W/Kg units, why this metric?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,303
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1139 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times
in
687 Posts
W/Kg units, why this metric?
I am not fully clear regarding this metric used. i don't race but i do see the race categories in zwift and they are separated by a W/Kg range. i get that it is power divided by weight but it seems a bit abstract to me. let's say a big man generating a lot of power has a value of 3.0 w/kg and a twig like rider also has a value of 3.0 w/kg. will these two extremes perform about the same regardless of terrain?
while riding zwift (and i know it is imaginary and rife with cheaters) i occasionally see someone blow past me with a much lower W/Kg that myself, it is puzzling at times.
while riding zwift (and i know it is imaginary and rife with cheaters) i occasionally see someone blow past me with a much lower W/Kg that myself, it is puzzling at times.
#2
Senior Member
On flats, pure watts is generally going to go faster, going 280w at 4w/kg is going to be faster than someone at 220 and 4.5w/kg, but on hills the person going 220 at 4.5w/kg is going to get up the hill faster. So it ultimately depends on the course profile and the type of rider it'll favor
#3
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
The W/kg is an attempt to normalize for body size differences. If I weigh in at twice your weight, it takes me twice as much power to climb the same hill as you do (in the same amount of time).
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,395
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times
in
1,920 Posts
dial your "weight" back by 65% in the profile & go hunting for a KOM.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#5
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Otto
#6
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
I didn't know that. I just blamed it on being too fat, too old and too weak.
#7
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Otto
#8
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
My biggest problem is in the denominator.
Likes For Cyclist0108:
#9
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,641
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4737 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
But of course body weight, as it's added to a human, doesn't all end up in parts that actually help with cycling. Why wouldn't Zwift just auto-place participants in the appropriate categories (not defined by w/kg) based on their past Zwift performances.. there should be a way will all of the speed, watts, terrain specifics to do this. Eg. how do cyclists get put into Cat1, 2, 3, etc?
#10
Senior Member
But of course body weight, as it's added to a human, doesn't all end up in parts that actually help with cycling. Why wouldn't Zwift just auto-place participants in the appropriate categories (not defined by w/kg) based on their past Zwift performances.. there should be a way will all of the speed, watts, terrain specifics to do this. Eg. how do cyclists get put into Cat1, 2, 3, etc?
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,303
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1139 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times
in
687 Posts
i'd agree with better categorization for races in zwift. i tried one once. i put myself into cat C because i was border line C/B. when i did the race i was dropped almost immediately, it was really quite ridiculous, not fun at all. have not tried it since. i also think the cats are too broad.
Likes For spelger:
#12
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
i'd agree with better categorization for races in zwift. i tried one once. i put myself into cat C because i was border line C/B. when i did the race i was dropped almost immediately, it was really quite ridiculous, not fun at all. have not tried it since. i also think the cats are too broad.
#13
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,699 Times
in
2,519 Posts
Maybe they should have watts based racing and avoid the possibility of scale doping.
#14
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,641
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4737 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
All Zwift knows is your power output. Everything that happens within the program is based on that and whatever information you provide about yourself. The only way to try and make it a realistic simulation of how you normally ride is to use information such as w/kg. Using something like speed or whatever you mean by terrain specifics doesn't work unless you try to use something like w/kg to normalize performance.
#15
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
I am not fully clear regarding this metric used. i don't race but i do see the race categories in zwift and they are separated by a W/Kg range. i get that it is power divided by weight but it seems a bit abstract to me. let's say a big man generating a lot of power has a value of 3.0 w/kg and a twig like rider also has a value of 3.0 w/kg. will these two extremes perform about the same regardless of terrain?
while riding zwift (and i know it is imaginary and rife with cheaters) i occasionally see someone blow past me with a much lower W/Kg that myself, it is puzzling at times.
while riding zwift (and i know it is imaginary and rife with cheaters) i occasionally see someone blow past me with a much lower W/Kg that myself, it is puzzling at times.
I simply don't agree that Zwift chooses to "roughly" apply the same CdA to really large riders as they do smaller riders. If they do apply a different and less advantageous CdA to larger riders, it isn't how it works out in the real world. Meaning, the sliding scale should be more aggressive. As in it isn't believable whatsoever.
You simply can't ride a road bike looking like Eddie in the hour record the same way at 210lb as someone at 150lb can.
But only so much they can do. People already can cheat on their weight. Folks would cheat on this also by lowering their weight or height to get a lower CdA. If they went super detail oriented and had you measure your bike fit and put the reach, stack, etc... into your profile.............people would figure out how to cheat that also by lowering the stack height.
So, I take it "as-is".
It's gamified riding. So, we're bound to encounter similar things as in video games.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Yeah, but it's watts/drag which, given similar on-bike position, is going to scale differently than w/kg. So the bigger person making more absolute power will have increased frontal area and drag, but it'll increase at a much lower rate. Think of a 2x2x2 cube vs a 3x3x3 cube - the volume of the 3x cube is 3.375 times greater (27 vs 8), but the frontal area (one face) is only 2.25 times greater (9 vs 4).
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,447
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4236 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
But of course body weight, as it's added to a human, doesn't all end up in parts that actually help with cycling. Why wouldn't Zwift just auto-place participants in the appropriate categories (not defined by w/kg) based on their past Zwift performances.. there should be a way will all of the speed, watts, terrain specifics to do this. Eg. how do cyclists get put into Cat1, 2, 3, etc?
All Zwift knows is your power output. Everything that happens within the program is based on that and whatever information you provide about yourself. The only way to try and make it a realistic simulation of how you normally ride is to use information such as w/kg. Using something like speed or whatever you mean by terrain specifics doesn't work unless you try to use something like w/kg to normalize performance.
Likes For himespau:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,447
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4236 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
You may have tried in the wrong race. The WTRL TTT and series races use a system that verifies through ZwiftPower dot com and enforces the rules. Its working very well as evidenced by the number of racers entering the races and lack of "sandbagging" claims being made that are so prevalent in other races.
#19
Senior Member
Yeah, but it's watts/drag which, given similar on-bike position, is going to scale differently than w/kg. So the bigger person making more absolute power will have increased frontal area and drag, but it'll increase at a much lower rate. Think of a 2x2x2 cube vs a 3x3x3 cube - the volume of the 3x cube is 3.375 times greater (27 vs 8), but the frontal area (one face) is only 2.25 times greater (9 vs 4).
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,395
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times
in
1,920 Posts
factor in the group set combo being used, seat height, rubber resistance, & carrying load (water bottles) it would seem that the program couldn't know where to stop tracking your data.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,880
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1461 Post(s)
Liked 1,486 Times
in
870 Posts
I've heard this too. Someone on this board in another thread was posting about how they changed their height to 3ft and their top speed on descents went through the roof.
Do big e-races verify height? I know some have on-camera weigh-in requirements.
Do big e-races verify height? I know some have on-camera weigh-in requirements.
#23
I think I know nothing.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NE PA
Posts: 709
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 233 Post(s)
Liked 290 Times
in
204 Posts
Based on my ftp I'm just under 3.1 w/kg. I do a few races not a lot and not well advertised races and I'm not even remotely a "racer". But I race in C class and my ZwiftPower results usually come in with a race average of about 3 w/kg.
Still, I get my ass handed to me all the time. Where I'm at I should be at the top of C class. I have not come close to making the podium. I don't really care though, I enter races for my personal enjoyment and the excuse to push hard. Having said that I'm going to do an ftp test in about a week and I expect to get a boost that will put me at at least 3.3 w/kg, B class in most races. At that point I will go from getting my ass handed to me to having my ass served with a side of mountain oysters.
Still, I get my ass handed to me all the time. Where I'm at I should be at the top of C class. I have not come close to making the podium. I don't really care though, I enter races for my personal enjoyment and the excuse to push hard. Having said that I'm going to do an ftp test in about a week and I expect to get a boost that will put me at at least 3.3 w/kg, B class in most races. At that point I will go from getting my ass handed to me to having my ass served with a side of mountain oysters.
#24
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
Based on my ftp I'm just under 3.1 w/kg. I do a few races not a lot and not well advertised races and I'm not even remotely a "racer". But I race in C class and my ZwiftPower results usually come in with a race average of about 3 w/kg.
Still, I get my ass handed to me all the time. Where I'm at I should be at the top of C class. I have not come close to making the podium. I don't really care though, I enter races for my personal enjoyment and the excuse to push hard. Having said that I'm going to do an ftp test in about a week and I expect to get a boost that will put me at at least 3.3 w/kg, B class in most races. At that point I will go from getting my ass handed to me to having my ass served with a side of mountain oysters.
Still, I get my ass handed to me all the time. Where I'm at I should be at the top of C class. I have not come close to making the podium. I don't really care though, I enter races for my personal enjoyment and the excuse to push hard. Having said that I'm going to do an ftp test in about a week and I expect to get a boost that will put me at at least 3.3 w/kg, B class in most races. At that point I will go from getting my ass handed to me to having my ass served with a side of mountain oysters.
Your FTP is considered to be 95% of your best 20 minutes in that event, so the FTP that one manually inputs within profile>settings is not considered for categorisation. If you have done less than 3 events in 90 days then the average FTP from those events will be used. If you are new or have been inactive for 90 days then you will be classified after the first event based on your FTP. In cases where you do not have 20 min data, perhaps because the race lasted less than 20 mins or data pulled from Zwift is missing then they will estimate your FTP at the backend using 10 min data for example. Your average w/kg for the duration of the race is also irrelevant. It is based on that best 20 minute duration. In addition to all of this they will give a rider a small over factor before they upgrade.
Likes For La Tortue:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,447
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4236 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
Because of the 95% thing, you'd be consistently in the 3.3 range and not really at risk of moving up.