Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Any 10-speed cranksets that *aren't* Hollowtech-type?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Any 10-speed cranksets that *aren't* Hollowtech-type?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-21, 09:26 PM
  #26  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
Thread Starter
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack Tone
I've got 3 bikes with 6800 cranks. Now you've got me worried. Sometimes I put out over 300 watts in a sprint. What should I look for if it starts to separate? PS they live in a hot garage.
You're way ahead of me. I might put out 300 watts climbing the stairs, but rarely on a bike. When I asked the LBS about whether I should get a power meter the guy who'd seen me ride said "Nah, they don't register that low."
canklecat is offline  
Old 07-07-21, 09:35 PM
  #27  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
Thread Starter
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Yeah, when I first received the Dura Ace 7410 cranks to rebuild my '93 Trek 5900 OCLV, my first thought was "Am I gonna break this damn thing?" They're much lighter than my other Shimano and Suntour cranks... which I've also never borken.
Because I named my Trek 5900 the Noisy Cricket.
Because of Men In Black.
Because it klunked so loudly with the original downtube index shifters, resonating like bongos in those carbon fiber tubes.
Because it was my first carbon fiber bike and I felt like I was gonna break something so lightweight.
Hey, it was funny when I came up with that a couple of years ago. To me.

Then I remembered I'm not Andre Greipel, who puts out more power going to the bathroom than I do on my bike.

Whew, what a relief.

Anyway, cranks asploding was never my primary concern. Apparently on my cheapskate budget I will never be in the market for those newer hollow bonded Ultegra and Dura Ace cranks. So, problem solved once again by poverty.

canklecat is offline  
Old 07-07-21, 09:39 PM
  #28  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,024 Times in 723 Posts
I would suggest for something new the 4700 series of Tiagra cranks as well if you want 10sp specific. Good sturdy parts. Will come in a 50/34 and 170.
Russ Roth is offline  
Likes For Russ Roth:
Old 07-07-21, 09:59 PM
  #29  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
Thread Starter
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Originally Posted by Racing Dan
Just to clarify my above post. Ultegra and DA are made from two clams shells that are glued/bonded together. Those are the ones that break from fatigue. 105 also has hollow arms and spindle, but is not bonded. Its made with hollow forged arms, that are a bit heavier but, to my knowledge, wont break. That would be my pick. Tiagra is made with solid arms and a hollow spindle. It wont break but is heavy, but fairly relatively inepensive.

EDIT: Its all in here.

https://youtu.be/FkEkQV-zK0s
Thanks, I'll check the video. I wish that info was more readily available on Shimano's website, archives and tech documents. I spent hours checking the Shimao site for this info. Once an item is discontinued their consumer catalogs, brochures and easily accessible spec sheets seem to vanish or get buried in the internet basement.

I'm impressed with how much Shimano 105 and "lower" spec stuff has improved -- trickle down from early gen Dura Ace and Ultegra. I have boxes of mostly older Shimano stuff and while some of the older 105 stuff was good, others were distinctly inferior to Shimano 600/Ultegra. The 600/Ultegra stuff was so good I still use those derailleurs on a couple of bikes, and the FDs in particular offer more adjustability than the 105.

Originally Posted by himespau
Are you wedded to shimano? I don't know how close the spacing is, but Campy 10 speed alloy cranks are beautiful and solid and may work with shimano FD/shifters. They use square taper bb though, so that introduces another variable.
Nah, I'm not picky about brands or getting matchy-matchy with groups. My first carbon fiber bike was a 1993 Trek 5900 OCLV, which may have been the closest thing to a custom bike Trek ever put out. Rather than matching the group to be all Dura Ace, they spec'd the lightest available components. So it's a mish-mash of Dura Ace, Dia Compe brakes, Ibis titanium stem, Chris King titanium headset (before King decided titanium didn't accomplish anything for headsets and switched to more sensible materials), White Industries titanium BB, American Classic Equipment titanium seat post, etc. It's kinda like what British hill climb specialists do now with their custom bikes for those autumn competitions. Awful brownish-goldish logos on purple paint. Funky ugly cool bike.

Originally Posted by terrymorse
Personal anecdote: I remove Shimano cranksets from my new bikes and replace them with FSA carbon cranks. My cranks currently have about 15,000 miles on them. No issues.
Thanks! I use FSA stems and Omega compact drops and they're outstanding values. I'd heard varying opinions about FSA cranks but I'll definitely consider those since you've ridden them a lot.

Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Thanks!
canklecat is offline  
Old 07-07-21, 10:00 PM
  #30  
big john
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,291
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8280 Post(s)
Liked 9,042 Times in 4,475 Posts
Originally Posted by canklecat
You're way ahead of me. I might put out 300 watts climbing the stairs, but rarely on a bike. When I asked the LBS about whether I should get a power meter the guy who'd seen me ride said "Nah, they don't register that low."
A friend puts out 1600 watts during a crit. He breaks a lot more stuff than I do but he races @265 pounds.
big john is offline  
Likes For big john:
Old 07-07-21, 10:08 PM
  #31  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
Thread Starter
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Originally Posted by big john
A friend puts out 1600 watts during a crit. He breaks a lot more stuff than I do but he races @265 pounds.
Yikes. That's why I say goodbye to Frank and the beans and thank them for a lifetime of service before every interval session with standing sprints and short, steep hill climbs.

But I worry a bit less now that my weight is down around 150. I can't figure out how I managed to walk at all when I weighed 205. I get tired now just carrying 20 lbs of groceries or cat food home from the store in a backpack.
canklecat is offline  
Old 07-07-21, 11:08 PM
  #32  
big john
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,291
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8280 Post(s)
Liked 9,042 Times in 4,475 Posts
Originally Posted by canklecat
Yikes. That's why I say goodbye to Frank and the beans and thank them for a lifetime of service before every interval session with standing sprints and short, steep hill climbs.

But I worry a bit less now that my weight is down around 150. I can't figure out how I managed to walk at all when I weighed 205. I get tired now just carrying 20 lbs of groceries or cat food home from the store in a backpack.
The guy I was referring to played offensive guard in college so, a big dude. I climbed a local mountain with him when he was 285.

I know another guy who played in college as a lineman and he raced at the velodrome and did pretty well.
big john is offline  
Old 07-08-21, 11:50 AM
  #33  
terrymorse 
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times in 1,792 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
Jobst Brandt proposed a solution to this stupidity ages ago, that would allow for backwards compatibility, and to upgrade existing cranks to a proper pedal interface.

A 45° taper cut into the crank around the pedal thread, with split collets to adapt existing pedals, while future pedals could have the taper integrated. It'd prevent this sort of utterly preventable failure caused by the fretting inherent to this piss-poor interface.
Jobst Brandt was a very tall guy who pushed big gears, and he used to break his aluminum Campagnolo crank arms fairly often.

He would come into my dad's shop in Palo Alto to get them replaced. At one point, my dad ordered him a steel Campagnolo crankset, which seemed to hold up much better.



Jobst Brandt (right), Kings Ridge Rd, Sonoma County, 2003
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is offline  
Likes For terrymorse:
Old 07-08-21, 12:23 PM
  #34  
GnipGnop
just having fun
 
GnipGnop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 102

Bikes: 1994 TiCycles Softride, 199X Cyclops Stealth Softride, 1999 Rocky Mountain Soul, 1973 Colnago Super

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 56 Times in 29 Posts
Originally Posted by canklecat
Darth Lefty , yeah, there's an entire Instagram page devoted to pix of asploded Hollowtech cranksets. I think it's called "thanksShimano". I'm not sure how seriously to take it because they also gripe about stuff that can happen to any brand, like frayed cables.

And there's no real data available because of course Shimano isn't gonna provide that info. So while dozens of broken cranks seems like a lot, statistically it may be 1% or 2%? Who knows. And some anecdotes indicate it mostly seems to affect regions with hot, humid and/or salty air. But, still, just anecdotes without data.

Anyway, I'll probably go for another older 6700 crankset since it appears those are solid arms, or the 105 or Tiagra. I wouldn't get any real benefit from the 6800 or newer cranksets. Mostly I was just wondering what the options were for solid cranks, from Shimano or any other decent brand.
Shimano brifters have a history of messing up the ends of cables. I don't think Campy/SRAM/Rotor have that issue.
GnipGnop is offline  
Old 07-08-21, 04:07 PM
  #35  
Kimmo
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
Originally Posted by GnipGnop
Shimano brifters have a history of messing up the ends of cables. I don't think Campy/SRAM/Rotor have that issue.
I think it's because they kept the same RD actuation ratio from 6s all the way to 10s, which meant they were stuck with pretty much the same cable spool diameter as the old downtube levers. This was getting a bit sketchy at 9s, and totally went to crap with the second 10s generation when the cables went under the tape, since the extra friction combined with the short cable pull produced a really marginal signal to noise ratio in the system.

IIRC they changed the actuation ratio for 11s, but oddly they didn't increase the cable pull by very much, which still meant the cable was being wrapped around a pretty small diameter spool in the shifter, which causes fatigue. Shimano may be the best, but they sure aren't perfect.
Kimmo is offline  
Old 07-08-21, 04:49 PM
  #36  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
Thread Starter
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Originally Posted by GnipGnop
Shimano brifters have a history of messing up the ends of cables. I don't think Campy/SRAM/Rotor have that issue.
Originally Posted by Kimmo
I think it's because they kept the same RD actuation ratio from 6s all the way to 10s, which meant they were stuck with pretty much the same cable spool diameter as the old downtube levers. This was getting a bit sketchy at 9s, and totally went to crap with the second 10s generation when the cables went under the tape, since the extra friction combined with the short cable pull produced a really marginal signal to noise ratio in the system.

IIRC they changed the actuation ratio for 11s, but oddly they didn't increase the cable pull by very much, which still meant the cable was being wrapped around a pretty small diameter spool in the shifter, which causes fatigue. Shimano may be the best, but they sure aren't perfect.
Ah, I didn't know that. I have a couple of sets of Dura Ace 74xx series 8-speed brifters but I haven't installed them yet. My only brifters are MicroShift 7-speed, which aren't as polished feeling as Dura Ace, of course, but work well and don't chew up cables. I'm going on two years with the same cables. They're good enough I'll probably buy MicroShift 10 speed brifters when they're available again, assuming they're compatible with my Dura Ace 7800 RD. For now I only have DA 10-speed bar-end shifters for that RD, leftover from a TT/tri-bike that I stripped after the frame cracked.
canklecat is offline  
Likes For canklecat:
Old 07-14-21, 04:05 PM
  #37  
GnipGnop
just having fun
 
GnipGnop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 102

Bikes: 1994 TiCycles Softride, 199X Cyclops Stealth Softride, 1999 Rocky Mountain Soul, 1973 Colnago Super

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 56 Times in 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Kimmo
I think it's because they kept the same RD actuation ratio from 6s all the way to 10s, which meant they were stuck with pretty much the same cable spool diameter as the old downtube levers. This was getting a bit sketchy at 9s, and totally went to crap with the second 10s generation when the cables went under the tape, since the extra friction combined with the short cable pull produced a really marginal signal to noise ratio in the system.

IIRC they changed the actuation ratio for 11s, but oddly they didn't increase the cable pull by very much, which still meant the cable was being wrapped around a pretty small diameter spool in the shifter, which causes fatigue. Shimano may be the best, but they sure aren't perfect.
Interesting! Thanks for sharing that info
GnipGnop is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.