Cycling to running miles conversion
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
Some estimates from the science folks, for a 150 lb. person:
Running at a 6 min/mile pace consumes 1145 Calories per hour, and the runner covers 10 miles. 1145 Calories / 10 miles = 115 Calories/mile
Cycling at 20+ mph consumes 1145 Calories per hour, and the cyclists covers 20 miles. 1145 Calories / 20 miles = 57 Calories/mile
Cycling at 20+ mph is metabolically just as "hard" as running a 6 min/mile pace, but cycling gets you twice as far.
Running at a 6 min/mile pace consumes 1145 Calories per hour, and the runner covers 10 miles. 1145 Calories / 10 miles = 115 Calories/mile
Cycling at 20+ mph consumes 1145 Calories per hour, and the cyclists covers 20 miles. 1145 Calories / 20 miles = 57 Calories/mile
Cycling at 20+ mph is metabolically just as "hard" as running a 6 min/mile pace, but cycling gets you twice as far.
6 minute mile for an hour is running fast.
#77
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 2,007
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2724 Post(s)
Liked 488 Times
in
353 Posts
Cycling at a 20 mph pace on a road bike is way easier than running at a 6 minute mile pace. You have to do a lot of fancy shmancy math to justify that kind of number, and it’s a lie!
Likes For wheelreason:
#79
Junior Member
I both run and bike, and without wind or hills I'm reasonably certain I could maintain 20 mph for at least 10 minutes, probably 20 minutes. Most rides I average 15-16 mph with fairly significant hills. My best ever, flat-out running mile is 6:52.
#81
Junior Member
Likes For One Wheel:
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,831
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times
in
386 Posts
Larger, sometimes muscular guys will skew towards the bike, and lanky or smaller folks to the run, but again, everyone is different. I think anyone who trains properly and is of average ability (and isn't overly mature) can roll at 20 MPH or run a 6 minute mile.
#83
Junior Member
I'm probably on the more muscular side. I still have some flab to lose at 5'9" 190 lbs, I'd be pretty lean at 170. It would be much easier for me ride at 20 mph than run a 6 minute mile, but both would be possible with work.
#84
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,150
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3468 Post(s)
Liked 3,608 Times
in
1,810 Posts
Same for me. When I was running all the time, a 6-minute pace was not that hard, as long as it was flat and not windy. And 20 mph cycling on a flat course was a tempo pace.
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 774
Bikes: Trek 970, Bianchi Volpe,Casati
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 358 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
87 Posts
shouldn't burn you up,, A marathoner running to work, even a couple times a week, would burn out. On a bike, you can ride to work and back home, and not burn out... PS i used to run a bit of track and cross country and I can tell you a 5 mile race to me feels like a 40 mile bike ride at touring pace, of course I did my first mile in the 5 mile race under 5 minutes(a few moons ago), and that was on the cross country trail.
Last edited by rossiny; 02-15-24 at 04:27 PM.
Likes For rossiny:
#86
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,979
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,045 Times
in
668 Posts
Otto
#87
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,609
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1100 Post(s)
Liked 890 Times
in
499 Posts
I’ve ran 4 marathons. None since I was older than 22 or so. I’m in mid 40’s now. I’ve ridden probably a hundred or more centuries, none last year due to time constraints, bummer.
Heres my recollection. Running kind of beats me up. Even when I was young and fit, I just needed time off. I don’t recall the 3.5 to 4 hours of effort being all that taxing but it’s definitely not easy.
I think there are a handful of rare gifted people who have such a smooth running stride that they don’t suffer the beating that most of us do. Those people probably can run significant distances every day. Just like you or I can ride every day.
I met some old dude on the bus to the starting point of the Vegas marathon who seemed to run about 15-20 marathons a month. Took him 6 hours to do it but he never needed to stop. They do exist.
The inherent smoothness and low impact of bicycles totally messes up how to compare the two.
Heres my recollection. Running kind of beats me up. Even when I was young and fit, I just needed time off. I don’t recall the 3.5 to 4 hours of effort being all that taxing but it’s definitely not easy.
I think there are a handful of rare gifted people who have such a smooth running stride that they don’t suffer the beating that most of us do. Those people probably can run significant distances every day. Just like you or I can ride every day.
I met some old dude on the bus to the starting point of the Vegas marathon who seemed to run about 15-20 marathons a month. Took him 6 hours to do it but he never needed to stop. They do exist.
The inherent smoothness and low impact of bicycles totally messes up how to compare the two.
Likes For rosefarts:
#88
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,979
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,045 Times
in
668 Posts
Otto
Likes For ofajen:
#89
Newbie
As a runner who recently took up cycling and cycles the same loop i run i can offer the following:
my loop is about 10k or 6.25 miles with about 260 feet of elevation. The 10k run takes me about 48 minutes while to bike ride takes me around 22min when intentionally riding to exercise, so pushing myself. I think whomever put the 4.6 ish ratio up there is pretty darn close. There is a shorter 1.6 mile loop and a 2 mile loop. Running somewhere between those two feels like cycling the big 10k 6.25 mile loop for me.
my loop is about 10k or 6.25 miles with about 260 feet of elevation. The 10k run takes me about 48 minutes while to bike ride takes me around 22min when intentionally riding to exercise, so pushing myself. I think whomever put the 4.6 ish ratio up there is pretty darn close. There is a shorter 1.6 mile loop and a 2 mile loop. Running somewhere between those two feels like cycling the big 10k 6.25 mile loop for me.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,831
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times
in
386 Posts
I thinlk it's not so much a few folks who do it right, as there are so many that do it wrong. My knees and ankles hurt just watching some folks "running". Ideally, you don't want to throw your body up in the air with each stride, you want your feet bearly clearing the ground, and brushing the ground while not landing on your heels. A running shoe with a level sole helps, a lot of shoes have exagerated heel padding, which makes it almost impossible to run correctly.
#91
Junior Member
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: Blur / Ibis Hakka MX / team machince alr2 / topstone 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 426 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times
in
201 Posts
running is harder zero argument there. It's harder on your joints etc..
let;s assume college athlete almost zero body fat yadayda etc...no old man/women joint issues etc...
there's a big difference between walking/hiking and RUNNING.
it's harder to define biking when you can coast, soft pedal etc..
someone would need to define what your W/kg = to RUNNING not hiking/walking.
Then if you always kept your W/kg the same or higher than what it is to running it would probably be a very close work out.
People are saying they can ride all day but only run for a few hours etc.. Well the same can be said I can hike/walk ( that would be like coasting or soft pedaling ) all day 10+ hours but I would die on bike trying to maintain 23 mph for any length of time.
let;s assume college athlete almost zero body fat yadayda etc...no old man/women joint issues etc...
there's a big difference between walking/hiking and RUNNING.
it's harder to define biking when you can coast, soft pedal etc..
someone would need to define what your W/kg = to RUNNING not hiking/walking.
Then if you always kept your W/kg the same or higher than what it is to running it would probably be a very close work out.
People are saying they can ride all day but only run for a few hours etc.. Well the same can be said I can hike/walk ( that would be like coasting or soft pedaling ) all day 10+ hours but I would die on bike trying to maintain 23 mph for any length of time.
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 584
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 377 Post(s)
Liked 282 Times
in
182 Posts
Yeah, biking is literally designed to be an easier way of getting around.
You can compare energy output, but that ignores the stresses running puts on the body. Biking isn't much more than sitting down and moving your legs in circles (and you can glide when you want to). Running, on the other hand, is like a harder kind of walking - only semi-athletic folks even do it.
You can compare energy output, but that ignores the stresses running puts on the body. Biking isn't much more than sitting down and moving your legs in circles (and you can glide when you want to). Running, on the other hand, is like a harder kind of walking - only semi-athletic folks even do it.
#95
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 2,007
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2724 Post(s)
Liked 488 Times
in
353 Posts
Yeah, biking is literally designed to be an easier way of getting around.
You can compare energy output, but that ignores the stresses running puts on the body. Biking isn't much more than sitting down and moving your legs in circles (and you can glide when you want to). Running, on the other hand, is like a harder kind of walking - only semi-athletic folks even do it.
You can compare energy output, but that ignores the stresses running puts on the body. Biking isn't much more than sitting down and moving your legs in circles (and you can glide when you want to). Running, on the other hand, is like a harder kind of walking - only semi-athletic folks even do it.
#96
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,150
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3468 Post(s)
Liked 3,608 Times
in
1,810 Posts
This is about walking vs. biking, but it's a cool quote:
Man on a bicycle can go three or four times faster than the pedestrian, but uses five times less energy in the process. He carries one gram of his weight over a kilometer of flat road at an expense of only 0.15 calories. The bicycle is the perfect transducer to match man’s metabolic energy to the impedance of locomotion. Equipped with this tool, man outstrips the efficiency of not only all machines but all other animals as well. -- Ivan Illich, Toward a History of Needs, 1978
Man on a bicycle can go three or four times faster than the pedestrian, but uses five times less energy in the process. He carries one gram of his weight over a kilometer of flat road at an expense of only 0.15 calories. The bicycle is the perfect transducer to match man’s metabolic energy to the impedance of locomotion. Equipped with this tool, man outstrips the efficiency of not only all machines but all other animals as well. -- Ivan Illich, Toward a History of Needs, 1978
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3966 Post(s)
Liked 7,376 Times
in
2,970 Posts
agreed, you can take it so easy when cycling. I live on an insane hill, and often traverse (do the zig zag) to an extreme degree to just negate the hill. Once when my ribs were bruised and I couldn’t put down power, a woman walking her dog passed me as I’m doing my zig zags. I think of this as not even engaging with the hill, like no I’m not going to spend energy getting up this time
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,831
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times
in
386 Posts
This is about walking vs. biking, but it's a cool quote:
Man on a bicycle can go three or four times faster than the pedestrian, but uses five times less energy in the process. He carries one gram of his weight over a kilometer of flat road at an expense of only 0.15 calories. The bicycle is the perfect transducer to match man’s metabolic energy to the impedance of locomotion. Equipped with this tool, man outstrips the efficiency of not only all machines but all other animals as well. -- Ivan Illich, Toward a History of Needs, 1978
Man on a bicycle can go three or four times faster than the pedestrian, but uses five times less energy in the process. He carries one gram of his weight over a kilometer of flat road at an expense of only 0.15 calories. The bicycle is the perfect transducer to match man’s metabolic energy to the impedance of locomotion. Equipped with this tool, man outstrips the efficiency of not only all machines but all other animals as well. -- Ivan Illich, Toward a History of Needs, 1978
Seriously though, cycling is much more efficient than walking or running, but the question is what would be an equivalent or similar workout, two different things.
#100
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,443
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 1,175 Times
in
503 Posts
This is about walking vs. biking, but it's a cool quote:
Man on a bicycle can go three or four times faster than the pedestrian, but uses five times less energy in the process. He carries one gram of his weight over a kilometer of flat road at an expense of only 0.15 calories. The bicycle is the perfect transducer to match man’s metabolic energy to the impedance of locomotion. Equipped with this tool, man outstrips the efficiency of not only all machines but all other animals as well. -- Ivan Illich, Toward a History of Needs, 1978
Man on a bicycle can go three or four times faster than the pedestrian, but uses five times less energy in the process. He carries one gram of his weight over a kilometer of flat road at an expense of only 0.15 calories. The bicycle is the perfect transducer to match man’s metabolic energy to the impedance of locomotion. Equipped with this tool, man outstrips the efficiency of not only all machines but all other animals as well. -- Ivan Illich, Toward a History of Needs, 1978
Likes For RChung: