Are You A Spinner Or A Grinder Up Hills?
#76
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,536
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,078 Times
in
2,010 Posts
Hope you're all stopping at the stop sign.
Last edited by terrymorse; 03-09-24 at 11:57 AM.
#77
There is also an “overhead” of work required (core and upper body at least) working to stabilize the body on the bike while standing. So if I add the ruck vest, I’m also increasing that overhead, presumably by 20%. The same difference would also be there for a rider my height and fitness who was carrying an 16 kg.
Since that overhead increases and detracts from the fraction of total work I’m doing that is moving the bike, it makes it less practical to spend that energy on standing and makes it preferable to sit and be more efficient.
There may also an effect if the extra weight is due to adipose tissue versus say greater height, since a similar musculature is trying to stabilize more weight.
In the climbing context there is also that effect of power as a function of mass, which published data indicate is about 0.7 for athlete of similar level of conditioning. So the available power doesn’t keep up with the climbing work as a rider gets heavier. Another pressure to seek maximum efficiency.
Otto
#78
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,376
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,225 Times
in
6,791 Posts
Downhill speed records are so meh. My highest speed on the Corte Madera down hill is 35.6 mph, lasting without getting aero. The "KOM" speed is 61.7 mph, set by a woman. I call shenanigans.
Hope you're all stopping at the stop sign.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#79
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,536
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,078 Times
in
2,010 Posts
Good habit, and always look left for the sheriff's deputy car. Many tickets have been handed out there.
#80
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,376
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,225 Times
in
6,791 Posts
I haven't seen one there, but I've heard about that, so I always look left there, even when going straight. Mind you, I watched the entire Spectrum ride - midsummer, so a LOT of riders! - pour through that intersection from Portola without even slowing. Even stragglers, seconds after the peloton had passed! Taking their lives in their hands, those stragglers - cars on Alpine were starting to roll.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,502
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,313 Times
in
3,301 Posts
#82
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,376
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,225 Times
in
6,791 Posts
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,502
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,313 Times
in
3,301 Posts
Here’s a thought. I’m an 80kg rider. If I wear a 16kg ruck vest when I ride, I will have 20% more total work climbing a hill against the conservative force of gravity (neglecting bike weight).
There is also an “overhead” of work required (core and upper body at least) working to stabilize the body on the bike while standing. So if I add the ruck vest, I’m also increasing that overhead, presumably by 20%. The same difference would also be there for a rider my height and fitness who was carrying an 16 kg.
Since that overhead increases and detracts from the fraction of total work I’m doing that is moving the bike, it makes it less practical to spend that energy on standing and makes it preferable to sit and be more efficient.
There may also an effect if the extra weight is due to adipose tissue versus say greater height, since a similar musculature is trying to stabilize more weight.
In the climbing context there is also that effect of power as a function of mass, which published data indicate is about 0.7 for athlete of similar level of conditioning. So the available power doesn’t keep up with the climbing work as a rider gets heavier. Another pressure to seek maximum efficiency.
Otto
There is also an “overhead” of work required (core and upper body at least) working to stabilize the body on the bike while standing. So if I add the ruck vest, I’m also increasing that overhead, presumably by 20%. The same difference would also be there for a rider my height and fitness who was carrying an 16 kg.
Since that overhead increases and detracts from the fraction of total work I’m doing that is moving the bike, it makes it less practical to spend that energy on standing and makes it preferable to sit and be more efficient.
There may also an effect if the extra weight is due to adipose tissue versus say greater height, since a similar musculature is trying to stabilize more weight.
In the climbing context there is also that effect of power as a function of mass, which published data indicate is about 0.7 for athlete of similar level of conditioning. So the available power doesn’t keep up with the climbing work as a rider gets heavier. Another pressure to seek maximum efficiency.
Otto
All of my posts have addressed the idea that lifting one's body weight while standing penalizes heavier riders. You introduced the idea of conservative forces, which makes it obvious that lifting the body weight isn't an issue. When you lift the body during the pedal stoke, it increases the potential energy of the body briefly, before some of it gets swapped out for increased potential energy of the bike.
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,657
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,491 Times
in
1,916 Posts
It depends on the hill
Eons ago, I developed the concept of "bite size" hills, modeled on the concept of bite size candy bars you pop into your mouth, rather than biting off sections. So, a bite size hill is attacked and (hopefully) topped before you crap out.
While I've always been a decent climber, I don't enjoy doing so. So when I approach a hill I'll decide whether it's bite-sized, and if so, I'll take it like a sprinter, otherwise like a distance runner.
Eons ago, I developed the concept of "bite size" hills, modeled on the concept of bite size candy bars you pop into your mouth, rather than biting off sections. So, a bite size hill is attacked and (hopefully) topped before you crap out.
While I've always been a decent climber, I don't enjoy doing so. So when I approach a hill I'll decide whether it's bite-sized, and if so, I'll take it like a sprinter, otherwise like a distance runner.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Likes For FBinNY:
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,502
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,313 Times
in
3,301 Posts
#86
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,911
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Liked 2,931 Times
in
1,229 Posts
I heard it attributed to Hampsten. It was probably actually first said by Alfredo Binda or maybe Maurice Garin.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#87
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,911
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Liked 2,931 Times
in
1,229 Posts
If we both start from a dead stop and just coast, my money is on me. Let's not sully the results by introducing unfair factors such as pedaling ability . . . .
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#88
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,376
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,225 Times
in
6,791 Posts
Do not overlook the aerodynamic advantage of a smaller frontal area. You're a couple inches taller than me!
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#89
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,376
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,225 Times
in
6,791 Posts
So, there IS a scientific explanation. We - meaning you and I - haven't identified it. Others may well have done.
*generally little spidery guys.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#90
I grind, 100%. My cassette is 11-28, with 52-42-30 chainrings. It takes a couple of hours on the bike first, or a grade of at least 10% probably 15%, to get me into the 30t chainring. Overall average speed is around 16 mph, so I'm not spinning 800+ watts to do those gears.
2 observations:
1. It takes energy to move your legs, regardless of how much force you're putting out. More fat or muscle on your legs increases internal resistance, therefore lighter (thinner) athletes will be relatively more efficient spinning than grinding, while heavier (fatter) athletes will be relatively more efficient grinding than spinning. I'm definitely on the heavier side for cyclists at about 5'9" 190 lbs.
2. Most cyclists are running gearing that is too narrow. Base your calculations on max and min speeds, not average. I want to pedal both up a 20% grade into a 30 mph headwind (1.5 mph?) and turn around and pedal down the same (65-70 mph?). That means for similar cadence I should have a gear range of about 4500%, not the 500+% bike companies like to talk about. If you're spending more than 1-2% of your riding time in either your biggest or your smallest gear, you have the wrong gears.
2 observations:
1. It takes energy to move your legs, regardless of how much force you're putting out. More fat or muscle on your legs increases internal resistance, therefore lighter (thinner) athletes will be relatively more efficient spinning than grinding, while heavier (fatter) athletes will be relatively more efficient grinding than spinning. I'm definitely on the heavier side for cyclists at about 5'9" 190 lbs.
2. Most cyclists are running gearing that is too narrow. Base your calculations on max and min speeds, not average. I want to pedal both up a 20% grade into a 30 mph headwind (1.5 mph?) and turn around and pedal down the same (65-70 mph?). That means for similar cadence I should have a gear range of about 4500%, not the 500+% bike companies like to talk about. If you're spending more than 1-2% of your riding time in either your biggest or your smallest gear, you have the wrong gears.
Likes For One Wheel:
#91
All of my posts have addressed the idea that lifting one's body weight while standing penalizes heavier riders. You introduced the idea of conservative forces, which makes it obvious that lifting the body weight isn't an issue. When you lift the body during the pedal stoke, it increases the potential energy of the body briefly, before some of it gets swapped out for increased potential energy of the bike.
Otto
#92
Senior Member
as someone who lives on a very steep hill and doesn’t drive, my usual strategy is to do the “easiest” thing. This means zig-zagging up the hill while seated, using as little energy as possible, or going out of the saddle and finding a rhythm, which is kind of difficult at low powers. I feel that standing is better for your knees.
if I’m trying to go as fast as I can up a hill, I stay seated if the climb is longer than 20 seconds.
Likes For LarrySellerz:
#93
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,376
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,225 Times
in
6,791 Posts
sounds terrible lol.
as someone who lives on a very steep hill and doesn’t drive, my usual strategy is to do the “easiest” thing. This means zig-zagging up the hill while seated, using as little energy as possible, or going out of the saddle and finding a rhythm, which is kind of difficult at low powers. I feel that standing is better for your knees.
if I’m trying to go as fast as I can up a hill, I stay seated if the climb is longer than 20 seconds.
as someone who lives on a very steep hill and doesn’t drive, my usual strategy is to do the “easiest” thing. This means zig-zagging up the hill while seated, using as little energy as possible, or going out of the saddle and finding a rhythm, which is kind of difficult at low powers. I feel that standing is better for your knees.
if I’m trying to go as fast as I can up a hill, I stay seated if the climb is longer than 20 seconds.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#94
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 19,376
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Liked 13,225 Times
in
6,791 Posts
I grind, 100%. My cassette is 11-28, with 52-42-30 chainrings. It takes a couple of hours on the bike first, or a grade of at least 10% probably 15%, to get me into the 30t chainring. Overall average speed is around 16 mph, so I'm not spinning 800+ watts to do those gears.
2 observations:
1. It takes energy to move your legs, regardless of how much force you're putting out. More fat or muscle on your legs increases internal resistance, therefore lighter (thinner) athletes will be relatively more efficient spinning than grinding, while heavier (fatter) athletes will be relatively more efficient grinding than spinning. I'm definitely on the heavier side for cyclists at about 5'9" 190 lbs.
2. Most cyclists are running gearing that is too narrow. Base your calculations on max and min speeds, not average. I want to pedal both up a 20% grade into a 30 mph headwind (1.5 mph?) and turn around and pedal down the same (65-70 mph?). That means for similar cadence I should have a gear range of about 4500%, not the 500+% bike companies like to talk about. If you're spending more than 1-2% of your riding time in either your biggest or your smallest gear, you have the wrong gears.
2 observations:
1. It takes energy to move your legs, regardless of how much force you're putting out. More fat or muscle on your legs increases internal resistance, therefore lighter (thinner) athletes will be relatively more efficient spinning than grinding, while heavier (fatter) athletes will be relatively more efficient grinding than spinning. I'm definitely on the heavier side for cyclists at about 5'9" 190 lbs.
2. Most cyclists are running gearing that is too narrow. Base your calculations on max and min speeds, not average. I want to pedal both up a 20% grade into a 30 mph headwind (1.5 mph?) and turn around and pedal down the same (65-70 mph?). That means for similar cadence I should have a gear range of about 4500%, not the 500+% bike companies like to talk about. If you're spending more than 1-2% of your riding time in either your biggest or your smallest gear, you have the wrong gears.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#95
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,536
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,078 Times
in
2,010 Posts
Downhill speed records are so meh. My highest speed on the Corte Madera down hill is 35.6 mph, coasting without getting aero.
New highest speed: 40.8 mph. 7th place on the old people's leader board (65+). Might be my maximum, given my weight handicap.
Likes For terrymorse:
#96
#97
2. Most cyclists are running gearing that is too narrow. Base your calculations on max and min speeds, not average. I want to pedal both up a 20% grade into a 30 mph headwind (1.5 mph?) and turn around and pedal down the same (65-70 mph?). That means for similar cadence I should have a gear range of about 4500%, not the 500+% bike companies like to talk about. If you're spending more than 1-2% of your riding time in either your biggest or your smallest gear, you have the wrong gears.
But I kind of agree with your point. Most people don’t have a low enough gear for steep climbs at a comfortable cadence. I have a 1:1 lowest gear and that becomes a total grindfest above 15% gradient. Old-school gearing is even worse.
Likes For PeteHski:
#98
Henderson, NV
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Henderson/Las Vegas NV
Posts: 671
Bikes: Trek Alpha 3700, GT STS DH, Raleigh Grand Prix, Fisher Montare, Fisher CR-7, Fisher Aquila, Diamondback Sorrento, The Bike Beat Revolution, KHS XC 504R
Liked 749 Times
in
369 Posts
sounds terrible lol.
as someone who lives on a very steep hill and doesn’t drive, my usual strategy is to do the “easiest” thing. This means zig-zagging up the hill while seated, using as little energy as possible, or going out of the saddle and finding a rhythm, which is kind of difficult at low powers. I feel that standing is better for your knees.
if I’m trying to go as fast as I can up a hill, I stay seated if the climb is longer than 20 seconds.
as someone who lives on a very steep hill and doesn’t drive, my usual strategy is to do the “easiest” thing. This means zig-zagging up the hill while seated, using as little energy as possible, or going out of the saddle and finding a rhythm, which is kind of difficult at low powers. I feel that standing is better for your knees.
if I’m trying to go as fast as I can up a hill, I stay seated if the climb is longer than 20 seconds.
#99
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,964
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Liked 6,631 Times
in
3,350 Posts
I eat grinders whilst I spin
Passing seated people pushing high gears on a climb and obviously suffering makes me want yell out, go to a lower gear. But then there bike may be in the lowest, or they are working on doing some leg strengthening. Or maybe they are dumb a=@$$e$. But gear down anyway!
Passing seated people pushing high gears on a climb and obviously suffering makes me want yell out, go to a lower gear. But then there bike may be in the lowest, or they are working on doing some leg strengthening. Or maybe they are dumb a=@$$e$. But gear down anyway!
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Last edited by rsbob; 03-09-24 at 06:34 PM.
#100
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: NorCal
Posts: 828
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur 4 TR, Canyon Endurace cf sl, Canyon Ultimate cf slx, Canyon Strive enduro, Canyon Grizl sl8
Liked 1,572 Times
in
578 Posts
I grind, 100%. My cassette is 11-28, with 52-42-30 chainrings. It takes a couple of hours on the bike first, or a grade of at least 10% probably 15%, to get me into the 30t chainring. Overall average speed is around 16 mph, so I'm not spinning 800+ watts to do those gears.
2 observations:
1. It takes energy to move your legs, regardless of how much force you're putting out. More fat or muscle on your legs increases internal resistance, therefore lighter (thinner) athletes will be relatively more efficient spinning than grinding, while heavier (fatter) athletes will be relatively more efficient grinding than spinning. I'm definitely on the heavier side for cyclists at about 5'9" 190 lbs.
2. Most cyclists are running gearing that is too narrow. Base your calculations on max and min speeds, not average. I want to pedal both up a 20% grade into a 30 mph headwind (1.5 mph?) and turn around and pedal down the same (65-70 mph?). That means for similar cadence I should have a gear range of about 4500%, not the 500+% bike companies like to talk about. If you're spending more than 1-2% of your riding time in either your biggest or your smallest gear, you have the wrong gears.
2 observations:
1. It takes energy to move your legs, regardless of how much force you're putting out. More fat or muscle on your legs increases internal resistance, therefore lighter (thinner) athletes will be relatively more efficient spinning than grinding, while heavier (fatter) athletes will be relatively more efficient grinding than spinning. I'm definitely on the heavier side for cyclists at about 5'9" 190 lbs.
2. Most cyclists are running gearing that is too narrow. Base your calculations on max and min speeds, not average. I want to pedal both up a 20% grade into a 30 mph headwind (1.5 mph?) and turn around and pedal down the same (65-70 mph?). That means for similar cadence I should have a gear range of about 4500%, not the 500+% bike companies like to talk about. If you're spending more than 1-2% of your riding time in either your biggest or your smallest gear, you have the wrong gears.
Likes For Sierra_rider: