penality for riding on prohibited trails on federal land ?
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
penality for riding on prohibited trails on federal land ?
As many of you know, here in America there are wide areas of land on federal property that are off limits for mountain bikers.
Does anyone know what the penalty is or can cite the relevant federal codes that apply ?
Does anyone know what the penalty is or can cite the relevant federal codes that apply ?
#2
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,702 Times
in
2,522 Posts
good question. I have ridden on many trails that end at a sign that say "no bicycles." Always thought that those signs should be on both ends of the trails, but what do I know?
#3
Senior Member
If its a designated wilderness area: 43 CFR Parts 6300 and 8560. Not too big on following laws are you?
#4
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,702 Times
in
2,522 Posts
designated wilderness areas are one thing, but many trails that aren't in wilderness areas don't allow cyclists either.
#5
Senior Member
Yes then it would depend on the specific regulation that apply to the specific locations and land management agency. I do not believe that there is a standard penalty that applies to all situations. Google makes it really easy to do this type of research.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 705
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here in Canada crown lands (our version of federal land, basically the queen's "back yard") are pretty vast yet easy to access. We (the more adventurous of us) head out of our igloo cities to camp, mountain bike, etc. on crown land all the time.
The chance of getting caught or charged is next to minimal.
The chance of getting caught or charged is next to minimal.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Here in Canada crown lands (our version of federal land, basically the queen's "back yard") are pretty vast yet easy to access. We (the more adventurous of us) head out of our igloo cities to camp, mountain bike, etc. on crown land all the time.
The chance of getting caught or charged is next to minimal.
The chance of getting caught or charged is next to minimal.
Or for that matter a lot can change depending on actions taken. Go screaming down a trail where someone was killed because of a Mtn. biker screaming down it last year and you can bet you are in trouble if caught. Just taking a shortcut through a flat no bikes trail at a reasonable speed and you would be unlucky to get worse than a warning.
#8
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I didnt read through the entire link you send me.
Do you have a cliff notes version ? All I want to know if what the penalties are.
#9
Cycle Year Round
As to the penalty, a ticket with some nominal fine and walking the bike out.
Alternate penalty is running into neck high fishing line or barbed wire that some nut case extreme environmentalist bubby trapped the trail with.
Alternate penalty is running into neck high fishing line or barbed wire that some nut case extreme environmentalist bubby trapped the trail with.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#10
Senior Member
Seems like if you are willing to risk violating the law, you would be willing to invest the time to determine your exposure. By the way, if you get caught in a wilderness area you can be fined up to $100K, and be sentenced to to 1 year in jail, if my speed reading is correct.
#11
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
umm...thats what i am trying to do in this thread.
so far no one has been able to help and my google skills cant find relevant codes and penalties.
i will call various federal agencies tomorrow and ask them
Last edited by Angio Graham; 02-13-13 at 07:47 PM.
#12
Senior Member
As I said, here is the official text relating to illegal activites in wildeerness areas. took 5 minutes:
(a) If you commit a prohibited act
listed in § 6302.20 in a BLM wilderness
area, you are subject to criminal prosecution
on each offense. If convicted,
you may be fined not more than
$100,000 under 18 U.S.C. 3571. In addition,
you may be imprisoned for not
more than 12 months, as provided for
by 43 U.S.C. 1733(a
)https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-200...sec6302-30.pdf
(a) If you commit a prohibited act
listed in § 6302.20 in a BLM wilderness
area, you are subject to criminal prosecution
on each offense. If convicted,
you may be fined not more than
$100,000 under 18 U.S.C. 3571. In addition,
you may be imprisoned for not
more than 12 months, as provided for
by 43 U.S.C. 1733(a
)https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-200...sec6302-30.pdf
#13
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,702 Times
in
2,522 Posts
mountain bikers have gotten a lot better about not rutting up trails through self-enforcement. Horse riders, OTOH, are allowed to destroy trails with impunity for some reason. This is not to say that I favor cyclists violating bans on trail use.
I recognize that the OP is a bit provocative, but the forum rules forbid insulting other bikeforums members even if you think they deserve it. Please consider this when drafting any future posts
I recognize that the OP is a bit provocative, but the forum rules forbid insulting other bikeforums members even if you think they deserve it. Please consider this when drafting any future posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,729
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,595 Times
in
1,438 Posts
Next year the rangers came up with a new approach. They bought XC motorbikes and chased riders down. Then took the front wheel which they carried with an improvised sling on their backs. When the violating cyclist walked back to park headquarters he was given his wheel back and asked not to repeat, no ticket was issued for a first offense. Within a month -- problem solved.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#15
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As I said, here is the official text relating to illegal activites in wildeerness areas. took 5 minutes:
(a) If you commit a prohibited act
listed in § 6302.20 in a BLM wilderness
area, you are subject to criminal prosecution
on each offense. If convicted,
you may be fined not more than
$100,000 under 18 U.S.C. 3571. In addition,
you may be imprisoned for not
more than 12 months, as provided for
by 43 U.S.C. 1733(a
)https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-200...sec6302-30.pdf
(a) If you commit a prohibited act
listed in § 6302.20 in a BLM wilderness
area, you are subject to criminal prosecution
on each offense. If convicted,
you may be fined not more than
$100,000 under 18 U.S.C. 3571. In addition,
you may be imprisoned for not
more than 12 months, as provided for
by 43 U.S.C. 1733(a
)https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-200...sec6302-30.pdf
Thanks for the link. I read the list of prohibited things and I didnt see mountain biking on it.
However, that link dealt with BLM land I was thinking more of National Forest land and more specifically the areas in Montana like the Gallatin NF where the feds recently banned mtb on over 150 miles of trails that were previously open to riding.
#16
Senior Member
That link applies to all wilderness areas. The prohibition is on mechanized transport, which bicycles are considered a subset . Individual penalties for trespass in national forest ?? Contact the national forest in question. In Montana, I think there are parts of the Gallatin NF that are wilderness, so those penalties would apply in the wilderness areas.
Oh Yea, BLM is the management agency for a lot of national forrest land.
Oh Yea, BLM is the management agency for a lot of national forrest land.
#17
Cycle Year Round
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,729
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,595 Times
in
1,438 Posts
Actually not. They patrolled on MCs anyway, and knew how to ride. Much of the problems caused by mtn bikers are due to poor riding habits, such as tearing grooves straight up the fall line, which leads to erosion. It's often also a question of numbers. In many parks here mtn biking was tolerated (actually ignored) when the numbers were small. Then word would get out and too many people would be using the same trails without regard to the damage.
In many areas in the east, park staff and mtn biking groups form partnerships, trading volunteer help maintaining the trails, setting erosion stops on some of the steeper climbs, agreeing to stay off trails after hard rains, etc. and these alliances have worked well for everybody.
In many areas in the east, park staff and mtn biking groups form partnerships, trading volunteer help maintaining the trails, setting erosion stops on some of the steeper climbs, agreeing to stay off trails after hard rains, etc. and these alliances have worked well for everybody.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Show-Me State
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the link. I read the list of prohibited things and I didnt see mountain biking on it.
However, that link dealt with BLM land I was thinking more of National Forest land and more specifically the areas in Montana like the Gallatin NF where the feds recently banned mtb on over 150 miles of trails that were previously open to riding.
However, that link dealt with BLM land I was thinking more of National Forest land and more specifically the areas in Montana like the Gallatin NF where the feds recently banned mtb on over 150 miles of trails that were previously open to riding.
I'm a hiker first and a cyclist second. I like riding my bike, but few things bother me more than going on a hike in the woods and nearly getting hit by a MTBer bombing down a trail.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Around here, our trails are volunteer built and volunteer maintained. The USFS does little to nothing to maintain them. Many of our trails travel through sensitive habitat that gets torn up quite a bit just by hikers. I have no idea how your trails are in MT, but mountain bikes are banned from certain trails for a reason. I would imagine that MT has a lot of fragile alpine environments that could be easily damaged by mountain bikes.
I'm a hiker first and a cyclist second. I like riding my bike, but few things bother me more than going on a hike in the woods and nearly getting hit by a MTBer bombing down a trail.
I'm a hiker first and a cyclist second. I like riding my bike, but few things bother me more than going on a hike in the woods and nearly getting hit by a MTBer bombing down a trail.
#21
Slob
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 497
Bikes: 1970s AMF Roadmaster 3 speed, Bianchi Volpe, 2012 GT Zum City
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Around here, our trails are volunteer built and volunteer maintained. The USFS does little to nothing to maintain them. Many of our trails travel through sensitive habitat that gets torn up quite a bit just by hikers. I have no idea how your trails are in MT, but mountain bikes are banned from certain trails for a reason. I would imagine that MT has a lot of fragile alpine environments that could be easily damaged by mountain bikes.
are
correct.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Show-Me State
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Agreed. On those descents, just make sure that 1) you have a clear line of sight and 2) there is no one in front of you. Riding on a shared hiking/MTB/horse trail is a lot like riding on the road - the faster road users (mountain bikes -> cars) need to exercise care in not running the slower road users (hikers/horses -> bicycles) over.
#23
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Around here, our trails are volunteer built and volunteer maintained. The USFS does little to nothing to maintain them. Many of our trails travel through sensitive habitat that gets torn up quite a bit just by hikers. I have no idea how your trails are in MT, but mountain bikes are banned from certain trails for a reason. I would imagine that MT has a lot of fragile alpine environments that could be easily damaged by mountain bikes.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Show-Me State
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Since volunteers go out of the way to maintain many trails like that, you are doing them a disservice by riding on them. Stick to local multi-use trails or trails geared to MTBs instead. Or gather up a bunch of your MTBing friends to build and maintain your own MTB trail (local public landowners, like the USFS, often support that) rather than tearing up a trail that is not meant for bikes.
#25
Slob
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 497
Bikes: 1970s AMF Roadmaster 3 speed, Bianchi Volpe, 2012 GT Zum City
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Even hiking has a detrimental impact on fragile habitats.
All human use is burdensome to wilderness areas.
Suggesting otherwise is just a non-starter.
Now, the NFS, NPS, BLM, and so on make a great many mistakes. At the same time, trails do get closed for a reason. I understand that you want to ride your bike on the trails. But the question isn't, what's the most fun for you? It's, what's best for the bears, owls, skunks, and so on, which inhabit that particular bit of land? And it's probably best for them if humans stay out of their faces, especially humans aboard rad machinery. Just a thought.