Help me settle a Strava argument
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233
Bikes: Trek Emonda S6
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Help me settle a Strava argument
My buddy and I had a competition on a 23km Strava segment this morning.
I beat his time by 1:15 but had to stop for a minute at one point cause my leg cramped up. I argue that the process of slowing from 28kph to 0 and starting up again was much more of a negative than 1 minute of rest was a positive. I wasn't tired at all, my leg just ceased up due to a cramp, I had no choice.
I say he can have as many breaks as he want. It will hurt him more than help.
Here is the route. Segment Is M and B's loop.
https://www.strava.com/activities/1073594484/shareable_images/map_based?hl=en-US&v=1499527902
I beat his time by 1:15 but had to stop for a minute at one point cause my leg cramped up. I argue that the process of slowing from 28kph to 0 and starting up again was much more of a negative than 1 minute of rest was a positive. I wasn't tired at all, my leg just ceased up due to a cramp, I had no choice.
I say he can have as many breaks as he want. It will hurt him more than help.
Here is the route. Segment Is M and B's loop.
https://www.strava.com/activities/1073594484/shareable_images/map_based?hl=en-US&v=1499527902
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,480
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Liked 374 Times
in
256 Posts
I'll answer assuming I know the question.
If the clock stopped while you stopped - that does not count.
If the clock was running - that does count.
Cramping is reflective of performance - it counts. A faster rider that cramps and finishes after the slower rider - is the slower rider.
If the clock stopped while you stopped - that does not count.
If the clock was running - that does count.
Cramping is reflective of performance - it counts. A faster rider that cramps and finishes after the slower rider - is the slower rider.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233
Bikes: Trek Emonda S6
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'll answer assuming I know the question.
If the clock stopped while you stopped - that does not count.
If the clock was running - that does count.
Cramping is reflective of performance - it counts. A faster rider that cramps and finishes after the slower rider - is the slower rider.
If the clock stopped while you stopped - that does not count.
If the clock was running - that does count.
Cramping is reflective of performance - it counts. A faster rider that cramps and finishes after the slower rider - is the slower rider.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233
Bikes: Trek Emonda S6
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
#11
Upgrading my engine
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alamogordo
Posts: 6,218
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Strava counts the stopped time. At least it does in the segments I've looked at where I stopped in the middle. There's a longer segment near my house that goes past a place where I often stop to pee. I would have had the KOM one day if I hadn't stopped to pee.
So, in theory, Froome could build up a big lead on the Mont du Chat tomorrow, stop for a little break, then continue riding and still win the stage.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233
Bikes: Trek Emonda S6
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh thanks for clearing that up. I just assumed they paused when your ride paused. Makes sense it keeps running.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,480
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Liked 374 Times
in
256 Posts
Your stopping is fine as long as it goes against your total time. You can stop to eat a sandwich, drink, do whatever you want except move forward due to mechanical help and it counts.
If it took buddy 10 min riding and it took you 9:50 riding 9 min and doing whatever - your time is 9:50 and faster.
If it took your buddy 10 min riding and you stopped for 30 sec cause you needed a natural break, or a cramp, or mechanical, or anything and your riding time was really 9:30 but total time was was 10:00.0003 (.0003 is how much Kittle won by) then your buddy is faster.
The stopping has nothing to do with anything.
#14
Then why is there any argument? Is there some question as to whether you stopped for only one minute, or maybe something more than 1:15? If that's the case, we can't help you. We'd have to look at clock times when each of you stopped and finished.
#15
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,802
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 7,742 Times
in
4,302 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233
Bikes: Trek Emonda S6
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not an argument anymore cause segment clocks keep running even if you pause your ride. Argument settled.
#17
Senior Member
By default Strava pauses the "moving time" clock when you stop. You can change the setting where the "moving time" clock does not pause when you stop. The "elapsed time" clock is always running.
__________________
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
#18
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,012
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Liked 3,066 Times
in
1,657 Posts
For a segment, the time is finish time minus start time... That simple. Auto pause only affects overall ride data.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Segment is overall time that includes stops. Ride has a "moving time" number that doesn't include stops.
The segment in question is "M & B's Loop" with the 1:16 pause and is an actual segment. I'd say that the 49:15 is a righteous time and result, and OP is correct that the pause didn't help him. His buddy is free to stop and rest on the segment if he thinks it will help his time. But it won't help him
#21
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,357
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Liked 769 Times
in
396 Posts
Arguing over Strava results IMHO is stupid. If you want to race your friend, race your friend. If you want to race multiple people pin on a number. I get that some people enjoy Strava, but when you have to argue about this that and the other, it just seems very trivial and absurd.
And get off my lawn.
And get off my lawn.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#22
Senior Member
When people pin on a number, no one argues about the results.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Yeah, segment times are elapsed, not moving. Regardless, stopping is not going to be beneficial to your moving time unless you're operating under a very peculiar set of circumstances - the time spent slowing down and speeding back up is a huge knock and the energy necessary to get back up to speed is significant.
#24
Th* F*t Cyclist
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 140
Bikes: 2016 Trek Emonda SLR, Kestrel Talon TT Bike, 1964 Schwinn Sierra, KHS Tandemania Comp, Nashbar Frame Ultegra Dura Ace Mix
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I agree, you stopping just adds to your segment time. It only makes it worse for you. So you beat him.