Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Solid aluminium vs cheap carbon for heavy rider

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Solid aluminium vs cheap carbon for heavy rider

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-16, 12:58 PM
  #1  
Balverde
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Solid aluminium vs cheap carbon for heavy rider

Hello,

I am struggling to pick between a road bike for around 1500$. I weigh in at around 90-93 kgs, so seeing all the broken carbon pictures on the internets makes me wonder if a cheap (like in Fuji Transonic 2.9) carbon frame would not crack easily with me on and on some rather bad roads I have locally (not very smooth, but tarmac obviously). Is it safer to buy highend aluminium frame with carbon fork? I mean there must be a reason, why one carbon frame for a Fuji costs about 800$ and a carbon frame for a Specialized Tarmac is 4x more expensive?
Also probably the weight of the bike is not such a big issue as firstly, I dont have much big climbs (well none in fact) around and secondly... with 90kgs I am not going to become a great climber, am I.
Balverde is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 01:18 PM
  #2  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
You're not going to break a bike frame just by riding it. Crashing it maybe, but try not to do that. The wheels will have trouble long before the frame does.

One reason some frames are more expensive than others is R&D. You can do things making a carbon frame that you can't do with metal, some of them are useful, but not all of them, and it takes time and effort to figure out which ones. A lot of the more expensive frames weigh less because someone figured out where they're subjected to a lot of stress and where they aren't, then removed material from the places that don't need it. Cheaper frames are often overbuilt in some areas, making them slightly heavier than they absolutely have to be, stronger in places that don't matter. Of course, another reason is that they'll sell enough at boutique prices to turn a profit because some people will pay for them...

At the end of the day, you should ride both bikes and get the one you enjoy more, that fits you better, that looks better, or that's the best deal.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 01:24 PM
  #3  
JanMM
rebmeM roineS
 
JanMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,217

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 654 Post(s)
Liked 348 Times in 227 Posts
Solid aluminum - literally?
You can find pics of all kinds of broken frames on the internet. Go aluminum if it gives you peace of mind over CF. The only frame I ever broke was hi-ten steel.
__________________
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
JanMM is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 01:36 PM
  #4  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
The only frame I broke was steel, too. And it wasn't even rust! It was getting hit by a car.

Just about every bike on the road these days has a carbon fork. Even steel and titanium bikes. If carbon was half as dangerous as people like to say, every cyclist on earth would be dead by now. Most of us would be dead several times!
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 02:09 PM
  #5  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,360 Times in 866 Posts
Major Brands have original Buyer life time warrantees for materials and workmanship defects .

Such as Trek, Specialized and many others ..

whats wrong with Steel?

Last edited by fietsbob; 03-10-16 at 02:19 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 02:49 PM
  #6  
Balverde
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for answers!
Yeah, but if my frame breaks on the 70km/h descent, the least of my worries would be the warranty

I get that the carbon just doesnt break on its own for no reason under an regular cyclist, but with my 90+ kgs I doubt that I fall under the regular cyclists physique category. The frames are not probably aimed exactly for that kind of weight statistically.

Also, if we're on it, I wonder, is there a difference in comfort between "regular" frames (like Scott Speedster or Merida Scultura) vs aero frames (like mentioned Fuji Transonic 2.9 or Meridas Reacto). My lower back is getting a battering during 100km+ rides on Scott Speedster 30 (aluminium with carbon fork) and although I can handle that, it would be great if my next bike wouldnt be less comfy (preferably more).
Balverde is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 03:05 PM
  #7  
apn
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you're having lower-back issues (flexibility), you'd be advised to eschew the racing geometry bikes and consider an endurance frame like the Cannondale Synapse, Scott Solace and Fuji Sportif etc.

The taller head tube and more relaxed geometry will result in a more comfortable, although slightly less aero position on the bike.

IIRC, all the bikes I mentioned are available in an Aluminum frameset.
apn is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 03:10 PM
  #8  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,670
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18596 Post(s)
Liked 16,096 Times in 7,558 Posts
I still want to hear more about this "solid aluminum" frame. Must be pretty heavy.
indyfabz is online now  
Old 03-10-16, 03:14 PM
  #9  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Balverde
I get that the carbon just doesnt break on its own for no reason under an regular cyclist, but with my 90+ kgs I doubt that I fall under the regular cyclists physique category. The frames are not probably aimed exactly for that kind of weight statistically.
When the engineers say "we've tested this frame and it takes 500 kg to break it," the lawyers say "that's great, we'll say 75 kg so we have a safety margin and don't get sued."

But when you find a bike you like, check its weight limit (if there is a weight limit) instead of assuming it can't possibly do what it was designed for.

Lower back soreness probably won't get better with aero posture.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 03:24 PM
  #10  
james_v
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NW Houston
Posts: 112

Bikes: 2008 Marin Kentfield FS, Sun EZ Sport AX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by indyfabz
I still want to hear more about this "solid aluminum" frame. Must be pretty heavy.
^^^This is what I came here for. Or maybe how many watts it takes to climb a 3.4% grade with a solid aluminum frame.
james_v is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 03:31 PM
  #11  
ypsetihw
Senior Member
 
ypsetihw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,109

Bikes: s-1

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 95kg before kit and bottles and whatever else I'm carrying and I have an aluminum with carbon forks, never had any issue with frames or flexing. the rear wheel of my RS10 stock wheelset (24r/20f spokes) is about 1mm out of true after 1500 miles, but that's about it. I saw a video where it took 900 lbs of force or so to crack a carbon MTB frame, the aluminum one bent before that. make sure the frame will fit some wider (25 or 28mm) tires and you'll be good on either.
ypsetihw is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 03:36 PM
  #12  
Jarrett2
Senior Member
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
At 205 lbs, ride whatever you want.

It's past 250 lbs when you start to need to think about what makes the most sense.
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 03:46 PM
  #13  
Balverde
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
I still want to hear more about this "solid aluminum" frame. Must be pretty heavy.
English is not my first language and the word "solid" in my language means high quality or something like that and hence this unfortunate phrase. You knew what I meant

Well then, the aluminium/carbon wont be the most important criterium I guess now.
Balverde is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 03:53 PM
  #14  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,670
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18596 Post(s)
Liked 16,096 Times in 7,558 Posts
Originally Posted by james_v
Or maybe how many watts it takes to climb a 3.4% grade with a solid aluminum frame.
LOL!

OP: I know what you meant since you used it the adjective cheap to modify carbon. Just yanking your chain. At your weight you have nothing to worry about. Just make sure you get a red bike. Red is the fastest color.
indyfabz is online now  
Old 03-10-16, 04:14 PM
  #15  
chevmaro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 190 lbs. and have both Carbon and Aluminum bikes. Haven't thought a single time about my Frame being strong enough. Most frame weight limits are 275lbs or more, some claim to not have a weight limit. At your weight, don't worry so much and go ride your bike.

Unless you wanted a friend to ride on your handlebars, then I suggest not getting a road bike.
chevmaro is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 04:26 PM
  #16  
dksix
Senior Member
 
dksix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East Tennessee
Posts: 1,616

Bikes: Basso Luguna, Fuji Nevada

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
I agree with @Jarrett2 , I'm up to about 205 (93KG) and just bought my CF frameset and wheelset. I never gave any real consideration to weight limit on either, but didn't buy ultra light weight stuff either. I would especially expect the endurance geometry frame sets would be engineered to handle well beyond the weight of the OP. If there is a Trek dealer local to you check out the Domane line, they have both aluminum and CF within the same model line.
dksix is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 04:31 PM
  #17  
dim
Senior Member
 
dim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 1,667

Bikes: Trek Emonda SL6 .... Miyata One Thousand

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times in 22 Posts
buy a good used surly long haul trucker

problem solved .... ride it for a few years then sell it for more than what you paid
dim is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 05:00 PM
  #18  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,700

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7740 Post(s)
Liked 3,685 Times in 1,943 Posts
I weigh more than you and I don't worry about any of that stuff ... but if you do, the obvious solution would be solid carbon. You can cut glass with that stuff.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 05:50 PM
  #19  
Sy Reene
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,723

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4823 Post(s)
Liked 1,557 Times in 1,021 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
One reason some frames are more expensive than others is R&D. You can do things making a carbon frame that you can't do with metal, some of them are useful, but not all of them, and it takes time and effort to figure out which ones. A lot of the more expensive frames weigh less because someone figured out where they're subjected to a lot of stress and where they aren't, then removed material from the places that don't need it. Cheaper frames are often overbuilt in some areas, making them slightly heavier than they absolutely have to be, stronger in places that don't matter. .
Could one argue though that the high end carbon segment, exists in at least part, to service the pro rider. And the pro rider/peloton doesn't typically consist of a lot of 200lb riders. So, when the bike makers are shaving weight, are they doing it to service the pro peloton, or everybody? Then again perhaps the 15lb weight limit for bikes, exists solely so the bike making industry can make a bike that works (and is relatively safe) for everyone, and they don't have to worry about servicing pros vs. Joe Everyday rider; otherwise you might indeed see a bunch of 13lb bikes in events?
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 06:05 PM
  #20  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,286

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1304 Post(s)
Liked 959 Times in 495 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob

whats wrong with Steel?

Custom Bicycle Frames from Gunnar Cycles USA
__________________
"In every job that must be done, there is an element of fun. You find the fun, and - SNAP - the job's a game!"


1989Pre is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 06:15 PM
  #21  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,286

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1304 Post(s)
Liked 959 Times in 495 Posts
Originally Posted by Balverde
English is not my first language and the word "solid" in my language means high quality or something like that and hence this unfortunate phrase. You knew what I meant

Well then, the aluminium/carbon wont be the most important criterium I guess now.
Thanks for clarifying that. I don't think Indy knew what you meant. Language has so many subtleties!
One commenter, here, mentioned that the weight max for "most bikes" is 275. I had heard that it is 250 for aluminum. In either case, you should be fine if you ride carefully and intelligently. Another commenter mentioned something about the strength of the wheels being paramount in importance. That makes sense to me. Have your wheels built by the best wheelsmith in town.
__________________
"In every job that must be done, there is an element of fun. You find the fun, and - SNAP - the job's a game!"


1989Pre is offline  
Old 03-10-16, 06:38 PM
  #22  
martianone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern VT
Posts: 2,200

Bikes: recumbent & upright

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Liked 40 Times in 31 Posts
My mass is around 98 kg, rode an aluminum Cannondale CAAD for a few seasons. The frame and stock Shimano wheels handled my weight just fine, the bike rode well also. The CAAD was a little more race orientated than my body; looked at many other bikes, especially CF. The CF bikes I was able to try, also had a more race fit than endurance. A couple dealers did suggest my mass was at the bike's limit, some wheels have weight limits of around 100 kg. I finally went with a steel frame bike which I've ridden pretty hard on some rather awful roads, including dirt/gravel - the bike and wheels have been great. If steel interests you, try a Surly Pacer ?
martianone is offline  
Old 03-11-16, 12:25 AM
  #23  
Balverde
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
Just make sure you get a red bike. Red is the fastest color.
That is silly thinking. I can just buy any bike and paint it red!
Balverde is offline  
Old 03-11-16, 12:39 AM
  #24  
chrislee99777
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
haha,"solid aluminium"sounds too heavy,even heavy than you
chrislee99777 is offline  
Old 03-11-16, 06:35 AM
  #25  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,670
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18596 Post(s)
Liked 16,096 Times in 7,558 Posts
Originally Posted by Balverde
That is silly thinking. I can just buy any bike and paint it red!
That would make it faster.
indyfabz is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.