What Sort of Gearing Works Best for your Needs?
#176
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Likes For livedarklions:
#177
Senior Member
There are basically no hills here, Mostly paved overpasses, So my needs are limited as much by wind, which is probably average as hills,
On my typical 20 - 25 km casual ride I usually use only 5 of the 12 distinct, reasonably well spaced (<15% increase) gears obtained with the 3 x 7 speed drivetrain, from 49 gear inches (GI) against some wind to 78 GI, for riding speeds of between 15 kph @60 rpm cadence to 26 kph @70 rpm. That's a GI range of 160% of the 300% available. I seldom use the 89 GI high gear, And the only time I use the 30 GI cogs is climbing a short steep gravel trail near my home.
There's also an insanely low 21 GI option with the Shimano Megarange cassette that is handy for climbing that short steep gravel trail if I'm feeling lazy. But unfortunately nothing between it and 30 GI. I think I would really like something in the 25 - 26 GI range. Though it too would seldom get used.
On my typical 20 - 25 km casual ride I usually use only 5 of the 12 distinct, reasonably well spaced (<15% increase) gears obtained with the 3 x 7 speed drivetrain, from 49 gear inches (GI) against some wind to 78 GI, for riding speeds of between 15 kph @60 rpm cadence to 26 kph @70 rpm. That's a GI range of 160% of the 300% available. I seldom use the 89 GI high gear, And the only time I use the 30 GI cogs is climbing a short steep gravel trail near my home.
There's also an insanely low 21 GI option with the Shimano Megarange cassette that is handy for climbing that short steep gravel trail if I'm feeling lazy. But unfortunately nothing between it and 30 GI. I think I would really like something in the 25 - 26 GI range. Though it too would seldom get used.
Last edited by xroadcharlie; 10-20-21 at 07:23 AM.
#178
Senior Member
I live along the southern shores of the glacially-scoured/scraped lower Great Lakes.. The only hills around here (within 25 miles) are river valleys, and even the Cuyahoga River (Cleveland) valley 25 miles south of Lake Erie is at most 200' deep. If I were to ride west from here, I could ride (and I actually have ridden) from here to Chicago - 350 miles - and not vary more than 200' in elevation. My work commute is 12.5 miles each way. The biggest 'hills' are highway and railroad overpasses, so maybe 30' of short hill-climb. So let's just say it is very flat here.
My bike gearing is - Fuji: 27x1-1/8 tires, 28/38/48 with a 13-21 six-speed freewheel. The Univega Viva Sport: 27x1-1/8 tires, 42/52 with 13-24 six-speed freewheel, and the Miyata: 700x25f/28r tires, 42/52 with a 13-21 six speed freewheel.
I generally ride in gearing that puts me somewhere between 75-85 Gear-Inches, with my normal cadence of ~90, that equates to a riding speed of right around 20-21mph. Of course the nine stop signs/stoplights tend to drop my average door-to-door speed down to around 17-18mph (42-44 minutes to ride the 12.5 miles) and that includes the slower speed for the last two miles as a 'cool-down'
BTW, this is coming from a 63+-year-old borderline 'Clyde' riding vintage steel bikes of somewhere between 24 and 30 pounds (depending on which bike I ride) as ridden including tool kit, spare tube, water bottle, pump, lights, etc.
My bike gearing is - Fuji: 27x1-1/8 tires, 28/38/48 with a 13-21 six-speed freewheel. The Univega Viva Sport: 27x1-1/8 tires, 42/52 with 13-24 six-speed freewheel, and the Miyata: 700x25f/28r tires, 42/52 with a 13-21 six speed freewheel.
I generally ride in gearing that puts me somewhere between 75-85 Gear-Inches, with my normal cadence of ~90, that equates to a riding speed of right around 20-21mph. Of course the nine stop signs/stoplights tend to drop my average door-to-door speed down to around 17-18mph (42-44 minutes to ride the 12.5 miles) and that includes the slower speed for the last two miles as a 'cool-down'
BTW, this is coming from a 63+-year-old borderline 'Clyde' riding vintage steel bikes of somewhere between 24 and 30 pounds (depending on which bike I ride) as ridden including tool kit, spare tube, water bottle, pump, lights, etc.
#179
Newbie
I live along the southern shores of the glacially-scoured/scraped lower Great Lakes.. The only hills around here (within 25 miles) are river valleys, and even the Cuyahoga River (Cleveland) valley 25 miles south of Lake Erie is at most 200' deep. If I were to ride west from here, I could ride (and I actually have ridden) from here to Chicago - 350 miles - and not vary more than 200' in elevation. My work commute is 12.5 miles each way. The biggest 'hills' are highway and railroad overpasses, so maybe 30' of short hill-climb. So let's just say it is very flat here.
My bike gearing is - Fuji: 27x1-1/8 tires, 28/38/48 with a 13-21 six-speed freewheel. The Univega Viva Sport: 27x1-1/8 tires, 42/52 with 13-24 six-speed freewheel, and the Miyata: 700x25f/28r tires, 42/52 with a 13-21 six speed freewheel.
I generally ride in gearing that puts me somewhere between 75-85 Gear-Inches, with my normal cadence of ~90, that equates to a riding speed of right around 20-21mph. Of course the nine stop signs/stoplights tend to drop my average door-to-door speed down to around 17-18mph (42-44 minutes to ride the 12.5 miles) and that includes the slower speed for the last two miles as a 'cool-down'
BTW, this is coming from a 63+-year-old borderline 'Clyde' riding vintage steel bikes of somewhere between 24 and 30 pounds (depending on which bike I ride) as ridden including tool kit, spare tube, water bottle, pump, lights, etc.
My bike gearing is - Fuji: 27x1-1/8 tires, 28/38/48 with a 13-21 six-speed freewheel. The Univega Viva Sport: 27x1-1/8 tires, 42/52 with 13-24 six-speed freewheel, and the Miyata: 700x25f/28r tires, 42/52 with a 13-21 six speed freewheel.
I generally ride in gearing that puts me somewhere between 75-85 Gear-Inches, with my normal cadence of ~90, that equates to a riding speed of right around 20-21mph. Of course the nine stop signs/stoplights tend to drop my average door-to-door speed down to around 17-18mph (42-44 minutes to ride the 12.5 miles) and that includes the slower speed for the last two miles as a 'cool-down'
BTW, this is coming from a 63+-year-old borderline 'Clyde' riding vintage steel bikes of somewhere between 24 and 30 pounds (depending on which bike I ride) as ridden including tool kit, spare tube, water bottle, pump, lights, etc.
#180
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
We have flat, glaciated lands on the north edge of town, with modest hills in town and tumbling down about 200 feet to the river flood plain to the south and west. So some hills and some relatively flat terrain.
I won’t say it’s best, but for over a year now, both my bikes have been single speed. This summer I geared down just a tad, so the road bike is about 67 gear inches and the MTB is about 64. It’s been loads of fun and definitely provides a challenge!
Otto
I won’t say it’s best, but for over a year now, both my bikes have been single speed. This summer I geared down just a tad, so the road bike is about 67 gear inches and the MTB is about 64. It’s been loads of fun and definitely provides a challenge!
Otto
#181
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
mstateglfr , factors such as wheel diameter and crank arm length can change the amount of gear inches you are able to push through.
Therefore, gear combinations front to rear alone are not the only factor concerning gear inches.
Therefore, gear combinations front to rear alone are not the only factor concerning gear inches.
Sheldon disagrees with your arm length claim. Enter whatever arm length you want, the gear inches stay the same.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
A longer arm does create more leverage, thats for sure true.
Likes For Jumpski:
#183
Senior Member
I use three gears as I accelerate up to speed. Trying to start out in a 85GI would put too much strain on the knees, and mine are shot. I'll also gear down a bit to climb those 'huge' overpasses for the same reason. I am a spinner, not a masher.. Besides, it is nice to have choices depending on wind strength/direction.
#184
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
Last night was repeats on our group hill loop. Gentle 2% grade up/back for a mile. The 56/42 combo was key to maximum smiles on the TT bike. So, 56/42 and 11-30 for the TT bike is 'just' right for me in this area. Plenty easy uphill and plenty fast down.
Likes For burnthesheep:
Likes For SpeedyBlueBiker:
#186
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,109
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 822 Post(s)
Liked 1,961 Times
in
944 Posts
I did a ramp that reached 24% on a 34x34. It was not fun, but those types of ramps do not come up often.
Frankly, it is the descents that concern me more at times.
Frankly, it is the descents that concern me more at times.
#188
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
I'm sure you and your physiotherapist are correct, im not questioning your observations or experience.
#189
Senior Member
Here in the Yangtze River delta, it's pancake flat, with the only climbs of any note being inclines up on to bridges - these are neither particularly steep nor particularly long. I run a 1x9 setup with a 46t chainring and an 11-32 cassette, and it's more than enough gear range for my needs.
#190
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
He doesn't have proof that exactly 21% which he now advocates and sells, or 21.3%, is optimal, either. The few actual studies published on the topic which put trained cyclists on cranks of various lengths and found a small decrease in sustainable power only at extreme crank sizes. It's worth also keeping in mind that he sells people custom frames because extra long cranks on a mass produced frame which is designed for 170-175mm cranks reduce pedal clearance and change the handling.
The problem which is alluded to is, even if we agree taller cyclists would benefit from longer cranks in principle, the question is how do you get the ideal number. The numbers given by Zinn such as 21% and 21.3% suggest that I should be riding 175mm or 177.5mm cranks. 177.5mm? Yeah, no thanks!
Personally, when I was replacing a 175mm crankset with one with a power meter on one of my bikes, I went with 170mm cranks and the comfort is slightly better. I sometimes ride a bike attached to our turbo trainer with 172.5mm cranks and I can't say I produce any more or less power on it.
So, why not 20.4%? Or any other number in that range? Why not a range, say 20%-21%? Putting a precise number to it suggests that it's an exact science, and there is just nothing of the sort in it.
Anyway, on topic, within the confines of mass produced bikes and cranks (which, if you fall within 99% of the population height wise are appropriate for you), crank length doesn't have a meaningful impact on gearing selection.
The problem which is alluded to is, even if we agree taller cyclists would benefit from longer cranks in principle, the question is how do you get the ideal number. The numbers given by Zinn such as 21% and 21.3% suggest that I should be riding 175mm or 177.5mm cranks. 177.5mm? Yeah, no thanks!
Personally, when I was replacing a 175mm crankset with one with a power meter on one of my bikes, I went with 170mm cranks and the comfort is slightly better. I sometimes ride a bike attached to our turbo trainer with 172.5mm cranks and I can't say I produce any more or less power on it.
So, why not 20.4%? Or any other number in that range? Why not a range, say 20%-21%? Putting a precise number to it suggests that it's an exact science, and there is just nothing of the sort in it.
Anyway, on topic, within the confines of mass produced bikes and cranks (which, if you fall within 99% of the population height wise are appropriate for you), crank length doesn't have a meaningful impact on gearing selection.
Last edited by Branko D; 10-21-21 at 05:14 AM.
Likes For Branko D:
#192
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
He doesn't have proof that exactly 21% which he now advocates and sells, or 21.3%, is optimal, either. The few actual studies published on the topic which put trained cyclists on cranks of various lengths and found a small decrease in sustainable power only at extreme crank sizes. It's worth also keeping in mind that he sells people custom frames because extra long cranks on a mass produced frame which is designed for 170-175mm cranks reduce pedal clearance and change the handling.
The problem which is alluded to is, even if we agree taller cyclists would benefit from longer cranks in principle, the question is how do you get the ideal number. The numbers given by Zinn such as 21% and 21.3% suggest that I should be riding 175mm or 177.5mm cranks. 177.5mm? Yeah, no thanks!
Personally, when I was replacing a 175mm crankset with one with a power meter on one of my bikes, I went with 170mm cranks and the comfort is slightly better. I sometimes ride a bike attached to our turbo trainer with 172.5mm cranks and I can't say I produce any more or less power on it.
So, why not 20.4%? Or any other number in that range? Why not a range, say 20%-21%? Putting a precise number to it suggests that it's an exact science, and there is just nothing of the sort in it.
Anyway, on topic, within the confines of mass produced bikes and cranks (which, if you fall within 99% of the population height wise are appropriate for you), crank length doesn't have a meaningful impact on gearing selection.
The problem which is alluded to is, even if we agree taller cyclists would benefit from longer cranks in principle, the question is how do you get the ideal number. The numbers given by Zinn such as 21% and 21.3% suggest that I should be riding 175mm or 177.5mm cranks. 177.5mm? Yeah, no thanks!
Personally, when I was replacing a 175mm crankset with one with a power meter on one of my bikes, I went with 170mm cranks and the comfort is slightly better. I sometimes ride a bike attached to our turbo trainer with 172.5mm cranks and I can't say I produce any more or less power on it.
So, why not 20.4%? Or any other number in that range? Why not a range, say 20%-21%? Putting a precise number to it suggests that it's an exact science, and there is just nothing of the sort in it.
Anyway, on topic, within the confines of mass produced bikes and cranks (which, if you fall within 99% of the population height wise are appropriate for you), crank length doesn't have a meaningful impact on gearing selection.
Hip angle can affect power output.
#193
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Branko D
From my own findings, which i have extensively detailed on this forum, something from 20.5% to 21.6%(max) seems to be a sweet spot, Its generally okay to go down a bit below 20.5%, but certainly not past 21.6%.
From my own findings, which i have extensively detailed on this forum, something from 20.5% to 21.6%(max) seems to be a sweet spot, Its generally okay to go down a bit below 20.5%, but certainly not past 21.6%.
#194
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,951
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,299 Times
in
2,947 Posts
Yes, you would certainly never want to go to 21.7%. That extra 0.1% would be almost 1 mm -- no way anyone could safely ride a bike like that !!!
#195
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,450
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times
in
3,012 Posts
My current road bike has a Shimano 50/34 compact crankset and 11-34 cassette. It's actually not a bad setup for my local roads, which have a lot of short but very steep climbs (20%+) and not much flat terrain. But I'm seriously thinking of moving to a 1x setup with something like a 40T chainring and 9-42T cassette (Campag Ekar).
My mountain bike has a 1x 30T chainring and 10-50 cassette. It's just about perfect for all-round trail use with super-steep climbs
My mountain bike has a 1x 30T chainring and 10-50 cassette. It's just about perfect for all-round trail use with super-steep climbs
Likes For PeteHski:
#197
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Branko D
From my own findings, which i have extensively detailed on this forum, something from 20.5% to 21.6%(max) seems to be a sweet spot, Its generally okay to go down a bit below 20.5%, but certainly not past 21.6%.
From my own findings, which i have extensively detailed on this forum, something from 20.5% to 21.6%(max) seems to be a sweet spot, Its generally okay to go down a bit below 20.5%, but certainly not past 21.6%.
Your own findings? Let me guess. N=1?
Likes For livedarklions:
#199
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,951
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,299 Times
in
2,947 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#200
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I'll offer this--I suspect people vary enough in the proportions of their leg bones and hip bones that the idea that there's a universal ideal ratio seems pretty far-fetched.
I don't doubt that ratio works well for you, I just don't see how anyone could accept that as a generalizable finding.