What are the biggest wastes of money in biking?
#951
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,990
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,091 Times
in
3,829 Posts
Since I can't use it on my existing frame (as I understand it right now), and I'm not intending to buy a new MTB any time soon, it's kind of a moot point for my own personal use right now. The video I was was all about the benefits of the new system (hype!), but didn't comment about any downsides, and I haven't researched it any further yet. My initial impression is that they are "fixing" things that aren't really problems for most people. For performance and installation, it appears to be pretty slick...if you have a bike built for it. At this point, I'm not sold on it being the best thing ever. Maybe I will be proven wrong. If I was in the market for a new bike, and this drivetrain was an option on a bike I wanted....??? I don't know. I'm not a fan of all the proprietary requirements of the system, including chain.
EDIT: The new SRAM system is also heavier than the current XX1 AXS system.
EDIT: The new SRAM system is also heavier than the current XX1 AXS system.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Last edited by Eric F; 03-21-23 at 03:42 PM.
Likes For Eric F:
#952
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Since I can't use it on my existing frame (as I understand it right now), and I'm not intending to buy a new MTB any time soon, it's kind of a moot point for my own personal use right now. The video I was was all about the benefits of the new system (hype!), but didn't comment about any downsides, and I haven't researched it any further yet. My initial impression is that they are "fixing" things that aren't really problems for most people. For performance and installation, it appears to be pretty slick...if you have a bike built for it. At this point, I'm not sold on it being the best thing ever. Maybe I will be proven wrong. If I was in the market for a new bike, and this drivetrain was an option on a bike I wanted....??? I don't know. I'm not a fan of all the proprietary requirements of the system, including chain.
EDIT: The new SRAM system is also heavier than the current XX1 AXS system.
EDIT: The new SRAM system is also heavier than the current XX1 AXS system.
Likes For seypat:
#953
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,298 Times
in
2,947 Posts
What I'd be worrried about is forking out the dough for another bike with this new system. Then in 3-4 years, maybe the next time they add another gear, they tweak the hanger system just enough that I have to buy another new frame/bike because the one I purchased now won't be compatible with the future system. So new bike every 3-4 years. That's what I get out of it. I could be wrong.
#954
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,990
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,091 Times
in
3,829 Posts
Of course not. The issue would be for people who desire to run the newest gear, but currently have a frame that isn't compatible with the configuration required for it, because they created a new configuration requirement. My 2019 Trek is one of those bikes. Despite currently having a SRAM Eagle drivetrain, my frame does not have a UDH-standard rear end, and could not use the new SRAM parts. This is the nature of the bike industry, though. For example, rear end spacing standards have changed multiple times.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#955
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,298 Times
in
2,947 Posts
But, if those people really desire to run the newest gear, aren't they going to get a whole new bike?
#956
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,990
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,091 Times
in
3,829 Posts
EDIT: My use of "might" above is really just theoretically speaking. I'm not currently convinced on the system being all that...with or without a bag of chips.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Last edited by Eric F; 03-21-23 at 04:58 PM.
#957
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,298 Times
in
2,947 Posts
As the owner of a manufacturing company, I am unmoved by customers that say they might consider buying something if it was made available. When pressed, they almost always give you reasons why they wouldn't actually buy the item under discussion -- they just want it to be available.
#958
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,990
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,091 Times
in
3,829 Posts
As the owner of a manufacturing company, I am unmoved by customers that say they might consider buying something if it was made available. When pressed, they almost always give you reasons why they wouldn't actually buy the item under discussion -- they just want it to be available.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#959
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Thank you BTW, for setting that up for me. I knew it wouldn't take long.
Last edited by seypat; 03-21-23 at 06:27 PM.
#960
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Seriously though, the bike industry isn't moving the direction I want/need it to go. Doubtful I'll get a new or even 1-2 year old bike in the future. Why? I'm just 1 person/consumer, so it really doesn't matter anyway. I'll have to keep the ones I've got working instead.
Last edited by seypat; 03-21-23 at 07:32 PM.
#961
Senior Member
I've wasted a lot of money replacing mirrors and taillights.
I think I've lost three tailights because either the rubber mounting band, the light clip or the lens housing came loose. Sure, they look and feel secure when they are newly mounted but ride them through pot holes and rough asphalt and something will undo itself. Now I redundantly secure them with three elastic bands.
And then there's mirrors. I had a good cateye mirror for about twenty years until the mount broke. Then all of a sudden there was nothing available that had the right convex as the old one. Add to that the rubber mounting bands keep breaking. Then when I found the mirrycle, I bought two because it had the right convex and I was afraid that convexness would not be available again.
I think I've lost three tailights because either the rubber mounting band, the light clip or the lens housing came loose. Sure, they look and feel secure when they are newly mounted but ride them through pot holes and rough asphalt and something will undo itself. Now I redundantly secure them with three elastic bands.
And then there's mirrors. I had a good cateye mirror for about twenty years until the mount broke. Then all of a sudden there was nothing available that had the right convex as the old one. Add to that the rubber mounting bands keep breaking. Then when I found the mirrycle, I bought two because it had the right convex and I was afraid that convexness would not be available again.
#962
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,439
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4413 Post(s)
Liked 4,864 Times
in
3,010 Posts
That appears to be the BF way, at least from what I've read. Look at all the electronic vs mechanical vs mechanical discs vs hydraulic vs rim vs tubed vs tubeless vs carbon vs steel vs lube vs wax threads. Whenever something new comes out, you gotta get it because what is not the latest/greatest is so much worse it's useless.
Thank you BTW, for setting that up for me. I knew it wouldn't take long.
Thank you BTW, for setting that up for me. I knew it wouldn't take long.
Meanwhile we are free to use our older frames for the next few decades with the drivetrain standard it came with. Compatible parts will be available for many years and will probably become cheaper as they are now not the latest/greatest spec. I'm not going to rush out and buy a new mtb frame for this, but my next bike will probably have this new drivetrain. I'd rather they move forward than just doing the same-old. If I buy a new car, I expect it to be incrementally better than my old one. I have the same expectation of my bicycles. I was discussing this with a bike engineer and we agreed that if you buy a new mtb roughly every 5 years, you will likely see some significant improvements. Obviously it's a non-linear curve, but as a general rule of thumb I think it's pretty good. The state-of-the-art mtb I bought back in 2004 rode like crap compared to the 2015 mtb I replaced it with. It was like something from another planet and better in every single way. My 2019 mtb was a much smaller step forward, but still a little better. I'll probably replace it in 2024/25 and that will be the end of cable shifting for me and probably mech hangers by the look of it!
#963
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,439
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4413 Post(s)
Liked 4,864 Times
in
3,010 Posts
Out of curiosity, do you ever try riding newer bikes to see how they may actually work for you? I realise you are a committed 3x drivetrain guy, but you might be surprised how good a modern, electronic 1x or 2x actually is. They would certainly resolve your issues with mechanical shifting.
#964
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 863 Times
in
573 Posts
Out of curiosity, do you ever try riding newer bikes to see how they may actually work for you? I realise you are a committed 3x drivetrain guy, but you might be surprised how good a modern, electronic 1x or 2x actually is. They would certainly resolve your issues with mechanical shifting.
#965
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,439
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4413 Post(s)
Liked 4,864 Times
in
3,010 Posts
#966
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
What I'd be worrried about is forking out the dough for another bike with this new system. Then in 3-4 years, maybe the next time they add another gear, they tweak the hanger system just enough that I have to buy another new frame/bike because the one I purchased now won't be compatible with the future system. So new bike every 3-4 years. That's what I get out of it. I could be wrong.
Sorry, but we seem to be talking past each other. I just don't get why you would need to buy a new frame to accommodate the new hanger system rather than just foregoing the "upgrade" entirely. Manufacturers make lots of stuff I end up deciding not to buy, I can't see how that's a middle finger.
I think the bigger risk in being an early adopter would be that if there aren't enough frames being manufactured, SRAM may give up on the line completely and you won't be able to get replacement parts--I assume these are going to need special hubs and axles (cassettes?), and there could be unforeseen problems with these novel items that could make the replacement an issue much earlier than something with a tried and true approach.
#967
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
That appears to be the BF way, at least from what I've read. Look at all the electronic vs mechanical vs mechanical discs vs hydraulic vs rim vs tubed vs tubeless vs carbon vs steel vs lube vs wax threads. Whenever something new comes out, you gotta get it because what is not the latest/greatest is so much worse it's useless.
Thank you BTW, for setting that up for me. I knew it wouldn't take long.
Thank you BTW, for setting that up for me. I knew it wouldn't take long.
I seriously think that attitude is represented by such a small percentage of the market as to be completely irrelevant.
Likes For livedarklions:
#968
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,439
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4413 Post(s)
Liked 4,864 Times
in
3,010 Posts
Sorry, but we seem to be talking past each other. I just don't get why you would need to buy a new frame to accommodate the new hanger system rather than just foregoing the "upgrade" entirely. Manufacturers make lots of stuff I end up deciding not to buy, I can't see how that's a middle finger.
Likes For PeteHski:
#969
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,292
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8281 Post(s)
Liked 9,046 Times
in
4,477 Posts
That appears to be the BF way, at least from what I've read. Look at all the electronic vs mechanical vs mechanical discs vs hydraulic vs rim vs tubed vs tubeless vs carbon vs steel vs lube vs wax threads. Whenever something new comes out, you gotta get it because what is not the latest/greatest is so much worse it's useless.
Mostly what happens is every retrogrouch, tightwad, and anti-anything-new person will appear and crap all over the new stuff and say how their 1980 Whatever bike is just as good as a new carbon wonderbike and geez Eddy won on a steel bike and rim brakes are already too strong and who needs all those gears and what if your shifter battery goes dead and gravel bikes are not a thing and....you get the point.
Likes For big john:
#970
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,546
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,435 Times
in
2,761 Posts
My current most expensive disappointments- 1) Fancy rain jacket. I don't choose to ride in the rain and it was too bulky to carry for the unexpected. 2) SPD-SL shoes and pedals. I gave them about 3 months then went back to SPD. That one was a surprise, I expected to like them. 3) Mini-Vs. Don't hear about them much anymore but they were a thing in the early days of gravel. Pain in the butt to set up and IMO no better braking than the stock cantis.
#971
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,990
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,091 Times
in
3,829 Posts
I think the bigger risk in being an early adopter would be that if there aren't enough frames being manufactured, SRAM may give up on the line completely and you won't be able to get replacement parts--I assume these are going to need special hubs and axles (cassettes?), and there could be unforeseen problems with these novel items that could make the replacement an issue much earlier than something with a tried and true approach.
SRAM is definitely pushing this system hard. Yesterday - right on cue - top SRAM-sponsored MTB racers dropped social media posts pimping the benefits of the new system, and showing it off with their new race bikes...
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CqDS6..._web_copy_link
Personally, I'm hoping this new system means a price drop on last year's AXS upgrade kit - LOL.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Last edited by Eric F; 03-22-23 at 09:53 AM.
#972
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,990
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4947 Post(s)
Liked 8,091 Times
in
3,829 Posts
Mini-Vs eliminated the major advantage of V-brakes - more leverage. Do away with that leverage, and you are right back to cantilever territory.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#973
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times
in
1,793 Posts
It's already hard to find decent 10-speed Shimano components, and quality rim-brake wheel set selections are becoming thin.
Last edited by terrymorse; 03-22-23 at 12:15 PM.
#974
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,298 Times
in
2,947 Posts
#975
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Had an issue pop up. Where was I/we?
I do, at least go in to the store and climb aboard. Unfortunately, I'm built like your countryman Chris Hoye. A little shorter, but every bit as stout. The newer frames are getting too thick/wide, particularly on the TT behind the head tube. There are some clearance issues now unless I have a really wide Q factor.
Eric F explained in one of his posts. I would not upgrade as long as I knew there were plenty of parts out there for my current system. But, as post 974 pointed out, that might not be the case.
Out of curiosity, do you ever try riding newer bikes to see how they may actually work for you? I realise you are a committed 3x drivetrain guy, but you might be surprised how good a modern, electronic 1x or 2x actually is. They would certainly resolve your issues with mechanical shifting.
Sorry, but we seem to be talking past each other. I just don't get why you would need to buy a new frame to accommodate the new hanger system rather than just foregoing the "upgrade" entirely.