What can you tell me about this Bridgestone MB-1?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
What can you tell me about this Bridgestone MB-1?
I'm picking up this baby tomorrow. My daughter wants a trail bike now, I plan on waiting her out to eventually turn it into a 650B tourer. We old people plan for years down the road.
Can you tell the year by the color scheme?
Right now the plan is to, well; for starters fix that rear tire. From there the usual servicing, rewiring, upgrade the drivetrain to 8 speed cassette (should have a 7 speed freewheel), and more likely than not drop bars on a nicer stem with bar end shifters.
Then I wait. Muahaha...
Can you tell the year by the color scheme?
Right now the plan is to, well; for starters fix that rear tire. From there the usual servicing, rewiring, upgrade the drivetrain to 8 speed cassette (should have a 7 speed freewheel), and more likely than not drop bars on a nicer stem with bar end shifters.
Then I wait. Muahaha...
#2
Señor Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 897
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 303 Times
in
151 Posts
Are you confident that it is an MB-1? I associate the upper tier Bridgestone MBs as having the "Comp" designation while the lower tier having "Trail" or "TrailBlazer".
It's a fully-lugged frame, at least, which is a good sign.
It's a fully-lugged frame, at least, which is a good sign.
#3
Senior Member
Looks like a MB4 to me. MB1 should have a Tange Prestige sticker and XT components.
#4
I don't know.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 2,035
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night, '89 Marinoni
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 869 Times
in
452 Posts
I'd say that's an MB-4 Trail. Still should be sufficient for your future evil plans.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,177
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3817 Post(s)
Liked 6,742 Times
in
2,625 Posts
Also, wheel size is 26"/559mm. A 650B wheel is 584mm. I don't think it would work unless you have someone move the canti posts.
Likes For nlerner:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,437
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5891 Post(s)
Liked 3,475 Times
in
2,080 Posts
https://velo-orange.blogspot.com/201...t-to-650b.html
I could never figure out why you might want to make this swap other than to feed the need to tinker with a bike. 26 inch tires and rims are widely available.
Likes For bikemig:
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Well I'm not gonna lie, feeding the tinkering need is important, but on an touring bike the larger wheel just works better all around.
I never liked 700c tires on a dirt bike (nor understood the need to call them 29"). To me the smaller 26" wheels are better for rolling over stuff. On an open road (again, to me) a larger wheel works better. This frame has the geometry suitable for a touring bike with the slightly oversize tubing to make it bulletproof in the face of loaded touring. 650b just happens to be the largest wheel size it will take with enough clearance left over for reasonable tires and fender.
I have canti brakes that should have enough adjustment to reach but if it gets to this point I'll probably reposition the studs as part of doing other frame modifications. You'll be surprised how far I can take the need to tinker
I never liked 700c tires on a dirt bike (nor understood the need to call them 29"). To me the smaller 26" wheels are better for rolling over stuff. On an open road (again, to me) a larger wheel works better. This frame has the geometry suitable for a touring bike with the slightly oversize tubing to make it bulletproof in the face of loaded touring. 650b just happens to be the largest wheel size it will take with enough clearance left over for reasonable tires and fender.
I have canti brakes that should have enough adjustment to reach but if it gets to this point I'll probably reposition the studs as part of doing other frame modifications. You'll be surprised how far I can take the need to tinker
#8
buy my bikes
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,806
Bikes: my very own customized GUNNAR CrossHairs
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 520 Post(s)
Liked 433 Times
in
250 Posts
Originally Posted by abdon;[url=tel:22957938
22957938[/url]]Well I'm not gonna lie, feeding the tinkering need is important, but on an touring bike the larger wheel just works better all around.
I never liked 700c tires on a dirt bike (nor understood the need to call them 29"). To me the smaller 26" wheels are better for rolling over stuff. On an open road (again, to me) a larger wheel works better. This frame has the geometry suitable for a touring bike with the slightly oversize tubing to make it bulletproof in the face of loaded touring. 650b just happens to be the largest wheel size it will take with enough clearance left over for reasonable tires and fender.
I have canti brakes that should have enough adjustment to reach but if it gets to this point I'll probably reposition the studs as part of doing other frame modifications. You'll be surprised how far I can take the need to tinker
I never liked 700c tires on a dirt bike (nor understood the need to call them 29"). To me the smaller 26" wheels are better for rolling over stuff. On an open road (again, to me) a larger wheel works better. This frame has the geometry suitable for a touring bike with the slightly oversize tubing to make it bulletproof in the face of loaded touring. 650b just happens to be the largest wheel size it will take with enough clearance left over for reasonable tires and fender.
I have canti brakes that should have enough adjustment to reach but if it gets to this point I'll probably reposition the studs as part of doing other frame modifications. You'll be surprised how far I can take the need to tinker
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...e-project.html
#9
Senior Member
MB-1s and MB-2s did not have unicrown forks. Although I like 650B tires, and have converted bikes from 27" to 650B, I wouldn't bother with converting MTB. Just get a good set of tires.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
There are benefits that make the conversion from 26" totally worth it. For starters it is about the intended purpose of the bike; for long distance touring on mostly road the larger wheel and skinnier tires you can pump to 80psi really shines. A large 26" tire can't see those pressures and you end up with a lot of rolling resistance. You can put skinnier tires on 26" but then again they get even smaller. Having the ability to make it happen it is a no brainer.
Likes For abdon:
#11
buy my bikes
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,806
Bikes: my very own customized GUNNAR CrossHairs
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 520 Post(s)
Liked 433 Times
in
250 Posts
https://www.paulcomp.com/shop/compon...akes/motolite/
i was considering these as an option for a steamroller that I want to run 700 & 650b on- after adding canti posts.
paul had a video installing them on an old mtb.
I’ve subsequently talked myself into long reach Tektro calipers instead. I’m thinking for resale a steamroller rider isn’t going to find canti brakes on a SSFG an interesting combo.
i was considering these as an option for a steamroller that I want to run 700 & 650b on- after adding canti posts.
paul had a video installing them on an old mtb.
I’ve subsequently talked myself into long reach Tektro calipers instead. I’m thinking for resale a steamroller rider isn’t going to find canti brakes on a SSFG an interesting combo.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,115
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 269 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4528 Post(s)
Liked 6,424 Times
in
3,698 Posts
https://sheldonbrown.com/bridgestone/1992/1992.pdf
Actually many/most of them did until the last 2 years, 93, 94.
#13
spondylitis.org
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fleetwood, PA, USA
Posts: 1,003
Bikes: '84 Colnago Super; '90 Bridgestone MB-1; '81 Trek 930; '01 Cinelli Supercorsa; '62 Ideor Asso; '87 Tommasini Super Prestige; '13 Lynskey R2300; '84 Serotta Nova Special; '94 Litespeed Catalyst; etc.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times
in
63 Posts
Have tried to convert a 90's era Stumpjumper to 700c. The conversion was a bit of a hack job (due to the brake setup that was required), and the bike had much higher bottom bracket height than was comfortable to ride on anything that wasn't bolder-strewn. Not worth the effort, IMO. Drop bar conversions at 26" are a better bet.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The nice thing about the 650b conversion from 26" is that when you replace fat 26" tires for skinny 650b tires the outside wheel diameter doesn't change all that much which means that the bike geometry and handling doesn't change all that much. What you gain is much higher tire pressure that reduces rolling resistance by a lot and a lot less weight on the tire.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,177
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3817 Post(s)
Liked 6,742 Times
in
2,625 Posts
The nice thing about the 650b conversion from 26" is that when you replace fat 26" tires for skinny 650b tires the outside wheel diameter doesn't change all that much which means that the bike geometry and handling doesn't change all that much. What you gain is much higher tire pressure that reduces rolling resistance by a lot and a lot less weight on the tire.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
There are significant benefits to be had but there is a significant amount of effort and cost; it is up to you if the squeeze is worth the juice and there is certainly no wrong answer. It also depends on what your end goal is.
You can cyclotour on just about anything, but when you plan to do looooong loaded rides life is a lot more fun if you hit the nail in the head when it comes to split rolling resistance and comfort.
I'm looking at two wheels I have here; a standard 26" tire with 1.95" tires, a 650B with Gran Bois 32mm tires. Funny enough both have pretty much the same outside diameter, 26 1/4". The 32mm tire can be inflated to 80psi for a lot less rolling resistance, less rubber contact on the road, it offers a superb amount of comfort for road riding and even fine gravel, it has a lot less terminal weight, and it keeps the exact same geometry on the bike.
But on a budget yeah, slap a 32mm tire on the 26" rim and you'll get most of that benefit. The cost is a smaller tire, less revolutions per crank, and geometry changes; the lowering of the bottom bracket can affect the handling of the bike. I like my tourers dead stable a speed so I can eat while riding.
#17
Happy banana slug
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,708
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1536 Post(s)
Liked 1,537 Times
in
923 Posts
As a 5'4" rider, I much prefer 26" wheels, as well as shorter cranks, which tall people never think about.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,380
Bikes: Cuevas Custom, Cimmaron, 1988 "Pinalized Rockma", 1984 Trek 510, Moulton custom touring, Raleigh Competition GS, Bridgestone Mb-2 & 3, 1980's Peugeot - US, City, & Canyon Express (6)
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1134 Post(s)
Liked 3,878 Times
in
1,899 Posts
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Yeah, when I picked it up I was able to see it was the MB4.
As I suspected the frame was a bit too tall for my 5'2" daughter with short legs. As providence would have it at the local bike collective I picked a tiny slanted tube MB3 frame for $10 bucks. I'm currently transferring the components to that one and stashing the MB4 frame for a future 650B touring bike project. It is a pretty fantastic candidate for that.
She wants to ride it now but eventually I'm going to clean and just clear coat that frame.
One complication; the seatpost on the MB4 was pretty much welded shut... No heat, nor cold nor oxalic acid, no brute force in, out, around, would make it budge. As I type this it is outside being soaked in sodium hydroxide (lye) so I can dissolve the seat post in place...
As I suspected the frame was a bit too tall for my 5'2" daughter with short legs. As providence would have it at the local bike collective I picked a tiny slanted tube MB3 frame for $10 bucks. I'm currently transferring the components to that one and stashing the MB4 frame for a future 650B touring bike project. It is a pretty fantastic candidate for that.
She wants to ride it now but eventually I'm going to clean and just clear coat that frame.
One complication; the seatpost on the MB4 was pretty much welded shut... No heat, nor cold nor oxalic acid, no brute force in, out, around, would make it budge. As I type this it is outside being soaked in sodium hydroxide (lye) so I can dissolve the seat post in place...
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Like my daughter you are a good candidate for 650B. 26" tires shrink a lot on skinny rubber, 650B lets you have your cake and eat it too by maintaining the correct geometry. You can go full road width with Continental Grand Prix tires (23mm), get yourself comfy cushion with my favorite Gran Bois 32mm for city and touring, and (bike permitting) big fat chunky tires for trailing.
#21
Happy banana slug
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,708
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1536 Post(s)
Liked 1,537 Times
in
923 Posts
Like my daughter you are a good candidate for 650B. 26" tires shrink a lot on skinny rubber, 650B lets you have your cake and eat it too by maintaining the correct geometry. You can go full road width with Continental Grand Prix tires (23mm), get yourself comfy cushion with my favorite Gran Bois 32mm for city and touring, and (bike permitting) big fat chunky tires for trailing.
Getting ready to start the Critical Mass ride.
Likes For Korina:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,437
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5891 Post(s)
Liked 3,475 Times
in
2,080 Posts
My Maxxis DTHs are anything but shrunk. What I'm hearing is a lot of what you like. Does your daughter have any opinions or does she not know enough to have them yet? My husband does this a lot and I have to remind him that me, my bike, and my riding are different from him.
Getting ready to start the Critical Mass ride.
Getting ready to start the Critical Mass ride.
#23
Happy banana slug
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,708
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1536 Post(s)
Liked 1,537 Times
in
923 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
She knows the benefits and hindrances of tires on a given situation. She is extremely happy with the 26" going on her hard tail bike, the 650B on her tourer, and the 700c on her road bike. On that last one we both know she'll be a lot happier once we find darn 165mm cranks for it.
#25
Happy banana slug
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,708
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1536 Post(s)
Liked 1,537 Times
in
923 Posts
That's great to hear! Although at 5'2" she'd probably be better off with 160 or even shorter. If you have some disposable income, these guys make cranks down to 130mm. And here's a guide to figuring out how long she may need. Proper length cranks will save her knee and hip issues down the road. HTH.
She does. She actually knows a lot about bikes. She may ignore a lot of the things I may say on a wide variety of subjects but when it comes to bikes and back country snowboarding we share a lot of the same biases and she has come to respect my reasoning.
She knows the benefits and hindrances of tires on a given situation. She is extremely happy with the 26" going on her hard tail bike, the 650B on her tourer, and the 700c on her road bike. On that last one we both know she'll be a lot happier once we find darn 165mm cranks for it.
She knows the benefits and hindrances of tires on a given situation. She is extremely happy with the 26" going on her hard tail bike, the 650B on her tourer, and the 700c on her road bike. On that last one we both know she'll be a lot happier once we find darn 165mm cranks for it.