Bike Snob NY (Eben Weiss) on carbon
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,847
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,543 Posts
Bike Snob NY (Eben Weiss) on carbon
I am not a carbon hater, and neither is BSNYC, but i agree with a lot of this in terms of day to day use.
get the popcorn out
https://www.outsideonline.com/cultur...a-carbon-bike/
get the popcorn out
https://www.outsideonline.com/cultur...a-carbon-bike/
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Likes For squirtdad:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,968 Times
in
4,692 Posts
Likes For Koyote:
#4
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
Posts: 492
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 222 Post(s)
Liked 304 Times
in
194 Posts
While I don't disagree with the most of the facts, or maybe any in that article, I disagree with the conclusions. The word "need" is pointless. I don't even "need" a bike, and a pro doesn't need a bike either, they can flip burgers for a living. That of course is an extreme position, but so is the use of the word "need."
More realistically, the author seems to have the opinion that the only thing needed on a bike, beyond the basics, is what is needed to be competitive in bike races. I "need" a carbon frame because this increases my enjoyment of my bike and that is the reason I ride.
My carbon bike is more comfortable, aero and lighter. I like comfort and I like being lighter. While being a few pounds lighter only has a minimal effect on speed while climbing, the bike feels better to me. As for aero, I enjoy going as fast as I can. All of this adds to my enjoyment.
Oh, in the case of my two carbon bikes, a Trek Domane and Trek Checkpoint, both have down-tube storage which I don't think any metal frame bike has or could reasonably have without being extremely heavy. I really like being able to keep all my roadside repair stuff tucked away in the frame storage.
Clearly if carbon didn't exist, I would still enjoy cycling. Likely there is some future, yet to be discovered material, that will be lighter and stronger than carbon. That doesn't diminish my enjoyment of carbon, yet.
Aside from the expense of the carbon, there is no other downside that I have encountered. I'll accept a carbon frame is more fragile in some ways, that's why I don't use a typical clamp it in my repair stand and use a Silca Hirobel frame clamp. I also think the author is overstating how fragile carbon frames are. Carbon is popular for MTB's and many riders essentially crash their bikes every time they use them. Of course, I know an MTB is built differently, but I haven't crashed, tipped over, anything on my road bike in several years (knock on wood). And if I did, it's far from certain that the bike would be damaged.
And concerning damage, carbon frames can be repaired.
#5
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,630 Times
in
934 Posts
He's right about lots. I even had my fancy carbon bike repaired whereas an even more fun 10 year old aluminum frame with less miles hangs from the rafters with an unrepairable crack.
I agree. The sticking point is on need. Nobody needs anything except for perhaps Mazlows hierarchy. All my bikes are steel except 1 aluminum and the above mentioned carbon. But want is a pretty strong factor. I want the funnest most suitable bike for a given task. For some tasks, wünderbike is best in a way steel isn't and will never be.
As always, keep it classy, Eben.
Base2
I agree. The sticking point is on need. Nobody needs anything except for perhaps Mazlows hierarchy. All my bikes are steel except 1 aluminum and the above mentioned carbon. But want is a pretty strong factor. I want the funnest most suitable bike for a given task. For some tasks, wünderbike is best in a way steel isn't and will never be.
As always, keep it classy, Eben.
Base2
Last edited by base2; 01-31-24 at 11:26 AM.
Likes For base2:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,968 Times
in
4,692 Posts
As I wrote in the other thread on this topic, there is no way to differentiate "needs" from "wants" when talking about individual products. It's best to just not even use the word "need."
Likes For Koyote:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times
in
974 Posts
Every material has its own idiosyncrasies. But the most forgiving bike material is probably aluminum. For some reasons paint seems to stick to aluminum frames really well whereas it chips off of steel frames if you look at it too hard. The funny thing is- on cars, it is the opposite. Just look at any old Land Rover. Aluminum frames are also a lot less prone to small dents and dings as steel frame. And to state the obvious- aluminum doesn't rust and steel does.
The most worrisome material is probably a carbon-aluminum glue jointed frame. The thoughts of galvanic corrosion, glue failure, headtube overtightening and aluminum lug cracking are never far from your mind.
The most worrisome material is probably a carbon-aluminum glue jointed frame. The thoughts of galvanic corrosion, glue failure, headtube overtightening and aluminum lug cracking are never far from your mind.
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3513 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
I have no problem if someone wants to own and experience a world-class racing bike--no matter what it's made out of, and no matter what the rider's weight, riding style or mechanical skill-level. Being able to experience something high-end is its own reward.
#9
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times
in
1,793 Posts
Every material has its own idiosyncrasies. But the most forgiving bike material is probably aluminum. For some reasons paint seems to stick to aluminum frames really well whereas it chips off of steel frames if you look at it too hard. The funny thing is- on cars, it is the opposite. Just look at any old Land Rover. Aluminum frames are also a lot less prone to small dents and dings as steel frame. And to state the obvious- aluminum doesn't rust and steel does.
The most worrisome material is probably a carbon-aluminum glue jointed frame. The thoughts of galvanic corrosion, glue failure, headtube overtightening and aluminum lug cracking are never far from your mind.
The most worrisome material is probably a carbon-aluminum glue jointed frame. The thoughts of galvanic corrosion, glue failure, headtube overtightening and aluminum lug cracking are never far from your mind.
- Of the many features I look for in a frame, how well paint sticks to it is way, way down the list.
- Al frames don't dent easily because they are thick. They need to be to provide the same strength as steel (Edit: or Ti, settle down).
- Al doesn't rust, but it does corrode. Badly, in some situations.
Last edited by terrymorse; 01-31-24 at 12:08 PM.
Likes For terrymorse:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,249
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18421 Post(s)
Liked 15,569 Times
in
7,335 Posts
I loves me a good frame material thread.
But in the end, we all know Ti is the best, even if some of you can’t admit it.
But in the end, we all know Ti is the best, even if some of you can’t admit it.
Likes For indyfabz:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,952
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,301 Times
in
2,948 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,763
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
I'll bite.
While I don't disagree with the most of the facts, or maybe any in that article, I disagree with the conclusions. The word "need" is pointless. I don't even "need" a bike, and a pro doesn't need a bike either, they can flip burgers for a living. That of course is an extreme position, but so is the use of the word "need."
More realistically, the author seems to have the opinion that the only thing needed on a bike, beyond the basics, is what is needed to be competitive in bike races. I "need" a carbon frame because this increases my enjoyment of my bike and that is the reason I ride.
My carbon bike is more comfortable, aero and lighter. I like comfort and I like being lighter. While being a few pounds lighter only has a minimal effect on speed while climbing, the bike feels better to me. As for aero, I enjoy going as fast as I can. All of this adds to my enjoyment.
Oh, in the case of my two carbon bikes, a Trek Domane and Trek Checkpoint, both have down-tube storage which I don't think any metal frame bike has or could reasonably have without being extremely heavy. I really like being able to keep all my roadside repair stuff tucked away in the frame storage.
Clearly if carbon didn't exist, I would still enjoy cycling. Likely there is some future, yet to be discovered material, that will be lighter and stronger than carbon. That doesn't diminish my enjoyment of carbon, yet.
Aside from the expense of the carbon, there is no other downside that I have encountered. I'll accept a carbon frame is more fragile in some ways, that's why I don't use a typical clamp it in my repair stand and use a Silca Hirobel frame clamp. I also think the author is overstating how fragile carbon frames are. Carbon is popular for MTB's and many riders essentially crash their bikes every time they use them. Of course, I know an MTB is built differently, but I haven't crashed, tipped over, anything on my road bike in several years (knock on wood). And if I did, it's far from certain that the bike would be damaged.
And concerning damage, carbon frames can be repaired.
While I don't disagree with the most of the facts, or maybe any in that article, I disagree with the conclusions. The word "need" is pointless. I don't even "need" a bike, and a pro doesn't need a bike either, they can flip burgers for a living. That of course is an extreme position, but so is the use of the word "need."
More realistically, the author seems to have the opinion that the only thing needed on a bike, beyond the basics, is what is needed to be competitive in bike races. I "need" a carbon frame because this increases my enjoyment of my bike and that is the reason I ride.
My carbon bike is more comfortable, aero and lighter. I like comfort and I like being lighter. While being a few pounds lighter only has a minimal effect on speed while climbing, the bike feels better to me. As for aero, I enjoy going as fast as I can. All of this adds to my enjoyment.
Oh, in the case of my two carbon bikes, a Trek Domane and Trek Checkpoint, both have down-tube storage which I don't think any metal frame bike has or could reasonably have without being extremely heavy. I really like being able to keep all my roadside repair stuff tucked away in the frame storage.
Clearly if carbon didn't exist, I would still enjoy cycling. Likely there is some future, yet to be discovered material, that will be lighter and stronger than carbon. That doesn't diminish my enjoyment of carbon, yet.
Aside from the expense of the carbon, there is no other downside that I have encountered. I'll accept a carbon frame is more fragile in some ways, that's why I don't use a typical clamp it in my repair stand and use a Silca Hirobel frame clamp. I also think the author is overstating how fragile carbon frames are. Carbon is popular for MTB's and many riders essentially crash their bikes every time they use them. Of course, I know an MTB is built differently, but I haven't crashed, tipped over, anything on my road bike in several years (knock on wood). And if I did, it's far from certain that the bike would be damaged.
And concerning damage, carbon frames can be repaired.
Likes For Camilo:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2700 Post(s)
Liked 486 Times
in
351 Posts
Recently “upgraded” to a full carbon fancy $3k bike, have to say the biggest changes are that I feel more upset at mechanical problems because of the cost of the bike, and am more paranoid about sudden catastrophic failures (had a carbon seatpost snap before.)
is it faster? Sure, but not by much, and I don’t like riding at the limit of my fitness on it because I don’t fully trust carbon yet, so it’s not even really faster except on climbs
is it faster? Sure, but not by much, and I don’t like riding at the limit of my fitness on it because I don’t fully trust carbon yet, so it’s not even really faster except on climbs
Likes For LarrySellerz:
#14
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,594
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 862 Times
in
490 Posts
There is no amount of logic that can be applied to consumers.
Does the 45 year old dad who rides one to two times a week when it’s warm need a 15lb carbon bike instead of an 18lb steel one?
Absolutely not. It’s a lost argument to try to state otherwise.
But that doesn’t mean that’s what he wants. There are a ton of consumers who’ve decided that they want carbon, and so, we have a market full of carbon. If the balding masses all wanted steel bikes, the market would reflect that.
I do pretty much agree with that article though. Of the 6 bikes in the garage between me and my wife, 5 are steel, one is aluminum, all have threaded bottom brackets, and aren’t likely to feel old anytime soon.
Can we start a new thread about how phenomenal carbon fiber is as a component material? Rims, forks, seatposts, cranks, handlebars, and shoes. Maybe especially shoes.
Does the 45 year old dad who rides one to two times a week when it’s warm need a 15lb carbon bike instead of an 18lb steel one?
Absolutely not. It’s a lost argument to try to state otherwise.
But that doesn’t mean that’s what he wants. There are a ton of consumers who’ve decided that they want carbon, and so, we have a market full of carbon. If the balding masses all wanted steel bikes, the market would reflect that.
I do pretty much agree with that article though. Of the 6 bikes in the garage between me and my wife, 5 are steel, one is aluminum, all have threaded bottom brackets, and aren’t likely to feel old anytime soon.
Can we start a new thread about how phenomenal carbon fiber is as a component material? Rims, forks, seatposts, cranks, handlebars, and shoes. Maybe especially shoes.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,323 Times
in
674 Posts
There is no amount of logic that can be applied to consumers.
Does the 45 year old dad who rides one to two times a week when it’s warm need a 15lb carbon bike instead of an 18lb steel one?
Absolutely not. It’s a lost argument to try to state otherwise.
But that doesn’t mean that’s what he wants. There are a ton of consumers who’ve decided that they want carbon, and so, we have a market full of carbon. If the balding masses all wanted steel bikes, the market would reflect that.
I do pretty much agree with that article though. Of the 6 bikes in the garage between me and my wife, 5 are steel, one is aluminum, all have threaded bottom brackets, and aren’t likely to feel old anytime soon.
Can we start a new thread about how phenomenal carbon fiber is as a component material? Rims, forks, seatposts, cranks, handlebars, and shoes. Maybe especially shoes.
Does the 45 year old dad who rides one to two times a week when it’s warm need a 15lb carbon bike instead of an 18lb steel one?
Absolutely not. It’s a lost argument to try to state otherwise.
But that doesn’t mean that’s what he wants. There are a ton of consumers who’ve decided that they want carbon, and so, we have a market full of carbon. If the balding masses all wanted steel bikes, the market would reflect that.
I do pretty much agree with that article though. Of the 6 bikes in the garage between me and my wife, 5 are steel, one is aluminum, all have threaded bottom brackets, and aren’t likely to feel old anytime soon.
Can we start a new thread about how phenomenal carbon fiber is as a component material? Rims, forks, seatposts, cranks, handlebars, and shoes. Maybe especially shoes.
Last edited by Atlas Shrugged; 01-31-24 at 08:41 PM.
#17
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 774
Bikes: Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, Cinelli Hobootleg, Zizzo Liberte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 781 Times
in
377 Posts
Nobody needs a Rolex or a Ducati or a Leica either. Yet they exist. Oh the humanity!
__________________
--------------------------------------
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
JohnMFlores.com | YouTube: JohnMFlores
Insta: JohnMichaelFlores | TikTok: @johnnymotoflores
--------------------------------------
Rider. Wanderer. Creator.
JohnMFlores.com | YouTube: JohnMFlores
Insta: JohnMichaelFlores | TikTok: @johnnymotoflores
Likes For john m flores:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
AsI see it the whole debate is artificial The whole debate over whether some riders “need” or “deserve” a bike of some specific frame material is a manufactured debate. The idea that one frame material is superior to another is a manufactured debate point.
I imagine proud pennyfarthing riders asking’ “Does that rider Deserve a safety bicycle?”
It is a bicycle. One does not “earn” the right to ride it based on mileage or speed. One earns the right to ride it by buying or otherwise acquiring it. No one needs it. Anyone who makes the effort can own it.
We can ridicule the author but so many posters actually seem to agree. Bike frame fascism is alive and well it seems
I imagine proud pennyfarthing riders asking’ “Does that rider Deserve a safety bicycle?”
It is a bicycle. One does not “earn” the right to ride it based on mileage or speed. One earns the right to ride it by buying or otherwise acquiring it. No one needs it. Anyone who makes the effort can own it.
We can ridicule the author but so many posters actually seem to agree. Bike frame fascism is alive and well it seems
Likes For Maelochs:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3513 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
Wonder how many duffers in this group play with professional-level golf clubs?
Likes For smd4:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,249
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18421 Post(s)
Liked 15,569 Times
in
7,335 Posts
Likes For indyfabz:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times
in
3,012 Posts
A lot of people choose bikes based on aesthetics. It's the same with cars and many other things once you get beyond basic needs. Beyond meeting functional requirements it's then all about how it looks and the cost.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3513 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
On another thread I mention about the Cinelli Supercorsa and chrome. In the late 1980s, Cinelli's American importer brought in a newer Cinelli model based on the Supercorsa, cheaper, with different lugs, and no chrome. It was a disaster, because people enjoyed the aesthetics of the Supercorsa. Aesthetics mattered.
Likes For smd4:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,887
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6972 Post(s)
Liked 10,968 Times
in
4,692 Posts
When I see these discussions on bf, I always end up shaking my head.
There is no way of distinguishing between needs and wants; thus there are only wants. I spend my money how I want to, as I know my wants better than anyone else can.
These arguments arise from an inability to comprehend that.
There is no way of distinguishing between needs and wants; thus there are only wants. I spend my money how I want to, as I know my wants better than anyone else can.
These arguments arise from an inability to comprehend that.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 884
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 772 Times
in
404 Posts
Not that there is anything wrong with it - but the internet has played a massive role in duffers using professional level gear. Go on any early golf based message board and there would be board golf "pro's" telling newbs that they need clubs suited for Tiger... or a bike suited for Lance... or fishing gear suited for the bass pro's...
I'm also a fisherman, and used to be a "professional" fisherman. I've literally cleaned 10's of thousands of fish, and helped people catch 10's of thousands of fish - the internet people would ask what's the " best" fillet knife - and the board experts would guide the newbs into $$$$ blades made of this or that material, with this or that handle type... meanwhile, the "pro's" used $15 fillet knives, and when this advice is offered up on the board - the board people would go nuts. You have to have the $$$$$ fillet knife, everything else is crap. Same for fishing rods, hooks, reels, boats... COOLERS!!!! Only a $500 yeti will keep ice cold!!