C&V dropbar gravel/offroader?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
C&V dropbar gravel/offroader?
Drop bar off roader NAHBS
I've got a hankering for a bike like the one shown above. Except that is a new custom show bike and I want to make something from a c&v bike.
I'm thinking take a decent steel road frame that is too small for me, fit long post and stem, some flavor of narrow MTB rim, get brake mounts repositioned for cantis or add disc mounts, then a vintage MTB drivetrain?
Or would you start with a rigid MTB frame?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
The geometry on your example above looks almost identical to my (rather lightweight) Kona Lava Dome MTB from the mid-90's. The Kona's chain stays may be just a little bit longer.
The only reason I haven't gotten around to converting it to a drop bar bike is it's a little small for me. It's about your size, though.
The only reason I haven't gotten around to converting it to a drop bar bike is it's a little small for me. It's about your size, though.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18379 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
Is this a frame that you have, or are you looking for one?
Many of the vintage MTBs are a little longer than their road bike counterparts. So, you might be able to achieve the tall/short effect you're wanting without compromising the actual fit of the bike too much.
I've done a skinny tire 26" to 700c conversion. But, you might be able to do a mid range tire size (35 or 40mm) 26" to 650b conversion.
Many of the vintage MTBs are a little longer than their road bike counterparts. So, you might be able to achieve the tall/short effect you're wanting without compromising the actual fit of the bike too much.
I've done a skinny tire 26" to 700c conversion. But, you might be able to do a mid range tire size (35 or 40mm) 26" to 650b conversion.
#4
Senior Member
In the classic era every bike was a gravel bike. The road turned to gravel and you kept racing. Or riding. Same bike was used for Paris-Roubaix and for Paris-Tours.
This might mean that a 10 or 20 year old bike is not classic enough. Go back 50 years and most bikes will take 32mm tires and still have a centimeter of clearance all around for mud and rocks to pass through. Youngest bike in my collection is 59 years old. It rides very well on gravel.
This might mean that a 10 or 20 year old bike is not classic enough. Go back 50 years and most bikes will take 32mm tires and still have a centimeter of clearance all around for mud and rocks to pass through. Youngest bike in my collection is 59 years old. It rides very well on gravel.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
336 Posts
Best bets:
-90s NORBA-style mtb like the Kona mentioned above. Short high stem and wide drop bars. If you are doing dirt drops make sure to get them high enough so that the primary position is in the drops. A lot of people angle them up so they can rest on the hoods, which defeats the purpose as the tops are narrow and have quite a lot of reach.
-70s Sports Touring bike with 650b conversion. A 42 or even 45mm tire might be possible if you don't use fenders.
-90s NORBA-style mtb like the Kona mentioned above. Short high stem and wide drop bars. If you are doing dirt drops make sure to get them high enough so that the primary position is in the drops. A lot of people angle them up so they can rest on the hoods, which defeats the purpose as the tops are narrow and have quite a lot of reach.
-70s Sports Touring bike with 650b conversion. A 42 or even 45mm tire might be possible if you don't use fenders.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,780
Bikes: Numerous
Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1678 Post(s)
Liked 3,099 Times
in
914 Posts
I don’t follow the latest gravel bike tech very closely but many look to me, like others noted, like early 90’s MTB geometry when the sloping frames first showed up. Kona, Univega, Gary Fisher, GT are some steel frame brands from that time that come to mind.
Me? I just put some 28 tires on a road bike and voila! , gravel bike!
Me? I just put some 28 tires on a road bike and voila! , gravel bike!
__________________
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
N = '96 Colnago C40, '04 Wilier Alpe D'Huez, '10 Colnago EPS, '85 Merckx Pro, '89 Merckx Century, '86 Tommasini Professional, '04 Teschner Aero FX Pro, '05 Alan Carbon Cross, '86 De Rosa Professional, '82 Colnago Super, '95 Gios Compact Pro, '95 Carrera Zeus, '84 Basso Gap, ‘89 Cinelli Supercorsa, ‘83 Bianchi Specialissima, ‘VO Randonneur, Ritchey Breakaway Steel, '84 Paletti Super Prestige, Heron Randonneur
#7
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
This Simoncini Cyclocross Special is used on firm gravel rails-to-trails and on pavement. It's a versatile bike, but it's not ideal for long days on minimally maintained rural roads.
Converting a hybrid from the nineties would allow for 700x35 tires, which are really the minimum for serious gravel roads. Also, you'll be well served by going tubeless. Tubeless tires allow for reduced air pressure without the risk of pinch flats.
A great bike for L'Eroica gravel routes would be this 1977 Grand Record. it can fit 700x35 tires. Again, its not ideal for the kind of really challenging gravel roads found in the rural corners of Midwestern states, but it does well on Strada Bianchi.
If you really want to be fast and efficient on any kind of gravel, there is really no substitute for a modern Gravel Bike. Hydraulic disc brakes, a thru-axle frameset, 46/33 crankset with an 11-36 cassette and room for 700x40 tubeless tires just can't be done on an older bike.
Converting a hybrid from the nineties would allow for 700x35 tires, which are really the minimum for serious gravel roads. Also, you'll be well served by going tubeless. Tubeless tires allow for reduced air pressure without the risk of pinch flats.
A great bike for L'Eroica gravel routes would be this 1977 Grand Record. it can fit 700x35 tires. Again, its not ideal for the kind of really challenging gravel roads found in the rural corners of Midwestern states, but it does well on Strada Bianchi.
If you really want to be fast and efficient on any kind of gravel, there is really no substitute for a modern Gravel Bike. Hydraulic disc brakes, a thru-axle frameset, 46/33 crankset with an 11-36 cassette and room for 700x40 tubeless tires just can't be done on an older bike.
Last edited by Barrettscv; 03-21-19 at 07:01 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times
in
471 Posts
I doubt an old road bike will have clearance for the tires you may want. Your starting options will likely be an older mountain bike or a hybrid. I recently acquired a 1991 Trek 750 (double-butted, fully lugged cromoly frame) in near showroom condition that I'm converting to a gravely..touring-ish bike.
While bikes have changed a lot over the years..they haven't changed much in many respects. Below is a comparison:
Peter Lombardi's 1992 Trek 750 conversion comes to mind:
While bikes have changed a lot over the years..they haven't changed much in many respects. Below is a comparison:
Peter Lombardi's 1992 Trek 750 conversion comes to mind:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times
in
471 Posts
One more from my files..not sure where I grabbed the pic from. After 40+ years of cycling, the 750 I picked up is my first Trek. One thing I will say in Trek's favor(on a project like this)..there's tons of documentation available online (annual catalogs and spec manuals going back to 1990-ish..edit..I checked & they go back to the mid 70's) and a TON of bikes available on the used market. The mtn bikes in the 930, 950, 970, 990 range or hybrids in the 750, 790, 7600, 7900 range are worth a look. While I agree there are arguably better starting points, or at least cooler (more unique) bikes out there, the problem is finding a used one, at the right price, in a locale you can get to, in good condition, in your size.
Last edited by fishboat; 03-21-19 at 08:09 PM.
#10
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
336 Posts
One more from my files..not sure where I grabbed the pic from. After 40+ years of cycling, the 750 I picked up is my first Trek. One thing I will say in Trek's favor(on a project like this)..there's tons of documentation available online (annual catalogs and spec manuals going back to 1990-ish) and a TON of bikes available on the used market. The mtn bikes in the 930, 950, 970, 990 range or hybrids in the 750, 790, 7600, 7900 range are worth a look. While I agree there are arguably better starting points, or at least cooler (more unique) bikes out there, the problem is finding a used one, at the right price, in a locale you can get to, in good condition, in your size.
#12
HarborBandS
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago Western Suburbs
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 266 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
57 Posts
If you go for a mid-90's MTB or Hybrid frame that takes a 1-1/8" steerer, you will have more options for fork upgrades, if the carbon fork in the original post is something that does indeed appeal to you. And you'll save weight with a threadless headset.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times
in
471 Posts
#14
Disciple of St. Tullio
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 743
Bikes: Ciöcc, Bianchi, DeRosa, Eddy Merckx, Frejus, Hampsten, Kondor, Losa, Magni, Pegoretti, Pelizzoli, Pogliaghi, Scapin
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times
in
140 Posts
An old MTB does make a good starting point....
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,852
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times
in
471 Posts
Piqued my interest, so I looked up the numbers for the 1996 Trek 950. Comparison of (mfg reported**) sizing/fit varies over the years, bike type, and mfgs, so I ~matched the top tube of the 54cm Straggler in the 16.5 inch 950 frame. As long as I had the comparison I thought I'd post them.
**In the 750 case..it's my understanding the 750 frame came from Trek's touring (road) frames..specifically the 520. Typically hybrid sizing follows mtn bike sizing..
**In the 750 case..it's my understanding the 750 frame came from Trek's touring (road) frames..specifically the 520. Typically hybrid sizing follows mtn bike sizing..
#16
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times
in
866 Posts
Back when the forward-thinking hybrids were a thing, Performance had Giant produce a variant without canti bosses, to be used with large, dual-pivot calipers and a drop handlebar.
Geo was textbook period mtb, 73degr ST and 71-degr HT, same as an early-70's Super Course or Grand Sports (and some other sport-tourers out of Japan).
These bikes left little to be desired. I added modern auxiliary brake levers and a suspension post to mine, and did many mtb rides and a few CX races on it.
One thing about the handlebars is that the very best setup for off-roading is the aux brake levers in lieu of attempting to optimize any of the forward or drops positions for technical descending or for traversing extremely rough terrain. I've set up a few touring bikes for mtb riding and it was exactly the same, only I used the original "safety" auxiliary levers with modified (cut away in front) lever housings for increased lever travel. Technical descending then became practical even with the relatively narrow grip span at the top of the road bars.
This then is my gripe with hydraulic disc brakes. All of these really fine and expensive new "gravel" bikes all fall short in terms of providing a shorter reaching hand position for descending, detracting greatly from their off-road worthiness. You can't just give away inches of hand setback and expect a bike to be competent in tough and/or descending situations, so the chosen stem length ends up being a gross compromise between open-road performance and off-road control.
I would challenge riders on modern gravel bikes to descend/traverse the same terrain as I can manage using cheaper old bikes that have some/any variant of auxiliary/safety brake levers:
Geo was textbook period mtb, 73degr ST and 71-degr HT, same as an early-70's Super Course or Grand Sports (and some other sport-tourers out of Japan).
These bikes left little to be desired. I added modern auxiliary brake levers and a suspension post to mine, and did many mtb rides and a few CX races on it.
One thing about the handlebars is that the very best setup for off-roading is the aux brake levers in lieu of attempting to optimize any of the forward or drops positions for technical descending or for traversing extremely rough terrain. I've set up a few touring bikes for mtb riding and it was exactly the same, only I used the original "safety" auxiliary levers with modified (cut away in front) lever housings for increased lever travel. Technical descending then became practical even with the relatively narrow grip span at the top of the road bars.
This then is my gripe with hydraulic disc brakes. All of these really fine and expensive new "gravel" bikes all fall short in terms of providing a shorter reaching hand position for descending, detracting greatly from their off-road worthiness. You can't just give away inches of hand setback and expect a bike to be competent in tough and/or descending situations, so the chosen stem length ends up being a gross compromise between open-road performance and off-road control.
I would challenge riders on modern gravel bikes to descend/traverse the same terrain as I can manage using cheaper old bikes that have some/any variant of auxiliary/safety brake levers:
Last edited by dddd; 03-21-19 at 10:35 AM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
336 Posts
@dddd I mostly agree with you about the lever ergonomics but I really do not like navigating technical terrain, whether descending or otherwise, with a very narrow hand placement that the interrupter levers or turkey levers would require. A wide stance on the handlebars gives me more leverage and helps me balance and shift my body weight over the bike, which is necessary for technical riding.
I used some dirt drop handlebars from Velo Orange (Dajia Far Bar) on my recent drop bar MTB that worked really well. The bar I got is 48cm C-T-C at the hoods and 62.5cm at the drops. I got the bars very high and set the brake levers so the primary position is in the drops. It worked far better than any traditional drop bar I've tried on technical terrain because my hands were nice and wide and plenty of bar to grip onto, not to mention a lot of leverage on the levers from the drops. And the multiple hand positions were really comfortable just riding long distances on the road.
I used some dirt drop handlebars from Velo Orange (Dajia Far Bar) on my recent drop bar MTB that worked really well. The bar I got is 48cm C-T-C at the hoods and 62.5cm at the drops. I got the bars very high and set the brake levers so the primary position is in the drops. It worked far better than any traditional drop bar I've tried on technical terrain because my hands were nice and wide and plenty of bar to grip onto, not to mention a lot of leverage on the levers from the drops. And the multiple hand positions were really comfortable just riding long distances on the road.
#18
Senior Member
I use this Mercier for my camping bike. It has really good handling and the tubular cyclocross tires really makes for a great ride with lots of control.
#19
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,926
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1492 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times
in
642 Posts
199x Giant Iguana conversion. It does sacrifice a bit of speed on pavement over a dedicated road bike, and the handling is a bit twitchy, but try and stop it.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,160
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,716 Times
in
2,613 Posts
I would think that starting with a hybrid made for 700c wheels and with canti brakes would be a good platform. I owned a Trek 730 multitrack made with TrueTemper steel for a while and used it as a commuter. It wasn't too long in the rear or too slack in the angles, but is a native 700c wheel bike with lots of clearance for wide 700c tires. I'd go with linear-pull brakes and the Tektro drop-bar levers that work with those.
#21
Senior Member
I have done a couple of drop bar conversions, but my favorite has been my 1990 520 which has room for 700x40, and maybe even 700x45, tires.
I used my modern Salsa Vaya as inspiration and it came out nicely.
Other bikes I have done was a 1992 Trek 950 and Stumpjumper, but the reach wasn't as nice on those. Here is the 950 with a too long of stem, no photos of the Stumpjumper as it's a newer build.
I used my modern Salsa Vaya as inspiration and it came out nicely.
Other bikes I have done was a 1992 Trek 950 and Stumpjumper, but the reach wasn't as nice on those. Here is the 950 with a too long of stem, no photos of the Stumpjumper as it's a newer build.
#22
Senior Member
In 1997 I took a Raleigh Tangent and converted to drop bar 700c commuter. The commute was 15 miles each way and the bike was great to ride. Used 37mm tires and any short cut available through the woods or fields was no problem.
#23
Senior Member
I would think that starting with a hybrid made for 700c wheels and with canti brakes would be a good platform. I owned a Trek 730 multitrack made with TrueTemper steel for a while and used it as a commuter. It wasn't too long in the rear or too slack in the angles, but is a native 700c wheel bike with lots of clearance for wide 700c tires. I'd go with linear-pull brakes and the Tektro drop-bar levers that work with those.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,421
Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked 1,007 Times
in
516 Posts
Back when the forward-thinking hybrids were a thing, Performance had Giant produce a variant without canti bosses, to be used with large, dual-pivot calipers and a drop handlebar.
Geo was textbook period mtb, 73degr ST and 71-degr HT, same as an early-70's Super Course or Grand Sports (and some other sport-tourers out of Japan).
These bikes left little to be desired. I added modern auxiliary brake levers and a suspension post to mine, and did many mtb rides and a few CX races on it.
One thing about the handlebars is that the very best setup for off-roading is the aux brake levers in lieu of attempting to optimize any of the forward or drops positions for technical descending or for traversing extremely rough terrain. I've set up a few touring bikes for mtb riding and it was exactly the same, only I used the original "safety" auxiliary levers with modified (cut away in front) lever housings for increased lever travel. Technical descending then became practical even with the relatively narrow grip span at the top of the road bars.
This then is my gripe with hydraulic disc brakes. All of these really fine and expensive new "gravel" bikes all fall short in terms of providing a shorter reaching hand position for descending, detracting greatly from their off-road worthiness. You can't just give away inches of hand setback and expect a bike to be competent in tough and/or descending situations, so the chosen stem length ends up being a gross compromise between open-road performance and off-road control.
I would challenge riders on modern gravel bikes to descend/traverse the same terrain as I can manage using cheaper old bikes that have some/any variant of auxiliary/safety brake levers:
Geo was textbook period mtb, 73degr ST and 71-degr HT, same as an early-70's Super Course or Grand Sports (and some other sport-tourers out of Japan).
These bikes left little to be desired. I added modern auxiliary brake levers and a suspension post to mine, and did many mtb rides and a few CX races on it.
One thing about the handlebars is that the very best setup for off-roading is the aux brake levers in lieu of attempting to optimize any of the forward or drops positions for technical descending or for traversing extremely rough terrain. I've set up a few touring bikes for mtb riding and it was exactly the same, only I used the original "safety" auxiliary levers with modified (cut away in front) lever housings for increased lever travel. Technical descending then became practical even with the relatively narrow grip span at the top of the road bars.
This then is my gripe with hydraulic disc brakes. All of these really fine and expensive new "gravel" bikes all fall short in terms of providing a shorter reaching hand position for descending, detracting greatly from their off-road worthiness. You can't just give away inches of hand setback and expect a bike to be competent in tough and/or descending situations, so the chosen stem length ends up being a gross compromise between open-road performance and off-road control.
I would challenge riders on modern gravel bikes to descend/traverse the same terrain as I can manage using cheaper old bikes that have some/any variant of auxiliary/safety brake levers:
I have one, too, a 1992 Performance Parabola. It is a bit heavy, but has room for 40+ tires.