Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Road bikes evolution

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Road bikes evolution

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-23, 03:47 PM
  #1  
Redbullet
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 49 Posts
Road bikes evolution

I was forced to switch from a very good 2015 road bike (SRAM Force mechanical, rim brakes) to a very good 2023 bike (Rival AXS, disk brakes).
Many will shout at me, but I feel like…

I have just swapped a technically very good bike for another technically very good bike, with the penalties of 15% increase in bike weight and 65% increase of price (say half of it coming from inflation). Better braking performance in wet or mud conditions is useless since, like many others, I am not a "pro" and I carefully avoid riding in such conditions.

Last edited by Redbullet; 04-14-23 at 03:51 PM.
Redbullet is offline  
Likes For Redbullet:
Old 04-14-23, 04:36 PM
  #2  
runningDoc
Senior Member
 
runningDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 11 Posts
i do agree with you and have bought a new bike road bike that has E-Shifting and disc brakes and its a fatty (Scott Addict 10 with Rival AXS that weights over 19lbs omg lol) and was wondering if I made a huge mistake.



but in the end I do love that with disc brakes you can put in a lot wider tires, mine came stock with 32c, braking with disc brakes (especially hydraulic disc brakes) is a lot smoother. the bike is the most comfortable road bike i've ridden/owned and I've done the retro steel with sram red that was so comfortable. i also did the super 14lbs light weight racing bike (van dessel rivet with sram red) that was unforgivingly stiff but fast and light and surprisingly not that expensive for that weight, carbon, and groupset (i spent well under 4k). Its probably mainly do to the 32c tires and i can even fit bigger 35-38c tires and turn the bike into a capable lighter gravel bike. hell even with the 32c tires I did some pretty gnarly semi-mountain trail riding just to see if it works and its good.

a lot of the modern endurance bikes also have mounts for accessory bags and fender mounts (i bought a official fender mount kit from scott thats super clean looking).



i'm contemplating spending $$$$ for carbon wheels/carbon cockpit/SRAM Red Cranks Groupt eventually to get it into that 15-16lbs range, but i actually don't care that the bike is over 19lbs so far I love riding it. The AXS shifting, Garmin Varia, Cadence APP (that tracks power meter and has varia) have made riding super fun and actually safer and mechanical stuff like no cables for shifting is even simpler.

i love this bike with all the newer stuff, I don't love its heavier and somewhat more expensive but everything is (groceries, eggs, gas, concert tickets, houses, etc).

the tech will catch up again and lower in price over time as well as get lighter for cheaper eventually.
runningDoc is offline  
Likes For runningDoc:
Old 04-14-23, 04:42 PM
  #3  
tomato coupe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3952 Post(s)
Liked 7,297 Times in 2,947 Posts
Originally Posted by Redbullet
I was forced to switch from a very good 2015 road bike (SRAM Force mechanical, rim brakes) to a very good 2023 bike (Rival AXS, disk brakes).
Many will shout at me, but I feel like…

I have just swapped a technically very good bike for another technically very good bike, with the penalties of 15% increase in bike weight and 65% increase of price (say half of it coming from inflation). Better braking performance in wet or mud conditions is useless since, like many others, I am not a "pro" and I carefully avoid riding in such conditions.
Yeah, you got fleeced. Silly you.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 04-14-23, 05:00 PM
  #4  
genejockey 
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10424 Post(s)
Liked 11,898 Times in 6,094 Posts
Is better braking performance every really useless?
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is online now  
Likes For genejockey:
Old 04-14-23, 05:06 PM
  #5  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,085 Times in 1,181 Posts
You also swapped an occasional need to charge batteries for the occasional need to swap shift cables. I find charging a lot easier to deal with.
Steve B. is offline  
Old 04-14-23, 05:08 PM
  #6  
jon c. 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,811
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,018 Times in 571 Posts
Originally Posted by genejockey
Is better braking performance every really useless?
I hope to never find out.
jon c. is offline  
Old 04-14-23, 05:27 PM
  #7  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,052

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22598 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times in 4,158 Posts
Agree with OP. The newer tech may be marginally “better” in some ways but the cost is big and the benefits small.

__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 04-14-23, 05:27 PM
  #8  
Steve B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,882

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3238 Post(s)
Liked 2,085 Times in 1,181 Posts
I have a Topstone with 105 discs, as well as a Chinese carbon with 105 rims brakes. I pretty much never ride in the rain (unless I accidentally get caught out) and avoid wet roads. There is functionally no difference between the 2 braking systems in good conditions. The singularly different advantage to a disc equipped bike is I can run much wider tires, up to 44mm, where as I would never be able to get a tire that large past a set of rim brakes. So discs are great for gravel and endurance bikes.

Last edited by Steve B.; 04-15-23 at 07:53 AM.
Steve B. is offline  
Likes For Steve B.:
Old 04-14-23, 07:46 PM
  #9  
Velo Vol 
VFL For Life
 
Velo Vol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 51,219

Bikes: Velo Volmobile

Mentioned: 780 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28610 Post(s)
Liked 1,857 Times in 1,319 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
Agree with OP. The newer tech may be marginally “better” in some ways but the cost is big and the benefits small.
You don't say.
__________________
Originally Posted by Velo Vol
People here don't get it.
Velo Vol is offline  
Old 04-14-23, 08:55 PM
  #10  
terrymorse 
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,109

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3431 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times in 1,792 Posts
A Scott Addict that weighs 19 lbs? No, thank you.

My 2011 Addict R1, with frame pump, bottle cages, mounts for computer and lights, and power pedals weighs just over 16 lbs.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is offline  
Old 04-14-23, 10:48 PM
  #11  
Kimmo
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1528 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
Originally Posted by Redbullet
I was forced to switch from a very good 2015 road bike (SRAM Force mechanical, rim brakes) to a very good 2023 bike (Rival AXS, disk brakes).
Many will shout at me, but I feel like…

I have just swapped a technically very good bike for another technically very good bike, with the penalties of 15% increase in bike weight and 65% increase of price (say half of it coming from inflation). Better braking performance in wet or mud conditions is useless since, like many others, I am not a "pro" and I carefully avoid riding in such conditions.
My 2006 bike with rim brakes, English BB and straight 9/8” steerer is a total weapon with its semi aero ISP frame and 50mm tubulars, weighs 6.14kg, owes me like au$3.5k, and half that was the wheels.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 04-14-23, 11:30 PM
  #12  
Eric F 
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,986

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4946 Post(s)
Liked 8,086 Times in 3,825 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
My 2006 bike…owes me like au$3.5k…
1. How do you get a bike to owe you money? Apparently, I’m doing it really wrong.
2. You suck at debt collection. 17 years is a very long time…unless you’re charging an exorbitant interest rate.
Eric F is offline  
Likes For Eric F:
Old 04-15-23, 04:24 AM
  #13  
Redbullet
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by genejockey
Is better braking performance every really useless?
I heard about better performance of disk brakes, but my previous sram force rim brakes had very similar performance. Maybe that is to be expected, since pros had no problems to abuse rim brakes for decades, probably 5 times harder than myself.
Redbullet is offline  
Likes For Redbullet:
Old 04-15-23, 05:06 AM
  #14  
seypat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times in 1,510 Posts
Evolution or devolution? You decide.
seypat is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 05:17 AM
  #15  
runningDoc
Senior Member
 
runningDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
A Scott Addict that weighs 19 lbs? No, thank you.

My 2011 Addict R1, with frame pump, bottle cages, mounts for computer and lights, and power pedals weighs just over 16 lbs.
in 2011 i weighed 215lbs on my 10sp mechanical sram red rim brake carbon road bike that weighed 14.5lbs.

in 2023 i weigh 153lbs on this 12spd sram electronic rival hydraulic disc brake bike that weighs 19.5lbs.

19lbs 2022 Scott Addict 10 for me please, thank you!

Last edited by runningDoc; 04-15-23 at 05:24 AM.
runningDoc is offline  
Likes For runningDoc:
Old 04-15-23, 02:41 PM
  #16  
Redbullet
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by runningDoc
i'm contemplating spending $$$$ for carbon wheels/carbon cockpit/SRAM Red Cranks Groupt eventually to get it into that 15-16lbs range.
I'm not sure you can. If you further spend around 2000 EUR, you might obtain around 500 g weight reduction, which will reduce your actual 19.29 lbs (8.75 kg) to 18.19 lbs (8.25 kg). Does this worth the effort?

Originally Posted by runningDoc
the tech will catch up again and lower in price over time as well as get lighter for cheaper eventually.
I am pessimistic about that. I spent lots of hours to find a decent lightweight road bike and I unterstood that the norm for all the providers during the last years was to continuously increase bike weight. I could find a bike below 7 kg in 2015 with 2300-2500 EUR. Now I should have spent 8000+ EUR for such lightweight – insane amount for just a bike. I think they will never go back to lightweight for casual riders.
I got now 7.7-7.8 kg from the start with less than 4000 EUR, but I clearly feel the difference compared with the old 6.65 kg.

Last edited by Redbullet; 04-15-23 at 02:45 PM.
Redbullet is offline  
Likes For Redbullet:
Old 04-15-23, 02:44 PM
  #17  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,052

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22598 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times in 4,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Velo Vol
You don't say.
Durianrider agrees fwiw
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 04:08 PM
  #18  
runningDoc
Senior Member
 
runningDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Redbullet
I'm not sure you can. If you further spend around 2000 EUR, you might obtain around 500 g weight reduction, which will reduce your actual 19.29 lbs (8.75 kg) to 18.19 lbs (8.25 kg). Does this worth the effort?


I am pessimistic about that. I spent lots of hours to find a decent lightweight road bike and I unterstood that the norm for all the providers during the last years was to continuously increase bike weight. I could find a bike below 7 kg in 2015 with 2300-2500 EUR. Now I should have spent 8000+ EUR for such lightweight – insane amount for just a bike. I think they will never go back to lightweight for casual riders.
I got now 7.7-7.8 kg from the start with less than 4000 EUR, but I clearly feel the difference compared with the old 6.65 kg.

upgrade to wheels saves about 500g/1lb. integrated cockpit saves 250-300g. my seat is already 100g lighter. tubless setup another 150g. sram red crankset alone is 400-500g savings. i'm already in the 16lb range but will have to spend a ton.

everything gets cheaper eventually. even this stuff does too. I also bought a older 2019 scott addict 10 for $1000 used before this one and it has hydraulic disc brakes, 32c tires and 11sp group that sold for $3500 brand new. its all relative.

the only reason i spent $3700 on this is because it was new and I wanted a new bike again. i could scour the craigslist/ebay and probably get a comparable cervelo that was $5-6k new for maybe 4k or lower. its variable arguing about pricing when you compare new bikes from a bike shop to a used bike from ebay/craigslist. I know how to shop for both.
runningDoc is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 06:08 PM
  #19  
seypat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times in 1,510 Posts
Has the OP explained why he was forced to switch yet?
seypat is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 06:36 PM
  #20  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,024 Times in 723 Posts
At 19lbs if seems like there isn't much effort to get the weight down, my cyclocross bike 2x12 with road tires is 19.5 while my daughter's with road tires and 1x12 is 18.75lb, both are steel frames, seems like just a swap to aluminum or carbon frames would drop a lb with no real effort. A real effort to shave weight wouldn't take much, some lightbicycle carbon rims with lighter spokes and hubs could get mine into the sub18lb range with a little effort.
Russ Roth is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 07:05 PM
  #21  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times in 740 Posts
The strange thing is that none of this really matters to me. I am fine with rim or disk brakes. I have no problem with electronic shifting. Do I need it? No. What matters to me is riding for fitness and enjoyment of the adventure.
bruce19 is offline  
Likes For bruce19:
Old 04-15-23, 07:17 PM
  #22  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,052

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22598 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times in 4,158 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
The strange thing is that none of this really matters to me. I am fine with rim or disk brakes. I have no problem with electronic shifting. Do I need it? No. What matters to me is riding for fitness and enjoyment of the adventure.
My complaint (and OP’s too I believe) is that for a mid or better tier groupset, going forward, we will HAVE to get disc brake and electric shifting, at a much higher price point. It’s unfortunate that the older technology may be relegated to entry level lower quality tier groupsets.

“Progress.”
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Likes For datlas:
Old 04-15-23, 07:26 PM
  #23  
Atlas Shrugged
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,323 Times in 674 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
My complaint (and OP’s too I believe) is that for a mid or better tier groupset, going forward, we will HAVE to get disc brake and electric shifting, at a much higher price point. It’s unfortunate that the older technology may be relegated to entry level lower quality tier groupsets.

“Progress.”
The good thing is used bikes are plentiful and prices are stable if not dropping. Premium bikes rarely get destroyed or disposed of so no worries getting what you want for a long time to come.
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 07:56 PM
  #24  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times in 4,189 Posts
Originally Posted by Russ Roth
At 19lbs if seems like there isn't much effort to get the weight down, my cyclocross bike 2x12 with road tires is 19.5 while my daughter's with road tires and 1x12 is 18.75lb, both are steel frames, seems like just a swap to aluminum or carbon frames would drop a lb with no real effort. A real effort to shave weight wouldn't take much, some lightbicycle carbon rims with lighter spokes and hubs could get mine into the sub18lb range with a little effort.
What steel frame CX bike with hydraulic disc brakes weighs 19.5?

...I'm assuming this is a production frame.
...I'm also assuming it's a carbon fork and not steel fork, plus a smaller size?
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 08:23 PM
  #25  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,024 Times in 723 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
What steel frame CX bike with hydraulic disc brakes weighs 19.5?

...I'm assuming this is a production frame.
...I'm also assuming it's a carbon fork and not steel fork, plus a smaller size?
54cm but built with heavier tubing since I'm not small weight wise, the fork is the one thing I don't like on it, too chunky looking, I'd like one more streamlined for cyclocross rather than designed for 48c gravel tires. But lighter rims, hubs, brake rotors, cassette, carbon post, carbon bars would all bring the weight down with ease. Daughter's is a 50cm, but running square taper cranks, nothing lightweight there, rival shifters, brakes and der, cheap take off saddle from the 10.00 bin.
Russ Roth is offline  
Likes For Russ Roth:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.