Extending gear range for occasional weekend trip
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Extending gear range for occasional weekend trip
So, over the winter, I have de a full groupset upgrade from 15 year old Tiagra 3x9 to current gen 105. The new set is standard full size chainrings and a 12-25 cassette. I went with the chain rings because I didn't want to add another 6-9 months additional lead time. Apparently this groupset in silver is pretty low priority on the production schedule. And I wanted as close of ratios on the cassette as feasible.
Around home, this will work just fine. But, the wife and I are planning some seemed trips to areas that the hills are steep enough, the car doesn't want to up shift. So, I am figuring I will need more low end range.
I will probably get a different cassette. The main issue, is the rear derailleur I ordered is a short cage, and Shimano lists max tooth count for that as 30. Though some say, I can run 32 with a B screw adjustment.
I guess my current options would be the following.
30/32 tooth cassette and adjust B screw
34 tooth cassette and medium cage derailleur (no idea unless time for this with wanting silver)
34 tooth cassette and potentially swap the smaller chainring, is this even an option for R7000 105 crankset?
34 tooth cassette and hanger extension from somewhere like Wolf Tooth
Like I said, this is only for a couple weekend trips throughout the year, and potentially RAGBRI.
What would you guys suggest?
Around home, this will work just fine. But, the wife and I are planning some seemed trips to areas that the hills are steep enough, the car doesn't want to up shift. So, I am figuring I will need more low end range.
I will probably get a different cassette. The main issue, is the rear derailleur I ordered is a short cage, and Shimano lists max tooth count for that as 30. Though some say, I can run 32 with a B screw adjustment.
I guess my current options would be the following.
30/32 tooth cassette and adjust B screw
34 tooth cassette and medium cage derailleur (no idea unless time for this with wanting silver)
34 tooth cassette and potentially swap the smaller chainring, is this even an option for R7000 105 crankset?
34 tooth cassette and hanger extension from somewhere like Wolf Tooth
Like I said, this is only for a couple weekend trips throughout the year, and potentially RAGBRI.
What would you guys suggest?
#2
Senior Member
I'm not sure that defining your ride as a "weekend trip" is the critical criteria for selecting a gear train combo. For me, it's the terrain that necessitates the gear range I'm going to want/need, not the number of days on the bike for the trip duration.
I've used both the Tiagra and 105 components, and the Tiagra is quite serviceable. More expensive parts are a bit lighter and sometimes work a little better. Is the 105 crankset equipped with the same size chain rings as your old group and did the old group get the job done? That's the question. Gear ratios are gear ratios. See Sheldon Brown's website for a gear calculator. If you're climbing steep hills with luggage, you need a low gear in the area of 17 gear inches, from what I've read and experienced.
Or maybe I misunderstood the question.
I've used both the Tiagra and 105 components, and the Tiagra is quite serviceable. More expensive parts are a bit lighter and sometimes work a little better. Is the 105 crankset equipped with the same size chain rings as your old group and did the old group get the job done? That's the question. Gear ratios are gear ratios. See Sheldon Brown's website for a gear calculator. If you're climbing steep hills with luggage, you need a low gear in the area of 17 gear inches, from what I've read and experienced.
Or maybe I misunderstood the question.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'm not sure that defining your ride as a "weekend trip" is the critical criteria for selecting a gear train combo. For me, it's the terrain that necessitates the gear range I'm going to want/need, not the number of days on the bike for the trip duration.
I've used both the Tiagra and 105 components, and the Tiagra is quite serviceable. More expensive parts are a bit lighter and sometimes work a little better. Is the 105 crankset equipped with the same size chain rings as your old group and did the old group get the job done? That's the question. Gear ratios are gear ratios. See Sheldon Brown's website for a gear calculator. If you're climbing steep hills with luggage, you need a low gear in the area of 17 gear inches, from what I've read and experienced.
Or maybe I misunderstood the question.
I've used both the Tiagra and 105 components, and the Tiagra is quite serviceable. More expensive parts are a bit lighter and sometimes work a little better. Is the 105 crankset equipped with the same size chain rings as your old group and did the old group get the job done? That's the question. Gear ratios are gear ratios. See Sheldon Brown's website for a gear calculator. If you're climbing steep hills with luggage, you need a low gear in the area of 17 gear inches, from what I've read and experienced.
Or maybe I misunderstood the question.
I have nothing against Tiagra as a groupset. But the old groupset was 11-28, and a weird ratio Cannondale triple from 2005 era. It worked fine around home. I have drove where we want to take these trips at, but never cycles it. A lot of hills in the 15%+ range. Hardly anywhere flat.
I have a reasonable estimation where I want to be with gear ratios. I guess my biggest question, hope for the best with a B screw adjustment and try and squeeze a 32 tooth cassette, get a longer cage rear mech and a 34 tooth cassette (unknown lead time), or to with the 34 tooth cassette and a derailleur hanger extension.
The extension would be the easiest to aquire, and be the least amount of hassle for prepping the bike for that area. Mostly, it would eliminate extra cable damage from removing and reapplying end caps to the cable, unless I could solder it.
#4
Senior Member
What kind of gradients are you dealing with right now, and how low are the gears that you're using on them?
For example, if the steeper hills in your area are 7%, and you ride up them at ~80rpm in your 39-25, then you're going around 9.8mph.
At the same power output, on a 15% hill, you'd likely be doing only around 5mph. In your 39-25, this would mean pedaling with a lot of torque at 40rpm. And typically, when people are that badly bottomed-out, their power output drops significantly and they end up being even slower.
In this case, even switching to a 34T rear cog only gets you up to a still-pretty-painful-for-most-people 55rpm, assuming you're still holding the same power.
In this situation, in order to comfortably pedal at the same 80rpm as before, you'd need a roughly 49T cog on your cassette.
The point being, big differences in gradient can require big differences in gearing if you're trying to avoid bad gearing bottom-out. If you're not doing anything close to 15% right now, and if you're using your lowest gears already, switching to a 32T big cog might only cover a small portion of the difference.
For example, if the steeper hills in your area are 7%, and you ride up them at ~80rpm in your 39-25, then you're going around 9.8mph.
At the same power output, on a 15% hill, you'd likely be doing only around 5mph. In your 39-25, this would mean pedaling with a lot of torque at 40rpm. And typically, when people are that badly bottomed-out, their power output drops significantly and they end up being even slower.
In this case, even switching to a 34T rear cog only gets you up to a still-pretty-painful-for-most-people 55rpm, assuming you're still holding the same power.
In this situation, in order to comfortably pedal at the same 80rpm as before, you'd need a roughly 49T cog on your cassette.
The point being, big differences in gradient can require big differences in gearing if you're trying to avoid bad gearing bottom-out. If you're not doing anything close to 15% right now, and if you're using your lowest gears already, switching to a 32T big cog might only cover a small portion of the difference.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
What kind of gradients are you dealing with right now, and how low are the gears that you're using on them?
For example, if the steeper hills in your area are 7%, and you ride up them at ~80rpm in your 39-25, then you're going around 9.8mph.
At the same power output, on a 15% hill, you'd likely be doing only around 5mph. In your 39-25, this would mean pedaling with a lot of torque at 40rpm. And typically, when people are that badly bottomed-out, their power output drops significantly and they end up being even slower.
In this case, even switching to a 34T rear cog only gets you up to a still-pretty-painful-for-most-people 55rpm, assuming you're still holding the same power.
In this situation, in order to comfortably pedal at the same 80rpm as before, you'd need a roughly 49T cog on your cassette.
The point being, big differences in gradient can require big differences in gearing if you're trying to avoid bad gearing bottom-out. If you're not doing anything close to 15% right now, and if you're using your lowest gears already, switching to a 32T big cog might only cover a small portion of the difference.
For example, if the steeper hills in your area are 7%, and you ride up them at ~80rpm in your 39-25, then you're going around 9.8mph.
At the same power output, on a 15% hill, you'd likely be doing only around 5mph. In your 39-25, this would mean pedaling with a lot of torque at 40rpm. And typically, when people are that badly bottomed-out, their power output drops significantly and they end up being even slower.
In this case, even switching to a 34T rear cog only gets you up to a still-pretty-painful-for-most-people 55rpm, assuming you're still holding the same power.
In this situation, in order to comfortably pedal at the same 80rpm as before, you'd need a roughly 49T cog on your cassette.
The point being, big differences in gradient can require big differences in gearing if you're trying to avoid bad gearing bottom-out. If you're not doing anything close to 15% right now, and if you're using your lowest gears already, switching to a 32T big cog might only cover a small portion of the difference.
#6
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Personally I think I'd stick to the 12-25 unless you really do need the extra couple teeth, that is a really good ratio spread.
If you have something like a 34t for the front chainring granny gear, I think you'll do just fine.
My lowest gear right now is 38t front, 30t rear and I would sometimes use 34t rear when climbing a moderate hill, loaded, in windy circumstances. If you're not dealing with heavy wind, you'll managed with 34t front and 25 rear.
If you have something like a 34t for the front chainring granny gear, I think you'll do just fine.
My lowest gear right now is 38t front, 30t rear and I would sometimes use 34t rear when climbing a moderate hill, loaded, in windy circumstances. If you're not dealing with heavy wind, you'll managed with 34t front and 25 rear.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Personally I think I'd stick to the 12-25 unless you really do need the extra couple teeth, that is a really good ratio spread.
If you have something like a 34t for the front chainring granny gear, I think you'll do just fine.
My lowest gear right now is 38t front, 30t rear and I would sometimes use 34t rear when climbing a moderate hill, loaded, in windy circumstances. If you're not dealing with heavy wind, you'll managed with 34t front and 25 rear.
If you have something like a 34t for the front chainring granny gear, I think you'll do just fine.
My lowest gear right now is 38t front, 30t rear and I would sometimes use 34t rear when climbing a moderate hill, loaded, in windy circumstances. If you're not dealing with heavy wind, you'll managed with 34t front and 25 rear.
#8
Senior Member
Not defining gear needs on "weekend trip". But where these trips are going to be has vastly different terrain and much steeper hills than what I have locally.
I have nothing against Tiagra as a groupset. But the old groupset was 11-28, and a weird ratio Cannondale triple from 2005 era. It worked fine around home. I have drove where we want to take these trips at, but never cycles it. A lot of hills in the 15%+ range. Hardly anywhere flat.
I have a reasonable estimation where I want to be with gear ratios. I guess my biggest question, hope for the best with a B screw adjustment and try and squeeze a 32 tooth cassette, get a longer cage rear mech and a 34 tooth cassette (unknown lead time), or to with the 34 tooth cassette and a derailleur hanger extension.
The extension would be the easiest to aquire, and be the least amount of hassle for prepping the bike for that area. Mostly, it would eliminate extra cable damage from removing and reapplying end caps to the cable, unless I could solder it.
I have nothing against Tiagra as a groupset. But the old groupset was 11-28, and a weird ratio Cannondale triple from 2005 era. It worked fine around home. I have drove where we want to take these trips at, but never cycles it. A lot of hills in the 15%+ range. Hardly anywhere flat.
I have a reasonable estimation where I want to be with gear ratios. I guess my biggest question, hope for the best with a B screw adjustment and try and squeeze a 32 tooth cassette, get a longer cage rear mech and a 34 tooth cassette (unknown lead time), or to with the 34 tooth cassette and a derailleur hanger extension.
The extension would be the easiest to aquire, and be the least amount of hassle for prepping the bike for that area. Mostly, it would eliminate extra cable damage from removing and reapplying end caps to the cable, unless I could solder it.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Ok, I have a Shimano Sora triple crankset with only 46/30 chain rings mounted, running a SRAM 10-42 cassette, long cage RD, again SRAM. That gets me up most climbs. When I was riding in Alaska, the front chain rings were 38/26. I never missed a third, largest chain ring. Depending on your smallest front chain ring, I don't think an 11-34 or 11-36 is low enough, even if your short cage RD works. Sorry, but you definitely will need a new shifter cable to make a good install. No point in being cheap and causing yourself problems.
#10
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,804 Times
in
1,801 Posts
My various short cage rear derailleurs handle cassettes and freewheels with 28T big cogs just fine. I've used mostly 13-28 on my 7-speed freewheel bikes, and 12-28 on my 7- and 8-speed cassette bikes, with various short cage RDs: older Suntour GPX, Shimano 600 Tricolor/Ultegra, Dura Ace, one or two others. I have one wheelset with a 13-25 but that mostly gets used on the trainer. And I have a Dura Ace 10-speed 11-25 but haven't used it for a couple of years.
My chainring setups range from 52/42 on one 1990s era bike, 53/39 on my most recent bike, and 50/38 on my 1989 steel bike. Vuelta makes good 38T chainrings for 130 BCD cranks, affordable and good quality. I lucked into some Vuelta plain and ramped/pinned chainrings for around $10 via Amazon warehouse sales, but those usually cost $25-$50.
I'm 63 (150 lbs), not a strong climber, but these combos are fine on our roller coaster terrain. No long serious climbs. A few longish grades that average 2% over 10 miles or so, mostly rollers with hillettes in the 5%-12% range that last for up to 400 yards at a time, followed by comparable downhills, etc. The only continuous climb I can think of in my area that lasts for at least a mile of around 5% without any false flats is at least 25 miles west of me (D/FW area).
The only tricky bit is cutting the chain short enough to minimize chain slap against the chainstay, but long enough to avoid damaging the rear derailleur in the big/big combo. It'll happen eventually, usually when we're exhausted, trying to keep up with a group, or the ambient noise level is so loud we can't hear the telltale crosschaining sound. So it's best to be sure the chain is long enough to handle that 53/28 crosschain combo. I've seen a couple of friends claim they'd never shift to that big/big combo so they cut their chains a bit short. Aaannnddd they shifted into the big/big and tore off their RDs, usually on fast group rides in noisy conditions. Helicopter tape or something similar over the chainstay will minimize paint/carbon fiber damage from a chain that's just a link or two long.
If we had serious climbs I'd switch my lightest carbon bike to a compact crankset, probably 50/34, and 32 big cog. And a medium cage or long cage rear derailleur. But there's nothing long and steep enough to need that here.
With a heavier bike, touring bike, etc., granny gears are good. My 30+ lb Univega hybrid has a 30T small chainring and I've switched from the original 7-speed 13-28 to 8-speed 11-32, and occasionally use that 30/32 combo on a couple of hills with double digit grades of 11%-%16 for about 50-200 yards. Especially when I'm hauling stuff on the rear rack or in the handlebar bag. But that Univega has a long cage RD and does run more smoothly in big cogs than forcing a short cage road bike RD beyond its design limits.
My chainring setups range from 52/42 on one 1990s era bike, 53/39 on my most recent bike, and 50/38 on my 1989 steel bike. Vuelta makes good 38T chainrings for 130 BCD cranks, affordable and good quality. I lucked into some Vuelta plain and ramped/pinned chainrings for around $10 via Amazon warehouse sales, but those usually cost $25-$50.
I'm 63 (150 lbs), not a strong climber, but these combos are fine on our roller coaster terrain. No long serious climbs. A few longish grades that average 2% over 10 miles or so, mostly rollers with hillettes in the 5%-12% range that last for up to 400 yards at a time, followed by comparable downhills, etc. The only continuous climb I can think of in my area that lasts for at least a mile of around 5% without any false flats is at least 25 miles west of me (D/FW area).
The only tricky bit is cutting the chain short enough to minimize chain slap against the chainstay, but long enough to avoid damaging the rear derailleur in the big/big combo. It'll happen eventually, usually when we're exhausted, trying to keep up with a group, or the ambient noise level is so loud we can't hear the telltale crosschaining sound. So it's best to be sure the chain is long enough to handle that 53/28 crosschain combo. I've seen a couple of friends claim they'd never shift to that big/big combo so they cut their chains a bit short. Aaannnddd they shifted into the big/big and tore off their RDs, usually on fast group rides in noisy conditions. Helicopter tape or something similar over the chainstay will minimize paint/carbon fiber damage from a chain that's just a link or two long.
If we had serious climbs I'd switch my lightest carbon bike to a compact crankset, probably 50/34, and 32 big cog. And a medium cage or long cage rear derailleur. But there's nothing long and steep enough to need that here.
With a heavier bike, touring bike, etc., granny gears are good. My 30+ lb Univega hybrid has a 30T small chainring and I've switched from the original 7-speed 13-28 to 8-speed 11-32, and occasionally use that 30/32 combo on a couple of hills with double digit grades of 11%-%16 for about 50-200 yards. Especially when I'm hauling stuff on the rear rack or in the handlebar bag. But that Univega has a long cage RD and does run more smoothly in big cogs than forcing a short cage road bike RD beyond its design limits.
#11
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Thats part of the problem. To avoid an exceedingly long lead time on the crankset, I went with a full size, 53-39. If I could swap the inner chainring, I think that would help a lot by itself. Couple that with a 30 tooth rear for the occasional hilly weekend, I think that would work out fine.
You wouldnt want a more than 14t different between the two front chainrings. You'll have this weird gap where you require something in between. When I was using a 34/50 chainring setup, i did find that the 34t ring was useful for windy climbs, but most of the time, I was left looking for something a bit taller. My new rings solved that. I like the small imperceptible change in ratios between 38/48.
If you really need to, use the rear cassette to compensate. Or try to find some used rings or crankset.
FWIW, the added efficiency of the biopace rings really helped ofset a lack of a serious granny gear.
#12
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,414
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3940 Post(s)
Liked 4,940 Times
in
2,277 Posts
Just to clarify - if you have a crank with a BCD for 53/39, it may not be possible to just change the rings to 50/34. Check to make sure mounting holes and BCD match before buying replacement rings. 4 or 5 arm crank?
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It is R7000 Shimano 105. According to their website, they only list one BCD.
#14
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,414
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3940 Post(s)
Liked 4,940 Times
in
2,277 Posts
In my experience 38 is the smallest ring you might find for 130bcd.
But I've got ShimaNo on none of my bikes, so what do I know?
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
According to Shimano's website, Max front difference is 16 (at limit for compact), and 35 tooth max total capacity, again at the limit with 11-30.
#16
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
39/25 as your granny gear could be doable for lighter touring application if you are in good physical condition.
Once you factor in a real touring load, and steep hills, could be more less doable until you begin dealing with wind. In that case, you'll want a 11-34 rear cassette.
Once you factor in a real touring load, and steep hills, could be more less doable until you begin dealing with wind. In that case, you'll want a 11-34 rear cassette.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
39/25 as your granny gear could be doable for lighter touring application if you are in good physical condition.
Once you factor in a real touring load, and steep hills, could be more less doable until you begin dealing with wind. In that case, you'll want a 11-34 rear cassette.
Once you factor in a real touring load, and steep hills, could be more less doable until you begin dealing with wind. In that case, you'll want a 11-34 rear cassette.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,597
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 3,136 Times
in
1,995 Posts
I'd swap the crank gears & adjust the chain length before swapping the chain, rear der & cassette.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#19
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
After thinking about your question over today's ride, I can confirm that 39x25 as your granny gear will be tough, mainly due to wind conditions rather than a light touring load.
Likes For Elvo:
#21
I think I know nothing.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NE PA
Posts: 709
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 233 Post(s)
Liked 290 Times
in
204 Posts
I think the whole discussion hinges on the riders conditioning, pain threshold, anticipated travel speed and what tackle they have strapped to the bike.
My suggestion is try a few hills before making any changes. 15% grade is a lot of hill unless you are used to it.
My suggestion is try a few hills before making any changes. 15% grade is a lot of hill unless you are used to it.
#22
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,429
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, Karate Monkey, Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,304 Times
in
651 Posts
https://www.wolftoothcomponents.com/...ducts/roadlink
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
wolftooth road link will fix the cassette issue
https://www.wolftoothcomponents.com/...ducts/roadlink
https://www.wolftoothcomponents.com/...ducts/roadlink
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,014
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4886 Post(s)
Liked 4,052 Times
in
2,627 Posts
I'm not sure I see why it is so important to keep the small rear derailleur. The penalty for a derailleur with more capacity when used with your current gearing is almost zero. A couple of ounces. Derailleurs are easy to swap. Cables are cheap. Yeah, you need a new chain and if you have gone too long, it won't work with the old cassette. (Keep the old chain and use the two together.)
Once you've upsized the rear derailleur, you have more freedom with cassettes, chainrings and chain take-up. Life just gets easier.
I run a mid-sized old Campy derailleur with a 50-38-24 triple and anything from 12-23 to 14-28. (It's a Campy cassette. Loose cogs except a carrier of 3 cogs.) I use all sorts of combos and never have to change anything else. Usually have the large and small made up on separate wheels and just grab what I feel like riding.
Once you've upsized the rear derailleur, you have more freedom with cassettes, chainrings and chain take-up. Life just gets easier.
I run a mid-sized old Campy derailleur with a 50-38-24 triple and anything from 12-23 to 14-28. (It's a Campy cassette. Loose cogs except a carrier of 3 cogs.) I use all sorts of combos and never have to change anything else. Usually have the large and small made up on separate wheels and just grab what I feel like riding.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,140
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7143 Post(s)
Liked 11,335 Times
in
4,841 Posts
Swapping to a smaller inner chainring will likely not work well.
You can buy an 11-30 cassette and use it with your current RD. If you want even lower gearing, look for a 105 GS rear derailleur and an 11-32 or 11-34 cassette. But be forewarned that you will be limited on the high end to an 11-28 cassette with that RD, according to Shimano's specs.
Or you could just stick with your current gearing, which probably works just fine in Iowa, and push your bike up the steepest hills on your weekend getaway. That's be far less hassle and expense. I've pushed my gravel bike up some nasty hills while gravel racing out here, and my heart rate probably gets higher than when pedaling.
You can buy an 11-30 cassette and use it with your current RD. If you want even lower gearing, look for a 105 GS rear derailleur and an 11-32 or 11-34 cassette. But be forewarned that you will be limited on the high end to an 11-28 cassette with that RD, according to Shimano's specs.
Or you could just stick with your current gearing, which probably works just fine in Iowa, and push your bike up the steepest hills on your weekend getaway. That's be far less hassle and expense. I've pushed my gravel bike up some nasty hills while gravel racing out here, and my heart rate probably gets higher than when pedaling.
Last edited by Koyote; 01-26-21 at 05:08 PM.