a long climb at the same pace but with 10 fewer watts, that will make a huge difference in my fatigue. Even a 5 watts difference is noticeable.
Rough url of thumb: When climbing at a spirited but not outrageous 1000 meters/hr, every kilogram requires about 3 watts. Add a kg, you have to put out another 3 watts. Dump a kg, reduce effort by 3 watts.
As far as fatigue goes, it makes no real difference to me if I’m riding solo. I just climb fractionally slower at the same power. If I’m riding in a group I have to suck up the extra 3W. It’s not enough to use as an excuse if I get dropped and it’s not as if everyone else has a lighter bike anyway.
Likes For PeteHski:
#46
Senior Member
Crucially, it's also not a cop-out: there are many situations in cycling where ease-of-speed is the framing device you're thrust into. When you're desperately clinging onto a pack, your speed is whatever speed the wheel in front of you is doing.
#47
Perceptual Dullard
"Every once in a while someone along the road lets us know how far behind we are. A man shouts: ‘Faster!’ He probably thinks bicycle racing is about going fast." -- Tim Krabbe, The Rider
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,758
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Liked 1,429 Times
in
835 Posts
The climbing challenge at the end is the truth. It shows it better than any explainations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCLvqN9kwuo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCLvqN9kwuo
#49
Perceptual Dullard
#50
OM boy
Damon Rinard, my friend now at Cannondale (but ex-Cervelo, ex-Trek, ex-Kestrel, and ex-rec.bicycles.tech) sometimes says we got it wrong when we started obsessing about how much *faster* a change makes us. He says it often makes sense for us to think in terms of how much *easier* a change makes it for us. There isn't much difference in speed between riding at 250 watts vs. 240 watts but if your threshold is 245 watts there's a big difference to you in which is easier.
which brings up that old Lemond 'quote'
"It never gets easier, you just go faster !"
the balance and challenge of finding 'more' in yourself and yet being ok with knowing that, in that moment, that's all there was...
one of the difficult things to balance on a lifetime basis...
Ride On
Yuri - and yes, philosophy helps get one thru ...