What do you guys think of the Cat Eye Padrone?
#1
Time Traveler
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 326
Bikes: 1983 Ross Paragon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 204 Post(s)
Liked 98 Times
in
51 Posts
What do you guys think of the Cat Eye Padrone?
Im looking to get a computer head. My old one was a Cat Eye back in the day which I thought was great. I see the Cat Eye Padrone for sale Im wondering if its any good? Any other suggestions?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
248 Posts
It's OK. I prefer wired models, personally, as they're more reliable (and you only need batteries in the head unit). The Padrone that I have is subject to interference, which renders the "max speed" function of limited use since on many rides (approx. 20%?) I see readings of 58 mph, 63 mph, etc. Also, the positioning of the magnet reading head/transmitter is more finicky than other cycle computer models I've used (e.g. Cat Eye Astrale). If you're frequently putting your bike on a rack to drive to the start of your ride, get used to checking that the computer is reading before you start your ride. I have the lower-end unit, and it is about 8-9 years old, however, so maybe the current, or more expensive, models are better in these respects.
Other than those somewhat minor gripes, it has been relatively reliable, battery life is good, it is readable, easy to set up and use. It's on our tandem, so I haven't tested it in the rain, sorry, I can't tell you how reliable it is in the wet. And, being wireless, you don't have to worry about routing wires, or about accidentally routing new cables over the wire thereby cutting it and making it necessary to buy a new docking unit/sensor sub-assembly (not that I would ever be guilty of such a thing ).
Other than those somewhat minor gripes, it has been relatively reliable, battery life is good, it is readable, easy to set up and use. It's on our tandem, so I haven't tested it in the rain, sorry, I can't tell you how reliable it is in the wet. And, being wireless, you don't have to worry about routing wires, or about accidentally routing new cables over the wire thereby cutting it and making it necessary to buy a new docking unit/sensor sub-assembly (not that I would ever be guilty of such a thing ).
Likes For noimagination:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,238
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18415 Post(s)
Liked 15,542 Times
in
7,329 Posts
Mine rattled. At least one other forum member posted about the same problem.
But worse, it would sometimes randomly reset during rides. Got so sick of that that when the battery died I didn’t bother replacing it.
My touring/commuting bike is fitted with a CatEye Velo wireless computer. It performs great in all sorts of weather.
But worse, it would sometimes randomly reset during rides. Got so sick of that that when the battery died I didn’t bother replacing it.
My touring/commuting bike is fitted with a CatEye Velo wireless computer. It performs great in all sorts of weather.
Last edited by indyfabz; 01-14-22 at 06:54 AM.
Likes For indyfabz:
#4
Senior Member
Dont know that model, but no matter, get at computer with digital transmission. Analog transmission is prone to noise pickup that can make the speedometer and odometer unreliable.
Likes For Racing Dan:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,109
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 822 Post(s)
Liked 1,960 Times
in
943 Posts
Only issues I have had is my flashing light interfered with the signal and caused it to miss revolutions.
The second issue is when stopping at lights, the magnetic sensors in the street gave false readings of 65 mph so my distance and average speed is askew.
Both issues are now avoided and I have had no other issues and the accuracy checks out with ridewithgps mapping.
The second issue is when stopping at lights, the magnetic sensors in the street gave false readings of 65 mph so my distance and average speed is askew.
Both issues are now avoided and I have had no other issues and the accuracy checks out with ridewithgps mapping.
Likes For sw20:
#7
The Wheezing Geezer
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Española, NM
Posts: 1,054
Bikes: 1976 Fredo Speciale, Jamis Citizen 1, Ellis-Briggs FAVORI, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 414 Post(s)
Liked 912 Times
in
446 Posts
Cat-Eye still makes good speedometers. I have a Velo 7 and a Velo 9, both wired, as I don't believe replacing a wire with two radios and two computers is a smart engineering decision, at least in this case. However, I am so vain that I just ordered a Cat-Eye Urban Wireless model for my old racing bike, now that it has a new paint job. Vanity, thy name is Fredo.
#8
Full Member
For anyone looking for something along the lines of an old-school cyclocomputer, but with wireless sensors, I would recommend the Bontrager RIDEtime Elite.
It works with ANT+ sensors (speed, cadence, heart rate), so you can buy what you want.
It works with ANT+ sensors (speed, cadence, heart rate), so you can buy what you want.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,431
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4406 Post(s)
Liked 4,858 Times
in
3,005 Posts
Is this a thread wormhole from the 1990s? I mean I do like the retro Cateye, but the wired vs wireless discussion is funny.
Likes For PeteHski: