Any other 1x road climbers here?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 912
Bikes: Time Scylon, Lynskey R350, Ritchey Breakaway, Ritchey Double Switchback, Lynskey Ridgeline, ICAN Fatbike
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 474 Post(s)
Liked 552 Times
in
310 Posts
I have 1X on a drop bar bike. It is my Gravel/Commuter/Touring bike
It is slower than my road bikes; not a surprise. The 1X13 gearing with Ekar is sort of wide ratio for slow going, then close ratio at the high end. I haven't had it out of ND/MN so I haven't done any climbing, but the gears work well going into our constant wind. If I build another road bike I will consider using Ekar.
It is slower than my road bikes; not a surprise. The 1X13 gearing with Ekar is sort of wide ratio for slow going, then close ratio at the high end. I haven't had it out of ND/MN so I haven't done any climbing, but the gears work well going into our constant wind. If I build another road bike I will consider using Ekar.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,953
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7030 Post(s)
Liked 11,062 Times
in
4,729 Posts
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,530
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3244 Post(s)
Liked 2,522 Times
in
1,516 Posts
#54
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,388
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1001 Post(s)
Liked 1,218 Times
in
697 Posts
In my opinion, the only reason to consider a 1x road bike is if you're okay with a wide range of cadences, and you really don't care to pedal on fast downhills. The benefits are mostly the simpler and less expensive drivetrain, and a little bit of weight savings.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,530
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3244 Post(s)
Liked 2,522 Times
in
1,516 Posts
I would never use a 1X, especially with a Shimano STI shifter. It has everything to do with fatigue in my right foream muscles. The long throw of the brake lever shift is very similar to a wrist curl(for me). Over the course of an all day ride, those muscles get tight. I get to a point where I can't squeeze the brake lever. I use a triple and Microshift shifters. One or 2 shifts of the front and 3-4 shifts of the back will cover a large part of the range. Way less shifting to go from your smallest to your largest gear and visa versa. I don't care if I have redundant gears. What I care about is having options.
#57
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 863 Times
in
573 Posts
I would say a 1X would be an advantage on a full-suspension mountain bike where the pivoting of the rear shock can make chain drops more likely. On other than a mountain bike, I would prefer a 2X.
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,953
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7030 Post(s)
Liked 11,062 Times
in
4,729 Posts
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 912
Bikes: Time Scylon, Lynskey R350, Ritchey Breakaway, Ritchey Double Switchback, Lynskey Ridgeline, ICAN Fatbike
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 474 Post(s)
Liked 552 Times
in
310 Posts
With a 40 tooth chainring and a 9-42 cassette it works out well. I was a little apprehensive about going back to a cable controlled derailleur, but the shift quality is good.
Top speed works out to about 36 MPH at a cadence of 100.
Likes For DangerousDanR:
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,041
Bikes: addict, aethos, creo, vanmoof, sirrus, public ...
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1282 Post(s)
Liked 1,397 Times
in
712 Posts
I have a 1x road e-bike, which I typically rode/ride without the motor on. 42t in the front and 10-42 in the back. my 12 speed 2x road bike is 52/36 up front and 11-34 in the back. obviously 4.7 is a lot higher highest gear than 4.2 but the range really isn’t that different. I could see living with a 44t up front and 10-42 rear on a road bike. The close spacing of 12 cogs between 11 and 34 doesn’t mean all that much to me.
__________________
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,786
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1115 Post(s)
Liked 1,211 Times
in
768 Posts
I would never use a 1X, especially with a Shimano STI shifter. It has everything to do with fatigue in my right foream muscles. The long throw of the brake lever shift is very similar to a wrist curl(for me). Over the course of an all day ride, those muscles get tight. I get to a point where I can't squeeze the brake lever. I use a triple and Microshift shifters. One or 2 shifts of the front and 3-4 shifts of the back will cover a large part of the range. Way less shifting to go from your smallest to your largest gear and visa versa. I don't care if I have redundant gears. What I care about is having options.
#62
Cantilever believer
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,598
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 546 Post(s)
Liked 1,891 Times
in
849 Posts
I recently set up a bike as a 1x9, partly as an experiment, and partly to save a bit of weight in chainrings / front derailleur / etc. I have a 36 in the front and an 11-36 in the rear. The 9 speed cassette gives me reasonably good spacing, with 2 tooth gaps in the higher end. I looked at my riding for the past several years, and I noted that about the only times I'm above 22 mph is on a descent, and I just coast anyway, so the 36/11 high should be sufficient. The low end is a 1:1, which gets me up long 7-8% climbs comfortably if not swiftly. So far, I'm reasonably satisfied.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
#63
Senior Member
I ride many different hill and mountain climbs in northern Colorado. If the climbing isn't too steep, I can ride a 22 mile climb from Loveland to Estes Park with over 3000 feet of climbing with a 48 or 46 big ring and not use a sprocket larger than a 28, since the steepest area is only 7-8%. I ride out of the saddle on those slopes. I've ridden a short 10-11% slope with a 46/32, out of the saddle. I wouldn't think of using a 1x drivetrain though. I wouldn't use a triple either. My 10-36 12 speed SRAM cassette with a Shimano GRX 48/31 or 46/30 crank gives me the low gear I need to ride 13% grades seated. For those with hand issues, electronic shifting is much easier. My toughest route has over 5000 feet of climbing with grades up to 13%, most of it in The first 30 miles of the 54 mile loop.
I agree with one poster about the 60 rpm cadence for pedaling up a steep climb, out of the saddle. 55 rpm is about my low limit. I ride out of the saddle a lot, even on lesser slopes where I don't need to, but with a higher cadence, up to 75. I reached that 2 pound per inch weight of 132 for awhile this season, but 134 or 135 is more common for me.
I agree with one poster about the 60 rpm cadence for pedaling up a steep climb, out of the saddle. 55 rpm is about my low limit. I ride out of the saddle a lot, even on lesser slopes where I don't need to, but with a higher cadence, up to 75. I reached that 2 pound per inch weight of 132 for awhile this season, but 134 or 135 is more common for me.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3966 Post(s)
Liked 7,376 Times
in
2,970 Posts
When you feed all those numbers into the Silca supercomputer, it says you should be on a single speed.
#65
Senior Member
Nope. They must be overlooking the difference between seated and out of the saddle pedaling. I use my 30/36 for seated pedaling on grades in the 11-13% range. At age 69, my power output isn't what it used to be. I also want at least a 46/10 top gear.
Last edited by DaveSSS; 12-12-22 at 11:35 AM.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,953
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7030 Post(s)
Liked 11,062 Times
in
4,729 Posts
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1463 Post(s)
Liked 1,487 Times
in
871 Posts
I have a 1x on my drop bar gravel/CX bike, which is also my road bike. For me, 1x makes the most sense for a dual-purpose bike.
I run a 44T with an 11-32 rear on a clutched GRX derailleur. This gearing works fine for normal road riding on flat roads. I have reasonably tight gear jumps through most of the cassette and can pedal up to around 30-35mph before spinning out. 44x32 is low enough for the short climbs I encounter. I have no problem keeping up with faster group road rides on this gearing, but I also don't use this bike for road racing so 44x11 is plenty of top-end.
I like 1x because it's simple and because on the flat roads I typically ride, I never use the small ring on a traditional 2x setup anyway. I also like the way 1x looks, and for gravel/CX, the 1x chain retention and mud clearance are better.
1x works for me specifically because I don't do a lot of climbing and I can run narrower cassettes. I don't need a big range of gears, and even when I rode 2x road bikes, 95% of my riding was big-ring only. That said, if I was looking for a bike that would be exclusively road and used for climbing, I'd definitely want 2x. Those larger 1x cassettes start to get really heavy and the resulting gaps between gears can get annoying on the road.
I run a 44T with an 11-32 rear on a clutched GRX derailleur. This gearing works fine for normal road riding on flat roads. I have reasonably tight gear jumps through most of the cassette and can pedal up to around 30-35mph before spinning out. 44x32 is low enough for the short climbs I encounter. I have no problem keeping up with faster group road rides on this gearing, but I also don't use this bike for road racing so 44x11 is plenty of top-end.
I like 1x because it's simple and because on the flat roads I typically ride, I never use the small ring on a traditional 2x setup anyway. I also like the way 1x looks, and for gravel/CX, the 1x chain retention and mud clearance are better.
1x works for me specifically because I don't do a lot of climbing and I can run narrower cassettes. I don't need a big range of gears, and even when I rode 2x road bikes, 95% of my riding was big-ring only. That said, if I was looking for a bike that would be exclusively road and used for climbing, I'd definitely want 2x. Those larger 1x cassettes start to get really heavy and the resulting gaps between gears can get annoying on the road.
Likes For msu2001la:
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,953
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7030 Post(s)
Liked 11,062 Times
in
4,729 Posts
I have a 1x on my drop bar gravel/CX bike, which is also my road bike. For me, 1x makes the most sense for a dual-purpose bike.
I run a 44T with an 11-32 rear on a clutched GRX derailleur. This gearing works fine for normal road riding on flat roads. I have reasonably tight gear jumps through most of the cassette and can pedal up to around 30-35mph before spinning out. 44x32 is low enough for the short climbs I encounter. I have no problem keeping up with faster group road rides on this gearing, but I also don't use this bike for road racing so 44x11 is plenty of top-end.
I like 1x because it's simple and because on the flat roads I typically ride, I never use the small ring on a traditional 2x setup anyway. I also like the way 1x looks, and for gravel/CX, the 1x chain retention and mud clearance are better.
1x works for me specifically because I don't do a lot of climbing and I can run narrower cassettes. I don't need a big range of gears, and even when I rode 2x road bikes, 95% of my riding was big-ring only. That said, if I was looking for a bike that would be exclusively road and used for climbing, I'd definitely want 2x. Those larger 1x cassettes start to get really heavy and the resulting gaps between gears can get annoying on the road.
I run a 44T with an 11-32 rear on a clutched GRX derailleur. This gearing works fine for normal road riding on flat roads. I have reasonably tight gear jumps through most of the cassette and can pedal up to around 30-35mph before spinning out. 44x32 is low enough for the short climbs I encounter. I have no problem keeping up with faster group road rides on this gearing, but I also don't use this bike for road racing so 44x11 is plenty of top-end.
I like 1x because it's simple and because on the flat roads I typically ride, I never use the small ring on a traditional 2x setup anyway. I also like the way 1x looks, and for gravel/CX, the 1x chain retention and mud clearance are better.
1x works for me specifically because I don't do a lot of climbing and I can run narrower cassettes. I don't need a big range of gears, and even when I rode 2x road bikes, 95% of my riding was big-ring only. That said, if I was looking for a bike that would be exclusively road and used for climbing, I'd definitely want 2x. Those larger 1x cassettes start to get really heavy and the resulting gaps between gears can get annoying on the road.
Do you mean that you normally run narrow cassettes anyway, and so 1x is not much of a compromise in that regard?
#70
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,150
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3468 Post(s)
Liked 3,608 Times
in
1,810 Posts
Likes For terrymorse:
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1463 Post(s)
Liked 1,487 Times
in
871 Posts
I understand your other reasons for running 1x, but must point out the one large advantage of multiple chainrings: the ability to run narrower cassettes. Running 1x means running a wider cassette, with more gaps, if you want anything close to the same low and high gearing.
Do you mean that you normally run narrow cassettes anyway, and so 1x is not much of a compromise in that regard?
Do you mean that you normally run narrow cassettes anyway, and so 1x is not much of a compromise in that regard?
I can run the same narrow range 11-32 cassette with a 44T 1x setup and have gearing that works very well for what I need. There's no compromise at all for flat road riding - the compromises only start when mountain climbing comes into the picture, which is what the OP is talking about. For that, I definitely would want 2x.
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,959
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
437 Posts
I run a SRAM 1x 40t front and 11-36t rear on my rain bike. It works fine, I've done the 20min Cat 2 climbs around Seattle on it in fastish group rides. The top end and gearing gaps don't bother me, but I would prefer spinning with a lower gear when hit with steeper than 12% grades for extended distances. Have entertained the idea of either a 38t chainring (would be dead simple to do except I've read some complaints on the SRAM 38t specifically and the hidden bolt arrangement) or using the Ratio kit to get 12sp with a SRAM MTB cassette that I could then also take on gravel, but in the end those aren't frequent enough scenarios.
Likes For sarhog:
#74
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,699
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1971 Post(s)
Liked 1,493 Times
in
1,035 Posts
My road riding is all flat, and I don't need a big range of gears for that. For me, an 11sp 2x drivetrain running a 50/34 with an 11-32 is overkill, and I will have a dozen gear combos on both the high and low ends that I'll never touch. When I had a 2x road bike I almost never used the small ring.
I can run the same narrow range 11-32 cassette with a 44T 1x setup and have gearing that works very well for what I need.
I can run the same narrow range 11-32 cassette with a 44T 1x setup and have gearing that works very well for what I need.
#75
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,061
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5006 Post(s)
Liked 8,175 Times
in
3,867 Posts
Your logic isn't following, Jonathan. Using a larger chainring will negate (or mostly negate) the lower gearing you got by going with a larger cassette. Your only gain would be at the higher end. Especially considering our part of the world isn't flat, a 1x becomes a compromise where you lose range at both ends of the spectrum, and have wider jumps in the middle. If that compromise works for you, that's cool, but understand that it's still a compromise.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions