Something to think about - strength/aerobic training and heart attacks
#1
Made it to 84 WHOOPIE
Thread Starter
Something to think about - strength/aerobic training and heart attacks
#2
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times
in
1,793 Posts
Strength Training May Be More Effective than Aerobic Exercise to Help Prevent Heart Attacks
That title looks like an overstatement:
The study that actually compared strength and aerobic training was for diabetic patients only, where strength training successfully lowered blood sugar. Heart disease wasn’t even studied.
Likes For terrymorse:
#3
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Best thing to do is to do both....Zone 2 aerobic training is probably the most beneficial thing anybody can do for health and fitness..,....Personally I prioritize Zone 2 training and supplement it with strength and explosive training.
Likes For wolfchild:
#4
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: "Driftless" WI
Posts: 388
Bikes: 1972 Motobecane Grand Record, 2022 Kona Dew+
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times
in
107 Posts
"Men over 60 who did 12 weeks of resistance training involving bending and straightening the knees against resistance, three sets of 10 repetitions a day, two days a week, increased their ability to move heavy weights by 16 percent."
Pedaling a bike is 'resistance' training right? You're moving yourself + bike's mass along against gravity (sometimes) at the same time displacing air as you progress, and there are no monthly fees for membership (unless you bought your bike on credit of course) whether you take advantage of the facility or not.
I like that. Why I bothered to get back on a bike when I started having right knee issues this past spring.
Pedaling a bike is 'resistance' training right? You're moving yourself + bike's mass along against gravity (sometimes) at the same time displacing air as you progress, and there are no monthly fees for membership (unless you bought your bike on credit of course) whether you take advantage of the facility or not.
I like that. Why I bothered to get back on a bike when I started having right knee issues this past spring.
#5
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,538
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3890 Post(s)
Liked 1,939 Times
in
1,384 Posts
Full paper:
Strength training is more effective than aerobic exercise for improving glycaemic control and body composition in people with normal-weight type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
https://link.springer.com/article/10...25-023-05958-9
The finding is that strength training worked better than anything else for reducing A1C. My guess is that it's an effect of body recomposition, which only happened for the strength training group. The study was started just before Covid and continued during with changes in method, which could be an issue. It is true that aerobic exercise doesn't build muscle like strength training in the gym will. So there's that.
Strength training is more effective than aerobic exercise for improving glycaemic control and body composition in people with normal-weight type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
https://link.springer.com/article/10...25-023-05958-9
The finding is that strength training worked better than anything else for reducing A1C. My guess is that it's an effect of body recomposition, which only happened for the strength training group. The study was started just before Covid and continued during with changes in method, which could be an issue. It is true that aerobic exercise doesn't build muscle like strength training in the gym will. So there's that.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#6
Junior Member
I have access to Bard which is Google's experimental, conversational, AI chat service. In a few seconds it did spit out the ANSWER.
Both strength exercise and aerobic training can help to prevent and protect from heart attack. However, aerobic training is generally considered to be more effective for heart health.Aerobic exercise (also known as cardio) is any type of exercise that gets your heart rate up and your blood pumping faster. Examples of aerobic exercise include walking, running, swimming, biking, and dancing.
Aerobic exercise has a number of benefits for heart health, including:
Strength exercise also has a number of benefits for heart health, including:
Both strength exercise and aerobic training can help to prevent and protect from heart attack. However, aerobic training is generally considered to be more effective for heart health.Aerobic exercise (also known as cardio) is any type of exercise that gets your heart rate up and your blood pumping faster. Examples of aerobic exercise include walking, running, swimming, biking, and dancing.
Aerobic exercise has a number of benefits for heart health, including:
- Strengthening the heart muscle
- Improving blood circulation
- Lowering blood pressure
- Reducing cholesterol levels
- Improving insulin sensitivity
- Reducing inflammation
Strength exercise also has a number of benefits for heart health, including:
- Lowering blood pressure
- Improving cholesterol levels
- Reducing inflammation
- Improving insulin sensitivity
- Reducing the risk of obesity
#7
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,538
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3890 Post(s)
Liked 1,939 Times
in
1,384 Posts
"Men over 60 who did 12 weeks of resistance training involving bending and straightening the knees against resistance, three sets of 10 repetitions a day, two days a week, increased their ability to move heavy weights by 16 percent."
Pedaling a bike is 'resistance' training right? You're moving yourself + bike's mass along against gravity (sometimes) at the same time displacing air as you progress, and there are no monthly fees for membership (unless you bought your bike on credit of course) whether you take advantage of the facility or not.
I like that. Why I bothered to get back on a bike when I started having right knee issues this past spring.
Pedaling a bike is 'resistance' training right? You're moving yourself + bike's mass along against gravity (sometimes) at the same time displacing air as you progress, and there are no monthly fees for membership (unless you bought your bike on credit of course) whether you take advantage of the facility or not.
I like that. Why I bothered to get back on a bike when I started having right knee issues this past spring.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#8
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,538
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3890 Post(s)
Liked 1,939 Times
in
1,384 Posts
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#9
Junior Member
AI is a part of science, more specifically computer science. AI allows to sweep through thousands of scientific papers in seconds, without any prejudice and including citation index. The old way is to read one or two scientific of pseudo scientific papers or articles that fit preconceived ideas and claim that this is the gospel.
================
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a field of computer science that deals with the creation of intelligent agents, which are systems that can reason, learn, and act autonomously. AI research has been highly successful in developing effective techniques for solving a wide range of problems, from game playing to medical diagnosis.Here are some examples of science and AI:
================
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a field of computer science that deals with the creation of intelligent agents, which are systems that can reason, learn, and act autonomously. AI research has been highly successful in developing effective techniques for solving a wide range of problems, from game playing to medical diagnosis.Here are some examples of science and AI:
- Science: Studying the climate to understand how it is changing and what can be done to mitigate its effects.
- AI: Developing a machine learning model to predict the risk of heart disease in patients.
- Science: Conducting experiments to develop new drugs and treatments for diseases.
- AI: Developing a deep learning model to diagnose cancer from medical images.
#10
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times
in
1,793 Posts
AI is a part of science, more specifically computer science. AI allows to sweep through thousands of scientific papers in seconds, without any prejudice and including citation index. The old way is to read one or two scientific of pseudo scientific papers or articles that fit preconceived ideas and claim that this is the gospel.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
AI is a part of science, more specifically computer science. AI allows to sweep through thousands of scientific papers in seconds, without any prejudice and including citation index. The old way is to read one or two scientific of pseudo scientific papers or articles that fit preconceived ideas and claim that this is the gospel.
================
================
- Science: Studying the climate to understand how it is changing and what can be done to mitigate its effects.
- AI: Developing a machine learning model to predict the risk of heart disease in patients.
- Science: Conducting experiments to develop new drugs and treatments for diseases.
- AI: Developing a deep learning model to diagnose cancer from medical images.
#12
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,978
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Otto
#13
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,981 Times
in
1,617 Posts
One in five people with T2 are normal weight, and they tend to have bigger problems with the disease. Enough that the study is worth while, but not to be extrapolated to the 80% who are overweight or obese.
#14
Junior Member
The final judgement about "conclusions validity" is still human responsibility. In this case I agree with the bot answer, if I would not I would state so.
==================================
Here are some of the ways that AI bots can be discerning in choosing source information:
- Identifying the author's expertise: AI bots can use various methods to identify the author's expertise, such as their educational background, work experience, and publication history.
- Evaluating the source's credibility: AI bots can evaluate the source's credibility by considering factors such as its reputation, the quality of its content, and its transparency.
- Detecting bias: AI bots can use various methods to detect bias in sources, such as identifying language that is biased or inflammatory.
Here are some tips for evaluating the reliability of AI bot responses:
- Consider the bot's source: Look at the sources that the bot cites in its response. Are they reputable sources? Are they from a variety of different sources?
- Be aware of the bot's limitations: Bots are not perfect, and they can sometimes make mistakes. Be critical of the information that you receive from bots, and do your own research to verify it.
- Use multiple sources: Don't rely on just one bot for information. Use multiple sources to get a more complete and accurate picture of a topic.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times
in
1,213 Posts
Amazon had Hitchhiker's Guide on Kindle for $2 earlier this week, but its price has gone back up.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
This is valid question, and I forwarded this question to the AI bot.
The final judgement about "conclusions validity" is still human responsibility. In this case I agree with the bot answer, if I would not I would state so.
==================================
Here are some of the ways that AI bots can be discerning in choosing source information:
Here are some tips for evaluating the reliability of AI bot responses:
The final judgement about "conclusions validity" is still human responsibility. In this case I agree with the bot answer, if I would not I would state so.
==================================
Here are some of the ways that AI bots can be discerning in choosing source information:
- Identifying the author's expertise: AI bots can use various methods to identify the author's expertise, such as their educational background, work experience, and publication history.
- Evaluating the source's credibility: AI bots can evaluate the source's credibility by considering factors such as its reputation, the quality of its content, and its transparency.
- Detecting bias: AI bots can use various methods to detect bias in sources, such as identifying language that is biased or inflammatory.
Here are some tips for evaluating the reliability of AI bot responses:
- Consider the bot's source: Look at the sources that the bot cites in its response. Are they reputable sources? Are they from a variety of different sources?
- Be aware of the bot's limitations: Bots are not perfect, and they can sometimes make mistakes. Be critical of the information that you receive from bots, and do your own research to verify it.
- Use multiple sources: Don't rely on just one bot for information. Use multiple sources to get a more complete and accurate picture of a topic.
#17
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,538
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3890 Post(s)
Liked 1,939 Times
in
1,384 Posts
Interesting. Why not, physiologically? "So much to know, so little time."
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#18
Junior Member
I was following my recent interest in CRISPR-Cas9 technology using AI-Bard bot. Pretty soon, with more specific questions the answers became more and more specific to the point that I had to slow down and take a break to understand and digest the answers.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
Yes, the answers are generic, but that is because the questions, here, are generic as well. If one wants more insight, one has to ask more specific questions.
I was following my recent interest in CRISPR-Cas9 technology using AI-Bard bot. Pretty soon, with more specific questions the answers became more and more specific to the point that I had to slow down and take a break to understand and digest the answers.
I was following my recent interest in CRISPR-Cas9 technology using AI-Bard bot. Pretty soon, with more specific questions the answers became more and more specific to the point that I had to slow down and take a break to understand and digest the answers.
#20
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,250
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10176 Post(s)
Liked 5,872 Times
in
3,161 Posts
Full paper:
Strength training is more effective than aerobic exercise for improving glycaemic control and body composition in people with normal-weight type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
https://link.springer.com/article/10...25-023-05958-9
The finding is that strength training worked better than anything else for reducing A1C. My guess is that it's an effect of body recomposition, which only happened for the strength training group..
Strength training is more effective than aerobic exercise for improving glycaemic control and body composition in people with normal-weight type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
https://link.springer.com/article/10...25-023-05958-9
The finding is that strength training worked better than anything else for reducing A1C. My guess is that it's an effect of body recomposition, which only happened for the strength training group..
Likes For MoAlpha:
#21
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
This is valid question, and I forwarded this question to the AI bot.
The final judgement about "conclusions validity" is still human responsibility. In this case I agree with the bot answer, if I would not I would state so.
==================================
Here are some of the ways that AI bots can be discerning in choosing source information:
Here are some tips for evaluating the reliability of AI bot responses:
The final judgement about "conclusions validity" is still human responsibility. In this case I agree with the bot answer, if I would not I would state so.
==================================
Here are some of the ways that AI bots can be discerning in choosing source information:
- Identifying the author's expertise: AI bots can use various methods to identify the author's expertise, such as their educational background, work experience, and publication history.
- Evaluating the source's credibility: AI bots can evaluate the source's credibility by considering factors such as its reputation, the quality of its content, and its transparency.
- Detecting bias: AI bots can use various methods to detect bias in sources, such as identifying language that is biased or inflammatory.
Here are some tips for evaluating the reliability of AI bot responses:
- Consider the bot's source: Look at the sources that the bot cites in its response. Are they reputable sources? Are they from a variety of different sources?
- Be aware of the bot's limitations: Bots are not perfect, and they can sometimes make mistakes. Be critical of the information that you receive from bots, and do your own research to verify it.
- Use multiple sources: Don't rely on just one bot for information. Use multiple sources to get a more complete and accurate picture of a topic.
#22
Junior Member
These bots are just TOOLS of research. The internet search was a new tool 30y ago, then the search engines got better and better, and eventually evolved into AI bots. If one has a question regarding: sport, finances, science, politics or ESG, one can try to locate books and journals in the library, or use google/yahoo/bing search, or use an AI bot. Each of this option differs in time required and quality of the answer. AI bots are still shaky but offer the fastest way to get the required information in somewhat organized form. The humans are definitely and 100% in charge, and have the privilege to grade the answer, accept or reject. These bots are just sophisticated computer programs, tools, and are supposed to make life easier, specially in areas where human senses are inadequate, for example, sifting through x-rays, MRI's to detect, diagnose cancer.
#23
Junior Member
Sometimes the bot is factually wrong, for example, provides answers as Draft 1, Draft 2 and Draft 3, and is obvious that the all the answer cannot be right. It is the same as with the internet search, many websites have wrong information, data, interpretations, conclusions.
#24
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,538
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3890 Post(s)
Liked 1,939 Times
in
1,384 Posts
Which claim in not in the paper, IIRC. Googling around, I can't find a study comparing cardiovascular event frequency among those who strength train and those who aerobic train. Might not exist..
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,872 Times
in
3,016 Posts
Absolutely NOT, this is testing phase as stated by google. I have fun using this and saving a lot of time as compared with old, good internet search engines.
Sometimes the bot is factually wrong, for example, provides answers as Draft 1, Draft 2 and Draft 3, and is obvious that the all the answer cannot be right. It is the same as with the internet search, many websites have wrong information, data, interpretations, conclusions.
Sometimes the bot is factually wrong, for example, provides answers as Draft 1, Draft 2 and Draft 3, and is obvious that the all the answer cannot be right. It is the same as with the internet search, many websites have wrong information, data, interpretations, conclusions.
Likes For PeteHski: