Need info on Trek 520
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Need info on Trek 520
I've been wanting a road bike for a while and it seems that to get a tall frame I need to go vintage or spen some big bucks for new. So I'm seeing a 64cm Trek 520 on Craigslist.
700 wheels, 18 speed, side pull brakes. Shifters on the stem. Says good shape and wants $325. Paint looks good and original in the picture.
Am I correct in thinking this bike came new with 27" wheels? How much should I expect to upgrade to bring it up to modern standards? End use will be brevet riding- if I ever get my self in shape.
Your thoughts?
edit: it's a 520 cirrus.
700 wheels, 18 speed, side pull brakes. Shifters on the stem. Says good shape and wants $325. Paint looks good and original in the picture.
Am I correct in thinking this bike came new with 27" wheels? How much should I expect to upgrade to bring it up to modern standards? End use will be brevet riding- if I ever get my self in shape.
Your thoughts?
edit: it's a 520 cirrus.
Last edited by XXLHardrock; 03-05-15 at 05:48 PM.
#2
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
It may well have come with 700c wheels, methinks.
One of the best all-around frames ever built, especially if you get the cantilever models.
Can do anything: tour, cross, gravel hammer, centuries
If you get the brown model, you never have to worry about it being stolen.
For some reason, that color triggers some fairly negative reactions.
One of the best all-around frames ever built, especially if you get the cantilever models.
Can do anything: tour, cross, gravel hammer, centuries
If you get the brown model, you never have to worry about it being stolen.
For some reason, that color triggers some fairly negative reactions.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks.
Further study shows shows the rear derailiour cable going through the chain stay.
Does this ID it somehow?
Further study shows shows the rear derailiour cable going through the chain stay.
Does this ID it somehow?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
The model year makes a big difference on the 520 model. I think they're are actually still making a model by that number, but it's very different from the vintage years. I'm guessing most of them from the mid 80's onward came with the 700c wheelset, so yours may have as well.
The first google image hit for "trek 520 cirrus" is a catalogue from 1987; which is tasty stuff; 531 tubing, Shimano Deore indexed shifting. I wouldn't modernize it at all if all the original gear was there and in good shape. (Though some would argue against BioPace chain rings)
You can probably find out the exact year by using the color scheme and serial number and comparing that info to what is posted on vintage-trek.com
The first google image hit for "trek 520 cirrus" is a catalogue from 1987; which is tasty stuff; 531 tubing, Shimano Deore indexed shifting. I wouldn't modernize it at all if all the original gear was there and in good shape. (Though some would argue against BioPace chain rings)
You can probably find out the exact year by using the color scheme and serial number and comparing that info to what is posted on vintage-trek.com
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 03-05-15 at 06:24 PM.
#5
Still learning
https://www.vintage-trek.com/images/trek/85TrekSport.pdf
1985 is the first year for internal cable routing to the RD. Spec for 1985 520 Cirrus shows 700c wheels, which is consistent with my 1986 Cirrus. However, shifters on a stock 520 Cirrus are on the downtube, not at the stem.
1985 is the first year for internal cable routing to the RD. Spec for 1985 520 Cirrus shows 700c wheels, which is consistent with my 1986 Cirrus. However, shifters on a stock 520 Cirrus are on the downtube, not at the stem.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
The bike is clearly suitable for the OP's purposes and there is no need to "modernize" it to ride brevets or anything else you might want to do. It will need to be overhauled and you'll probably need to replace a number of parts so figure in another $100 or more in parts to get the bike up to a first rate riding condition plus labor.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I called the guy. It's a 1986, much like the one in the picture above. He got it as a frame from a co-op and built it up. Nothing original, but that probably doesn't matter, does it? Would the frame accept modern hubs? Is it worth $325 given that it's pieced together? Seems the value is in the frame only. A new 64cm LHT or similar would be about 4 or 5 times that.
#8
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,650
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3091 Post(s)
Liked 6,600 Times
in
3,785 Posts
moved from C&V to Appraisals.
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
12 Posts
I called the guy. It's a 1986, much like the one in the picture above. He got it as a frame from a co-op and built it up. Nothing original, but that probably doesn't matter, does it? Would the frame accept modern hubs? Is it worth $325 given that it's pieced together? Seems the value is in the frame only. A new 64cm LHT or similar would be about 4 or 5 times that.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for all the help. He dropped the price to $250 overnight. But after I looked up the frame measurements, I concluded that the TT was going to be too short for this Clyde.
Likes For RoadGuy:
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,331
Bikes: 89 Schwinn 754, 90 Trek 1100, 93 Trek 2300, 94 Trek 1400 (under construction), 94 Trek 930, 97 Trek 1400
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Bike frames that size are not off the shelf.
So, long legs and not much trunk. A tall bike with a short top tube.
Sounds like what you need is a custom built frame.
So, long legs and not much trunk. A tall bike with a short top tube.
Sounds like what you need is a custom built frame.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Well, not a really short top tube. My Hardrock is 655cm plus a setback seat post and a 90mm stem and I often ride with my thumbs hooker on the curved part of a Surly Open Bar. So about 750mm from center of the seat post to the hoods? Give or take. Edit: more like 810mm
KHS FLITE 747 looks like it would fit. just have to save my money and be patient. But it only takes 28mm tires.
KHS FLITE 747 looks like it would fit. just have to save my money and be patient. But it only takes 28mm tires.
Last edited by XXLHardrock; 03-06-15 at 07:12 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,643
Bikes: 1997 Rivendell Road Standard 650b conversion (tourer), 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10 (gravel/tour), 2013 Foundry Auger disc (CX/gravel), 2016 Cannondale Fat CAAD 2 (MTB/winter), 2011 Cannondale Flash 29er Lefty (trail MTB)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Surly makes most of their bikes up to 64 cm frames, if those would fit. The Pacer is a good road bike that still clears 32mm tires. The Cross Check clears a 40 mm tire so it is a good bike for mixed surfaces. They're both around $1300, so a bit cheaper than the KHS. See if any shops nearby have 64 cm's in stock?
Other options, more expensive:
Rivendell makes several of their models in XXL sizes, and even made one model (Redwood, natch) exclusively in 65 and 68 cm frames. They're very pricy but they come up for sale used occasionally, especially in the Pacific NW. They take wider tires.
Gunnar (made by Waterford) makes large bikes (up to 68 cm) for about $1k/frame. They do custom geometry on any model for about $300 more.
There are several other smaller, custom builders who can make you a custom steel frame in about the same price range.
Other options, more expensive:
Rivendell makes several of their models in XXL sizes, and even made one model (Redwood, natch) exclusively in 65 and 68 cm frames. They're very pricy but they come up for sale used occasionally, especially in the Pacific NW. They take wider tires.
Gunnar (made by Waterford) makes large bikes (up to 68 cm) for about $1k/frame. They do custom geometry on any model for about $300 more.
There are several other smaller, custom builders who can make you a custom steel frame in about the same price range.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StinkyJeff
Classic & Vintage
23
03-31-13 08:43 PM
Tentacle Master
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
3
02-13-10 04:36 PM