Why does bike weight make sure a difference when climbing but your weight does not?
#1
Why does bike weight make sure a difference when climbing but your weight does not?
My late-great CAAD 12 came in at just under 18 pounds.
My Fuji touring bike at 26 pounds.
Now if my weight had been constant over the last few years there would be no question posted. But I've lost 30+ pounds and the Fuji was a pain in the ass to climb with when I was 205 pounds and now that I'm 175 its still a pain.
In contrast the CAAD 12 was always a joy to climb with regardless of weight.
In fact it was easier to climb with my CAAD 12 at 205 pounds than it is with my Fuji touring at 175 pounds!
So why is that that 8 pounds of bike mass makes such a difference?
My Fuji touring bike at 26 pounds.
Now if my weight had been constant over the last few years there would be no question posted. But I've lost 30+ pounds and the Fuji was a pain in the ass to climb with when I was 205 pounds and now that I'm 175 its still a pain.
In contrast the CAAD 12 was always a joy to climb with regardless of weight.
In fact it was easier to climb with my CAAD 12 at 205 pounds than it is with my Fuji touring at 175 pounds!
So why is that that 8 pounds of bike mass makes such a difference?
#2
Senior Member
The geometry and material probably plays a role. Slack geometry and springy steel frame on the Fuji vs race geometry and stiff aluminum with large geometry tubing and bottom bracket on the CAAD. So you are tansfering more power to wheels on the CAAD and losing more energy on the Fuji.
#3
Senior Member
I'll say that the bike is still extra weight from your norm. Carrying extra exte.rnal weight feels different from it being just part of you, IMO.
#4
Senior Member
Greg Lemond said something to the effect riding doesn’t get easier, you just get faster 🤣😂😅
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,333
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,336 Times
in
2,790 Posts
A piece of this may well be the stiffness as other have said. One factor is that we learn to tailor our riding style to the bikes re ride regularly. 40 years ago no one climbed on bikes as stiff as todays and a lot of us climbed on biked far less stiff. We learned to climb within the constraints of those flexible bikes, mostly by learning to keep our efforts smooth. If you took a racer of my day and put him on your Fuji tourer, it would set him back, yes, but probably a lot less that it does you because the adjustment he would have to make would be a lot less.
The other piece, as other said, is bike fit. That's huge. Less than optimum fit could be costing you 5-10% of your top end. (8 pounds in 190 pounds is 4.2%. 190 pound = 18 (bike) + 2 (waterbottles, tools, stuff in pockets) + 5 (clothes and helmet) + 165 (you).
Ben
The other piece, as other said, is bike fit. That's huge. Less than optimum fit could be costing you 5-10% of your top end. (8 pounds in 190 pounds is 4.2%. 190 pound = 18 (bike) + 2 (waterbottles, tools, stuff in pockets) + 5 (clothes and helmet) + 165 (you).
Ben
#6
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,151
Bikes: Lots
Liked 601 Times
in
332 Posts
From my experience, body weight makes a big difference when climbing.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#7
Francophile
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,570
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Liked 676 Times
in
331 Posts
IMO the wheels make a lot of difference. Not so much the bike.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
#8
Senior Member
If you were a riding robot, the key things would be overall weight of vehicle + rider, assuming that gearing, geometry/ergonomics/frame/fork properties are reasonably similar.
However, very few of us are riding robots. We tend to react disproportionally to fairly small changes in bike behaviour and performance. The consequence of this is that we tend to ride harder on "nice" bikes.
Spoke to a guy who'd stuck a power meter on his beater/commuter bike.
He'd "always" claimed that the bike was undeniably slower than his nice bike. Then data showed that he consistently used less effort when he used that bike. If he tried riding by the numbers instead of by feel, the difference between beater/commuter-nice bike became a lot smaller.
Wheel weight/rotating mass is something I react strongly to. Climbing gives a far more notchy or jagged speed curve than flat riding. While one could argue that heavier wheels keeps more inertia etc, my legs certainly don't agree. A wheelset/bike that reacts faster to each power stroke simply feels like a better bike uphill. Easier to motivate yourself to keep cranking.
However, very few of us are riding robots. We tend to react disproportionally to fairly small changes in bike behaviour and performance. The consequence of this is that we tend to ride harder on "nice" bikes.
Spoke to a guy who'd stuck a power meter on his beater/commuter bike.
He'd "always" claimed that the bike was undeniably slower than his nice bike. Then data showed that he consistently used less effort when he used that bike. If he tried riding by the numbers instead of by feel, the difference between beater/commuter-nice bike became a lot smaller.
Wheel weight/rotating mass is something I react strongly to. Climbing gives a far more notchy or jagged speed curve than flat riding. While one could argue that heavier wheels keeps more inertia etc, my legs certainly don't agree. A wheelset/bike that reacts faster to each power stroke simply feels like a better bike uphill. Easier to motivate yourself to keep cranking.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Wheels make little difference. Tires and tubes make a bigger difference than the wheel.
In terms of "feel" when climbing, especially standing, I'd assert that a heavy saddle makes a much bigger difference on feel than wheels versus a light saddle.
In terms of "feel" when climbing, especially standing, I'd assert that a heavy saddle makes a much bigger difference on feel than wheels versus a light saddle.
#11
Senior Member
Body weight matters just as much as bike weight. Gravity doesn't care if the weight is on you or on your bike. You probably don't notice because your body weight isn't changing by 8 lbs from one day to the next.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Shawnee, KS
Posts: 273
Bikes: Bike Friday NWT, Rans Stratus, Cannondale R500, trek 720 multitrack, Rockhopper
Liked 36 Times
in
22 Posts
If you were a riding robot, the key things would be overall weight of vehicle + rider, assuming that gearing, geometry/ergonomics/frame/fork properties are reasonably similar.
However, very few of us are riding robots. We tend to react disproportionally to fairly small changes in bike behaviour and performance. The consequence of this is that we tend to ride harder on "nice" bikes.
Spoke to a guy who'd stuck a power meter on his beater/commuter bike.
He'd "always" claimed that the bike was undeniably slower than his nice bike. Then data showed that he consistently used less effort when he used that bike. If he tried riding by the numbers instead of by feel, the difference between beater/commuter-nice bike became a lot smaller.
Wheel weight/rotating mass is something I react strongly to. Climbing gives a far more notchy or jagged speed curve than flat riding. While one could argue that heavier wheels keeps more inertia etc, my legs certainly don't agree. A wheelset/bike that reacts faster to each power stroke simply feels like a better bike uphill. Easier to motivate yourself to keep cranking.
However, very few of us are riding robots. We tend to react disproportionally to fairly small changes in bike behaviour and performance. The consequence of this is that we tend to ride harder on "nice" bikes.
Spoke to a guy who'd stuck a power meter on his beater/commuter bike.
He'd "always" claimed that the bike was undeniably slower than his nice bike. Then data showed that he consistently used less effort when he used that bike. If he tried riding by the numbers instead of by feel, the difference between beater/commuter-nice bike became a lot smaller.
Wheel weight/rotating mass is something I react strongly to. Climbing gives a far more notchy or jagged speed curve than flat riding. While one could argue that heavier wheels keeps more inertia etc, my legs certainly don't agree. A wheelset/bike that reacts faster to each power stroke simply feels like a better bike uphill. Easier to motivate yourself to keep cranking.
#13
Version 7.0
Bicycle weight changes the center of gravity of the man / machine system and a lighter bike raises the center of gravity. 8 pounds is a lot of weight to lose off the bike and would definitely change its feel.
Are your times faster with the lighter bike up your favorite climb than would be predicted by calculation with the 8 pound weight reduction?
Are your times faster with the lighter bike up your favorite climb than would be predicted by calculation with the 8 pound weight reduction?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,992
Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70
Liked 513 Times
in
306 Posts
This ^^ As I look at how much weight I've gained recently (damn you tasty tasty beer) my ability to climb had been getting slower and slower. Plus it just feels 'bad' having to move the extra weight up the hill. Good incentive to get on the weight loss program over the winter.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 303
Bikes: Road, Commuter, Mountain, Tandem and a couple others
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times
in
27 Posts
I would agree that body weight makes a difference. I've been building muscle mass in the gym, and climbing at 195# is harder than 180#, gravity doesn't care if it's muscle, fat or bicycle.
I do much prefer climbing with a stiff bike.
I do much prefer climbing with a stiff bike.
#18
Senior Member
It's probably the difference in bike design and geometry that makes one feel slower.
But another possibility is that when you lose weight you lose muscle and thus the gains from less weight are lost.
But another possibility is that when you lose weight you lose muscle and thus the gains from less weight are lost.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,279
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I agree, suspect geometry or other aspects that affect handling. And I think that it's possible that a particular person's technique could just be more suited to one type of weight distribution than to another.
For me, 5 pounds off my body makes more difference climbing than 5 pounds off the bike. But I barely move the bike when I'm out of the saddle and it stays in a pretty straight line, so maybe that's it.
For me, 5 pounds off my body makes more difference climbing than 5 pounds off the bike. But I barely move the bike when I'm out of the saddle and it stays in a pretty straight line, so maybe that's it.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,289
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Liked 491 Times
in
267 Posts
My late-great CAAD 12 came in at just under 18 pounds.
My Fuji touring bike at 26 pounds.
Now if my weight had been constant over the last few years there would be no question posted. But I've lost 30+ pounds and the Fuji was a pain in the ass to climb with when I was 205 pounds and now that I'm 175 its still a pain.
In contrast the CAAD 12 was always a joy to climb with regardless of weight.
In fact it was easier to climb with my CAAD 12 at 205 pounds than it is with my Fuji touring at 175 pounds!
So why is that that 8 pounds of bike mass makes such a difference?
My Fuji touring bike at 26 pounds.
Now if my weight had been constant over the last few years there would be no question posted. But I've lost 30+ pounds and the Fuji was a pain in the ass to climb with when I was 205 pounds and now that I'm 175 its still a pain.
In contrast the CAAD 12 was always a joy to climb with regardless of weight.
In fact it was easier to climb with my CAAD 12 at 205 pounds than it is with my Fuji touring at 175 pounds!
So why is that that 8 pounds of bike mass makes such a difference?
#21
Senior Member
Two years ago I was 185-190lb and had a 15lb carbon bike with 50/34 11-28. Right now I'm 165 and have an 18lb aluminum bike (basically same geometry as lighter bike) and 52/36 11-28 . I can do same climbs that I needed 34/28 gear combo with 36/25 now . I am much lighter as I mentioned but also spent about a year in gym doing a lot of squats and strength work over that time
#22
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,795
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Liked 828 Times
in
460 Posts
This reminds me of a racer who was said to to take his bottle out from its cage and put it in his jersey pocket before a climb, so his bike was lighter.
#25
☢
Makes sense. We mostly just refer to weight, but its actually a ratio of strengh to weight that matters most.