With the rise of throttle e-bikes, e-motorcycles, mopeds etc. on the MUPs....
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,657
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,491 Times
in
1,916 Posts
Words have meaning. There's no judgement, moral or otherwise, in calling things what they are.
Moral judgement only comes into play when people arbitrarily redefine words to suit an agenda.
I don't care about what people ride in don't, but I do care that regulations are well considered and make sense according to the essential nature of bicycles and motorcycles.
Likes For FBinNY:
#52
I have a throttle on my DIY drop-bar mountain e-bike, but I had to move it out of the way so I could install a better dropper post lever. I can still reach it on the very rare occasions that I use it for 30 seconds.
This bike is slower than my road bike on all but the steepest of hills. I use it to commute to and from work on rural back-roads.
I've only used the throttle to get started on an inconvenient uphill. The distinction is completely arbitrary, to the point of being completely meaningless. I could disconnect it and I would still have the same bike, but why should I? It very occasionally comes in handy, and I paid for it along with the rest of the ebike kit.
This bike is slower than my road bike on all but the steepest of hills. I use it to commute to and from work on rural back-roads.
I've only used the throttle to get started on an inconvenient uphill. The distinction is completely arbitrary, to the point of being completely meaningless. I could disconnect it and I would still have the same bike, but why should I? It very occasionally comes in handy, and I paid for it along with the rest of the ebike kit.
Likes For Polaris OBark:
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,873
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,307 Times
in
2,098 Posts
If you put a motor in a shopping cart, is it still OK to use in the store?
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#54
Senior Member
Likes For Trakhak:
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,873
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,307 Times
in
2,098 Posts
Likes For Troul:
Likes For Pratt:
#57
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,568
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Liked 356 Times
in
237 Posts
On the plus side, e-bikes are giving me a better workout. On the Doodle Trail from Pickford, SC to Easley, SC there was a guy on a fat tire e-bike trying to overtake me for SEVEN MILES! On the uphills he would slowly gain on me but on the downhills I could create a huge gap. I guess that was due to his regenerative braking resistance slowing him down. No clue. I was thinking it was just a matter of time before he overtook me but I somehow managed those 7 hilly miles without bonking. I was on a Surley Lowside 1x1 with pretty big tires that I often run low pressure for comfort. I am certainly not interested in SPEED on that bike but I still managed. What a great workout that guy afforded me! I would never have pushed like that on my own. Too lazy.
Footnote: I can turn 130 cadence on the downhills without bouncing in the saddle. It's true!
#58
Likes For PeteHski:
#59
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 30,120
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Liked 1,651 Times
in
1,112 Posts
On the plus side, e-bikes are giving me a better workout. On the Doodle Trail from Pickford, SC to Easley, SC there was a guy on a fat tire e-bike trying to overtake me for SEVEN MILES! On the uphills he would slowly gain on me but on the downhills I could create a huge gap. I guess that was due to his regenerative braking resistance slowing him down. No clue.
#61
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,568
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Liked 356 Times
in
237 Posts
SOURCE
.
.
.
Last edited by JoeyBike; 05-23-24 at 12:42 PM.
#62
They DO exist. This was exactly what was happening to the guy IMO. I had 7 miles of hills to observe him in my helmet mounted mirror. Gained ground on the uphills, lost ground on the downhills. So basically i tried to relax as much as I could without being overtaken on the uphills, then hammer the S#iT out of it on the downhills. He may have just been out on a pleasure ride for sure, but I did not give him the pleasure of passing me. And got a much better workout than if he wasn't behind me pushing me - known to him or not. I'm sure he wasn't "letting" me "win" an imaginary race either.
SOURCE
.
.
.
SOURCE
.
.
.
Likes For PeteHski:
#63
Senior Member
I came across this video on YT about the US changing ebike laws to more closely reflect the laws in the EU. I'm kind of skeptical it will happen soon, if at all, but it is the first time of hearing about this proposed change. However, if they do make the changes I guess that'll be good news for you MUP cyclists...I'll still stick to the roads, regardless
Here is a link I think he was referring to (in the video), but I didn't read the whole thing, since I'm not an ebiker. https://www.regulations.gov/document...2024-0008-0001
Here is a link I think he was referring to (in the video), but I didn't read the whole thing, since I'm not an ebiker. https://www.regulations.gov/document...2024-0008-0001
#64
Sr Member on Sr bikes
This linked article in today’s Providence (RI) Journal 6/8/2024. I’m glad to see this. But I think there should be a forth class that includes “any” electric bike that goes over ## speed. People modify them, and I’ve been passed on MUPs by e-bikes, with pedals, going much faster than the 28 mph mentioned for the class 3 e-bikes. But, I guess the new law allows only class 1 on the MUPs so that’s good. Also, according to the article, this is for “state bike paths and trails.” I think it should include all bike paths (I know of some that are not state-owned/controlled). And should also include roadways with shoulders for bicycling (i.e. with “sharrows”).
https://tinyurl.com/246p4449
Dan
https://tinyurl.com/246p4449
Dan
Likes For _ForceD_:
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,664
Bikes: 06 Lemond Reno, 98 GT Timberline mtn.bike
Liked 769 Times
in
472 Posts
The local MUP has some confusing regulations. Most e-bike riders are not crazy riders, so not a big problem usually. However, the MUP has a sign posted--no motorized vehicles. Does an e-bike not have an electric MOTOR, which makes it a motorized vehicle? I asked one of the MUP administrators (one of the very few times I've ever seen one) about it. The reply was they do not consider electric motors as "motors". And though it isn't posted, only Class 1 e-bikes are supposedly allowed, though the great majority I've seen are not Class 1, most can motor along without pedaling. Regulations mean nothing when they are not enforced. It isn't a problem there yet, but school is out now for the summer, so guess I'll see how it goes.
#66
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,955
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Liked 4,325 Times
in
2,385 Posts
My concern with e bikes on MUPs is that people are riding faster than their skill set warrants.
Likes For bikemig:
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,196
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Liked 2,063 Times
in
988 Posts
Pretty much gave up MUPS in SoCal because of several types of motorized vehicles not just e-bikes being on the trails.
I find it safer to ride on my local roads in non-commercial zones.
I find it safer to ride on my local roads in non-commercial zones.
Likes For CAT7RDR:
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gateway to the West
Posts: 835
Bikes: You mean this week?
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
28 Posts
From all the comments I've read, and news articles I've seen from different locations, it's obvious that experience varies greatly with location. The nearest trail system to me connects a series of small towns, which likely has a whole different rider set than more urban areas. I mostly see older couples on ebikes, sometimes RV travellers, who are just having a good time and aren't a threat to anybody. So while I understand why folks in some areas may have a jaded perspective, I hope we can refrain from casting too wide a net on the bikes/ebikes debate. Interestingly, I remember when mountain bikes were introduced to the masses and the polarity whether they would save or ruin the sport. It's still all about the attitude of people that make or break the sport, not the technology.
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,758
Bikes: Canyon Aeroad, CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX, Guru steel & Guru Photon
Liked 1,429 Times
in
835 Posts
I live in CT. It is my understanding that motorized vehicles are not permitted on Rail-Trails. I don't know the exact wording of the regulations so I don''t know how/if it affects electric vehicles.
#73
Banned
^^^^That is a simple and rational rule. Motor/ No Motor. Simple.
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,657
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,491 Times
in
1,916 Posts
Generally I agree, however I have no issue treating low power pedal assist bikes as bicycles. There are various barriers that keep people off bikes, these include terrain, age, physical limitations, or just plain out-of-shapeness. I grew up cycling through the 2nd hilliest city in the USA, and know how having to climb hills is super discouraging to cyclists. An assist motor to provide situational boost as needed can help overcome these barriers, and get more people riding.
To be clear, I'm referring to designs that help someone who is mainly providing human power, so the design has to limit itself to that. Things like battery capacity, lack of a throttle, motor wattage limits, power phaseout at 15-20mph, etc. need to be consistent with the goal.
Otherwise ANY bicycle that can operate on motor power alone, or can use motor assist to achieve speeds beyond typical bike speeds is a motorcycle.
To be clear, I'm referring to designs that help someone who is mainly providing human power, so the design has to limit itself to that. Things like battery capacity, lack of a throttle, motor wattage limits, power phaseout at 15-20mph, etc. need to be consistent with the goal.
Otherwise ANY bicycle that can operate on motor power alone, or can use motor assist to achieve speeds beyond typical bike speeds is a motorcycle.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#75
Banned
I don't worry much about "barriers." Some people can do an activity, some can't. There's a bunch of stuff I can't do and at some point I won't be able to ride a bike. An e-motor that puts out say 75W, half of what a normal casual cyclist would generate, is about the max that could be called "assist" IMO. A case could be made for allowing those in areas where motors are otherwise prohibited. Maybe with a handicap placard like for parking. Anyway, I'm just nattering. I don't ride MUPs and nobody who makes these decisions ever asks me.