What happens when you build a MUP without bollards?
#1
Happy banana slug
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,940
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Liked 1,758 Times
in
1,030 Posts
What happens when you build a MUP without bollards?
Likes For Korina:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
thats where easy revenue can be had... ticket them instead of adding obstructions that cost $
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,643
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,480 Times
in
1,911 Posts
Yep, use cameras similar to speed cameras, and set a fine at $500.
They, can even do it on the cheap with signs "No cars", "$500 fine", "Camera Enforced".
If the signs alone don't work, then install the cameras.
They, can even do it on the cheap with signs "No cars", "$500 fine", "Camera Enforced".
If the signs alone don't work, then install the cameras.
#4
Because bollards are so difficult to negotiate,
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
Because everyone can afford more taxes devoted to junk ideas.
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#6
I don't know.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 2,210
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night, '89 Marinoni
Liked 1,036 Times
in
529 Posts
holy crap.
#7
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,143
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,404 Times
in
3,729 Posts
It's not surprising. What I didn't hear is that anyone has ever reported this to law enforcement for the year it's been said to be happening. But then again is there any enforcement built in to the ordinance that says motor vehicles are prohibited? Although perhaps reckless driving might apply in some states.
#8
Full Member
Sactown is wild, that's for sure. I do see local park rangers on side by sides and sometimes trucks but they are nice and leave us riders plenty of room. One of these days I will have to venture out there.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 7,317
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Liked 2,397 Times
in
1,353 Posts
They can be badly designed. The bollards on a path in Eisenhower County Park, in Hempstead, NY, were originally about 4” wide and painted the same color yellow as the lane divider paint on the trail surface. This resulted in many people not seeing the bollard, as it blended with the pavement lane markings. A buddy subsequently hit one while riding here, was really banged up. The county finally got around to painting the bollards bright red, I understand.
#10
Happy banana slug
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,940
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Liked 1,758 Times
in
1,030 Posts
They can be badly designed. The bollards on a path in Eisenhower County Park, in Hempstead, NY, were originally about 4” wide and painted the same color yellow as the lane divider paint on the trail surface. This resulted in many people not seeing the bollard, as it blended with the pavement lane markings. A buddy subsequently hit one while riding here, was really banged up. The county finally got around to painting the bollards bright red, I understand.
#11
Cantilever believer
Bicyclists have been killed and crippled from hitting bollards, and agencies have paid out large judgments and settlements from bollard-related crashes.
Good current design guidance on the use of bollards is: "Don't use bollards unless the risk of motor vehicle intrusion is greater than the risk of a rider being seriously injured from hitting it." And: "Don't place bollards in the cyclist's direct path of travel, including tandems, trailers, and adult tricycles."
The MUTCD requires all obstructions in the traveled way of a path to be marked with retroreflective material.
Good current design guidance on the use of bollards is: "Don't use bollards unless the risk of motor vehicle intrusion is greater than the risk of a rider being seriously injured from hitting it." And: "Don't place bollards in the cyclist's direct path of travel, including tandems, trailers, and adult tricycles."
The MUTCD requires all obstructions in the traveled way of a path to be marked with retroreflective material.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Likes For BTinNYC:
#13
Happy banana slug
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,940
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Liked 1,758 Times
in
1,030 Posts
Bicyclists have been killed and crippled from hitting bollards, and agencies have paid out large judgments and settlements from bollard-related crashes.
Good current design guidance on the use of bollards is: "Don't use bollards unless the risk of motor vehicle intrusion is greater than the risk of a rider being seriously injured from hitting it." And: "Don't place bollards in the cyclist's direct path of travel, including tandems, trailers, and adult tricycles."
The MUTCD requires all obstructions in the traveled way of a path to be marked with retroreflective material.
Good current design guidance on the use of bollards is: "Don't use bollards unless the risk of motor vehicle intrusion is greater than the risk of a rider being seriously injured from hitting it." And: "Don't place bollards in the cyclist's direct path of travel, including tandems, trailers, and adult tricycles."
The MUTCD requires all obstructions in the traveled way of a path to be marked with retroreflective material.
#14
When I was young, older teen kids would run over peoples' mailboxes out at the road for fun. My dad got tired of it. He sunk a piece of solid steel, I think about 1-1/2" x 3" section, a few feet deep into concrete, sticking up from the ground about 10", with the mailbox post attached at the bottom with bolts sawn most of the way through. Next time a car hit it, the post bolts sheared off and it swung down, and the base took out I think, the right front tie-rod and lower control arm, this being based on the screeching sound and skid marks down the pavement of a sideways wheel. Next day, dad just raised the mailbox post and rebolted it. Never happened again.
The only problem I can see with bike trails, is that you need vehicle passage for ambulance/fire-department for injuries or sudden illness. Otherwise I'd say make passage at each access point, smaller than car-width except perhaps a micro, or a tight chicane. A bridge over a gap obstacle, can easily support 4 bikes and riders, but a car or truck instantly drops 2 feet, not enough to injure inside, but with sheer walls front and back, impossible for vehicle to drive out of there. To release vehicle, platform is unlocked and rotated 90 degrees to line up with escape path. And driver fined.
The only problem I can see with bike trails, is that you need vehicle passage for ambulance/fire-department for injuries or sudden illness. Otherwise I'd say make passage at each access point, smaller than car-width except perhaps a micro, or a tight chicane. A bridge over a gap obstacle, can easily support 4 bikes and riders, but a car or truck instantly drops 2 feet, not enough to injure inside, but with sheer walls front and back, impossible for vehicle to drive out of there. To release vehicle, platform is unlocked and rotated 90 degrees to line up with escape path. And driver fined.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,643
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,480 Times
in
1,911 Posts
A difference in worldview. You're focused on protecting cyclists. They're focused on protecting their bridges, and the fools who might try to drive over them.
Last edited by FBinNY; 05-21-24 at 08:31 AM.
#16
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,143
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,404 Times
in
3,729 Posts
While I don't know for certain I believe it's because the wooden bridge wasn't designed for the heavier axle loads of motor vehicles and the other bridges are. While motor vehicle use is prohibited, they still have to allow for emergency vehicles and maintenance crews along the path. The wood bridge is short and has a alternate path around it that maintenance and emergency vehicles can use.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,653
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Liked 3,680 Times
in
2,381 Posts
the one that my Wife crashed into & then fell & broker her wrist at, was the site of multiple crashes & the bollard is all scratched up from others crashing. the beach attendant nearby, who came running over to help, told me what a disaster that particular bollard was. when ppl cycle past the beach, they inevitably look at the beach. the bollard in question is not at the intersection of the road & the bike trail, it's several yards in. on the day she crashed, it was a sunny day & the tree shadows masked the bollard. she wears eye glasses, so her vision is not great to begin with & who knows if there was glare on her glasses. yes, I saw the bollard & rode a round it, but she did not. & others did not. sticking an object in the path of a moving vehicle, hoping that the obstacle will affect behavior isn't always successful. it relies on ppl reacting the way you expect. but ppl can be unpredictable
there are better ways to keep cars off bike paths. personally, I like the big gate or fence approach, which force a rider to walk thru a little maze of sorts, rather than ride straight
a bollard is like hoping ppl stop at stop signs
there are better ways to keep cars off bike paths. personally, I like the big gate or fence approach, which force a rider to walk thru a little maze of sorts, rather than ride straight
a bollard is like hoping ppl stop at stop signs
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
a wide variety of reasons for/against mup prevention designs exists, but the design should not cause more harm than good to the legit end user.
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
Our MUP has a wooden bridge. It has a bollard in the middle of both entrances. The 3 or 4 newer bridges are steel and concrete. They don't have bollards.
While I don't know for certain I believe it's because the wooden bridge wasn't designed for the heavier axle loads of motor vehicles and the other bridges are. While motor vehicle use is prohibited, they still have to allow for emergency vehicles and maintenance crews along the path. The wood bridge is short and has a alternate path around it that maintenance and emergency vehicles can use.
While I don't know for certain I believe it's because the wooden bridge wasn't designed for the heavier axle loads of motor vehicles and the other bridges are. While motor vehicle use is prohibited, they still have to allow for emergency vehicles and maintenance crews along the path. The wood bridge is short and has a alternate path around it that maintenance and emergency vehicles can use.
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#20
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,143
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,404 Times
in
3,729 Posts
But can you confirm it and say absolutely?
I would have thought that if the bridge wasn't suitable, that they'd also have weight limits posted for the bridge or axle weight limits. But they don't.
And the other path is just a section of old trail before they rerouted and put in the bridge.
I would have thought that if the bridge wasn't suitable, that they'd also have weight limits posted for the bridge or axle weight limits. But they don't.
And the other path is just a section of old trail before they rerouted and put in the bridge.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 39,643
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Liked 3,480 Times
in
1,911 Posts
First they must be over 5 feet tall, and painted brightly or reflective at the top. This would make them as visible as pedestrians.
Secondly, there must be a stop sign, warning, or other signage to slow cyclists as they approach.
If done right, they can be safe, or at least there would be no excuse for crashing into them.
Last edited by FBinNY; 05-21-24 at 10:20 AM.
Likes For FBinNY:
#22
Senior Member
The AT (Appalachian Trail) only permits foot travel. They have no bollards, they enforce it by making the trail extremely rugged and impassable by wheeled contraptions.
Maybe those to build MUPS can do the same thing, of course not as rugged
Maybe those to build MUPS can do the same thing, of course not as rugged
#23
Happy banana slug
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,940
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Liked 1,758 Times
in
1,030 Posts
The trail in Eureka has dark brown(!!) bollards; I questioned the color at the time, but the city guy responsible for getting the trail liked the color and wasn't interested in changing it; probably something to do with taggers. They at least have red/white reflective tape at the top now; woo. This is the same guy who left a 1/2 mile gap in the trail and called it done (he's the city manager now). My city of Arcata put in hi-viz yellow bollards because they're not stupid.
#24
Cantilever believer
Sounds like a lot of people here are trying to design vehicle intrusion countermeasures on pathways. There has been decades of experience and practice in this area, most notably in the current AASHTO Guide for Bicycle Facilities. The bigger issue is that designers and agencies either aren't aware of this guidance or choose not to follow it. And I know of a few people who make a good living as expert witnesses testifying against public agencies in court when bicyclists are hurt, crippled, or killed on a path and it can be linked to a design or operational decision involving a fixed object in the travel way of a path.
A number of reports describe a situation where there are several riders on a path, a rider in the front of the group sees a bollard and swerves, and a following rider sees the bollard only after the rider ahead moves laterally and does not react in time to avoid a crash - even if it meets all recommended guidance on conspicuity and retroreflectivity.
A number of reports describe a situation where there are several riders on a path, a rider in the front of the group sees a bollard and swerves, and a following rider sees the bollard only after the rider ahead moves laterally and does not react in time to avoid a crash - even if it meets all recommended guidance on conspicuity and retroreflectivity.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Likes For RCMoeur:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,867
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Liked 3,302 Times
in
2,096 Posts
I have no problem with bollards centered at the ends of MUPs. But under some conditions.
First they must be over 5 feet tall, and painted brightly or reflective at the top. This would make them as visible as pedestrians.
Secondly, there must be a stop sign, warning, or other signage to slow cyclists as they approach.
If done right, they can be safe, or at least there would be no excuse for crashing into them.
First they must be over 5 feet tall, and painted brightly or reflective at the top. This would make them as visible as pedestrians.
Secondly, there must be a stop sign, warning, or other signage to slow cyclists as they approach.
If done right, they can be safe, or at least there would be no excuse for crashing into them.
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV