Noseless saddles: recommendations?
#2
Newbie
What did you have? Did you like it?
I have been using a Spongy Wonder for a while and really like it.
I have been using a Spongy Wonder for a while and really like it.
Likes For 400E:
Likes For Paul Barnard:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,595
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 608 Post(s)
Liked 352 Times
in
225 Posts
I had the Spongy Wonder for a while and still have the t shirt that came with it. Didn't work for my particular problem but I still recommend it for a well made noseless saddle.
Likes For blakcloud:
#5
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,519
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4355 Post(s)
Liked 3,993 Times
in
2,665 Posts
I recommend a saddle with a nose on it. You have better control of the bike and may not be sliding off the saddle as much but some people like to put more pressure on their hands I guess.
#6
Senior Member
That's not really how saddles or noseless saddles in particular work. Typically noseless saddles are more effective in taking away pressure from hands than nosed. It's not inherently related to nose or no, but noseless saddles tend to be though out better in an anatomic sense = more bone contact + surface area back to front = more stable seating platform = more stable rider = less weight on hands.
#7
Senior Member
Double post due to forum glitch
#8
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,109
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3431 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts
Noseless is also a design that tends to favor a single seated position, which is not ideal. A rider should change saddle positions often.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: THE belly-button of Ohio
Posts: 91
Bikes: Surly Cross, Franklin tandem, Culprit Jr., BMX racer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times
in
28 Posts
I bought an Evolve Manta saddle. Super cool looking , like a ribcage made of the bones of your enemies. And it does prevent any chafing. Unfortunately, I kept slipping forward.
I also tried ISM, but my lady parts fell into the very wide cutout. Perhaps the whole seat was too wide for me.
My new Serfas Dual Density saddle seems just right on width and length while preserving control using my thighs.
So, maybe none of this advice is usable to you, except for knowing the width of your sit bones and knowing if you use your thighs to steer.
I also tried ISM, but my lady parts fell into the very wide cutout. Perhaps the whole seat was too wide for me.
My new Serfas Dual Density saddle seems just right on width and length while preserving control using my thighs.
So, maybe none of this advice is usable to you, except for knowing the width of your sit bones and knowing if you use your thighs to steer.
#10
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,519
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4355 Post(s)
Liked 3,993 Times
in
2,665 Posts
That's not really how saddles or noseless saddles in particular work. Typically noseless saddles are more effective in taking away pressure from hands than nosed. It's not inherently related to nose or no, but noseless saddles tend to be though out better in an anatomic sense = more bone contact + surface area back to front = more stable seating platform = more stable rider = less weight on hands.
#11
Senior Member
As to the usefulness of the nose, it isn't particularly. It's a bit of a relic from the time of leather saddles and there's no real need for it these days. If one needs it for keeping weight off hands there's a decent chance the nose is compressing soft tissue and thus causing damage.
As to control, I haven't noticed a lack of control with noseless saddles. Takes a bit of getting used to, but after that I'd say the rider is more stable and in control than they were with an ordinary seat.
Likes For elcruxio:
#12
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,109
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3431 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts
1. you can't move forward on the saddle, an ideal position when pedaling a high cadence or taking an aero position
2. you can't move back on the saddle, an ideal position for generating high power (especially when climbing)
3. you can't move forward or back to alleviate the muscle workload of the hamstrings or quads, respectively
If you watch professional cyclists carefully, you will see them changing their position on the saddle constantly. They adapt this behavior naturally, after thousands of hours in the saddle.
Likes For terrymorse:
#13
Senior Member
Besides the obvious problem of uninterrupted stress on a single part of your anatomy, the single seating position has other downsides:
1. you can't move forward on the saddle, an ideal position when pedaling a high cadence or taking an aero position
2. you can't move back on the saddle, an ideal position for generating high power (especially when climbing)
3. you can't move forward or back to alleviate the muscle workload of the hamstrings or quads, respectively
If you watch professional cyclists carefully, you will see them changing their position on the saddle constantly. They adapt this behavior naturally, after thousands of hours in the saddle.
1. you can't move forward on the saddle, an ideal position when pedaling a high cadence or taking an aero position
2. you can't move back on the saddle, an ideal position for generating high power (especially when climbing)
3. you can't move forward or back to alleviate the muscle workload of the hamstrings or quads, respectively
If you watch professional cyclists carefully, you will see them changing their position on the saddle constantly. They adapt this behavior naturally, after thousands of hours in the saddle.
I'll divide this latter part for hammocking curved saddles and noseless even though noseless saddles have options in both categories.
Curved.
1. You can, but it's generally not a good idea since sitting on the nose typically leads to pressure buildup on the soft tissues instead of bone structures. This can then interrupt blood flow and impinge nerves. Done too long and too frequently this can lead to permanent damage. The only time I'd consider sitting on the nose or "on the rivet" would be whilst sprinting since the pressure on the pelvic region is then diminished to a large degree.
2. You can but it depends on the shaping of the rear whether that's a viable option. However typically with curved saddles one tends to sit pretty far back anyways so going much farther back can result in the saddle running out.
3. Muscle workload is more related to pelvic angle and orientation. Moving back or forward can force changes in pelvic angle, but typically it's a better idea to learn how to lean back and forward to recruit different muscle groups. This is where curved saddles are at a disadvantage, because they usually lock one into a pretty static pelvic angle. Great for long distance riding because of the superb pelvic stability the locked in position provides. Not that great for racing though.
However if the curved saddle is setup for a racing orientation it can be just as good or even better than a flat traditional saddle for racing as then the locked in position is quite aggressive and aerodynamic.
Noseless.
1. You might not be able to move forward but with a noseless saddle you are typically able to tilt the pelvis forward to a high degree and far beyond what nosed saddles usually allow. Noseless saddles evolved from time trial and triathlon saddles meaning they take their design cues from saddles designed for the most aerodynamic positions possible. Needless to say this also works for high cadence.
2. Cutting off the nose doesn't need to alter the rear of the saddle desing in any way and usually it doesn't. Even ISM's have a typical rear saddle region where one can move to when climbing etc.
3. See point 2. There's no reason why this wouldn't be possible with a noseless saddle. You don't have the rivet position but in my opinion no casual rider actually needs that position anyways.
One the other hand the noseless desing allows for far larger pelvic angle variation when compared to the nosed saddle so in this regard the noseless saddle is superior.
Taking gear, bikefit or riding cues from the pro's is typically not a wise choice. Their realities are pretty different from that of a casual rider or even a semi serious racer. Pro's also don't usually choose their gear so that switching about the saddle can be just alleviating pain or numbness caused by a saddle that they did not choose and which doesn't fit well. The pro's also don't always care about their well being all that much so numbness or other discomfort is more than likely to be ignored by some in the pro peloton.
That being said, it is interesting to see that some pro teams are apparently switching over to noseless saddles. But really it depends largely on whether their sponsor makes noseless saddles and whether they are willing to provide them for typical road racing. In time trials nobody uses typical nosed saddles anymore.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Ergo - The Seat - Endurance
Yes, but I have to buy a new saddle and may as well investigate other choices. Also I got it for $25 last time; the cheapest I can find one now is $60, and there's only 1 vendor, and the manufacturer's website doesn't work anymore - makes me wonder about it.
Thanks. It's even more expensive, but could be worth it.
That's decent advice, and under consideration.
I slipped off for a while but after I got used to it I didn't notice. I use an old saddle from my parts box, mind the nose, catch my thighs on it.
Yes, but I have to buy a new saddle and may as well investigate other choices. Also I got it for $25 last time; the cheapest I can find one now is $60, and there's only 1 vendor, and the manufacturer's website doesn't work anymore - makes me wonder about it.
Thanks. It's even more expensive, but could be worth it.
That's decent advice, and under consideration.
I slipped off for a while but after I got used to it I didn't notice. I use an old saddle from my parts box, mind the nose, catch my thighs on it.
#15
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Every time I see this thread title, I think it says "Noiseless Saddles"!
#16
Newbie