Working towards longer rides question
#51
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,077
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 508 Times
in
262 Posts
Going hard on every ride is a prescription for burn out. You need to vary it.
Some days, go as hard as you can for that 12 miles. Other times, take it easy and enjoy the day. You might not be completely exhausted, but you are still gaining fitness and enjoying our sport. Way too much to read here on Zone 2 training, but that will give you an idea. For me, a once a week sufferfest is plenty. Then another couple of days of just loving being outside.
Some days, go as hard as you can for that 12 miles. Other times, take it easy and enjoy the day. You might not be completely exhausted, but you are still gaining fitness and enjoying our sport. Way too much to read here on Zone 2 training, but that will give you an idea. For me, a once a week sufferfest is plenty. Then another couple of days of just loving being outside.
I need to take it easier.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 1,206
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Liked 1,125 Times
in
559 Posts
Compared to many here, I have a relatively low max HR for my age - 168 - my upper Z2 is 125. 130 max would be extremely low IMHO.
Likes For Jughed:
#53
Just Pedaling
Z2 should be 70%+/- of your max HR. So that 100 range works if 130 is your max (and if 130 is your max, you may want to get that looked at by a doc)
Compared to many here, I have a relatively low max HR for my age - 168 - my upper Z2 is 125. 130 max would be extremely low IMHO.
Compared to many here, I have a relatively low max HR for my age - 168 - my upper Z2 is 125. 130 max would be extremely low IMHO.
#54
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,077
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 508 Times
in
262 Posts
The way I calculated my max heart rate was to subtract my age from 220. My zone 2 target heart rate should be 60%-70% of that.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 1,206
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Liked 1,125 Times
in
559 Posts
I'm behind the curve here so maybe I can get a little help. How do you calculate your max HR? Or do you just push yourself till you drop and do a quick HR check before you pass out? I'm trying to be serious because I really have no idea. Of course, I'm still on my first cup of Java too, so that might be my problem. TIA
VO2 max efforts = 3-5 min all out, everything you have, rest and repeat... or to quote one of those online coaches - "ride until you see Jesus". I'm not real religious, but I think I've seen him once or twice doing that, and that is when my HR is 168-170.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 1,206
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Liked 1,125 Times
in
559 Posts
The way I calculated my max heart rate was to subtract my age from 220. My zone 2 target heart rate should be 60%-70% of that.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
Yep, sorry, my math was fuzzy with the 130...
#57
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,309
Bikes: Bike Friday All-Packa & Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte, Ozark Trail G.1 Explorer
Liked 1,603 Times
in
723 Posts
Best of luck!
__________________
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
JohnMFlores.com | YouTube: JohnMFlores
Insta: JohnMichaelFlores | TikTok: @johnnymotoflores
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
JohnMFlores.com | YouTube: JohnMFlores
Insta: JohnMichaelFlores | TikTok: @johnnymotoflores
#58
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,510
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,058 Times
in
1,999 Posts
The way I calculated my max heart rate was to subtract my age from 220. My zone 2 target heart rate should be 60%-70% of that.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
I wouldn't be too concerned about dialing in your zones precisely. Until you start getting into many hours per week of training, where managing accumulated fatigue becomes important, it doesn't really matter that much.
Likes For terrymorse:
#59
Just Pedaling
I only see that max number on my 2nd or 3rd VO2 max effort. It can be hard to reach max HR on a bike - often ones legs will give out first.
VO2 max efforts = 3-5 min all out, everything you have, rest and repeat... or to quote one of those online coaches - "ride until you see Jesus". I'm not real religious, but I think I've seen him once or twice doing that, and that is when my HR is 168-170.
VO2 max efforts = 3-5 min all out, everything you have, rest and repeat... or to quote one of those online coaches - "ride until you see Jesus". I'm not real religious, but I think I've seen him once or twice doing that, and that is when my HR is 168-170.
#60
Senior Member
The way I calculated my max heart rate was to subtract my age from 220. My zone 2 target heart rate should be 60%-70% of that.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
My max is based on when I start to grey out on extremely hard efforts. I wish my relatively high max rate for my age meant I had an unusually high VO2 max or other characteristic. But I think all it really means is I have a rather small stroke volume. So, my heart has to beat fast to move enough blood around for my modest level of bike fitness.
Below is a graph of the error for actual max heart rate versus the 220-age that I found on the internet. So, you can see there are some values with over a +/-25 BPM difference. I found this here:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523886/
From this article
QUOTE
In comparison, the proportional bias evident in the other equations show that those with lower fitness and/or elderly individuals will have HRmax consistently underestimated, and fitter and/or younger individuals will have HRmax consistently overestimated.
END QUOTE
Likes For Mtracer:
#61
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,077
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 508 Times
in
262 Posts
The problem with the 220 - age calculation is it is known to be a poor fit for older riders and it's just an average. While it's been a while since I looked into this I think it is something like 220 - age +/- 20 BPM. I'm 63 and my max is about 185 BPM. So, I'm more like 220 - age + 28 BPM. Point is, 220 - age is a VERY general guideline, slightly better than nothing and really applies to the average of a population of people, not specific individuals. But you got to start with something.
My max is based on when I start to grey out on extremely hard efforts. I wish my relatively high max rate for my age meant I had an unusually high VO2 max or other characteristic. But I think all it really means is I have a rather small stroke volume. So, my heart has to beat fast to move enough blood around for my modest level of bike fitness.
Below is a graph of the error for actual max heart rate versus the 220-age that I found on the internet. So, you can see there are some values with over a +/-25 BPM difference. I found this here:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523886/
From this article
QUOTE
In comparison, the proportional bias evident in the other equations show that those with lower fitness and/or elderly individuals will have HRmax consistently underestimated, and fitter and/or younger individuals will have HRmax consistently overestimated.
END QUOTE
My max is based on when I start to grey out on extremely hard efforts. I wish my relatively high max rate for my age meant I had an unusually high VO2 max or other characteristic. But I think all it really means is I have a rather small stroke volume. So, my heart has to beat fast to move enough blood around for my modest level of bike fitness.
Below is a graph of the error for actual max heart rate versus the 220-age that I found on the internet. So, you can see there are some values with over a +/-25 BPM difference. I found this here:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7523886/
From this article
QUOTE
In comparison, the proportional bias evident in the other equations show that those with lower fitness and/or elderly individuals will have HRmax consistently underestimated, and fitter and/or younger individuals will have HRmax consistently overestimated.
END QUOTE
The last time my cardiologist did a treadmill stress test my output volume was still 65%-70%.
I really think most of my problems are simply from being out of shape. I retired in ‘20. The first 15 years I was doing very hard physical work. The last 4-5 years I supervised, and got soft.
#62
dot dash
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,568
Bikes: Shmikes
Liked 6,167 Times
in
3,320 Posts
I will see how I do with a lower avg. heart-rate but not as low at 90 or 95.
The last time my cardiologist did a treadmill stress test my output volume was still 65%-70%.
I really think most of my problems are simply from being out of shape. I retired in ‘20. The first 15 years I was doing very hard physical work. The last 4-5 years I supervised, and got soft.
The last time my cardiologist did a treadmill stress test my output volume was still 65%-70%.
I really think most of my problems are simply from being out of shape. I retired in ‘20. The first 15 years I was doing very hard physical work. The last 4-5 years I supervised, and got soft.
Likes For MoAlpha:
#64
dot dash
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,568
Bikes: Shmikes
Liked 6,167 Times
in
3,320 Posts
Your EF is fine. The usual way to find out your stroke volume is to get studied in a physiology lab or start going down the tubes in the ICU.
Likes For MoAlpha:
#65
OM boy
The way I calculated my max heart rate was to subtract my age from 220. My zone 2 target heart rate should be 60%-70% of that.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
I am 65 so my max should be 155. 60% of that is 93 and 70% is 108.
I have been averaging about 129 while riding and hit about 159 on a climb at the lake.
'climbing' is a form of 'interval' training, extended... keep at that hill at 159 ! the muscles will eventually keep up with you...
on uphills of any sort, my system goes straight from whatever HR I had before to well over 150 or more... skips the 130-140+ range...
I always used a simple 'sign' to know where my HR was (when not wearing an HRM) - if I can 'hear' my heartbeat, I'm close or in Z4... Really prominent, even loud, entering lower ranges of Z5.
Pretty much all I need to judge where my effort was going and the onset of getting 'shelled'...
Ride On
Yuri
Likes For cyclezen:
#66
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,624
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2022 Trek Supercaliber, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Liked 8,946 Times
in
4,197 Posts
I only see that max number on my 2nd or 3rd VO2 max effort. It can be hard to reach max HR on a bike - often ones legs will give out first.
VO2 max efforts = 3-5 min all out, everything you have, rest and repeat... or to quote one of those online coaches - "ride until you see Jesus". I'm not real religious, but I think I've seen him once or twice doing that, and that is when my HR is 168-170.
VO2 max efforts = 3-5 min all out, everything you have, rest and repeat... or to quote one of those online coaches - "ride until you see Jesus". I'm not real religious, but I think I've seen him once or twice doing that, and that is when my HR is 168-170.
For me, figuring out my zones is about how my body is reacting. I can feel the shift from zone 2 to zone 3 @ 149bpm. I know an extended FTP effort is going to put me at right about 170bpm. I can last about a minute at 180bpm, maybe a little more if I'm having a good day, but I also know I can repeat an effort like that quite a few times.
__________________
Platypus gravelus.
Platypus gravelus.
Likes For Eric F:
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 1,206
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Liked 1,125 Times
in
559 Posts
I agree 100% that getting the body to true max HR on a bike is hard. Really hard. In my racer-boy days, I saw max HR numbers at the end of a sprint in a race, where I was putting every last watt of power into my bike for a long as I could possibly tolerate. It's a level of intensity that is deeply uncomfortable, and takes practice to understand how to push your body to that far. In my early-30s, I saw 207 a couple of times. When I quit racing at 35yo, it was 204. At 55, I don't inflict that level of suffering on my body very often, but the most recent time I did (desperate to stay with a group over the top of a short climb), it was 189.
For me, figuring out my zones is about how my body is reacting. I can feel the shift from zone 2 to zone 3 @ 149bpm. I know an extended FTP effort is going to put me at right about 170bpm. I can last about a minute at 180bpm, maybe a little more if I'm having a good day, but I also know I can repeat an effort like that quite a few times.
For me, figuring out my zones is about how my body is reacting. I can feel the shift from zone 2 to zone 3 @ 149bpm. I know an extended FTP effort is going to put me at right about 170bpm. I can last about a minute at 180bpm, maybe a little more if I'm having a good day, but I also know I can repeat an effort like that quite a few times.
My zones are about 20bpm lower than yours... 170 bpm to me = a near death experience. I'm only 52 for what its worth.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 6,006
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Liked 2,277 Times
in
1,393 Posts
Others have mentioned this. I’m in the camp of slower mph and more variety.
Slowing your speed does wonders for mileage. When I rode with my wife, I went much slower over the same route. At the end of the ride I was pretty refreshed and could have keep going much further to equal my normal workout level.
Any place new is exploring. Exploring is usually interesting. You concentrate more on the ride and less on speed and mileage.
In my opinion, throw your zones out the window, at least for now. If you are doing 12 miles consistently at zone 2/3, but struggle at 15 miles, it is not really helping.
Over time go from 12 to 20 and learn to ride and recover throughout the ride. You need to figure out how your body responds at different levels. Being able to back off and recover during a ride is important. But you need to learn what works for you.
John
Slowing your speed does wonders for mileage. When I rode with my wife, I went much slower over the same route. At the end of the ride I was pretty refreshed and could have keep going much further to equal my normal workout level.
Any place new is exploring. Exploring is usually interesting. You concentrate more on the ride and less on speed and mileage.
In my opinion, throw your zones out the window, at least for now. If you are doing 12 miles consistently at zone 2/3, but struggle at 15 miles, it is not really helping.
Over time go from 12 to 20 and learn to ride and recover throughout the ride. You need to figure out how your body responds at different levels. Being able to back off and recover during a ride is important. But you need to learn what works for you.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#69
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,077
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 508 Times
in
262 Posts
Others have mentioned this. I’m in the camp of slower mph and more variety.
Slowing your speed does wonders for mileage. When I rode with my wife, I went much slower over the same route. At the end of the ride I was pretty refreshed and could have keep going much further to equal my normal workout level.
Any place new is exploring. Exploring is usually interesting. You concentrate more on the ride and less on speed and mileage.
In my opinion, throw your zones out the window, at least for now. If you are doing 12 miles consistently at zone 2/3, but struggle at 15 miles, it is not really helping.
Over time go from 12 to 20 and learn to ride and recover throughout the ride. You need to figure out how your body responds at different levels. Being able to back off and recover during a ride is important. But you need to learn what works for you.
John
Slowing your speed does wonders for mileage. When I rode with my wife, I went much slower over the same route. At the end of the ride I was pretty refreshed and could have keep going much further to equal my normal workout level.
Any place new is exploring. Exploring is usually interesting. You concentrate more on the ride and less on speed and mileage.
In my opinion, throw your zones out the window, at least for now. If you are doing 12 miles consistently at zone 2/3, but struggle at 15 miles, it is not really helping.
Over time go from 12 to 20 and learn to ride and recover throughout the ride. You need to figure out how your body responds at different levels. Being able to back off and recover during a ride is important. But you need to learn what works for you.
John
Likes For pepperbelly:
#70
Senior Member
I think you’ve had a lot of good advice here. We have certain things in common. I’m 69 and ride a Roubaix for most of my rides. But I have been riding a long time and also ski mountaineer in the winter. I go fairly quickly but try to keep a steady pace bearing in mind the target distance. I average around 20km/h on our mountainous terrain. If you are not climbing but you are panting then you are pushing too hard.
My ‘easy’ ride is over two modest mountain passes for a distance of 30 km. A more vigorous ride is again, two passes, for 50 km. I don’t feel particularly tired after those distances and hills don’t bother me (on the up - sometimes they do on excessively long downhills). However, I find I really don’t enjoy much more than 80 km. and seriously lag by 100 km. If I had more time to ride 80 km. more frequently I’d probably find graduating to 100 easier.
I strictly stay away from sugary drinks whether biking or skiing. They give you a short burst and then let you down with a crash. I think that’s why drinks like Gatorade are useful for hockey or football players. They want a short, sharp burst of energy. Instead I use electrolytes such as Nuun which have no sweetener at all. But, whatever you do, hydrate well.
Your shoulder pain suggests to me that you maybe up on the bars too much or riding with your elbows locked. Try and relax your shoulders while riding and stay in the drops as much as you can on the flats or downhills.
My ‘easy’ ride is over two modest mountain passes for a distance of 30 km. A more vigorous ride is again, two passes, for 50 km. I don’t feel particularly tired after those distances and hills don’t bother me (on the up - sometimes they do on excessively long downhills). However, I find I really don’t enjoy much more than 80 km. and seriously lag by 100 km. If I had more time to ride 80 km. more frequently I’d probably find graduating to 100 easier.
I strictly stay away from sugary drinks whether biking or skiing. They give you a short burst and then let you down with a crash. I think that’s why drinks like Gatorade are useful for hockey or football players. They want a short, sharp burst of energy. Instead I use electrolytes such as Nuun which have no sweetener at all. But, whatever you do, hydrate well.
Your shoulder pain suggests to me that you maybe up on the bars too much or riding with your elbows locked. Try and relax your shoulders while riding and stay in the drops as much as you can on the flats or downhills.
Likes For Mountain Mitch:
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX Single Track 2x11
Liked 638 Times
in
484 Posts
An "intervals" approach might help, to gradually build the ability to work through longer rides.
Back in the day, I used to do distance running. Lots of 10K and half marathon racing, as well. The first couple of years were tough, learning what my body was capable of doing ... much of it, with respect to that recovery within the route which others speak of. Fartlek type "speed play" during a run. Overall, a given longer distance of run would be at a relatively slower pace, but there would be frequent shorter intervals of higher speeds, even bursts of power and speed, followed by a recovery period back at the lower "base" pace of the route.
Over time, the body would get comfortable with this, pushing its recovery ability and allowing a gradual improvement in the overall time. As each of those intervals got harder and somewhat longer, the body learned to eventually recover easily, even with perhaps dozens of these intervals across the run. Helped, when needing to push hard for a hilly section, or to overtake a competitor.
A good slower warm-up period, an overall lower route pace, but with numerous shorter intervals. You'll need to play with how hard to push during an interval, for how long, and how much recovery time following that interval your body requires before attacking another interval. In time, you ought to see some improvements in overall performance, route speeds.
Nice thing is, anybody can do this. Just find a route pace that'll work for your given ability. Then, play with how many, how intense, how much recovery and how long of a route. If you can do this across two or three routes you frequently ride, you can document the efforts and chart the improvement over time.
Back in the day, I used to do distance running. Lots of 10K and half marathon racing, as well. The first couple of years were tough, learning what my body was capable of doing ... much of it, with respect to that recovery within the route which others speak of. Fartlek type "speed play" during a run. Overall, a given longer distance of run would be at a relatively slower pace, but there would be frequent shorter intervals of higher speeds, even bursts of power and speed, followed by a recovery period back at the lower "base" pace of the route.
Over time, the body would get comfortable with this, pushing its recovery ability and allowing a gradual improvement in the overall time. As each of those intervals got harder and somewhat longer, the body learned to eventually recover easily, even with perhaps dozens of these intervals across the run. Helped, when needing to push hard for a hilly section, or to overtake a competitor.
A good slower warm-up period, an overall lower route pace, but with numerous shorter intervals. You'll need to play with how hard to push during an interval, for how long, and how much recovery time following that interval your body requires before attacking another interval. In time, you ought to see some improvements in overall performance, route speeds.
Nice thing is, anybody can do this. Just find a route pace that'll work for your given ability. Then, play with how many, how intense, how much recovery and how long of a route. If you can do this across two or three routes you frequently ride, you can document the efforts and chart the improvement over time.
Last edited by Clyde1820; 05-04-24 at 09:29 AM.
Likes For Clyde1820:
#72
old newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,077
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Liked 508 Times
in
262 Posts
An "intervals" approach might help, to gradually build the ability to work through longer rides.
Back in the day, I used to do distance running. Lots of 10K and half marathon racing, as well. The first couple of years were tough, learning what my body was capable of doing ... much of it, with respect to that recovery within the route which others speak of. Fartlek type "speed play" during a run. Overall, a given longer distance of run would be at a relatively slower pace, but there would be frequent shorter intervals of higher speeds, even bursts of power and speed, followed by a recovery period back at the lower "base" pace of the route.
Over time, the body would get comfortable with this, pushing its recovery ability and allowing a gradual improvement in the overall time. Each of those intervals got harder and somewhat longer, and the body learned to eventually recover easily, even with perhaps dozens of these intervals across the run. Helped, when needing to push hard for a hilly section, or to overtake a competitor.
A good slower warm-up period, an overall lower route pace, but with numerous shorter intervals. You'll need to play with how hard to push during an interval, for how long, and how much recovery time following that interval your body requires before attacking another interval. In time, you ought to see some improvements in overall performance, route speeds.
Nice thing is, anybody can do this. Just find a route pace that'll work for your given ability. Then, play with how many, how intense, how much recovery and how long of a route. If you can do this across two or three routes you frequently ride, you can document the efforts and chart the improvement over time.
Back in the day, I used to do distance running. Lots of 10K and half marathon racing, as well. The first couple of years were tough, learning what my body was capable of doing ... much of it, with respect to that recovery within the route which others speak of. Fartlek type "speed play" during a run. Overall, a given longer distance of run would be at a relatively slower pace, but there would be frequent shorter intervals of higher speeds, even bursts of power and speed, followed by a recovery period back at the lower "base" pace of the route.
Over time, the body would get comfortable with this, pushing its recovery ability and allowing a gradual improvement in the overall time. Each of those intervals got harder and somewhat longer, and the body learned to eventually recover easily, even with perhaps dozens of these intervals across the run. Helped, when needing to push hard for a hilly section, or to overtake a competitor.
A good slower warm-up period, an overall lower route pace, but with numerous shorter intervals. You'll need to play with how hard to push during an interval, for how long, and how much recovery time following that interval your body requires before attacking another interval. In time, you ought to see some improvements in overall performance, route speeds.
Nice thing is, anybody can do this. Just find a route pace that'll work for your given ability. Then, play with how many, how intense, how much recovery and how long of a route. If you can do this across two or three routes you frequently ride, you can document the efforts and chart the improvement over time.
#73
don't try this at home.
I like the advice in the posts above for longer, moderate paced riding with some random fast sprints added.
There's a local short "hill" of maybe 30-45 feet of elevation, and I can go all-out full blast up it and reach the top in about 15 seconds. It's a fun challenge to see if I can hold the max pace all the way up.
Sometimes I pick out a goal ahead -- a utility pole, or a driveway, etc, and try to hold a fast pace to it. Without a "finish line", I tend to back off the fast pace much earlier!
There's a local short "hill" of maybe 30-45 feet of elevation, and I can go all-out full blast up it and reach the top in about 15 seconds. It's a fun challenge to see if I can hold the max pace all the way up.
Sometimes I pick out a goal ahead -- a utility pole, or a driveway, etc, and try to hold a fast pace to it. Without a "finish line", I tend to back off the fast pace much earlier!
Likes For rm -rf:
#74
Senior Member
I like the advice in the posts above for longer, moderate paced riding with some random fast sprints added.
There's a local short "hill" of maybe 30-45 feet of elevation, and I can go all-out full blast up it and reach the top in about 15 seconds. It's a fun challenge to see if I can hold the max pace all the way up.
Sometimes I pick out a goal ahead -- a utility pole, or a driveway, etc, and try to hold a fast pace to it. Without a "finish line", I tend to back off the fast pace much earlier!
There's a local short "hill" of maybe 30-45 feet of elevation, and I can go all-out full blast up it and reach the top in about 15 seconds. It's a fun challenge to see if I can hold the max pace all the way up.
Sometimes I pick out a goal ahead -- a utility pole, or a driveway, etc, and try to hold a fast pace to it. Without a "finish line", I tend to back off the fast pace much earlier!
Likes For Mountain Mitch: