How many balls are ideal?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,470
Bikes: -1973 Motobecane Mirage -197? Velosolex L'Etoile -'71 Raleigh Super Course
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
So... what about using ceramic bearings for cup-and-cone applications? Is that kosher or is it just asking to score the races?
#28
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26419 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times
in
7,208 Posts
for many years are designed with a certain useful lifespan that includes a few bearing replacement
cycles..........i.e. the races are more durable than the bearings, which are cheaper and more easily
replaced. But I have to admit I've never tried it.
__________________
#29
Full Member
And the number of the counting shall be eleven, thou shall not count to ten and thou shall not count of twelve.
__________________
Bikes are cool, even the dumb ones.
Bikes are cool, even the dumb ones.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,138
Bikes: 2 many
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1266 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
169 Posts
There is less friction with the nine balls and the cage. When a rolling ball touches the cage, it is a rolling ball against something not moving.
When a rotating ball touches a neighboring ball it is two surfaces going in opposite directions. That's worse. Bearing makers know how to make bearings, most of the time. Not always.
When a rotating ball touches a neighboring ball it is two surfaces going in opposite directions. That's worse. Bearing makers know how to make bearings, most of the time. Not always.
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indian Wells, CA (near Palm Springs)
Posts: 321
Bikes: Giant Defy Comp 2, Specialized Rockhopper Hard Tail 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting. I wonder how much the grease reduces that. It would seem the coefficient of friction for the unpolished cage could be as high as the highly polished counter-rotating surfaces of the balls. I'm sure the difference is minuscule, especially with appropriate lubrication. I was more interested in the potential for reducing wear due to greater load distribution over a higher number of bearings. I'm over 200#, so I have to think about these things. Going from 9 balls to 11 represents an over-20% increase in bearing surface.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: south Georgia
Posts: 375
Bikes: 1972 Schwinn super sport, heavy no name each cruiser
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
it depends on if you add a grease with a P.E.D to it.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,138
Bikes: 2 many
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1266 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
169 Posts
Interesting. I wonder how much the grease reduces that. It would seem the coefficient of friction for the unpolished cage could be as high as the highly polished counter-rotating surfaces of the balls. I'm sure the difference is minuscule, especially with appropriate lubrication. I was more interested in the potential for reducing wear due to greater load distribution over a higher number of bearings. I'm over 200#, so I have to think about these things. Going from 9 balls to 11 represents an over-20% increase in bearing surface.
#35
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indian Wells, CA (near Palm Springs)
Posts: 321
Bikes: Giant Defy Comp 2, Specialized Rockhopper Hard Tail 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#36
curmudgineer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,417
Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times
in
70 Posts
You guys & gals are overthinking this a little bit. Assuming the intended lubrication is present, the majority of friction will be due to sliding between the ball bearings that are taking the instantaneous load, and the races of the cone and the hub. Sliding is unavoidable because a monolithic ball bearing rotates at a given rate, while the range of line contact between the balls and the races require a variable rotation rate of the ball bearing. Of course, any non-circular irregularity in the bearings or the races will add to the friction, but that is mostly independent of the number for balls.
In the first approximation, sharing this sliding friction among more or fewer ball bearings will not appreciably change the net friction. It seems to me, that the main advantage of more ball bearings is increasing their longevity and that of the races, due to reduced cumulative fatigue damage (since the load is shared over more net contact area).
In the first approximation, sharing this sliding friction among more or fewer ball bearings will not appreciably change the net friction. It seems to me, that the main advantage of more ball bearings is increasing their longevity and that of the races, due to reduced cumulative fatigue damage (since the load is shared over more net contact area).
#37
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indian Wells, CA (near Palm Springs)
Posts: 321
Bikes: Giant Defy Comp 2, Specialized Rockhopper Hard Tail 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts