Adding a carbon seatpost
09-07-04, 08:31 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Adding a carbon seatpost
I am thinking of changing out the stock seatpost on my Klein (Bontrager Sport) for a carbon seatpost. I have been thinking about the Specialized Pave as I liked it on the Roubaix I rode. Is this a good investment of $100 and what are some recommendations on posts. I don't know much about them.
Thanks.
Thanks.
09-07-04, 08:48 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,511
Bikes: Surly Pacer/Cutter/Viking
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's a good investment. I recommend one from either Deda or Easton. You can get a look at both names at competitivecyclist.com and actually they have a sell on an easton for $89 https://www.competitivecyclist.com/za...&MODE=SPECIALS
Between the two if you spend the money I like the Deda Blackstick.
Also check ebay for carbon seatposts, many people take the post that came with their bike off and sale it as they may already have a post they like. I'm bidding on one right now...wait maybe I shouldn't have told you that. Outbid me and I'll have to kill you. heh.
Between the two if you spend the money I like the Deda Blackstick.
Also check ebay for carbon seatposts, many people take the post that came with their bike off and sale it as they may already have a post they like. I'm bidding on one right now...wait maybe I shouldn't have told you that. Outbid me and I'll have to kill you. heh.
09-07-04, 08:54 AM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Zona
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Go with Easton. It is hands down one of the best carbon posts on the market. I ride the EA-70 and absolutely love it. Go to the Easton bike website and it will give you all the features, specs and a cool download on how they stress test their carbon products.
__________________
I'm 148 lbs of legs and lungs.
"The bicycle has a soul. If you are able to love it as it deserves, it will give you emotions you will never forget." -Mario Cipollini
I'm 148 lbs of legs and lungs.
"The bicycle has a soul. If you are able to love it as it deserves, it will give you emotions you will never forget." -Mario Cipollini
09-07-04, 11:45 AM
#5
@ Checkmate Cycling
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,617
Bikes: CAAD 8 - Ultegra
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't real removing weight is ever a waste of money. $100 isn't that much, but you're right - you won't feel the weight difference, but when I added my carbon seat post I could definitely FEEL a slightly smoother ride. Obviously my road bike is still a pretty harsh ride, but it added a bit of shock absorbing.
09-07-04, 12:15 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,511
Bikes: Surly Pacer/Cutter/Viking
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
exactly, having a carbon seatpost is not just about losing a few grams of weight, but it also dampens the ride more than an alu post. And they have looks to boot.
09-07-04, 02:31 PM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,665
Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 6.2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You guys are talking yourselfs into carbon seatposts but thats ok,hell i got one but with zero difference. I just dont have enough post sticking out to make any difference.
09-07-04, 05:47 PM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Melbourne Oz
Posts: 2,397
Bikes: how long have you got?
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by edmaverik
I have a Deda MagicStick and it does take some of the road jitters out and hell, its a few grams that I like off my C'dale Six13.
G'day,
why would you worry about a 'few grams' on a 6-13???....many acrbon posts are no lighter than there ALu equivilants...If you want it for the ride, or the panache, or any other reason...go for it...but the weight savings are so minimal as to not make any difference whatsoever!.....but hey....if the manufacturer has convinced you otherwise...more power to 'em...its your money,
cheers,
hitchy
09-07-04, 06:16 PM
#10
gentleman of leisure
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
hitchy, are you sure you're spelling your name right? ;^)
toss-up: how much post should be showing for it to make a good comfort difference? i have 11.5cm (or 4.5") on my bike right now. but then since i got a steel frame i probably wouldn't benefit as much as somebody riding a Dale or something.
toss-up: how much post should be showing for it to make a good comfort difference? i have 11.5cm (or 4.5") on my bike right now. but then since i got a steel frame i probably wouldn't benefit as much as somebody riding a Dale or something.
09-07-04, 06:32 PM
#11
Senior Member
Originally Posted by shokhead
Waste of money unless you have a crap load sticking out or its just for looks.
Agree. I am using Ritchey WCS post. The saddle angle is "free" adjustment. You can set ANY angle you want. Weight? It weights about 210g. A carbon post is probably under 200g. I used to ride a carbon post but realized that over tightening the seat clamp can crack the post.
09-07-04, 07:18 PM
#12
Maglia Ciclamino
Originally Posted by shokhead
You guys are talking yourselfs into carbon seatposts but thats ok,hell i got one but with zero difference. I just dont have enough post sticking out to make any difference.
That's the point. I have an EV3 Alu (no carbon stays) with sloping top tube. It's a stiff mf'er. I also have a EA-70 post and it makes a difference when I'm out for 70+ miles on a Saturday. Weight doesn't matter (as long as it isn't significantly heavier), but comfort adds up.
09-07-04, 07:30 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I switched to the seat post you are considering. The one with the "viscoelastic dampening". Well, if you want it to help reduce weight, great. If you think it will help dampen vibrations.......well, in my opinion it doesn't help any.
09-07-04, 07:50 PM
#14
Has any manufacturer provided any vibration test data for their carbon components? It would be a straightforward test to measure the so-called vibration damping properties of a carbon stem versus aluminum, steel, or another brand stem. If it really makes a difference, where are the test results?
The same goes for forks, frames, handlebars, etc. If carbon components made a difference, you would think that the manufacturers would be touting how their carbon stuff has more damping than the other guy's stuff.
The same goes for forks, frames, handlebars, etc. If carbon components made a difference, you would think that the manufacturers would be touting how their carbon stuff has more damping than the other guy's stuff.
09-07-04, 08:28 PM
#15
Senior Member
Larger bike parts like frame and wheels may behind a lot from carbon. I know because I race with a pair of Zipp 303. Seatpost? Stem? Handle bar? Crankarms?? 
In fact, pros use carbon handle bar and stem because they are stiffer.
Seatpost? Stem? Handle bar? Crankarms?? In fact, pros use carbon handle bar and stem because they are stiffer.
Originally Posted by supcom
Has any manufacturer provided any vibration test data for their carbon components? It would be a straightforward test to measure the so-called vibration damping properties of a carbon stem versus aluminum, steel, or another brand stem. If it really makes a difference, where are the test results?
The same goes for forks, frames, handlebars, etc. If carbon components made a difference, you would think that the manufacturers would be touting how their carbon stuff has more damping than the other guy's stuff.
The same goes for forks, frames, handlebars, etc. If carbon components made a difference, you would think that the manufacturers would be touting how their carbon stuff has more damping than the other guy's stuff.
